[LSC (LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY) VERSUS UPHOLD TYPE TVM: A CASE CONTROL STUDY]

Efficacy of Transvaginal Surgery Using an ORIHIME Mesh With Wider Arms and Adjusted Length

INTRODUCTION

Transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) is an effective treatment measure for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, the ORIHIME mesh (Kono Seisakusho, Japan, Tokyo), which has the disadvantage of poor adherence to tissues, is currently the only product available for this procedure. Our research team has previously developed a modified ORIHIME mesh with wider arms with the aim of minimizing the risk of POP recurrence. Additionally, the length of the mesh behind the anterior vaginal wall has been adjusted to prevent urinary incontinence. The current study aims to examine the efficacy of this modified mesh in minimizing postoperative complications in patients undergoing uphold-type TVM.

METHODS

The data of 84 patients who underwent TVM using ORIHIME at our hospital since July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups as follows: (a) normal arms (NA; arm width < 6 cm; n = 29 cases); (b) wide arms without length adjustment (WA and LA (-); arm width > 6 cm; n = 27 cases); and (c) wide arms with length adjustment (WA and LA (+); n = 28 cases). Data were collected using various questionnaires, and the residual urine volume was measured before and after surgery. Additionally, the 60-minute pad test was performed where possible, and the recurrence and complication rates were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of mesh exposure and urinary incontinence in daily life tended to be lower in the WA and LA (+) groups, although this difference was not statistically significant. The one-year postoperative POP recurrence rate, residual urine volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score were significantly lower in the WA and LA (+) groups compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Uphold-type TVM using the modified ORIHIME mesh with wider arms and adjusted length was associated with better postoperative treatment outcomes compared to TVM using the traditional ORIHIME mesh.

Favorable Postoperative Outcomes After Transvaginal Mesh Surgery Using a Wide-Arm ORIHIME® Mesh

Introduction Transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) is an effective treatment option for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although ORIHIME®, the only available mesh product, is thin, soft, and easy to handle, it has the disadvantages of sliding off or mildly adhering to the surrounding tissues. The current study compared the efficacy of using wide-arm ORIHIME (Kono Seisakusho, Japan, Tokyo), non-wide arm ORIHIME, Gynemesh PS (Johnson and Johnson, Japan, Tokyo), and Polyform (Boston Scientific Japan, Japan, Tokyo) meshes for TVM. Methods The study included 116 patients who underwent TVM (Prolift with Gynemesh PS (n = 14); Elevate with Polyform (n = 43); Uphold with non-wide-arm ORIHIME (n = 24); Uphold with wide-arm ORIHIME (n = 35)) at our hospital. Pre- and post-surgical changes in symptoms were measured using questionnaires and 60-minute pad weight testing and compared by mesh type and surgical methods used. Results The residual urine volume, 60-minute pad weight testing, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form score (ICIQ-SF) significantly improved one year postoperatively in the TVM with the wide-arm ORIHIME group. Comparison of pre and one-year postoperative findings by mesh type and surgical methods used showed no significant differences in the 60-minute pad test, IPSS, Quality of Life (QOL), OABSS, and urinary incontinence in daily life scores, and improvement in residual urine volume, ICIQ-SF, and mesh exposure and POP recurrence rates in the TVM with the wide-arm ORIHIME group. Conclusion TVM with wide-arm ORIHIME had better postoperative outcomes compared to TVM with other mesh products.

Comparison of transvaginal mesh surgery and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is greatly affecting the quality of life (QOL) of women. There are some surgical techniques for POP repair, for example, transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM), laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC). In the United States and Europe, the number of TVM has rapidly decreased since 2011 due to complications and safety concerns and has shifted to LSC/RSC. In Japan, RSC has increased after the insurance coverage of RSC in 2020. Therefore, we compared the surgical outcomes of TVM and RSC in POP surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively collected POP surgery underwent TVM or RSC at our hospital and compared the operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and preoperative and postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) of two groups. Preoperative and postoperative SUI were classified into 3 groups: “improved preoperative SUI”, “persistent preoperative SUI” and “de novo SUI”, which occurred for the first time in patients with no preoperative SUI, and compared incidence rate. The Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the two groups, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

From August 2011 to July 2021, 76 POP surgery was performed and they were classified into two groups: TVM group (n = 39) and RSC group (n = 37). There was no difference in patient age and BMI between the TVM and RSC groups. The median of operative time was 78.0 vs. 111.0 min (p = 0.06), blood loss was 20.0 ml vs. 5.0 ml (p < 0.05), and postoperative hospital stay was 4.0 days vs. 3.0 days (p < 0.05), with less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stay in the RSC group. There was no difference in postoperative complications between the TVM and RSC groups (17.9% vs. 16.2%, p = 1.00). De novo SUI was 25.6% vs. 5.4% (p < 0.05) in the TVM and RSC groups, of which 23.1% vs. 5.4% (p < 0.05) occurred within 3 months of surgery.

Conclusion

RSC is more beneficial and less invasive for patients with pelvic organ prolapse than TVM. In addition, de novo SUI as postoperative complication of RSC was lower than of TVM.