Comparison of Infusion of Propofol and Ketamine-Propofol Mixture (Ketofol) as Anesthetic Maintenance Agents on Blood Pressure of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Leg Surgeries

Enhancing Safety in Tumescent Liposuction: Managing Sedation-Related Respiratory Issues and Serious Complications Under Deep Sedation with the Propofol-Ketamine Protocol

BACKGROUND

Over the past 4 years, aesthetic surgery, notably liposuction, has substantially increased. Tumescent liposuction, a popular technique, has two variants-true tumescent liposuction (TTL) and semi-tumescent liposuction. While TTL reduces risks, it has limitations. There is no literature reported on semi-tumescent liposuction under deep sedation using the propofol-ketamine protocol, which is proposed as a potentially safe alternative.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis covered 8 years and included 3094 patients performed for tumescent liposuction under deep sedation, utilizing the propofol-ketamine protocol. The evaluation of patient safety involved an examination of potential adverse events with a specific focus on respiratory issues related to sedation, including instances of mask ventilation.

RESULTS

Among the 3094 cases, no fatalities were recorded. Noteworthy events included 43 mask ventilation instances, primarily occurring in the initial 10 min. Twelve cases experienced surgery cancellation due to various factors, including respiratory issues. Three patients were transferred to upper-level hospitals, while another three required blood transfusions. Vigilant management prevented significant complications, and other adverse events like venous thromboembolism (VTE), fat embolism, severe lidocaine toxicity, and so on were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of 3094 tumescent liposuction cases highlighted the overall safety profile of the propofol-ketamine protocol under deep sedation. The scarcity of severe complications underscores its viability. The study emphasizes the significance of thorough preoperative assessments, careful patient selection, and awareness of potential complications. Prompt interventions, particularly in addressing sedation-related respiratory issues, further contribute to positive outcomes for patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison of the Effect of Adding Low-dose Ketamine to Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on the Quality of Sedation and Hemodynamic Response in Children During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: As endoscopy is an invasive and painful procedure, it is necessary to use a suitable sedative with a minimum dose, especially in children. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effect of adding low-dose ketamine to dexmedetomidine and propofol on the quality of sedation and hemodynamic response in children during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 52 children who were candidates for endoscopy in 2 groups, each consisting of 26 patients. In the first group (Ketadex group), infusion of dexmedetomidine (0.7 - 1 μg/kg) for 10 minutes and ketamine bolus (0.4 mg/kg) for anesthesia induction was prescribed. In the second group (Ketofol group), infusion of propofol (50 - 100 μg/kg) for 10 minutes and ketamine bolus (0.4 mg/kg) for anesthesia induction was prescribed. Results: The mean blood pressure of children decreased slightly during and after the endoscopic procedure in the Ketadex group than in the Ketofol group (P < 0.05). The recovery time was significantly less in the Ketofol group (41.85 ± 7.03 minutes) than in the Ketadex group (55.12 ± 7.55 minutes; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The addition of the low-dose ketamine to propofol and dexmedetomidine did not result in any significant changes in the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the endoscopist’s satisfaction; however, the recovery time was shorter in the propofol-ketamine combination than in the dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination.

Effects of Ketamine and Lidocaine Infusion on Acute Pain after Elective Open Abdominal Surgery, a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study

Background: Most patients suffer from moderate to severe pain after elective laparotomy. They often require opioids to alleviate their pain. Opiates invariably induce certain side effects and, occasionally, dependence. Intraoperative infusion of lidocaine and low-dose ketamine reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. This study aims to evaluate the effects of simultaneous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine during open abdominal surgery on the postoperative pain severity and analgesic consumption. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, single-center study that was performed in Iran, 80 patients scheduled for elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in two LK and P groups. Group LK (n=40) received lidocaine-ketamine infusion, and group P (n=40) received placebo (normal saline). Both infusions were started thirty minutes after initiation of surgery and were terminated once the surgery was completed. For postoperative pain management, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), including fentanyl and paracetamol, was administered for both groups. All patients were evaluated for pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and total adjunctive analgesic (diclofenac suppository) consumption within the first 24 hours after the surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS. P values <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Intraoperative infusion of Lidocaine and Ketamine resulted in desirable postoperative pain control. Patients of LK group demonstrated a significant reduction in the pain score at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after termination of surgery (p<0.001). It also resulted in a decreased requirement for postoperative analgesics, as cumulative analgesic consumption was decreased meaningfully in the patients of LK group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Intravenous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine during elective open abdominal surgery reduces pain intensity and analgesic requirements in the first 24 hours postoperatively, without major additional side effects.

