The new era of staging as a key for an appropriate treatment for esophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Two major pathological subtypes exist: oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Epidemiological studies in the last decade have shown a gradual increase in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma worldwide. The prognosis of oesophageal cancer has greatly improved due to breakthroughs in screening, surgical procedures, and novel treatment modalities. The success achieved with combined modality therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, to treat locally advanced oesophageal cancer is particularly notable. Immunotherapy has become a crucial treatment for oesophageal cancer, with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies now established as the standard of care in adjuvant and metastatic first-line settings. This Seminar provides an overview of advances in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and oesophageal adenocarcinoma, with a particular focus on neoadjuvant therapies for locally advanced oesophageal cancer and immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Improves the Diagnosis of the Tracheobronchial Invasion of Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer is essential to select appropriate treatment and improve prognosis; however, it is difficult using the conventional modalities. This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic usefulness of convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) for the diagnosis of the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a cadaveric study to clarify the changes in ultrasonic and histopathologic findings in the esophageal tumor and tracheal invasion models. Additionally, we examined CP-EBUS for patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer in whom tracheobronchial invasion was suspected on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scan. We retrospectivity evaluated the diagnosis of CP-EBUS, comparing the pathological findings and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Cadaveric esophageal tumor and tracheal invasion models showed the disappearance of the third layer observed with CP-EBUS and histologically proven interruption of the adventitia. This indicated that the third layer corresponded with the tracheal adventitia. We examined 40 patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer in whom tracheobronchial invasion was suspected. The precise diagnosis was pathologically confirmed in 9 of 14 patients diagnosed with cT3 who underwent radical surgery. 20 of 26 cases diagnosed with cT4b received definitive chemoradiotherapy, and 4 cases received salvage surgery and pathologically confirmed precise diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

CP-EBUS is extremely useful for diagnosing the tracheobronchial invasion of advanced esophageal cancer. It could be an effective modality for determining treatment strategies in cases with a marginal surgical indication.

Radiological prediction of positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) is regarded as a poor prognostic indicator in oesophageal cancer (OC) but its prediction can be challenging. MRI is used to predict a threatened CRM in rectal cancer but is not commonly performed in OC unlike PET/CT, which is now routinely used. Therefore, this study assessed the additional predictive value of PET-defined tumour variables compared with EUS and CT T-stage. The prognostic significance of CRM status was also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 117 consecutive patients [median age 64.0 (range 24-78), 102 males, 110 adenocarcinomas, 6 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 1 neuro-endocrine] treated between 1st March 2012 and 31st July 2015. A binary logistic regression model tested 5 staging variables; EUS T-stage (≤T2 vs ≥ T3), CT T-stage (≤T2 vs ≥ T3), PET metabolic tumour length (MTL), PET metabolic tumour width (MTW) and the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV_max).

RESULTS

The CRM was positive in 43.6%. Sixty-seven (57.3%) patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), 31 patients (26.5%) underwent surgery alone and 19 patients (16.2%) had neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (NACRT). Median overall survival (OS) was 36.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.1-47.9) and the 2-year OS was 55.4%. A binary logistic regression model showed EUS ≥ T3 tumours were independently and significantly more likely to have a positive CRM than EUS ≤ T2 tumours (HR 5.188, 95% CI 1.265-21.273, p = 0.022). CT T-stage, PET MTL, PET MTW and SUV_max were not significantly associated with CRM status (p = 0.783, 0.852, 0.605 and 0.413, respectively). There was a significant difference in OS between CRM positive and negative groups (X² 4.920, df 1, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Advanced EUS T-stage is associated with a positive CRM, but PET-defined tumour variables are unlikely to provide additional predictive information. This study demonstrates the continued benefit of EUS as part of a multi-modality OC staging pathway.

Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of contemporary N-staging and provide radiological-pathological correlation in patients with lymph node metastases (LNMs) that were radiologically staged N0.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twelve patients were included who underwent surgery alone (n=41) or neoadjuvant therapy (n=71) between October 2010 and December 2015. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and combined positron-emission tomography (PET) and CT N-stage were compared to pathological N-stage [node-negative (N0) versus node-positive (N+) groups]. Fifty LNMs from 15 patients preoperatively staged as N0 were measured and the maximum size recorded.

RESULTS

Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of N0 versus N+ disease with CECT, EUS, and PET/CT was 54.5%, 39.7% and 77.3%, 55.4%, 42.6% and 75%, and 57.1% 35.3%, and 90.9%, respectively. All techniques were more likely to under-stage nodal disease; CECT (X² 32.890, df=1, p<0.001), EUS (X² 28.471, df=1, p<0.001), and PET/CT (X² 50.790, df=1, p<0.001). PET/CT was more likely to under-stage nodal disease than EUS (p=0.031). Median LNM size was 3 mm, with 41 (82%) of LNMs measuring <6 mm and 22 (44%) classified as micro-metastases (≤2 mm).

