Well-differentiated neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors of the extrahepatic biliary ducts

Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Small Biopsies From the Bile Duct and Ampulla

CONTEXT.—

Histopathologic evaluation of bile duct and ampullary biopsies can be challenging. Biopsies from these sites are often tiny, scant, and/or fragmented. When assessing these biopsies, there is significant overlap between reactive atypia and malignancy, in situ precursor lesions can be misinterpreted as malignancy, and nonprimary tumors can mimic primary disease.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide diagnostic pearls and pitfalls in the evaluation of small biopsies from the biliary tract.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review of published studies and the author's own observations.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Because the procedures for obtaining specimens from the bile duct and ampulla are invasive, pathologists need to try to make definitive diagnoses. Diagnostic clues/pearls, ancillary studies, and recognition of various pitfalls can assist in providing accurate and confident diagnoses.

Spectra of well-differentiated neuroendocrine lesions in the extrahepatic biliary system: a case series

AIMS

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) occurring in the extrahepatic biliary system are exceedingly rare. While NETs typically manifest as mass lesions, the occurrence of microscopic neuroendocrine cell proliferation without a distinct mass remains undocumented at this location. This study aims to characterise the clinicopathological features of a series of well-differentiated neuroendocrine lesions involving the extrahepatic biliary tree, including mass forming NETs and microscopic non-mass-forming neuroendocrine cell proliferation, designated neuroendocrine cell micronests (NCMs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Surgical resections of NETs/NCMs involving the extrahepatic bile ducts and gallbladder were identified from electronic pathology databases among seven institutions spanning from January 2011 to September 2023. Clinical and histological findings were recorded. Ten patients (four female, six male: age range = 34-75 years) were included in the study. Histopathological examination revealed visible mass-forming lesions in four cases (1.6-14.0 cm in size), identified in the gallbladder (n = two) or extrahepatic bile duct (n = two), all diagnosed as well-differentiated NETs. The remaining six cases revealed incidental non-mass-forming NCMs in either the cystic duct (n = two), common bile duct (n = three) or gallbladder (n = one), ranging from < 0.1 to 0.4 cm; four were associated with biliary lithiasis. No evidence of metastasis or recurrence was seen in the follow-up period (range = 0.1-11.2 years).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the spectrum of extrahepatic biliary well-differentiated neuroendocrine lesions, ranging from incidental microscopic NCMs to grossly apparent mass-forming NETs, potentially requiring different clinical management. Noteworthy is the frequent association of incidental microscopic neuroendocrine cell proliferations with biliary lithiasis, indicating a potential neuroendocrine metaplastic pathogenesis that merits further exploration.

A Rare Neuroendocrine Tumor at the Junction of the Cystic and Common Hepatic Ducts: The Value of a Multimodal Approach in Preoperative Diagnosis

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the biliary tract are extremely rare due to a paucity of Kulchitsky cells. While their preoperative diagnosis remains challenging due to the lack of specific diagnostic markers and imaging findings, there have been no detailed reports describing the diagnostic utility of various imaging modalities for bile duct NETs at the junction of the cystic and common hepatic ducts. We report a case of a woman in her 40s who presented with jaundice and elevated hepatobiliary enzymes. Imaging studies identified a 17 mm × 15 mm × 13 mm nodule at the junction of the cystic and common hepatic ducts. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a well-enhanced nodule from the early phase, while magnetic resonance imaging showed slightly high intensity on T2-weighted images and strong diffusion restriction. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/CT revealed mild 18F-FDG uptake with a maximum standardized uptake value of 3.5. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) suggested extramural compression by a submucosal tumor, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) revealed a well-circumscribed, homogeneous, hypoechoic submucosal nodule. This comprehensive multimodal approach allowed for the inclusion of NET in the preoperative differential diagnosis. The patient underwent cholecystectomy and extrahepatic bile duct resection, and histopathological examination confirmed a World Health Organization grade 1 NET at the junction of the cystic and common hepatic ducts. The patient remains recurrence-free after two years of follow-up. This is the first detailed report demonstrating the potential utility of a multimodal approach, including ERCP, EUS, and IDUS, in the preoperative diagnosis of biliary tract NET at this specific anatomical location, particularly in identifying the characteristic features of a submucosal tumor.

