Relationship between the number of glaucoma medications, ocular surface disorder, and treatment adherence

Topical glaucoma medications - Possible implications on the meibomian glands

One of the most common causes of blindness on a global scale is glaucoma. There is a strong association between glaucoma and increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Because of this, adequate IOP-lowering is the most important treatment strategy, mostly through topical eyedrops. Well-functioning meibomian glands are paramount for maintaining a stable tear film, and their dysfunction is the most common cause of dry eye disease. There is a growing concern that both topical glaucoma medications themselves and their added preservatives damage the meibomian glands, and consequently, the ocular surface. Preserved topical glaucoma medications appear to cause dysfunction and atrophy of the meibomian glands. Upon comparison, preserved formulations caused more symptoms of dry eye, tear film instability, inflammatory changes and meibomian gland dropout than the preservative-free counterpart. However, although seemingly less detrimental, unpreserved alternatives may diminish glandular efficacy, and, depending on the active ingredient, lead to glandular death. This negatively impacts quality of life, adherence to treatment regimens and prognosis. In this review, we explore the available evidence regarding the effects of IOP-lowering eye drops on the meibomian glands.

The association between glaucoma treatment adherence with disease progression and loss to follow-up

Prospective cohort study from Brazil to evaluate glaucoma treatment adherence using a medication event monitoring system (MEMS) device and correlate with glaucoma progression and loss to follow-up (LTF) after one year of follow up. We included primary open glaucoma (POAG) patients treated with at least one ocular hypotensive eye drop. MEMS devices was used to monitor adherence for 60 days and evaluate the percentage of doses prescribed taken within the 60-day period. We classified patients according to rates of adherence: low adherence (less than 75% from MEMS measurements) and high adherence (more than 75% from MEMS measurements). We applied a questionnaire to investigated self-reported behavior towards treatment behaviors (glaucoma treatment compliance assessment tool, GTCAT). We also correlated rates of treatment adherence with clinical, demographical variables and the occurrence of glaucoma progression or LTF after one year of observation. We included 110 POAG patients and found that 28.18% of them were considered low adherent. We identify several variables associated with poor adherence such as glaucoma progression, LTF, younger age, low educational and income levels, absence of health insurance, years of disease and peak intraocular pressure. Several constructs from the self-reported GTCAT were also correlated with the rates of treatment adherence. To date, this is the first study in Latin America to evaluate glaucoma treatment adherence with MEMS devices and correlate adherence rates with glaucoma progression and LTF. We found a low-adherence rate of 28.18% and several additional risk factors were statistically associated with poor adherence.