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated poor N-staging accuracy in the modern era of radiological staging. Eighty-two percent of LNMs measured <6 mm, making direct identification extremely challenging on medical imaging. Future research should focus on investigating and developing alternative surrogate markers to predict the likelihood of LNMs.

Minimally invasive staging of esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world today and the sixth-leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Accurate preoperative staging of esophageal cancer is imperative to the selection of appropriate treatments. Patients with esophageal carcinomas typically undergo a multimodality staging process including noninvasive imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET), as well as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), which is slightly more invasive. Minimally invasive surgical staging, with laparoscopy, occasionally in combination with video-assisted thoracoscopy, is used in the staging process at select institutions and has been shown to be more accurate than noninvasive staging modalities. Two major advantages of minimally invasive surgical staging over conventional techniques are the improved assessment of locoregional disease and enhanced identification of distant metastases. These advantages decrease the likelihood that the patient will undergo a nontherapeutic laparotomy. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding which patients with esophageal cancer would benefit most from the addition of minimally invasive surgical staging. We have, however, found that minimally invasive surgical staging with laparoscopy is particularly valuable in detection of occult distant metastases. In this article, we summarize the staging modalities for esophageal cancer including minimally invasive surgical staging.

Impact of PET/CT on radiation treatment in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

With the advances in radiotracers, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is recognized as a useful adjunct to anatomic imaging with CT, MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The objective of this review was to comprehensively analyze the roles of PET/CT for the radiotherapy of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

In this review, we focused on issues concerning the application of PET/CT in TNM staging, target volume delineation and response to therapy, both for the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Furthermore, the following questions were addressed: how does PET/CT guide appropriate treatment protocols, how does it allow accurate tumor delineation and how does it guide prognosis and future treatment decisions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

For the staging of esophageal cancer, PET/CT played a crucial role in exploring distant malignant lymph nodes and metastasis with high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. PET/CT using different radiotracer provided a serial of thresholding methods based on standardized uptake value (SUV) to assist in auto-contouring the gross tumor volume (GTV). The change in SUV may offer a potential paradigm of personalized treatment to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In total, PET/CT has sought to further optimize radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with esophageal cancer.

The 100 most cited articles investigating the radiological staging of oesophageal and junctional cancer: a bibliometric analysis

Objectives

Accurate staging of oesophageal cancer (OC) is vital. Bibliometric analysis highlights key topics and publications that have shaped understanding of a subject. The 100 most cited articles investigating radiological staging of OC are identified.

Methods

The Thomas Reuters Web of Science database with search terms including “CT, PET, EUS, oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer” was used to identify all English language, full-script articles. The 100 most cited articles were further analysed by topic, journal, author, year and institution.

Results

A total of 5,500 eligible papers were returned. The most cited paper was Flamen et al. (n = 306), investigating the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) for the staging of patients with potentially operable OC. The most common research topic was accuracy of staging investigations (n = 63). The article with the highest citation rate (38.00), defined as the number of citations divided by the number of complete years published, was Tixier et al. investigating PET texture analysis to predict treatment response to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, cited 114 times since publication in 2011.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis has identified key publications regarded as important in radiological OC staging. Articles with the highest citation rates all investigated PET imaging, suggesting this modality could be the focus of future research.

Main Messages

• This study identifies key articles that investigate radiological staging of oesophageal cancer.

• The most common topic was accuracy of staging investigations.

• The article with the highest citation rate investigated the use of texture analysis in PET images.

Determination of regional lymph node status using (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters in oesophageal cancer patients: comparison of SUV, volumetric parameters and intratumoral heterogeneity

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate whether the standardized uptake values, volumetric parameters and intratumoral heterogeneity of fluorine-18-fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake could predict regional lymph node (rLN) metastasis in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

51 patients with surgically resected oesophageal cancer were included in the present study. The (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT findings and rLN metastasis were compared with the histopathological results. The intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity was represented by the heterogeneity factor (HF), which was determined for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyse the associations between the rLN metastasis and clinical findings, standardized uptake values, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and HF.