Neuroendocrine Tumours of Extrahepatic Biliary Tract: Report of Four Cases with Literature Review

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) originating from extrahepatic bile duct are an extremely rare entity. They are typically slow growing tumours with malignant potential. Commonly presenting as obstructive jaundice, preoperative clinico-radiologic differentiation between extrahepatic biliary tract neuroendocrine tumours and cholangiocarcinoma is difficult and the final diagnosis is usually established after surgical histopathology and immunohistochemistry examination. R0 resection offers the only curative option with good long-term outcomes for well-differentiated NETs (grade1, grade2, and grade3) while the aggressive poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) needs multimodality approach. We present our experience of management of four cases including three cases of grade II NET and one case of NEC undergoing surgical resection at a single centre with a short review of available literature.

Primary extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumor: a case report

Extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumors (EBNETs) are extremely rare and difficult to diagnose. The vast majority are diagnosed postoperatively on histological evaluation of surgical specimens. Workup and treatment principles are largely based on retrospective series and case reports. Complete surgical resection is the gold standard treatment for these lesions. Here we present a case of a 77-year-old male with a biopsy-proven EBNET incidentally discovered during evaluation for fatty liver disease. Further workup did not show any other suspicious lesions. Resection of the tumor and multiple Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed. Final pathology revealed grade 1, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. This is the third case reported in the literature with a confirmed preoperative EBNET diagnosis based on endoscopic biopsy results. This case highlights the feasibility of preoperative diagnosis of EBNETs and emphasizes the importance of complete surgical resection.

Neuroendocrine tumor of the common bile duct: A case report of extremely rare cause for obstructive jaundice

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of common bile duct are rare. There have been less than 100 cases reported worldwide.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 37-year-old female patient was referred to our center after six months of abdominal pain with no definite diagnosis. At initial presentation, she complained of increased abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, oral intolerance to food and icteric sclera. Physical examination and laboratory tests were indicative of pancreatitis. At day four, she took retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and a mid CBD stenosis or impacted stone was found. In order to locally investigate the lesion, Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) examination was performed which reported 16 × 12 mm isoechoic tumoral lesion at the middle of the CBD. In this regard we decided to perform ERCP-guided brushing biopsy of the lesion. The pathology report was highly suggestive for malignancy. She underwent resection of the mid portion of the CBD with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, cholecystectomy and portahepatis lymph node dissection. The pathology report indicated that the CBD lesion was well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor grade II.

DISCUSSION

The exact etiology of developing NET in the bile duct tissues is not clear however cholelithiasis and congenital malformation of the biliary tract has been proposed to cause chronic inflammation with subsequent metaplasia which ultimately transforms into NET.

CONCLUSION

As there are very few cases of NETs of the CBD, no definite surgical or medical treatment is proposed. Currently, combination of radical surgical resection and lymph node dissection followed by chemotherapy is the treatment of choice.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct: a case report

Background

The concept of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) was introduced in the 2010 World Health Organization classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms. Bile duct invasion by MANEC is exceptionally rare. We herein report a case of MANEC with invasion of multiple bile ducts.

Case presentation: A 60-year-old man presented with a 7-day history of upper abdominal pain, and a mass in the cystic duct was suspected based on computed tomography findings. The patient underwent resection of the extrahepatic bile ducts with concomitant radical lymphadenectomy and Roux-en-Y cholangiojejunostomy. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was detected in a component of the resected tumor. According to the pathological and immunohistochemical features of the tumor, the final histopathological diagnosis was a biliary MANEC, tumor stage T2N0M1 (Stage IIIC). The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged from the hospital 10 days after surgery.

Conclusions

We have described a rare case of extrahepatic MANEC invading multiple bile ducts, with particular emphasis on the physician’s awareness of MANEC and its optimal treatment. MANEC arising from extrahepatic bile ducts is rare, and surgical resection is the most effective treatment method.

