Prevalence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Adult Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms in a Locality in Upper Egypt

Prevalence and patterns of peptic ulcer disease in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) remains a significant yet poorly understood public health issue in Africa, despite its declining prevalence in Western countries. Studies from Africa report a highly variable burden, with the highest prevalence observed in West Africa and the lowest in Southern Africa. However, the overall burden of PUD in Africa, its patterns (duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers, and coexisting ulcers), and its association with H. pylori infection remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to systematically analyze the pooled prevalence and patterns of PUD in Africa through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA checklist. We searched PubMed, Hinari, and Google Scholar, supplemented by Google and Yahoo search engines. Observational studies reporting the prevalence and patterns of PUD among the African population were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic.

RESULTS

A comprehensive analysis of 58 studies revealed a pooled prevalence of PUD in Africa at 15.2%. The most common ulcer pattern was DU at 10.2%, followed by GU at 5.8%, while 0.6% of cases had both types. Regional variations were observed, with West Africa having the highest prevalence (19%), followed by East Africa (15%), North Africa (12%), and Southern Africa (8%). Among individual countries, Ghana reported the highest prevalence (27%), followed by Ethiopia (19%) and Tanzania (16%). Furthermore, the pooled prevalence of PUD was 14% before 2010 and 15% in 2011 and later. Additionally, 57.1% of patients tested positive for Helicobacter pylori infection, with its prevalence reaching 76.4% among those diagnosed with PUD. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across most analyses, with I2 values exceeding 95% and p-values < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The analysis revealed a significant burden of PUD in Africa, with DU being more common than GU. Regional disparities were observed, with the highest prevalence in West and East Africa. Over the past two decades, the burden has remained relatively stable, reflecting a concerning trend. H. pylori infection was also frequently diagnosed in individuals undergoing endoscopic examination. However, substantial heterogeneity was noted across studies, highlighting variability in reported prevalence.

Indications and endoscopic findings of upper gastrointestinal diseases in Africa: A systematic review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) plays a crucial role in diagnosis of gastrointestinal pathology. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the indications and findings UGIE, while exploring their regional distribution and temporal trend across Africa.

METHODS

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of pooled prevalence for various indications and endoscopic findings were analyzed from multiple studies in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Seventeen common indication were identified. Of these dyspepsia was the most prevalent indication 52.4%, followed by abdominal pain 17.4%, hematemesis 13.9%, and GERD symptoms 11.2%. Other indications included dysphagia 9.2%, vomiting 9.2, odynophagia 3.5%, and melena 6.2% were identified. Rare indications such as anemia 2.3%, weight loss 2.6% were also reported. Regarding endoscopic findings, thirty-one common findings were identified by UGIE. Gastritis (33.3%) was the most common findings followed by normal findings 21.8%, the third most common was PUD 15.1%, particularly duodenal ulcer (10%), gastric cancer 3.3% were also prevalent in stomach. Related to esophageal findings, GERD 9.6%, esophagitis 8.3%, esophageal varices 7.2% and esophageal cancer 6.1% were identified. Regional difference were apparent, with esophageal cancer prevalent in Eastern (10%) and Southern Africa (10%). Gastritis (45%) and GERD (18%) were more apparent and common in Northern Africa. Even though it is not significant, temporal trends showed an increase in prevalence of gastritis (26 to 36%) and esophagitis (6 to 10%) from 2000-2010 to 2011-2024.

CONCLUSION

Most UGIE indications resulted significant UGIT pathology. However, this analysis did not assess age, sex based indications and findings and their relationship among specific indications and UGIE findings. So, future analysis should focus on age and sex based difference in indications and findings, and explore their relationship among specific indication and corresponding UGIE findings.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What Are the Differences?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with EoE predominantly provoked by food and aeroallergens, whereas IBD is driven by a broader spectrum of immunopathological and environmental triggers. This review presents a comprehensive comparison of the pathophysiological and therapeutic strategies for EoE and IBD. We examine the current understanding of their underlying mechanisms, particularly the interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. A crucial element in both diseases is the integrity of the epithelial barrier, whose disruption plays a central role in their pathogenesis. The involvement of eosinophils, mast cells, B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and their associated cytokines is examined, highlighting the importance of targeting cytokine signaling pathways to modulate immune-epithelial interactions. We propose that advances in computation tools will uncover the significance of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in connecting immune and epithelial cells, leading to novel therapies for EoE and IBD.

Prevalence of esophageal eosinophilia in patients referred for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Background

Several conditions are associated with esophageal eosinophilia such as eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to detect the prevalence of esophageal eosinophilia in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms referred for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy. This study included 86 patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy and biopsies.

Results

Esophageal eosinophilia EE was found in 26 patients (30.2%): 3 patients (3.5%) had EoE and 23 patients (26.7%) had low-grade esophageal eosinophilia. The most common presenting symptoms were heart burn in 84 patients (97.7%) and upper abdominal pain in 78 patients (90.7%). Reflux esophagitis (ERD) was observed in 18.6% of patients. In histopathological examination, EoE was found in 3.5%, mild reflux esophagitis in 37.2%, and severe reflux esophagitis in 16.3%. There is statistically significant correlation between EE and male sex, hypertension, dysphagia, hiatus hernia, incompetent cardia, and fixed rings. Age, incompetent cardia, and dysphagia were statistically significant independent predictors of low-grade EE.

Conclusion

Esophageal eosinophilia EE was found in 30.2% of patients: 3.5% had eosinophilic esophagitis EoE and 26.7% had low-grade esophageal eosinophilia.

Clinico-pathological characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis in Jordanian children

Introduction

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder manifested by symptoms of impaired esophageal function and hypereosinophilic esophageal inflammation. It is believed that the number of patients being diagnosed globally is increasing.

Aim

To describe the frequency and clinicopathological features of EoE in Jordanian children.

Material and methods

A retrospective review of all paediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis diagnosed and followed up at our paediatric gastroenterology service at King Abdullah University Hospital between January 2015 and January 2020.

Results

During the study period, 21 patients were diagnosed with EoE out of 700 diagnostic endoscopic procedures. Only 1 (4.8%) female was diagnosed. The average age at presentation was 9.5 years (age range: 1-16 years). The most common manifestation was solid food dysphagia (15, 71.4%), followed by food impaction and vomiting (11, 52.4% and 6, 28.6%, respectively). Atopy was diagnosed in 10 (47.6%) patients. Four (19.0%) had food allergy, 3 (14.3%) had respiratory allergy, and 3 (14.3%) had combined. Linear furrows and circular rings were the most common endoscopic features - 17 (81.0%) and 10 (47.6%), respectively, while papillary elongation, basal zone hyperplasia, and eosinophilic infiltrate were the most common reported histopathological features. Almost all patients received proton pump inhibitors (19, 90.5%). Steroids were used in 18 (85.7%) patients; local steroids in 11 (52.4%), and oral steroids in 7 (33.3%). Out of the 4 (19%) patients with esophageal strictures, 2 (9.5%) required pneumatic dilatation.

Conclusions

Eosinophilic esophagitis is not uncommon in our community. Clinical and histological parameters point to delayed referral and diagnosis. Increasing awareness of this problem will lead to early diagnosis and will decrease complications.