Avoiding Misdiagnosis Due to Antibody Interference with Serum Free Thyroxin

Free thyroid hormone: Methods and standardization

Free thyroid hormone (FTH) serves as the preferred indicator for the clinical assessment of thyroid function, mainly encompassing free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine. The immunoassay commonly employed in the clinical setting exhibits certain unresolvable deficiencies. The results of over 5,500 clinical laboratories for FTH from China in 2024 demonstrated that the outcomes of immunoassay were not comparable, with robust CVs calculated in accordance with ISO 13528 ranging from 13.82% to 21.42%. Establishing reference methods is an important tool to achieve accurate and comparable results of free hormones. Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) holds a distinct advantage in the precise detection of small molecules, and two reference methods for free thyroxine based on LC-MS/MS are included in the JCTLM list. This article conducts a comprehensive review of the detection methods and standardization of FTH. It presents the metabolism of thyroid hormones, the significance of detection, the techniques, and application examples of free thyroid hormone assays, and deliberates on the current status, prospects, and recommendations for the standardization of FTH assays. Immunoassay and LC-MS/MS, as significant techniques for FTH detection, are predominantly emphasized in the case references. Ultrafiltration and equilibrium dialysis, which are utilized to separate FTH, are also addressed. This article aims to discuss the status quo of FTH detection and clarify the advantages of LC-MS/MS in FTH detection, propose that LC-MS/MS can be utilized as an auxiliary validation method or alternative method in clinical applications, and offer suggestions for the standardization of testing results.

Interference with Immunoassays of a Neonate on High Biotin: Case Report and Literature Review

Biotin is sometimes administered in mega doses to children to treat certain inborn errors of metabolism. We report the case of a one-week-old newborn who was started on a 'mitochondrial cocktail' that contained a high dose of biotin. On day seven of life, his thyroid function test showed a biochemical picture of primary hyperthyroidism, which was not clinically evident. The suspicion of immunoassay interference with thyroid function test was confirmed when another lab, using a different immunoassay, gave normal results. If the biochemical profile does not match the clinical picture, it is reasonable to doubt the test result and think of assay interference.

Hyperthyroidism

Thyrotoxicosis causes a variety of symptoms and adverse health outcomes. Hyperthyroidism refers to increased thyroid hormone synthesis and secretion, most commonly from Graves' disease or toxic nodular goitre, whereas thyroiditis (typically autoimmune, viral, or drug induced) causes thyrotoxicosis without hyperthyroidism. The diagnosis is based on suppressed serum concentrations of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), accompanied by free thyroxine and total or free tri-iodothyronine concentrations, which are raised (overt hyperthyroidism) or within range (subclinical hyperthyroidism). The underlying cause is determined by clinical assessment, detection of TSH-receptor antibodies and, if necessary, radionuclide thyroid scintigraphy. Treatment options for hyperthyroidism include antithyroid drugs, radioactive iodine, and thyroidectomy, whereas thyroiditis is managed symptomatically or with glucocorticoid therapy. In Graves' disease, first-line treatment is a 12-18-month course of antithyroid drugs, whereas for goitre, radioactive iodine or surgery are preferred for toxic nodules or goitres. Evidence also supports long-term treatment with antithyroid drugs as an option for patients with Graves' disease and toxic nodular goitre.

Dubiously increased FT4 and FT3 levels in clinically euthyroid patients: clinical finding or analytical pitfall?

OBJECTIVES

We systematically investigated normally or subclinically increased thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) values associated with unexpectedly increased thyroxine (FT4) and free triiodothyronine (FT3) in findings of patients without any thyroid disease. Moreover, we looked for alternatives to overcome such states with an improved diagnostic procedure and to investigate the pathogenetic background of the respective patients.

METHODS

Samples with TSH concentrations within the range of 0.4-10 mU/L combined with increased concentrations of FT4 (n=120; Cobas, Roche) were collected over a period of around six years. Cobas FT4 results were compared with measurements from Liaison (DiaSorin) and Architect (Abbott) FT4 assays. For further validation all samples were measured for total thyroxine (TT4) (Cobas, Roche). Finally, FT3 and TT3 as complementary parameters were measured in samples with leftover material. To overcome potential analytical disturbances from stimulating heterophilic antibodies, we used heterophilic blocking tubes (HBTs).

RESULTS

From the 120 samples with increased FT4 concentrations by Cobas, 51/120 were also increased by Liaison, and 26/120 by Architect. However, the measurement of TT4 indicated only n=10/120 increased values. The number of increased FT3 (n=71) measurements was higher in Architect>Cobas>Liaison (28>27>9). TT3 levels of 70/71 samples were within the reference interval. HBTs were inappropriate to reduce unspecific immunoreactivity in our samples. No clear pathogenetic background could be elucidated in the anamnesis of individual patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To overcome dubious constellations of TSH, FT4, and FT3, it is helpful to measure TT4 and TT3 for control or to use an immunoassay with an alternative assay design for the respective parameters.

