Efficacy of the Segment-Counting Method in Predicting Lung Function and Volume Following Stapler-Based Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy

Compensatory function change by segment-counting method in predicted postoperative pulmonary function at 1 year after surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to assess the accuracy of the segment-counting method in predicting long-term pulmonary function recovery and investigate compensatory changes following different extents of lung resection.

METHODS

We included studies that measured forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) between 6 and 18 months postoperatively, comparing it to the predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) using the segment-counting method. The extent of lung resection was correlated with the ratio of postoperative FEV1 to ppoFEV1. A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science using terms related to 'lung resection' and 'pulmonary function'. The final search was completed on 18 February 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

39 studies comprising 78 observation cohorts met the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed significant differences in pulmonary function in patients with ≥3 resected segments. Meta-regression indicated that the number of resected segments significantly impacted the postoperative FEV1/ppoFEV1 ratio, explaining 57% of the variance (R²=0. 57), with moderate heterogeneity (I²=61. 87%) across studies. Other variables, including patient age, body mass index, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery use and tumour stage, did not show significant effects.

DISCUSSION

Limitations of the review included moderate heterogeneity between studies and potential selection bias related to the stage of cancer and lung volume reduction effects. The findings suggest that the extent of lung resection correlates with better-than-expected pulmonary function, potentially due to compensatory mechanisms.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021293608).

Lobar graft evaluation in cadaveric lobar lung redo transplantation after living-donor lobar lung transplantation: a case report

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a vital option for patients with end-stage lung disease. However, it faces a significant challenge due to the shortage of compatible donors, which particularly affects individuals with small chest cavities and pediatric patients. The novel approach of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation is a promising solution to alleviate the donor shortage crisis. Both the mid-term and long-term outcomes of lobar lung transplantation are comparable to those of standard lung transplantation. However, patients undergoing lobar lung transplantation reported a significantly higher rate of primary graft dysfunction compared to patients undergoing standard lung transplantation. Therefore, careful donor selection is critical to improve outcomes after lobar transplantation. However, no established method exists to evaluate each lung lobar graft of deceased donors. This case report describes a case of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation to overcome size mismatch and donor shortage, with particular emphasis on lobar graft evaluation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 39-year-old woman with scleroderma-related respiratory failure was listed for deceased donor lung transplantation due to a rapidly progressing disease. Faced with a long waiting list and impending mortality, she underwent bilateral living-donor lobar lung transplantation donated by her relatives. Post-transplant complications included progressive pulmonary vein obstruction and pleural effusion, which ultimately required retransplantation. An oversized donor with pneumonia in the bilateral lower lobes was allocated. Lung ultrasound was used to evaluate each lung lobar graft during procurement. The right upper and middle lobes and left upper lobe were confirmed to be transplantable, and lobar lung redo transplantation was performed. The patient's post-transplant course was uneventful, and she was discharged home and returned to her daily activities.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the clinical impact of cadaveric lobar lung transplantation as a feasible and effective strategy to overcome the shortage of donor lungs, especially in patients with small thoracic cavities. By establishing donor lung evaluation techniques and overcoming anatomical and logistical challenges, cadaveric lobar lung transplantation can significantly expand the donor pool and offer hope to those previously considered ineligible for transplantation.

An analysis of residual lung volume changes after segmentectomy based on three-dimensional computed tomography

Background

Based on the results of JCOG0802 and CALGB studies, segmentectomy has considered to be a standard procedure for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After lobectomy, the residual cavity is filled with mediastinal and diaphragmatic deviations, and compensatory volume changes are present in the residual lungs. In this study, we examined the efficacy of segmentectomy, a surgical procedure, by focusing on its impact on postoperative lung volume and function.

Methods

We enrolled 77 patients who underwent segmentectomy as their initial surgical procedure, excluding those with additional lung resections and those who lacked postoperative computed tomography imaging. The predicted residual volume (mL) was defined as the total lung volume before surgery minus the volume of the resected area. Using the predicted residual volume (mL) and postoperative total lung volume (mL), we calculated the rate of postoperative lung volume increase [(postoperative total lung volume/predicted residual volume) × 100] (%). We also classified 52 cases with a rate of postoperative lung volume increase of ≥100% into a compensatory group, while those with a rate of <100% were classified into a non-compensatory group.

Results

The average postoperative lung volume increase was 104.6% among 77 cases. Age ≥65 years, pack year index ≥27.5, ≥3 resected segments, and use of electrocautery for intersegmental plane division were significantly associated with compensatory group classification. In 20 compensatory cases with preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests, postoperative vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second values exceeded the preoperative predictions. This study further examined the areas responsible for postoperative compensatory lung volume increase. In the compensatory group, significant expansion was observed in the ipsilateral lobes, excluding the resected segment and contralateral lung, while no significant changes were noted in the volume of the lobe, including the resected segment. Conversely, the non-compensatory group showed a significant volume decrease in the resected lobe, but no significant increase in other areas.

Conclusions

This study emphasizes the importance of preserving lung segments in segmentectomy. The study demonstrates extensive compensatory volume changes in the ipsilateral lung and contralateral lung. There was no significant volume decrease in any residual segment. This underlines the potential of segmentectomy to maintain lung function and expand treatment options post-surgery. In addition, the compensated group included patients with a lower pack-year index and younger patients. These results suggest that postoperative compensatory lung expansion includes not only hyperinflation of the remaining lung, but also an increase in the functional lung parenchyma.

Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Patients with Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Objective

To assess the clinical efficacy of thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer.

Methods

A total of 70 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who were treated in our hospital from April 2018 to May 2020 were recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive either segmentectomy (observation group) or lobectomy (control group). Outcome measures included clinical efficacy, surgery-related indicators, pulmonary function indicators (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)), postoperative complications, and recurrence and metastasis.

Results

There was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy between the two groups (P > 0.05). Segmentectomy was associated with a longer operation time and shorter hospital stay compared to lobectomy (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the amount of intraoperative blood loss and the number of lymph nodes dissected (P > 0.05). Segmentectomy resulted in significantly higher FVC and FEV1 levels in patients compared to lobectomy (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The two groups of patients were followed up for 12 months after the operation, and there was no recurrence or metastasis in either group.

Conclusion

The two surgical methods have similar efficacy and safety profiles, but for the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer, thoracoscopic segmentectomy is associated with a shorter hospital stay and better protection of the lung function of patients compared to lobectomy.