RESULTS

The rLN(+) group showed statistically significant higher values of MTV (median, 13.59 vs 6.6; p = 0.0085), TLG (median, 119.18 vs 35.96; p = 0.0072) and HF (median, 3.07 vs 2.384; p = 0.0002) than the rLN(-) group. Univariate analysis showed that maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, MTV, TLG and HF were significantly associated with pathologic rLN involvement. However, in multivariate analysis, the HF was a potent associated factor for the prediction of pathologic rLN metastasis in oesophageal cancer.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters such as maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, MTV, TLG and HF were useful for the prediction of pathologic rLN status in patients with oesophageal cancer. However, HF might be the most powerful predictor of rLN metastasis of patients with oesophageal cancer.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT may be a useful adjunct for rLN staging of oesophageal cancer.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Estimates for Tumor Depth at the Gastroesophageal Junction Are Inaccurate: Implications for the Liberal Use of Endoscopic Resection

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection is increasingly utilized for treating early stage esophageal cancer, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) frequently guides treatment selection. Studies report greater than 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity, but our experience suggests less accuracy at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. The objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of EUS for depth of GE junction cancer and the potential treatment implications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed for patients from 1995 to 2014 with GE junction esophageal cancer that underwent EUS staging and resection (surgical or endoscopic) without neo-adjuvant therapy. Patient, tumor, EUS, and pathologic characteristics were examined.

RESULTS

For the 181 patients that met criteria, the median age was 66 years, 17% were female, 91% white, and 98% had adenocarcinoma. Concordance between EUS (u) T and pathologic (p) T was 48%, with 23% under-staged and 29% over-staged. The EUS was accurate in the following: uT0 6% (1 of 18); uT1a 56% (23 of 41); uT1b 58% (41 of 71); uT2 10% (2 of 21); and uT3 70% (21 of 30). Inaccurate EUS depth had potential to lead to over-treatment in 38% (27 of 71) of uT1b and 76% (16 of 21) of uT2. In 50% of pT1a tumors, EUS depth was T1b or greater. Logistic regression revealed tumor length (continuous variable) to be associated with inaccurate uT (p = 0.016). Accurately staged tumors were significantly longer than inaccurately staged tumors (2.7 vs 1.7 cm, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Early to intermediate GE junction tumors are frequently over-staged. This highlights the importance of diagnostic endoscopic resection for determining accurate tumor depth and selecting correct therapy.

Value of oral effervescent powder administration for multidetector CT evaluation of esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the value of oral effervescent powder (EP) for evaluation of esophageal distension, and for detection and staging of esophageal cancer with contrast-enhanced CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 patients without esophageal pathology and 52 patients with histological confirmed diagnosis of esophageal cancer were included in this prospective IRB-approved study. Half of the patients in both groups received EP prior to CT. Esophageal distension was assessed by planimetry of the inner (IA) and outer area (OA). Two blinded readers evaluated the datasets separately with regard to diagnosis of esophageal cancer (yes/no) and staging (T0-T4), if applicable. Distension results were compared (t-Test). In patients with cancer sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were calculated. CT staging results were compared to histopathology (Cohen-k).

RESULTS

IA and IA/OA were significantly larger after EP as compared to the group without EP (p<0.05). Sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV for cancer detection cancer were as follows: 78%/78%, 98%/98%, 95%/95%, 87%/87% with EP; 60%/68%, 98%/98%, 94%/94%, 80%/83% without EP. Staging with EP was good (k=0.84/0.67) and moderate without EP (k=0.58/0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of EP prior to CT results in good distension of the esophagus, and improves detection and staging of esophageal cancer, as compared to control studies without EP.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.

Talen-mediated girdin knockout downregulates cell proliferation, migration and invasion in human esophageal carcinoma ECA109 cells

Girdin is an actin-binding Akt substrate that is involved in the regulation of cell migration. Accumulating evidence has revealed that girdin has regulatory effects on invasion and metastasis in several types of cancer. However, the role of girdin in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) is yet to be investigated. In the present study, tissue microarray data revealed that among 95 cases of ESCC, 27 cases (28.7%) exhibited a low expression of girdin, while 67 cases (71.3%) had an enhanced expression of girdin. However, among 78 cases of adjacent tissues, 64 cases (82.1%) did not express girdin and 14 cases (17.9%) exhibited a low expression of girdin. Furthermore, the expression of girdin was significantly associated with the tumor stage, lymph node metastasis stage, and tumor, lymph node and metastasis stage. Of note, the mean survival time of girdin-positive cases was only 30.62±2.99 months, while it was 53.37±5.02 months in girdin-negative cases, indicating that girdin protein expression is an independent prognostic factor of poor survival. Talen-mediated girdin knockout (KO) significantly suppressed cellular proliferation, migration and invasion in ESCC ECA109 cells. In conclusion, the present study suggested that girdin protein expression was significantly correlated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in ESCCs, and that girdin had a positive role in the regulation of cell proliferation, migration and invasion in ESCC cells. Therefore, girdin may be a potential candidate for the development of novel prognostic tools and therapeutic strategies for ESCCs.

