|
1
|
Sherif Naguib M, Khairy A, Shehab H, Abosheaishaa H, Meguid Kassem A. The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study. Arab J Gastroenterol 2024; 25:102-108. [PMID: 38418285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and most CRCs develop from polyps with malignant potential. We aimed to study the difference in polyp detection rate between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopy (SC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was conducted at Cairo University Hospitals on patients referred for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy from July 2018 to August 2020. All included patients underwent back-to-back standard colonoscopy (SC) and ENDOCUFF VISION-assisted colonoscopies (EAC). RESULTS 214 patients were included in this study. In comparison between EAC and SC, EAC increased the polyp detection rate (69 (32.24 %) vs. 57(26.64 %) (p < 0.05), EAC increased the detection of diminutive polyps ≤ 5 mm (104 vs. 81) (p < 0.05), and small polyps 6-9 mm (12 vs. 10) while there was no difference in large polyps ≥ 10 mm. EAC increased the adenoma detection rate (ADR) (37 (17.2 %) vs. 32(14.9 %) (p < 0.05). The findings detected by EAC shortened the interval of surveillance determined by SC findings. EndoCuff caused six mucosal erosions (2.8 %) in patients. CONCLUSION EAC increases the number of detected colonic polyps, primarily small polyps on the left and right sides of the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Sherif Naguib
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Liver Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Khairy
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Liver Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Gastroenterology Division, Endemic Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hany Shehab
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Liver Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Gastroenterology Division, Endemic Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hazem Abosheaishaa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NYC Health + Hospitals Queens, NY, USA.
| | - Abdel Meguid Kassem
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Liver Unit, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Gastroenterology Division, Endemic Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Weissman S, Mehta TI, Stein DJ, Tripathi K, Rosenwald N, Kolli S, Aziz M, Feuerstein JD. Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Assist Devices on Colonic Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:889-894. [PMID: 35324485 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Numerous endoscopic assist devices exist, yet data surrounding their comparative efficacy is lacking. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis to determine the comparative efficacy of endoscopic assist devices on colonic adenoma detection. METHODS A systematic search was performed using multiple electronic databases through July 2020, to identify all randomized controlled trials and dual-arm observational studies compared with either other endoscopic assist devices and/or standard colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated adenoma detection rate (SADR), right-sided adenoma detection rate (RADR), and proximal adenoma detection rate (PADR). RESULTS Fifty-seven studies (31,051 patients) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Network meta-analysis identified an enhanced ADR among (clear) cap [odds ratio (OR): 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45-4.99], endocuff, (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 3.15-7.78), and endoring (OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.47-9.20)-with no significant difference amongst any particular device. Similar findings for PDR were also seen. Enhanced SADR was identified for endocuff (OR: 9.43) and endoring (OR: 4.06) compared with standard colonoscopy. Enhanced RADR (OR: 5.36) and PADR (OR: 3.78) were only identified for endocuff. Endocuff comparatively demonstrated the greatest ADR, PDR, and SADR, but this was not significant when compared with the other assist devices. Subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials identified enhanced PDR and ADR for both cap and endocuff. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic assist devices displayed increased ADR and PDR as compared with standard colonoscopy and thus should be widely adopted. A nonsignificant trend was seen toward higher efficacy for the endocuff device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simcha Weissman
- Department of Medicine, Hackensack Meridian Health Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ
| | - Tej I Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | | | - Kartikeya Tripathi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate Campus, Springfield, MA
| | | | - Sindhura Kolli
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Muhammad Aziz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH
| | - Joseph D Feuerstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Li A, Yang JZ, Yang XX, Feng BC, Zhang MM, Qu JY, Zhou RC, Wang P, Li LX, Zuo XL, Li YQ. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:2066-2073. [PMID: 32562282 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Add-on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC). METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference. RESULTS Of the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta-analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95). CONCLUSION EAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ai Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jing-Ze Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiao-Xiao Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Bing-Cheng Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ming-Ming Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jun-Yan Qu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ru-Chen Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Li-Xiang Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiu-Li Zuo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yan-Qing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Robot Engineering Laboratory for Precise Diagnosis and Therapy of GI tumor, Qilu Hospital, Cheloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|