Younginer NA, Draper CL. Capacity, Communication, and Coordination Are Key to Successful Implementation of Policy, Systems, and Environmental Strategies at SNAP-Ed Partner Sites in One Southeastern US State: A Qualitative Approach.
J Acad Nutr Diet 2024;
124:169-180. [PMID:
37482267 DOI:
10.1016/j.jand.2023.07.016]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The United States Department of Agriculture expanded the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-Ed program to all 50 states in 2004. In 2010, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act required that agencies implementing SNAP-Ed support policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) strategies, in addition to providing direct education (DE). Research has evaluated the impact of PSEs on health, but few studies have investigated the process of PSE implementation.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to identify facilitators and barriers to PSE implementation at SNAP-Ed partner sites from the perspectives of site contacts and SNAP-Ed implementers.
DESIGN
This study employed a qualitative longitudinal design. The PSE planning and implementation process was observed over 1 year at SNAP-Ed partner sites. Semistructured interviews were conducted with site contacts and SNAP-Ed implementers throughout the year.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING
Participants were SNAP-Ed implementers (n = 8) and site contacts (n = 18) from 18 partner sites where both PSE and direct education were occurring. SNAP-Ed implementers were debriefed once, and site contacts were interviewed three times over the course of the study. This study was conducted in a Southern US state with SNAP-Ed partner sites that intended to implement PSEs. The duration of data collection was October 2017 through September 2018.
ANALYSIS
A thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators to PSE implementation across sites was conducted.
RESULTS
The PSE implementation barriers were lack of site or implementer readiness or capacity; breakdowns in communication; and DE prioritized over PSE. Facilitators were effective communication; site capacity or readiness; and alignment between site and SNAP-Ed goals.
CONCLUSIONS
Communication, capacity, and coordination between SNAP-Ed and partner sites were key components over the timeline of PSE planning and potential implementation.
Collapse