Epidemiological assessment and therapeutic response in hypopharyngeal cancer

Hypopharyngeal cancer trends in a high-incidence region: A retrospective tertiary single center study

BACKGROUND

Hypopharyngeal cancer has the bleakest prognosis among head and neck cancers due to its extensive submucosal involvement, advanced tumor stage, and limited surgical reconstruction options. Its primary causes include alcohol consumption, tobacco use, genetic predisposition, 1` diet, and socioeconomic conditions. While squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) accounts for 95% of hypopharyngeal tumors, it remains a rare form, comprising only 3%-5% of all SCC cases in the head and neck region. Globally, Central and Eastern Europe have the highest incidence rates for males (3.9 per 100000) and the third highest for females (2.26 per 100000), underscoring the significance of this seemingly uncommon condition. In Romania, hypopharyngeal cancer ranked 24th in incidence rate, with 634 new cases in 2020.

AIM

To study the incidence, treatment and survival rates of hypopharyngeal tumor cases in a major ear, nose, throat (ENT) surgical center.

METHODS

A retrospective epidemiological clinical study was conducted on patients diagnosed and treated for hypopharyngeal cancer at the ENT department of "Carol Davila Central University Emergency Military Hospital" in Bucharest between January 2018 and August 2022. The study included 53 patients and was authorized by the Ethics Committee of Titu Maiorescu Doctoral School (Bucharest, Romania) and the Ethics Committee of Carol Davila Central University Emergency Military Hospital (Bucharest, Romania). Inclusion criteria required a positive histopathological diagnosis of hypopharyngeal cancer, tumor localization in the hypopharyngeal region, and informed consent for data usage. Exclusion criteria involved major psychiatric pathologies and disagreement for data usage. Diagnosis was based on ENT assessment, imaging reports, and laboratory data. Treatment methods were determined based on various factors. Additional tools, such as Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 and Karnofski Performance Status Scale, were used for risk assessment and functional capacity evaluation. Quality of life aspects were measured using the European Organisation for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Head and Neck-35 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Our retrospective study examined 53 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer between January 2018 and August 2022. The majority of patients were male (94.3%), with an average age at diagnosis of 62.5 years. Among the patients, 20.75% were employed, 66.03% were retired, and 9.43% were unemployed. Smoking was prevalent among 69.81% of patients, while alcohol consumption was frequent in 32.07% of cases. The tumors were mostly diagnosed at an advanced stage (stage IV) and were predominantly SCC. Comorbidities were present in 83.01% of patients, with cardiovascular diseases being the most common. Dysphagia and neck mass were the most common symptoms reported. Treatment methods included surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. A favorable treatment response was observed in 22.64% of cases, while relapse occurred in 6 cases. Follow-up data was unavailable for some patients.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our findings align with existing literature; however, we observed a higher severity.

Evaluation of the prevalence of metachronous second primary malignancies in hypopharyngeal carcinoma and their effect on outcomes

Background

To investigate the clinical characteristics of metachronous second primary malignancies (Met‐SPMs) and its impact on prognosis in hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC).

Methods

We reviewed 593 newly diagnosed HPC patients without invasive synchronous SPMs (Syn‐SPMs) who were treated in our cancer center between 2009 and 2019. According to the status during follow‐up, patients were classified into three groups: (a) without SPMs (No‐SPMs, n = 440), (b) with tumors in situ in the esophagus or stomach (Tis, n = 80), or (c) with Met‐SPMs (n = 73).

Results

The median follow‐up time for entire cohort (n = 593) was 66.7 months. Met‐SPMs were present in 12.3% of the cohort (73/593). The predominant site of SPMs was esophagus, followed by lung, oral cavity, thyroid, stomach, and oropharynx. In Met‐SPMs group, both index tumor and SPMs were the main causes of death. Tis group exhibited comparable 5‐year overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) with that of No‐SPMs group. The Met‐SPMs group had similar 5‐year OS rate and better 5‐year DSS rate of 47.3% versus 43.6% (odds ratio [OR], 0.931; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.681–1.274, p = 0.657) and 66.3% vs. 46.2% (OR, 0.600; 95% CI, 0.402–0.896, p = 0.012), respectively, compared with the No‐SPMs group.

Conclusion

The overall incidence of Met‐SPMs in HPC was 12.3%. The occurrence of Met‐SPMs does not jeopardize the survival outcome of HPC. Routine surveillance of Met‐SPMs was requisite for patients with HPC.

Therapeutic Management of Pyriform Sinus Cancer

Objective To analyze the survival rate of a nonselected pyriform sinus cancer population. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting University hospital. Subjects and Methods A total of 122 patients were included in this study covering the 2002-2008 period. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma originating from the pyriform sinus. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 39.7% and 2.4%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates without recurrence were 34% and 27%, respectively. The median survival rates by UICC stage were as follows: stage 1 and 2 patients, 60 months; stage 3, 40 months; stage 4, 19 months. Stage 4 patients had a lower median survival rate than other stages ( P = .039). The 5-year survival rate was 46% for patients having T3-T4 operable cancers treated by surgery vs 45% for patients treated by laryngeal conservation protocol (not significant). The 5-year survival rate for patients having nonoperable T4 cancers was 17.2%. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of N0 patients was significantly higher than N1 patients ( P = .042). N2 and N3 patients had 100% 5-year mortality. Conclusion This study showed that overall survival and therapeutic management depend on the initial stage of pyriform sinus cancer, notably on the N status. In particular, nonoperable T4 pyriform sinus cancer and N2 and N3 patients had a very poor prognosis. A laryngeal conservation protocol seemed as effective as surgical management in terms of survival.