The Efficacy and Safety of the WATCHMAN Device in LAA Occlusion in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Contraindicated to Oral Anticoagulation: A Focused Review

Association between rates of ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality with the Watchman device compared to warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

Introduction

The Watchman device is approved in the US, but little is known about Watchman's ischemic stroke reduction compared to the newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study explored the differences in ischemic stroke reduction between the Watchman device, warfarin, and DOAC medication.

Methods

Three patient cohorts, each containing 10,969 patients, were created using TriNetX. The primary and secondary endpoints were the ischemic stroke risk and all-cause mortality risk at 1 and 5 years.

Results

At 1 year, the Watchman device's relative risk of ischemic stroke was 0.86 against warfarin but 1.27 against DOACs (P < 0.0001). The relative risk of ischemic stroke between the Watchman and DOACs was higher at 1 and 5 years (1.27 and 1.30, P < 0.0001). The relative risk of all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years was 0.49 and 0.72 for the Watchman device compared to warfarin (P < 0.0001) and 0.66 and 0.92 between the Watchman and DOACs (P < 0.0001 and 0.01).

Conclusion

While DOACs were associated with lower ischemic stroke rates, treatment with the Watchman device was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Patients placed on the Watchman device due to DOAC contraindications may benefit from its lower all-cause mortality risk.

Management of Atrial Fibrillation Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Some of these patients have preexisting AF as well. The management of these patients is complex, especially after the procedure, when there is a sudden change in hemodynamics. There are no established guidelines about the management of the patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with preexisting or new-onset AF. This review article discusses the management of these patients with rate and rhythm control strategies with medications. This article also highlights the role of newer oral anticoagulation medications and left atrial occlusion devices to prevent stroke after the procedure. We will also discuss new advances in the care of this patient population to prevent the occurrence of AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In conclusion, this article is a synopsis of both pharmacologic and device interventions for the management of AF in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Embolic Cerebrovascular Accident Secondary to Device-Related Thrombus Post WATCHMAN Device Implantation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias encountered. Aggressive and appropriate management, along with identification and modification of risk factors, remains at the forefront of evidence-based practice. Thrombus formation (primarily in the left atrial appendage) and consequent thromboembolism are risks associated with AF. Anticoagulation is utilized to prevent and reduce AF-induced complications such as stroke, heart failure, and death. However, in instances when the risk of bleeding from anticoagulation outweighs the benefits of stroke prevention, other modalities such as left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices like the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, MA) are utilized. LAAC devices, such as the WATCHMAN device, are also not without significant risks, one of them being device-related thrombus (DRT) formation. We present a case of device-related thrombus formation post WATCHMAN implantation and a subsequent embolic cerebrovascular accident (CVA).

Watchman Device Dislodgement Creating a Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction Requiring Emergency Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion device implantation is becoming a more common alternative for stroke prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who are not able to tolerate long-term anticoagulation. Studies suggest the procedure has a 98.5% successful deployment rate (Boersma et al., 2016). We present a case where a rare but known complication involving dislodgement and migration of an implanted Watchman LAA occlusion device led to functional stenosis of the aortic valve creating a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction necessitating emergency cardiopulmonary bypass in the electrophysiology lab to safely retrieve the device.

Watchman Device Procedure Complicated by Rare Perclose ProGlide Embolization: Case Report and Literature Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with significant morbidity and mortality. In this case, we present a 69-year-old man with a past medical history of atrial fibrillation on warfarin who came to the hospital for placement of the Watchman device (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, United States). His procedure was complicated by Perclose ProGlide™ Suture-Mediated Closure system (Abbott Laboratories Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States) embolism. The vascular surgery department was consulted STAT in the electrophysiology lab and was unable to fully visualize the vessel. The patient was then brought emergently to a hybrid operating room where venotomy was made. He tolerated the procedure well and was eventually discharged home.

Practical Applications of Concomitant Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Appendix Closure Device Implantation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon causes acute tissue edema of the osteal region of the pulmonary veins and the left atrium. In two cases combining PVI with an implantation of a left atrial appendage closure device led to malsizing of the device, device shouldering, and a paraprosthetic residual flow. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Severity by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Score and Clinical Features of Stroke Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation

The comparative severity of patent foramen ovale (PFO)-related stroke in patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related stroke in patients without PFO is unknown. Therefore, we compared the severity of PFO-related stroke and AF-related stroke. Twenty-six patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were diagnosed with cardioembolic stroke from July 2018 to March 2020. Cases with AF detected by electrocardiograms or thrombus in the left atrium or left atrial appendage on TEE were included in the AF-related stroke group. Cases with a positive microbubble test on the Valsalva maneuver during TEE, and with no other factors that could cause stroke, were included in the PFO-related stroke group. This study was designed as a single-center, small population pilot study. The stroke severity of the two groups by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was compared by statistical analysis. Of the 26 cases, five PFO-related stroke patients and 21 AF-related stroke patients were analyzed. The NIHSS score was 2.2 ± 2.8 and 11.5 ± 9.2 (p-value < 0.01), the rate of hypertension was 20.0% and 85.7% (p-value = 0.01), and the HbA1c value was 5.5 ± 0.2% and 6.3 ± 1.3% (p-value = 0.02) in the PFO-related and AF-related stroke groups, respectively. Compared with AF-related stroke patients, stroke severity was low in PFO-related stroke patients.

