Detection of adrenal mass during an educational point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department

Pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock: A multicentre analysis of clinical profiles, management and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

There is still uncertainty about the management of patients with pheochromocytoma-induced cardiogenic shock (PICS). This study aims to investigate the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients with PICS.

METHODS

We collected, retrospectively, the data of 18 patients without previously known pheochromocytoma admitted to 8 European hospitals with a diagnosis of PICS.

RESULTS

Among the 18 patients with a median age of 50 years (Q1-Q3: 40-61), 50% were men. The main clinical features at presentation were pulmonary congestion (83%) and cyclic fluctuation of hypertension peaks and hypotension (72%). Echocardiography showed a median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25% (Q1-Q3: 15-33.5) with an atypical- Takotsubo (TTS) pattern in 50%. Inotropes/vasopressors were started in all patients and temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) was required in 11 (61%) patients. All patients underwent surgical removal of the pheochromocytoma; 4 patients (22%) were operated on while under t-MCS. The median LVEF was estimated at 55% at discharge. Only one patient required heart transplantation (5.5%), and all patients were alive at a median follow-up of 679 days.

CONCLUSIONS

PICS should be suspected in case of a CS with severe cyclic blood pressure fluctuation and rapid hemodynamic deterioration, associated with increased inflammatory markers or in case of TTS progressing to CS, particularly if an atypical TTS echocardiographic pattern is revealed. T-MCS should be considered in the most severe cases. The main challenge is to stabilize the patient, with medical therapy or with t-MCS, since it remains a reversible cause of CS with a low mortality rate.

Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients with suspected adrenal disorders

A high level of clinical suspicion is essential in the diagnosis and management of a suspected adrenal mass during pregnancy and the peripartum period. Timely recognition is important in order to improve fetal and maternal outcomes. Imaging is often performed to confirm a suspected adrenal lesion; however, increasing usage of diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation has also increased awareness, concerns and confusion regarding the safety risks regarding fetal and maternal exposure to radiation and imaging intravenous contrast agents. This may lead to anxiety and avoidance of imaging examinations which can delay diagnosis and appropriate treatment. This article briefly reviews evidence-based recommended imaging modalities during pregnancy and the lactation period for the assessment of a suspected adrenal mass while recognizing that no examination should be withheld when the exam is necessary to confirm an important clinical suspicion. The imaging characteristics of the more common adrenal pathologies that may affect pregnant women are also discussed.