Applicability of respiratory variations in stroke volume and its surrogates for dynamic fluid responsiveness prediction in critically ill patients: a systematic review of the prevalence of required conditions

Transpulmonary thermodilution: A revised correction formula for global end-diastolic volume index derived after femoral indicator injection

PURPOSE

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is usually performed by jugular indicator injection. In clinical practice, femoral venous access is often used instead, resulting in substantial overestimation of global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI). A correction formula compensates for that. The objective of this study is to first evaluate the efficacy of the currently implemented correction function and then further improve this formula.

METHODS

The performance of the established correction formula was investigated in our prospectively collected dataset of 98 TPTD measurements from 38 patients with both, jugular and femoral venous access. Subsequently, a new correction formula was developed: cross validation revealed the favourite covariate combination and a general estimating equation provided the final version, which was tested in a retrospective validation on an external dataset.

RESULTS

Investigating the current correction function revealed a considerable reduction of bias compared to no correction. Concerning the objective of formula development, the covariate combination of GEDVI obtained after femoral indicator injection, age and body surface area is even favoured, when compared to the parameters of the previously published correction formula, as a further reduction of mean absolute error (68 vs. 61 ml/m2), a better correlation (0.90 vs. 0.91) and an increased adjusted R2 (0.72 vs 0.78) is noticed in the cross validation results. Of particular clinical importance is, that more measurements were correctly assigned to the same GEDVI category (decreased / normal / increased) using the revised formula, compared with the gold standard of jugular indicator injection (72.4 vs. 74.5%). In a retrospective validation, the newly developed formula showed a greater reduction of bias (to 2 vs. 6 %) than the currently implemented formula.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently implemented correction function partly compensates for GEDVI overestimation. Applying the new correction formula on GEDVI measured after femoral indicator administration enhances the informative value and reliability of this preload parameter.

Changes in the Cardiac Index Induced by Unilateral Passive Leg Raising in Spontaneously Breathing Patients: A Novel Way to Assess Fluid Responsiveness

Background

Evaluation of fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is crucial. This study was to determine whether changes in the cardiac index (CI) induced by a unilateral passive leg raising (PLR) test in spontaneously breathing patients can estimate fluid responsiveness.

Methods

This was a prospective study, and 40 patients with spontaneous breathing activity who were considered for volume expansion (VE) were included. CI data were obtained in a semirecumbent position, during unilateral PLR, bilateral PLR, and immediately after VE. If the CI increased more than 15% in response to the expansion in volume, patients were defined as responders.

Results

The results showed that a unilateral PLR-triggered CI increment of ≥7.5% forecasted a fluid-triggered CI increment of ≥15% with 77.3% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity with and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.82 [P < 0.001]. Compared with that for bilateral PLR, the area under the ROC curve constructed for unilateral PLR-triggered changes in CI (ΔCI) was not significantly different (p = 0.1544).

Conclusion

ΔCI >7.5% induced by unilateral PLR may be able to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients and is not inferior to that induced by bilateral PLR.

Trial Registration

Unilateral passive leg raising test to assess patient volume responsiveness: Single-Center Clinical Study, ChiCTR2100046762. Registered May 28, 2021.

Inferior vena cava evaluation in fluid therapy decision making in intensive care: practical implications

The fluid resuscitation of patients with acute circulatory failure aims to increase systolic volume and consequently improve cardiac output for better tissue oxygenation. However, this effect does not always occur because approximately half of patients do not respond to fluids. The evaluation of fluid responsiveness before their administration may help to identify patients who would benefit from fluid resuscitation and avoid the risk of fluid overload in the others. The dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness evaluation are promising predictive factors. Of these, the echocardiographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is easy to apply and has been used in the hemodynamic evaluation of intensive care unit patients. However, the applicability of this technique has many limitations, and the present studies are heterogeneous and inconsistent across specific groups of patients. We review the use of the inferior vena cava diameter respiratory variation, measured via transthoracic echocardiography, to decide whether to administer fluids to patients with acute circulatory failure in the intensive care unit. We explore the benefits and limitations of this technique, its current use, and the existing evidence.