Impact of Transoral Endoscopic Vestibular Approach Thyroidectomy on Pathologic Assessment

Impact of Large Thyroid Nodules (≥4 cm) on Surgical Outcomes Following Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Through the Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic thyroidectomy through the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) is predominantly used in cases involving low-risk thyroid malignancies and benign nodules measuring <4 cm. However, the efficacy and safety of this technique in larger goiters remain underexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared perioperative data and pathologic outcomes among patients who underwent endoscopic BABA thyroidectomy categorized on the basis of the size of the dominant nodule (<4 vs ≥4 cm).

RESULTS

Among the 113 included patients, 81 (72%) had a dominant nodule measuring <4 cm (group 1) and 32 (28%) presented with a nodule measuring ≥4 cm (group 2). Group 2 experienced longer operative times, greater blood loss, and higher drainage volumes than group 1. However, pain scores and length of postoperative hospital stay were similar between the groups. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery. The incidence rates of vocal cord palsy and hypoparathyroidism did not differ significantly between groups. In group 2, three patients developed seroma (9%) and one exhibited delayed bleeding (3%). Pathologic examination revealed that 6 patients (19%) in group 2 had malignant neoplasms; 3 were identified in the dominant nodule, whereas the remaining 3 were identified in separate, smaller nodules. Throughout the mean follow-up period of 43 months, no recurrence or metastasis was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic BABA thyroidectomy is a viable option for patients with large thyroid nodules (≥4 cm); however, this technique requires careful execution.

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: the mid-term oncological outcome

BACKGROUND

Traditional open thyroidectomy is the surgical standard for thyroid cancer; however, it inevitably leaves a visible scar on the neck and affects the patient's quality of life. Therefore, to avoid making a neck incision, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) have been developed recently, and the surgical outcomes of these techniques are as favorable as open surgery for benign disease. Additionally, positive short-term surgical outcomes have also been achieved in a few patients with thyroid cancer. However, no data on the mid-to-long-term recurrence and survival rates of transoral thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer are available. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the surgical outcomes and mid-term oncological results of the TOETVA and TORT in patients with thyroid cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who had received TOETVA or TORT between July 2017 and November 2021 and followed up on their oncological outcomes until December 2022. Perioperative surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 115 patients underwent 122 operations (57 TOETVAs and 65 TORTs), including seven complete thyroidectomies for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), Stage I-II, including T1-T3, N0-N1a, and initial low- to high-risk groups. There was no conversion from transoral to open surgery. TORT required a longer operating time (median [interquartile range]) than TOETVA (lobectomy: 279 [250, 318] vs. 196 [173, 253] min, p < 0.001; bilateral total thyroidectomy: 375 [309, 433] vs. 279 [238, 312] min, p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between the two groups regarding perioperative complications. Complete thyroidectomy with a second transoral approach was safe. TOETVA and TORT achieved favorable oncological outcomes with 100% survival and 98.2% acceptable response (excellent and indeterminate response) during a mean 37.88 ± 12.42 months mid-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy was safe and achieved favorable mid-term oncological outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with early-stage DTC.

Working Space Creation in Transoral Thyroidectomy: Pearls and Pitfalls

Simple Summary

Transoral thyroidectomy accesses the thyroid gland through three incisions in the oral vestibule. The cosmetic outcome was excellent since no scar was observed on the body surface. However, it is challenging to create a working space using this new approach. Unconventional but severe complications can also occur. Our review summarizes the tips regarding working space creation in transoral thyroidectomy and tricks for preventing complications.

Abstract

Transoral thyroidectomy is a novel technique that uses three small incisions hidden in the oral vestibule to remove the thyroid gland. It provides excellent cosmetic results and outcomes comparable to the open approach. One of the main obstacles for this technique is the creation of a working space from the lip and chin to the neck. The anatomy of the perioral region and the top-down surgical view are both unfamiliar to general surgeons. As a result, inadequate manipulation might easily occur and would lead to several unconventional complications, such as mental nerve injury, carbon dioxide embolism, and skin perforation, which are rarely observed in open surgery. Herein, we summarize the basic concepts, techniques, and rationales behind working space creation in transoral thyroidectomy to assist surgeons in obtaining an adequate surgical field while eliminating preventable complications.