A Comparative Study on the Effects of Ketofol, Dexmedetomidine, and Isofol in Anesthesia of Candidates for Dilatation and Curettage

Background

Dilatation and curettage (D & C) is one of the relatively common surgeries among women. Familiarity with the analgesics, along with their different uses and specific characteristics, can help to determine the best and most appropriate drug to control pain in the patients.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the effects of ketofol, dexmedetomidine, and isofol in anesthesia of candidates for D & C.

Methods

In this double-blind clinical trial, 150 candidates for D & C surgeries with ASA class 1 and 2 were included. Patients were randomly divided into three groups. The first group received ketamine + propofol, the second group received dexmedetomidine, and the third group received isofol (isoflurane + propofol). Any hemodynamic changes or respiratory disorders, including apnea or hypoventilation, drop in the level of blood oxygen saturation, and the need for respiratory support, were recorded and compared.

Results

Hypoventilation was observed in 47 patients in isofol group, 18 in the dexmedetomidine group, and 42 in ketofol group. Also, 48 patients in the isofol group, eight in the dexmedetomidine group, and 33 in the ketofol group experienced apnea. Moreover, 17 patients in the dexmedetomidine group, 35 in the ketofol group, and eight in the isofol group experienced bradycardia. The rate of bradycardia was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group (70%) compared to the other two groups, and the rate of hypotension was significantly higher in the isofol group (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

According to the results, dexmedetomidine was associated with fewer complications during general anesthesia in D & C surgery.

Reliable and Rapid Smooth Extubation After "Ketamine-Propfol Mixture" for Induction of General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Drilling of Polycystic Ovary: A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study

Background

Ketofol's effect on hemodynamics and the airway response during inducing general anesthesia has been studied previously. However, ketofol's effect on the smoothness of extubation has not been studied yet.

Objectives

We aimed to assess ketofol’s effect on the smoothness of extubation and compare it with propofol for inducing general anesthesia.

Methods

This double-blind, randomized, and controlled study was conducted on 106 class I and II female patients with the “American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASAPS),” aged 18 - 40 years, scheduled for laparoscopic drilling for polycystic ovary disease under general anesthesia. The patients were assigned to two groups of 53 patients each: Group KP = ketofol and Group P = propofol.

Results

There was an excellent sedation score during suction and extubation in the ketofol group. The airway response and smoothness of extubation were better in the ketofol group than in the propofol group.

Conclusions

Ketofol as an induction anesthetic agent more effectively attenuated the airway response during extubation than only propofol.

Effects of dexmedetomide, propofol and remifentanil on perioperative inflammatory response and lung function during lung cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of combined anesthesia with dexmedetomide, propofol and remifentanil on perioperative inflammatory response and pulmonary function in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

90 patients with lung cancer admitted to our hospital from April 2017 to April 2019 were selected. According to different anesthesia schemes, patients undergoing combined anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil were included in group A (GA), and patients receiving combined anesthesia with dexmedetomidine, propofol and remifentanil were included in group B (GB). The blood gas, pulmonary function index, inflammatory factor level in serum, anesthetic effect and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

HR indexes at T1 and T2 in GB were significantly lower than those in GA (P<0.001). There was no significant fluctuation in PaCO2 and PaO2 indexes in the two groups at different time points (P>0.05). At T0, T1 and T2, RV/TLC levels in serum increased significantly in the two groups. (MVV-VE)/FEV1 and MVV/FEV levels were significantly decreased (all P<0.05). The fluctuation levels of RV/TLC, (MVV-VE)/FEV1 and MVV/FEV levels in serum of GB were significantly lower than those of GA at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). At T0, T1 and T2, the levels of inflammatory factors in serum were significantly decreased in the two groups (P<0.05), but the levels of inflammatory factors in serum of GB were significantly lower than those of GA at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). The VAS scores of GB were significantly lower than those of GA at 1 hour and 4 hours after operation (P<0.05). Ramsay scores of GB were significantly higher than those of GA at 1 hour and 4 hours after operation (P<0.05). The restlessness score and choking cough score in GB were lower than those in GA (P<0.05). Perioperative complications in GB were better than those in GA (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of propofol and remifentanil anesthesia, the combination of dexmedetomidine for anesthesia induction can achieve satisfactory anesthesia effect. On the basis of propofol and remifentanil anesthesia combined with dexmedetomidine for anesthesia induction, it can significantly inhibit the inflammatory response of lung cancer patients during perioperative period and it can more effectively stabilize the blood gas microcirculation and lung function of patients.