Prognosis for Emergency Physician with substance abuse recovery: 5-year outcome study

Key factors for sustainable working conditions in emergency departments: an EUSEM-initiated, Europe-wide consensus survey

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Modern emergency medicine (EM) is a complex, demanding, and occasionally stressful field of work. Working conditions, provider well-being, and associated health and performance outcomes are key factors influencing the establishment of a sustainable emergency department (ED) working environment.

OBJECTIVES

This multinational European Delphi survey aimed to identify unequivocal major factors for good and poor ED working conditions and their possible effects on health care provider well-being.

DESIGN/SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 18 experts from six European countries (Belgium, Finland, Germany, Italy, Romania, and the UK) covering three different hospital sizes (small, medium, and large) in their respective countries participated in the two-round Delphi survey. All panelists held leadership roles in EM.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS

The first step involved conducting an extensive literature search on ED working conditions. The second step involved the first Delphi round, which consisted of structured interviews with the panelists. The survey was designed to obtain information concerning important working conditions, comments regarding work-life factors identified from the literature, and ratings of their importance. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed following a standardized protocol. In the second Delphi round, experts rated the relevance of items consolidated from the first Delphi round (classified into ED work system factors, provider health outcomes, and ED work-life intervention approaches).

RESULTS

A nearly unequivocal consensus was obtained in four ED work condition categories, including positive (e.g. job challenges, personal motivation, and case complexities) and negative (e.g. overcrowding, workflow interruptions/multitasking, medical errors) ED work conditions. The highly relevant adverse personal health events identified included physical fatigue, exhaustion, and burnout. Concerning intervention practices, the panelists offered a wide spectrum of opportunities with less consensus.

CONCLUSION

Work system conditions exert positive and negative effects on the work life of ED providers across Europe. Although most European countries have varying health care systems, the expert-based survey results presented herein strongly suggest that improvement strategies should focus on system-related external stressors common in various countries. Our findings lay the scientific groundwork for future intervention studies at the local and systemic levels to improve ED provider work life.

Navigating Work-Life Integration, Legal Issues, Patient Safety: Lessons for Work-Life Wellness in Academic Medicine: Part 1 of 3

In this series of three manuscripts, we will explore real-life scenarios encountered by clinicians, learners, and researchers in healthcare, which challenge our assumptions and our understanding of how to navigate issues as diverse as mental health, racial diversity, gender discrimination, imposter syndrome, and substance use disorder.

Returning to clinical work and doctors' personal, social and organisational needs: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to synthesise existing evidence on doctors' personal, social and organisational needs when returning to clinical work after an absence.

DESIGN

Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, Medline, PsycINFO and PubMed were searched up to 4 June 2020. Non-database searches included references and citations of identified articles and pages 1-10 of Google and Google Scholar.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Included studies presented quantitative or qualitative data collected from doctors returning to work, with findings relating to personal, social or organisational needs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted using a piloted template. Risk of bias assessment used the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument or Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist. Data were not suitable for meta-analyses and underwent narrative synthesis due to varied study designs and mixed methods.

RESULTS

Twenty-four included studies (14 quantitative, 10 qualitative) presented data from 92 692 doctors in the UK (n=13), US (n=4), Norway (n=3), Japan (n=2), Spain (n=1), Canada (n=1). All studies identified personal needs, categorised as work-life balance, emotional regulation, self-perception and identity, and engagement with return process. Seventeen studies highlighted social needs relating to professional culture, personal and professional relationships, and illness stigma. Organisational needs found in 22 studies were flexibility and job control, work design, Occupational Health services and organisational culture. Emerging resources and recommendations were highlighted. Variable quality and high risk of biases in data collection and analysis suggest cautious interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS

This review posits a foundational framework of returning doctors' needs, requiring further developed through methodologically robust studies that assess the impact of length and reason for absence, before developing and evaluating tailored interventions. Organisations, training programmes and professional bodies should refine support for returning doctors based on evidence.

Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms among emergency physicians in Libya after civil war: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the prevalence of depression and anxiety among physicians working in the emergency departments of nine tertiary care centres in Libya.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Nine main tertiary centres in Libya PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department doctors were surveyed between December 2018 and February 2019.

INTERVENTION

The standardised Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was selected as a measurement tool for analysing anxiety and depression symptoms; a HADS score of 8 indicated anxiety as well as depression symptoms. The primary outcomes were anxiety and depression, which were tabulated with independent sociodemographic variables. χ² tests were conducted to compare the prevalence of anxiety and depression between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.25.

RESULTS

A total of 108 out of 150 (72%) emergency physicians from all levels participated in the study and took the survey. The emergency physicians had a mean±SD age of 31.2±4.5 years, and were predominantly males (74 out of 108, 68.5%). Overall, 49 (45.4%) physicians reached the cut-off score to define both depression and anxiety (ie, a score ≥8). In terms of violence, 71 (65.7%) reported incidents of verbal violence, while 26 (24.1%) reported physical violence or abuse by militias. In addition, 28 reported being threatened by militias.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence rate of anxiety and depression is of concern, and the high rate of physical and verbal abuse highlights the range of abuse endured by doctors in Libya. Therefore, screening for anxiety and depression at regular intervals is needed to avoid the deterioration of mental health, which can increase the risk of suicide and dropping out, and decrease the level of healthcare for patients.

