Split-Bolus Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Technique for Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions in Oncologic Patients

What do we see when we do not see the bladder? Review of the main urinary diversion techniques and their complications

OBJECTIVE

To review the different types of urinary diversion surgeries (UDS) in order to recognize the expected findings in a postoperative study, using different imaging techniques. To recognize the main postoperative complications, both early and late.

CONCLUSION

UDS are surgical procedures whose purpose is to redirect urine flow after cystectomy, generally in an oncologic context. The imaging evaluation of urological surgeries is often a radiological challenge, with CT being the most commonly used image modality. Therefore, it is essential to know the main surgical techniques, the expected postoperative findings and the optimization of imaging techniques for early diagnosis and correct evaluation of postoperative complications.

Split-bolus vs. multiphasic contrast bolus protocol in patients with pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and dose reduction potential of a split-bolus protocol(SBP) compared with a multiphasic protocol(MPP) in the detection of recurrent or progressive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC) or cholangiocarcinoma(CC) using contrast- enhanced computed tomography(CECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 56 patients who underwent CECT, 28 with our institutional standard MPP(100 ml contrast bolus) and 28 with a novel SBP(110 ml). Radiation exposure was determined in terms of total dose- length product(DLP) and computed tomography dose index(CTDI). Image quality was measured objectively by analysis of attenuation in Hounsfield units(HU) in regions of interest(ROIs) and subjectively by two blinded readers using a Likert scale. Diagnostic accuracy and interreader variability were tested.

RESULTS

The total DLP of the SBP group(498.1 ± 43.7 mGy*cm) was significantly lower than in the MPP group(1,092.5 ± 106.9 mGy*cm; p < 0.001). The SBP showed higher contrast enhancement of all critical anatomical structures including portal vein, liver, and pancreas compared with the MPP, except for the aorta(SBP: 326.9 ± 15.7 HU vs. MPP: 246.7 ± 12.2 HU; p < 0.001). Subjective analysis revealed poorer image quality ratings for important landmarks with the MPP (resection surface: p = 0.624, portal vein: p = 0.395, liver p = 0.361). The two blinded readers correlated significantly. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), and overall interreader variabilities correlated significantly. Furthermore, significantly fewer slices per exam were required for the SBP(1,823 vs. 3,235; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SBP provides the same image quality and diagnostic accuracy as an MPP while significantly lowering radiation exposure in CT follow-up of PDAC or CC.

Preoperative Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Split-Bolus Combined Phase Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a split-bolus combined phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography protocol in evaluation of liver vasculature in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients for the purpose of surgery guidance.

Material/Methods

Two groups of patients were recruited for the study: 24 consecutive cases of HCC who underwent multiphasic CT examination, and 22 consecutive cases who afterwards underwent split-bolus combined phase CT examination. The multiphasic protocol included an unenhanced scan and 3 image acquisitions after contrast injection. The injection of contrast medium was 440 mgI/kg in a single bolus. The split-bolus combined phase protocol included unenhanced scan and combined phase. The injection of contrast medium was 440 mgI/kg for the first bolus and 220 mgI/kg for the second bolus. The vascular delineation was evaluated with Likert scales. The CT values were measured, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. We also compared the effective radiation dose (ED) of the 2 protocols.

Results

All mean CT values were significantly higher in the split-bolus protocol than in the multiphasic protocol (all P<.05), except for the hepatic vein (P>.05). The ED was significantly lower in the split-bolus protocol, corresponding to a dose reduction of 66% compared to the multiphasic protocol (P<.05). The scores of the branches of the hepatic vein in the split-bolus protocol were not lower than those in the multiphasic protocol.

Conclusions

For the preoperative HCC patients, the split-bolus combined phase CT examination meets the diagnostic requirement of surgical planning, with approximately 60% reduction in the radiation dose.