Preoperative diagnosis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor in common hepatic duct by brush cytology: A case report

The biological behavior of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is heterogeneous and differs from that of cholangiocarcinoma, which is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary tree. However, the preoperative diagnosis of NET in the biliary tree is extremely difficult and to our knowledge, diagnosis by brush cytology has not previously been reported. Herein, we first reported a case of biliary NET preoperatively diagnosed by brush cytology in a 33-year-old female patient. Imaging study revealed a 2.6-cm mass in the common hepatic duct. The brush cytology was characterized by loosely cohesive plasmacytoid tumor cells and scattered clusters of thin vascular septa. The tumor cells showed abundant cytoplasm and severe nuclear size variation but mitosis was not observed. Immunohistochemical staining of the cell block (CB) showed strong positivity for both synaptophysin and chromogranin A and a Ki-67 labeling index of 3.5%. The surgically resected bile duct mass was pathologically confirmed as NET, G2 with lymphovascular and perineural invasion of the tumor cells. The patient showed no evidence of tumor recurrence 10 months after operation without adjuvant chemotherapy. Suspicion of this rare tumor and immunohistochemical staining of the CB are important for the preoperative diagnosis of NET in the biliary tree.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Rare Locations: Clinicopathological Features and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) occur more often in lungs, gastrointestinal tract, or pancreas. Data about terminology and grading of NETs in rare locations are scarce and variable, and they have been reported mainly as case reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We here describe our experience with NETs in unusual locations. We have reviewed all NETs diagnosed in our institution and summarized their clinicopathological features. We have also reviewed the literature and discussed the main characteristics of NETs in each site.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-three primary NETs were diagnosed. About 55.2% of patients were men and the mean age was 62 years. About 90.7% of NETs were located in lungs, gastrointestinal tract, or pancreas, and 50.8% of them were low-grade tumors. We identified 13 NETs in rare locations: breast, ovary, endometrium, vulva, uterine cervix, extrahepatic biliary tract, kidney, sinonasal tract, and thymus. Three additional tumors were diagnosed by the senior author in other institution. Patients were asymptomatic or presented with nonspecific symptoms. All NETs were treated with surgery and 31% of patients received adjuvant therapy. There were 10 Grade 3 (62.5%), 2 Grade 2 (12.5%), and 4 Grade 1 (25%) tumors. Mean follow-up was 72 months. About 60% of G3 tumors recurred or progressed. G2 tumors were located in breast, and both patients are stable. About 50% of G1 tumors recurred or progressed (both renal NETs).

CONCLUSIONS

NETs in rare locations are heterogeneous, and their behavior does not seem to correlate absolutely with tumor grade. More studies are needed to clarify the role of proliferation rate in these tumors.

Clinicopathological characteristics of biliary neuroendocrine neoplasms: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the clinicopathological features, therapeutic approaches, and prognosis of patients with biliary neuroendocrine neoplasm (NENs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multicenter retrospective study of patients with biliary tract NENs in the gallbladder, the extrahepatic bile duct, or the ampulla of Vater between 2005 and 2014.

RESULTS

Total of 43 patients were included in the study. The median age was 62 years (range: 29-84 years) and 58.1% of the patients were male. The tumors occurred in the gallbladder (n = 11), the extrahepatic bile duct (n = 5) or the ampulla of Vater (n = 27). The liver was the most common metastatic site. Based on the 2010 World Health Organization classification, more patients with gallbladder NENs (11/11 (100%)) had neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 than those with NENs in the ampulla of Vater (10/27 (37.1%)). The median progression free survival time (39.3 vs 5.1 months, p = 0.001) and median overall survival time (46.9 vs 7.9 months, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in patients with ampulla of Vater NENs than gallbladder NENs. A 2010 World Health Organization classification of neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 was independently related to poor overall survival (hazard ratio (HR), 27.1; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.81-260.68; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The 2010 World Health Organization classification of neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 was the only factor related to poor prognosis in patients with biliary neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Recent Updates on Neuroendocrine Tumors From the Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Tracts

CONTEXT

-Gastrointestinal (GI) and pancreatobiliary tracts contain a variety of neuroendocrine cells that constitute a diffuse endocrine system. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from these organs are heterogeneous tumors with diverse clinical behaviors. Recent improvements in the understanding of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts have led to more-refined definitions of the clinicopathologic characteristics of these tumors. Under the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, NETs are classified as grade (G) 1 NETs, G2 NETs, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas. Histologic grades are dependent on mitotic counts and the Ki-67 labeling index. Several new issues arose after implementation of the 2010 World Health Organization classification scheme, such as issues with well-differentiated NETs with G3 Ki-67 labeling index and the evaluation of mitotic counts and Ki-67 labeling. Hereditary syndromes, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome, von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, neurofibromatosis 1, and tuberous sclerosis, are related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts. Several prognostic markers of GI and pancreatobiliary tract NETs have been introduced, but many of them require further validation.