Maximum standardized uptake value on PET/CT in preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis from thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The presence of lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. Accurate assessment of lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal carcinoma is essential for selecting appropriate treatment and forecasting disease progression. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) is becoming an important tool in the workup of esophageal carcinoma. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in assessing lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) prior to surgery. Fifty-nine surgical patients with pathologically confirmed thoracic ESCC were retrospectively studied. These patients underwent radical esophagectomy with pathologic evaluation of lymph nodes. They all had ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans in their preoperative staging procedures. None had a prior history of cancer. The pathologic status and PET/CT SUVmax of lymph nodes were collected to calculate the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and to determine the best cutoff value of the PET/CT SUVmax to distinguish benign from malignant lymph nodes. Lymph node data from 27 others were used for the validation. A total of 323 lymph nodes including 39 metastatic lymph nodes were evaluated in the training cohort, and 117 lymph nodes including 32 metastatic lymph nodes were evaluated in the validation cohort. The cutoff point of the SUVmax for lymph nodes was 4.1, as calculated by ROC curve (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 92%; accuracy, 90%). When this cutoff value was applied to the validation cohort, a sensitivity, a specificity, and an accuracy of 81%, 88%, and 86%, respectively, were obtained. These results suggest that the SUVmax of lymph nodes predicts malignancy. Indeed, when an SUVmax of 4.1 was used instead of 2.5, FDG-PET/CT was more accurate in assessing nodal metastasis.

Concordance of studies for nodal staging is prognostic for worse survival in esophageal cancer

Pretreatment clinical staging in esophageal cancer influences prognosis and treatment strategy. Current staging strategies utilize multiple imaging modalities, and often the results are contradictory. No studies have examined the implications of concordance of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) when used for the evaluation of nodal disease. The objective of this study was to determine if concordance of CT, PET, or EUS for nodal disease predicts worse overall survival. We reviewed 615 esophageal cancer patients with pretreatment CT, PET, and EUS that underwent esophagectomy for survival outcomes based on concordance of studies for nodal disease. Concordant N+ is defined as two or three studies positive for nodal disease; non-concordant N+ is defined as only one positive study. Node-positive disease by any study predicted shorter survival than node-negative disease (42% vs. 73% 5-year survival; P<0.001). Additionally, non-concordant N+ patients had shorter survival than N- patients (52% vs. 73% 5-year survival; P<0.001). Concordant N+ patients had shorter survival than non-concordant N+ patients (38- vs. 61-month median survival; P=0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in survival based on specific combinations of studies. When PET was disregarded, patients with both CT+ and EUS+ had shorter survival than patients with either CT+ or EUS+ (39- vs. 58-month median survival; P=0.029). Pretreatment CT, PET, or EUS concordance for node-positive disease predicts shorter overall survival in patients that undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Predicting survival in esophageal cancer should consider the synergistic capabilities of CT, PET, and EUS in evaluating nodal status.

Esophagectomy for failed endoscopic therapy in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma

Endoscopic therapy (ablation +/- endoscopic resection) for high-grade dysplasia and/or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) of the esophagus has demonstrated promising results. However, there is a concern that a curable, local disease may progress to systemic disease with repeated endotherapy. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent esophagectomy after endotherapy at three tertiary care esophageal centers from 2006 to 2012. Our objective was to document the clinical and pathologic outcomes of patients who undergo esophagectomy after failed endotherapy. Fifteen patients underwent esophagectomy after a mean of 13 months and 4.1 sessions of endotherapy for progression of disease (53%), failure to clear disease (33%), or recurrence (13%). Initially, all had Barrett's, 73% had ≥3-cm segments, 93% had a nodule or ulcer, and 91% had multifocal disease upon presentation. High-grade dysplasia was present at index endoscopy in 80% and IMC in 33%, and some patients had both. Final pathology at esophagectomy was T0 (13%), T1a (60%), T1b (20%), and T2 (7%). Positive lymph nodes were found in 20%: one patient was T2N1 and two were T1bN1. Patients with T1b, T2, or N1 disease had more IMC on index endoscopy (75% vs. 18%) and more endotherapy sessions (median 6.5 vs. 3). There have been no recurrences a mean of 20 months after esophagectomy. Clinical outcomes were comparable to other series, but submucosal invasion (27%) and node-positive disease (20%) were encountered in some patients who initially presented with a locally curable disease and eventually required esophagectomy after failed endotherapy. An initial pathology of IMC or failure to clear disease after three treatments should raise concern for loco-regional progression and prompt earlier consideration of esophagectomy.