Trauma Triage and Trauma System Performance

A China-Based exploration of surgical timing for polytrauma with a focus on fracture reconstruction

BACKGROUND

For patients with severe polytrauma and fractures, early fracture reconstruction surgery under stable conditions can significantly reduce pulmonary and other complications. However, premature surgical intervention may heighten infection risk, adversely affecting the patient's prognosis. Consequently, determining the optimal timing of surgery is crucial for patients with multiple traumatic injuries. Given China's healthcare context, this study will assess injury severity and perform definitive fracture reconstruction at specified post-trauma intervals. Postoperative infection rates, including wound infections, other complication incidences, hospital stay duration, treatment costs, and long-term outcomes will be observed and compared to identify the optimal timing for surgical intervention. This study also aims to develop effective polytrauma management models. By applying accessible criteria and choosing suitable timing for fracture reconstruction, we can better assess patient conditions, reduce complications, and minimize the surgery's "second hit" effect, addressing an important research gap regarding optimal surgical timing for polytrauma in China.

METHODS

This study collected data on 200 patients treated at our hospital between March 2023 and March 2024, with an average age of 47.24 ± 16.56 years and an average Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25.85 ± 13.35. A total of 250 fractures received definitive fixation in the initial surgery, including femoral fractures (n = 75), spinal fractures (n = 46), pelvic ring fractures (n = 49), tibial fractures (n = 25), acetabular fractures (n = 12), humeral fractures (n = 12), and other fractures (n = 5) (including clavicle, radius and ulna, calcaneus, and patella). Among these patients, 151 underwent single-fracture reconstruction, 42 had two fractures reconstructed, and 5 had three fractures treated during the first surgery. The study protocol excluded patients with absolute contraindications, including bacteremia and infections near the surgical site. Additional inclusion criteria required stable vital signs (temperature < 38.5 °C with a downward trend, systolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg, stable traumatic brain injury status) and blood routine (white blood cell count < 22.0 × 10⁹/L with a neutrophil percentage < 90%, both trending downward; platelet count > 50 × 10⁹/L; hemoglobin > 90 g/L). Based on these criteria, historical cohorts were identified and assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. Observed outcomes included postoperative complications, wound healing grades, inflammatory markers, changes in vital signs, length of hospital stay, costs, and long-term follow-up results.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 97 underwent surgery after meeting the specified criteria for fracture reconstruction, while 103 received surgery without meeting these criteria. Patients who met the surgical criteria demonstrated superior outcomes, with lower complication rates (including pneumonia and respiratory distress syndrome), improved surgical incision healing, faster postoperative consciousness recovery, shorter overall and ICU stays, reduced hospitalization costs, greater joint mobility at the 9-month follow-up, and higher quality of life assessments compared to those who did not meet the criteria. Among patients who met the criteria, those with spinal fractures experienced better quality of life outcomes, and those with femoral fractures showed improved fracture healing.

CONCLUSIONS

For polytrauma patients with fractures, performing surgery once surgical requirements are met results in fewer early postoperative pulmonary complications, quicker recovery of consciousness, lower wound infection rates, shorter hospital and ICU stays, reduced costs, and improved postoperative outcomes. This protocol is safe and effective for most polytrauma patients requiring fixation, particularly those with mechanically unstable femoral, pelvic, acetabular, or spinal fractures.

Association between Torso Gunshot Wound Volumes of Trauma Centers and Outcomes of Torso Gunshot Wound Patients. A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study

Objective: The number and type of patients treated by trauma centers can vary widely because of a number of factors. There might be trauma centers with a high volume of torso GSWs that are not designated as high-level trauma centers. We proposed that, for torso gunshot wounds (GSWs), the treating hospital's trauma volume and not its trauma center level designation drives patient prognosis.Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for torso GSWs. The characteristics of torso GSWs in trauma centers with different volumes of torso GSWs were compared. The association between torso GSW volumes of trauma centers and the outcomes of torso GSWs were evaluated with propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis.Results: There were 618 trauma centers that treated 14,804 torso GSW patients in two years (2014-2015). In 191 level I trauma centers, 82 of them (42.9%, 82/191) treated <1 torso GSW per month. After well-balanced PSM, patients who were treated in higher volume trauma centers (≥9 torso GSWs/month) had a significantly lower mortality rate (7.9% vs. 9.7%). Patients treated in trauma centers with ≥9 torso GSWs/month had a 30.9% (odds ratio = 0.764) lower probability of death than if sent to trauma centers with <9 torso GSWs/month. Treatment in level I or II trauma centers did not significantly affect mortality.Conclusion: There is an uneven distribution of torso GSWs among trauma centers. Torso GSWs treated in trauma centers with ≥9 torso GSWs/month have significantly superior outcomes with regard to survival.

Trauma care system in China

With the development of modern society, high-energy trauma has become an increasing tendency, which brings a great challenge for trauma care. A well-running trauma care system that is composed by pre-hospital and in-hospital care has been proved to decrease the death and disability rate of trauma patients. However, establishment of trauma care system in China is still at the initial stage. Trauma care systems in China and developed countries represented by the United States and Germany are introduced respectively in this article. Construction of regional and hierarchical trauma center, training of specific trauma care team and performance of integrative trauma rescue model are recommended in China.