Outcomes of Physicians with Substance Use Disorders in State Physician Health Programs: A Narrative Review

The prevalence rate of addiction among physicians is similar to the general population, with approximately 10% to 12% of U.S.-based physicians developing substance use disorders (SUDs) during their lifetimes. To address this public health concern, physician health programs (PHPs) have been created to facilitate the early identification, evaluation, treatment, and monitoring of physicians. Although a number of published studies provide outcome information from PHPs, there has been no comprehensive review of the related literature. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the treatment outcomes, including treatment types, rates of relapse, rates of contract completion or extension, as well as licensure and work status rates of a nationally representative physician cohort and related subpopulations from a single dataset. Based on the studies included in this review, our findings reveal that physicians who completed their PHP contracts have more favorable treatment outcomes than members of the general population who receive mainstream treatment. In addition, our review describes unique features of physician rehabilitation facilitated by PHPs. However, further prospective research is needed to ensure a standardized and comparable dataset and facilitate performance improvement.

[Addictive disorders in physicians]

Despite their knowledge about the risks and treatment options for substance abuse disorders, physicians are not immune to them. Meanwhile, a number of studies have shown that physicians have an increased risk of depression, addictive diseases and burnout due to the occupation-linked mental and physical burden and in particular an increased prevalence of substance-related disorders, especially alcohol abuse or dependence and drug abuse. Drug dependence among physicians seems to be even higher than in the general population due to the relatively easy access to psychoactive medications, in particular hypnotic drugs, benzodiazepines, ketamine and opioids; however, the prognosis is good. According to data from the medical associations, three quarters of those affected for the first time and every sixth relapsed physician can be helped with preservation of the license and working as physicians.

A Call to Restore Your Calling: Self-Care of the Emergency Physician in the Face of Life-Changing Stress-Part 3 of 6: Physician Illness and Impairment

Physicians suffer from most medical conditions at the same rate as their lay peers. However, physicians' self-care is often sacrificed for patient care. This third article in our series examines physician and trainee illness and impairment. Presenteeism, physician impairment, and substance use disorder (SUD) are defined. We call attention to the potential for harm of dated cultural norms, which often fuel physicians' neglect of their own health and development of ill-advised coping skills.Although any medical condition may become a functional impairment, the primary cause of physician impairment is SUD. Alcohol and prescription opioids top the list of substances used in excess by physicians. Although SUD is less prevalent in residency, we focus on the rise of marijuana and alcohol use in emergency medicine trainees. A nonpunitive model for the prevention and treatment of SUD in residency is described.Physicians are ethically and legally mandated to report any concern for impairment to either a state physician health program or a state medical board. However, recognizing physician SUD is challenging. We describe its clinical presentation, voluntary and mandated treatment tracks, provisions for protecting reporters from civil liability, prognosis for return to practice, and prevention efforts. We underscore the need to model healthy coping strategies and assist trainees in adopting them.In closing, we offer our colleagues and trainees today's to-do list for beginning the journey of reclaiming your health. We also provide resources focused on the practical support of ill and/or impaired physicians.

Physician Impairment and Rehabilitation: Reintegration Into Medical Practice While Ensuring Patient Safety: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians

Physician impairment, the inability to carry out patient care responsibilities safely and effectively, is a problem of functioning. However, the presence or treatment of a potentially impairing illness or other condition does not necessarily imply impairment. This American College of Physicians position paper examines the professional duties and principles that should guide the response of colleagues and the profession to physician impairment. The physician should be rehabilitated and reintegrated into medical practice whenever possible without compromising patient safety. At the same time, physicians have a duty to seek help when they are unable to provide safe care. When identifying and assisting colleagues who might be impaired, physicians should act on collegial concern as well as ethical and legal guidelines that require reporting of behavior that puts patients at risk. Health care institutions and the profession should support practice environments in which patient safety is prioritized and physician wellness and well-being are addressed. Physician health programs should be committed to best practices that safeguard patient safety and the rights of physician-patients.

Family Medicine Physicians With Substance Use Disorder: A 5-year Outcome Study

OBJECTIVES

There is little published evidence on how well family medicine physicians (FMPs) with substance use disorder (SUD) perform in Physician Health Programs (PHPs). We examined outcomes for FMP compared with non-FMP physicians.

METHODS

This study utilized data from a 5-year, longitudinal, cohort study involving 904 physicians with diagnoses of SUD consecutively admitted to one of 16 state PHPs between 1995 and 2001. We compared 175 FMPs to 687 other physicians. Outcome measures were relapse, successful completion of monitoring contract at 5 years, and licensed and employed at 5 years.

RESULTS

Of the 3 outcome variables measured: relapse, successful completion of monitoring contract at 5 years, and licensed and employed at 5 years, FMPs had similar rates of success on all variables except monitoring contract completion at 5 years when compared with the other physician cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, FMPs with SUD do as well as other physicians in PHPs at 5 years. However, FMPs were less likely to complete the monitoring contract at 5 years as compared to the other physician cohort.

Coping behavior and risk and resilience stress factors in French regional emergency medicine unit workers: a cross-sectional survey

The Emergency Department (ED) has the highest workload in a hospital, offering care to patients in their most acute state of illness, as well as comforting their families and tending to stressful situations of the physical and psychological areal. Method. A cross-sectional survey of 366 Emergency Unit staff members including medical doctors, medical residents, medical nurses and ward aids, was undergone. Study participants came from four periphery hospitals in the Moselle Department of Eastern France with similar workforce and daily patient loads statistics. The instruments used were the Perceived Stress Scale PSS-10 and the Brief COPE questionnaire. Conclusions. Perceived work overload and overall stress is strongly related to work hours and tend to have a stronger influence on doctors than on the nursing staff. Substance use is a common coping method for medical interns, consistent with prior research. The regular assessment of the ED staff perception of stress and stress related factors is essential to support organizational decisions in order to promote a better work environment and better patient care.