OBJECTIVE

-To understand clinicopathologic characteristics of NETs from the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.

DATA SOURCES

-PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) reports were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

-In this review, we briefly summarize recent developments and issues related to NETs of the GI and pancreatobiliary tracts.

Extrahepatic biliary obstrution secondary to neuroendocrine tumor of the common hepatic duct

•

Extra hepatic biliary obstruction can be frequently caused by tumors.

•

Differentiation between cholangiocarcinoma and an unusual bile duct tumor such as a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is very difficult preoperatively.

•

Prognosis of NET of the extrahepatic bile duct is dependent on the grade of the tumor however is markedly better than cholangiocarcinoma.

•

Unusual biliary tumors can not be diferentiated preoperatively from cholangiocarcinoma.

Introduction

Primary neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the extrahepatic biliary tree are a rare entity with less than 100 reported cases in the literature.

Presentation of case

Here, we report a case of NET of the extrahepatic bile duct in a 64-year-old male patient presenting with painless jaundice, direct hyperbilirubinemia, and mildly elevated transaminases. Diagnostic workup with an ultrasound revealed dilation of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, without cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis. Additional cross sectional imaging identified a stricture at the confluence of the common hepatic and cystic duct junction. Given lack of additional findings presumptive diagnosis of localized klatskin’s tumor was made. The patient subsequently underwent resection of the common bile duct and roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy reconstruction. Final pathologic diagnosis showed G2 well-differentiated NET of the extrahepatic bile duct, measuring 1.3 × 1.1 × 1 cm.

Discussion

When a patient is evaluated for a primary bile duct neoplasm, differentiation between cholangiocarcinoma and an unusual bile duct tumor, such as a NET is very difficult before surgical resection and histologic review.

Conclusion

NET of the extrahepatic biliary tree are a rare entity. Typical presentation is with painless jaundice and other symptoms related to obstruction of the biliary tree and the diagnosis is usually made post-operatively.

Intrahepatic bile duct mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the biliary tract is rare with only a few reported cases. Consequently, knowledge about their pathogenesis, histopathological characteristics and outcomes is sparce.

Case presentation

A 53-year old man presented with epigastric pain on a background of excessive alcohol consumption. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of the liver revealed a central enhancing mass located at the bifurcation of right anterior and posterior portal veins. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated intrahepatic biliary duct dilatation distal to the mass. The patient underwent a right lobe hepatectomy and excision of the extrahepatic biliary tree with formation of a hepaticojejunostomy. Histopathological finding of the specimen revealed an intraductal tumour with predominant neuroendocrine immunohistochemical phenotype and infiltration into nearby tissue. An element of glandular differentiation on immunohistochemistry confirmed the lesion as MANEC.

Conclusions

We present the first reported histopathological case of a MANEC arising from the intrahepatic bile ducts. This report aims to review what is known about primary neuroendocrine and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bile ducts, particularly in comparison to other types of biliary and hepatic tumours.

Neuroendocrine tumors of extrahepatic biliary tract

Neuroendocrine tumors of the extrahepatic bile ducts (EBNETs) are very rare. The aim of the present review is to elucidate the characteristics of EBNETs, their treatment and prognosis. An exhaustive systematic review of the literature was performed from 1959 up-to-date. One hundred articles, describing 150 cases were collected. Each article was carefully analyzed and a database was created. The most common symptoms were jaundice (60.3 %) and pruritus (19.2 %). Cholelithiasis co-existed in 15 cases (19.2 %). Hormone- and vasoactive peptide- related symptoms were present in only 7 cases (9 %). The most frequent sites were found to be the common hepatic duct and the proximal common bile duct (19.2 %). Surgical management was considered the main treatment for EBNETs, while excision of extrahepatic biliary tree (62.82 %) with portal vein lymphadenectomy (43.6 %) was the most popular procedure. EBNETs are extremely rare. Their rarity makes their characterization particularly difficult. Up to date the final diagnosis is made after surgery by pathology and immunohistochemistry findings. The present analysis of the existing published cases elucidates many aspects of these tumours, giving complete clinicopathological documentation.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors with (90)Y-DOTATOC: is treatment response predictable by pre-therapeutic uptake of (68)Ga-DOTATOC?