Minimally invasive left atrial appendage (LAA) clip insertion after challenging LAA occluder implantation to minimize the risk of stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, requiring lifelong anticoagulation or interventional, transseptal left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder implantation to minimize stroke risk. Incomplete LAA closure post implantation is a frequent observation. Incomplete LAA occlusion after transseptal occluder implantation necessitates anticoagulation in cases of persistent AF to minimze risk of embolism and/or apoplexy. Patients with contraindications to lifelong anticoagulation therapy are challenging to treat and alternative options are needed. We present a case of a patient with persistent AF who underwent frustraneous LAA occluder implantation. The patient's anatomy necessitated surgical closure of the LAA, which was accomplished with an LAA clip 4 weeks after implantation. The patient was discharged in excellent clinical status 5 days after the surgery. No further complications were observed within the following year.

Unprotected discharge: absence of stroke prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for bleeding

PURPOSE

Patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) on anticoagulation (AC) for stroke prevention are at an increased risk of bleeding. A common clinical dilemma is deciding when to safely restart AC following a bleed. Although studies have shown better outcomes with re-initiation of AC after hemostasis, there are clinical barriers to restarting AC. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a safe and efficacious alternative for patients who are unable to tolerate AC following major bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the rate of stroke prevention strategies instituted at time of discharge in patients with AF on AC who had been hospitalized for a bleeding event.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with AF on AC admitted for bleeding between January 2016 and August 2019. The type of AC, form of bleeding, and CHA₂DS₂VASc were collected. Stroke prevention strategies upon discharge and at 3 months were noted.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four patients with AF on AC were hospitalized with a bleeding event, of which 10.9% died. Among patients who survived, AC was restarted in 45.2% of patients, 9.7% were referred for LAAO, and 45.1% were discharged without stroke prevention strategy. At 3 months, 32.6% of patients still had no documented stroke prophylaxis. Those referred for LAAO had, on average, higher CHA₂DS₂VASc (5 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients with AF hospitalized for bleeding were discharged with no plan for stroke prophylaxis. Despite its safety and efficacy, LAAO appears to be an underutilized alternative in AF patients with high bleeding risk.

Clinical Outcomes following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is an established alternative to anticoagulation therapy for stroke prophylaxis among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. There are currently no guidelines on the choice of antithrombotic therapy following placement of the Watchman® device, the optimal time to discontinue anticoagulation or the duration of follow-up imaging after device deployment. Our main objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes among these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received a Watchman® device at Mayo Clinic sites between January 2010 and December 2018. We constructed Cox-proportional hazard models to evaluate the effect of specific variables on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

231 patients were identified (33% female), median age was 77 years, CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5 and HASBLED score was 4. We found no difference in clinically significant bleeding based on initial antithrombotic choice. However, patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding were more likely to have a bleeding event in the first 6 weeks following Watchman® implantation (HR 9.40, 95% CI 2.15-41.09). Device sizes of 24-27 mm were significantly associated with a decreased risk of thromboembolic events (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.55) compared to 21-mm devices. Peridevice leak (PDL) sizes appeared to either remain the same or increase on follow-up imaging.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

This observational study showed no statistically significant difference in bleeding risk related to initial antithrombotic choice. Smaller device sizes were associated with thromboembolic events, and longitudinal PDL assessment using transesophageal echocardiography showed these frequently do not decrease in size. Larger studies are needed.

Left Atrial Cavity Thrombus and Fatal Systemic Embolization in a Stroke Patient with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Caveat against Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention

An 88-year-old male with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and severe congestive heart failure (HF), was admitted to the Neurological Intensive Care Unit because of the acute onset of aphasia and left hemiplegia. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a left atrial (LA) cavity thrombus. Its “fatal” distal embolization to abdominal aorta occurred in a few days. These observations should lead to a cautious approach in proposing a percutaneous closure of LA appendage in older NVAF patients, with HF and/or left ventricular dysfunction and larger LA volumes, who are not adequately anticoagulated.

Management of atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Challenges and therapeutic considerations

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is very common among patients with severe aortic stenosis. Moreover, new onset AF (NOAF) is a frequent finding after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). There is a significant impact of AF on outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR including mortality, thrombo-embolic and bleeding events. There is lack of clear evidence about the optimal management of AF in TAVR patients. This review aims to summarize the epidemiology, predictors, prognosis, therapeutic considerations and challenges in the management of AF in patients undergoing TAVR.

Emergency management of stroke in the era of mechanical thrombectomy

Emergency management of stroke has been directed at the delivery of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in a timely fashion. Because of the many limitations attached to the delivery of tPA and the perceived benefits accrued to tPA, its use has been limited. Mechanical thrombectomy, a far superior therapy for the largest and most disabling strokes, large vessel occlusions (LVOs), has changed the way acute strokes are managed. Aside from the rush to deliver tPA, there is now a need to identify LVO and refer those patients with LVO to physicians and facilities capable of delivering urgent thrombectomy. Other parts of emergency department management of stroke are directed at identifying and mitigating risk factors for future strokes and at preventing further damage from occurring. We review here the most recent literature supporting these advances in stroke care and present a framework for understanding the role that emergency physicians play in acute stroke care.

Patient-specific computer simulation for transcatheter cardiac interventions: what a clinician needs to know

Patient-specific computer simulation consists of the assessment of the interaction of the device with the host based on the integration of the detailed geometric and biomechanical properties of the device and host. Hence, it allows the prediction of valve performance (efficacy) and complications (safety) and may consequently help the physician to select the valve/device that best fits the individual patient, thereby improving outcome. There is currently little awareness and information in clinical medicine on patient-specific computer simulation. In this paper, we describe the technical background and a number of illustrations to illustrate how patient-specific computer simulation may be used for catheter-based treatment planning of acquired heart disease.