Hormone Immunoassay Interference: A 2021 Update

Immunoassays are powerful qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques. Since the first description of an immunoassay method in 1959, advances have been made in assay designs and analytical characteristics, opening the door for their widespread implementation in clinical laboratories. Clinical endocrinology is closely linked to laboratory medicine because hormone quantification is important for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of endocrine disorders. Several interferences in immunoassays have been identified through the years; although some are no longer encountered in daily practice, cross-reaction, heterophile antibodies, biotin, and anti-analyte antibodies still cause problems. Newer interferences are also emerging with the development of new therapies. The interfering substance may be exogenous (e.g., a drug or substance absorbed by the patient) or endogenous (e.g., antibodies produced by the patient), and the bias caused by interference can be positive or negative. The consequences of interference can be deleterious when clinicians consider erroneous results to establish a diagnosis, leading to unnecessary explorations or inappropriate treatments. Clinical laboratories and manufacturers continue to investigate methods for the detection, elimination, and prevention of interferences. However, no system is completely devoid of such incidents. In this review, we focus on the analytical interferences encountered in daily practice and possible solutions for their detection or elimination.

Clinical Consequences of Variable Results in the Measurement of Free Thyroid Hormones: Unusual Presentation of a Family with a Novel Variant in the THRB Gene Causing Resistance to Thyroid Hormone Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Resistance to thyroid hormone β (RTHβ) is an inherited syndrome caused by dominant negative variants in the THRB gene (NM_000461.5). The clinical picture of RTHβ is variable, and patients harboring the same variant may display different degrees of disease severity.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old man presented with thyrotoxicosis and central hyperthyroidism and was found to have a novel variant in the exon 10 of THRB gene (c.C1282G, p.L428V), located within the third hot spot region of the C-terminal of the receptor. Surprisingly, the same variant was found in two other relatives with an apparent normal thyroid function at initial screening. After exclusion of a TSH-secreting adenoma and serum interference in the proband, and the finding that exogenous levothyroxine failed to suppress the TSH in the brother affected by nodular goiter, relatives' thyroid function tests (TFTs) were reassessed with additional analytical method revealing biochemical features consistent with RTHβ in all carriers of the p.L428V variant. Functional studies showed a slightly impaired in vitro transcriptional activity of p.L428V. Interestingly' the expression of the human p.L428V thyroid hormone receptor beta in the zebrafish embryo background generated a phenotype consistent with RTHβ.

CONCLUSION

Variable results of TFTs on some immunoassays can be a cause of RTHβ diagnostic delay, but the genotype-phenotype correlation in this family and functional studies support p.L428V as a novel THRB variant expanding the spectrum of gene variants causing RTHβ. In vivo, rather than in vitro, functional assays may be required to demonstrate the dominant negative action of THRB variants.

Interference in thyroid function immunoassays: clinical consequences

Thyroid function tests are prone to analytical interference, which can cause misleading results when performed on automated immunoassay analyzers. We present a case of a 68-years old woman diagnosed with primary hypothyroidism and chronically treated with levothyroxine. Her status has been followed-up in several different institutions and before readmission to our institute, she was diagnosed as T3 toxicosis according to the lab results of suppressed TSH, normal FT4 and highly elevated FT3 values. Due to lack of toxic symptoms, our clinician suspected FT3 test interference, which was confirmed in our lab by performing the test on a different immunoassay platform. In conclusion, every discrepancy between clinical presentation and laboratory test results has to be inspected by close communication between clinicians and laboratory specialists. Our goal was to raise the awareness within the healthcare community about the interference in immunoassays affecting different kit manufacturers and analytical platforms in order to avoid erroneous diagnosis and mistreatment of patients. Key words: immunoassay, interference, free triiodothyronine, mistreatment

Interferences With Thyroid Function Immunoassays: Clinical Implications and Detection Algorithm

Automated immunoassays used to evaluate thyroid function are vulnerable to different types of interference that can affect clinical decisions. This review provides a detailed overview of the six main types of interference known to affect measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (T4) and free triiodothyronine (T3): macro-TSH, biotin, antistreptavidin antibodies, anti-ruthenium antibodies, thyroid hormone autoantibodies, and heterophilic antibodies. Because the prevalence of some of these conditions has been reported to approach 1% and the frequency of testing for thyroid dysfunction is important, the scale of the problem might be tremendous. Potential interferences in thyroid function testing should always be suspected whenever clinical or biochemical discrepancies arise. Their identification usually relies on additional laboratory tests, including assay method comparison, dilution procedures, blocking reagents studies, and polyethylene glycol precipitation. Based on the pattern of thyroid function test alterations, to screen for the six aforementioned types of interference, we propose a detection algorithm, which should facilitate their identification in clinical practice. The review also evaluates the clinical impact of thyroid interference on immunoassays. On review of reported data from more than 150 patients, we found that ≥50% of documented thyroid interferences led to misdiagnosis and/or inappropriate management, including prescription of an unnecessary treatment (with adverse effects in some situations), inappropriate suppression or modification of an ongoing treatment, or use of unnecessary complementary tests such as an I123 thyroid scan. Strong interaction between the clinician and the laboratory is necessary to avoid such pitfalls.