PURPOSE

PET with (68)Ga-DOTATOC allows for imaging and quantitative assessment of somatostatin receptor expression in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze whether pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT is able to predict response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with advanced stage NET were treated with a fixed dose of (90)Y-DOTATOC (5550 or 3700MBq). Prior to PRRT, each patient received (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. Treatment results were evaluated after 3months by CT, tumor marker levels and clinical course and correlated with (68)Ga-DOTATOC uptake (SUVmax) and the assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC in tumor manifestations (MBq/g). ROC analysis and pairwise comparison of area under the curve (AUC) were performed with pre-treatment uptake of (68)Ga-DOTATOC, assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC and treatment activity alone and in relation to body weight as continuous variables, and response/no response as classification variable.

RESULTS

According to conventional criteria (tumor shrinkage, decrease of tumor markers, improved or stable clinical condition), 20 patients were classified as responders, 16 as non-responders and in four patients findings were equivocal. Using a SUV more than 17.9 as cut-off for favorable outcome, PET was able to predict treatment response of all responders and 15 out of 16 non-responders. All four patients with equivocal findings showed SUV less than or equal to 17.9 and soon experienced tumor progression. The assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC in tumor manifestations using a cut-off more than 1.26MBq/g as predictor of response was able to correctly classify 19 out of 20 responders, and 14 out of 16 non-responders. In all patients with equivocal findings, the assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC was below 1.26MBq/g.

CONCLUSION

Pre-therapeutic (68)Ga-DOTATOC tumor uptake as well as assumed uptake of (90)Y-DOTATOC are strongly associated with the results of subsequent PRRT. The defined cut-off values should be confirmed by prospective studies and may then provide the rationale for individual dosing and selecting patients with high likelihood of favorable treatment outcome.

Well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma originating from the bile duct in association with a congenital choledochal cyst

We encountered a rare case of a well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma originating from the bile duct in association with a congenital choledochal cyst (CCC). The patient is a 28-year-old woman referred to our clinic for pruritus. Laboratory data showed mild elevation of serum hepatobiliary enzymes. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated pancreatobiliary maljunction and a Todani type IV-A CCC from the inferior bile duct to the bilateral intrahepatic bile ducts. A solid tumor was detected in the middle portion of the common bile duct. Pancreatoduodenectomy and total extrahepatic bile duct resection was performed. Based on pathologic and immunohistochemical examinations, a diagnosis of well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma was made according to the World Health Organization criteria. To our knowledge, this is the third report of a neuroendocrine tumor originating from the bile duct in association with a CCC.

Clinical features of 20 patients with curatively resected biliary neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours very rarely occur in the biliary tract; information about them is limited.

AIMS

To present the clinical characteristics and prognosis of curatively resected biliary neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

Review of medical records dated between 2000 and 2010 of 20 patients from three medical centres with biliary neuroendocrine tumour based on curative resection.

RESULTS

Based on the World Health Organization 2010 classification, five and one patients had neuroendocrine tumour grades 1 and 2, seven had neuroendocrine carcinoma, and seven were diagnosed with mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. The locations were the following: seven in the gallbladder, four in the extrahepatic bile duct, and nine in the ampulla of Vater. Lymph node and hepatic metastases were noted in 11 and 4 patients, respectively. Fourteen patients experienced recurrence; most had recurrence in the liver. Patients with neuroendocrine tumour grade 1 had a lower rate of recurrence compared to others (p=0.001). The median disease-free and overall survival times were 5.8 (0.4-53.6) and 13.7 (1.9-102.1) months for all four subtypes. However, the median disease free and overall survival rates of neuroendocrine tumours were significantly longer than those of neuroendocrine carcinomas or mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with biliary neuroendocrine tumour showed extremely different clinical outcomes according to histopathologic subtypes by World Health Organization 2010 classification.