A Randomized Comparison of In-hospital Rescuer Positions for Endotracheal Intubation in a Difficult Airway

Managing the difficult airway: A survey of doctors with different seniority in China

ABSTRACT

Although equipment and human resources are vital elements of difficult airway management (DAM). But the approach and practice of DAM are more important. So, we conducted the present survey to address anesthesiologists of different working years in this knowledge gap.This nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted from October 27, 2016 to November 27, 2016. The survey was completed online in New Youth Anesthesia Forum including DAM assessment, anticipated and unanticipated DAM, difficult airway algorithm, use of the front of neck access (FONA) technique and training, DAM outside the operation room, and difficult extubation management.We received 1935 replies (44%). Mouth opening and Mallampati classification were the most common methods to evaluate difficult airways. When suffering from unanticipated difficult airway 63% less than 10 years anesthesiologists (LA) and 65% more than 10 years anesthesiologists (MA) would ask for help after trying 1 to 2 times (P = .000). More than 70% of LA and MA respondents reported preferring cannula cricothyrotomy to deal with emergency airway, 507 (41.6%) MA respondents reported that they used FONA techniques to save patients' lives (P = .000). Nearly 70% respondents worried full stomach when intubated outside operation room and more than 80% respondents selected auscultation to identify the placement. More than 80% respondents had not used Bougie to assist extubation. A 73.2% respondents know ABS algorithm and 96.4% know Chinese airway expert consensus among MA respondents, this was significant to LA respondents (P = .000).The respondents in the LA and MA have a training gap in their evaluation of difficult airways, trained and used FONA emergency skills, facilitated of the airway guidelines at home and abroad. Also, we should provide more airway theory and skill training to our young doctors to advanced airway skills.

Teaching Endotracheal Intubation Using a Cadaver Versus a Manikin-based Model: a Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

The optimal method to train novice learners to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI) is unknown. The study objective was to compare two models: unembalmed cadaver vs simulation manikin.

METHODS

Fourth-year medical students, stratified by baseline ETI experience, were randomized 1:1 to train on a cadaver or simulation manikin. Students were tested and video recorded on a separate cadaver; two reviewers, blinded to the intervention, assessed the videos. Primary outcome was time to successful ETI, analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Authors also compared percentage of glottic opening (POGO), number of ETI attempts, learner confidence, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of 97 students randomized, 78 were included in the final analysis. Median time to ETI did not differ significantly (hazard ratio [HR] 1.1; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.7-1.8): cadaver group = 34.5 seconds (interquartile ratio [IQR]: 23.3-55.8) vs manikin group = 35.5 seconds (IQR: 23.8-80.5), with no difference in first-pass success (odds ratio [OR] = 1; 95% CI, 0.1-7.5) or median POGO: 80% cadaver vs 90% manikin (95% CI, -14-34%). Satisfaction was higher for cadavers (median difference = 0.5; p = 0.002; 95% CI, 0-1) as was change in student confidence (median difference = 0.5; p = 0.03; 95% CI, 0-1). Students rating their confidence a 5 ("extremely confident") demonstrated decreased time to ETI (HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.0-17.2).

CONCLUSION

Manikin and cadaver training models for ETI produced similar time to ETI, POGO, and first-pass success. Cadaver training was associated with increased student satisfaction and confidence; subjects with the highest confidence level demonstrated decreased time to ETI.