1
|
Promny D, Hauck T, Cai A, Arkudas A, Heller K, Wullich B, Apel H, Horch RE, Ludolph I. Abdominal Panniculectomy Can Simplify Kidney Transplantation in Obese Patients. Urol Int 2021; 105:1068-1075. [PMID: 34130304 DOI: 10.1159/000516678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is frequently present in patients suffering from end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, overweight kidney transplant candidates are a challenge for the transplant surgeon. Obese patients tend to develop a large abdominal panniculus after weight loss creating an area predisposed to wound-healing disorders. Due to concerns about graft survival and postoperative complications after kidney transplantation, obese patients are often refused in this selective patient cohort. The study aimed to analyze the effect of panniculectomies on postoperative complications and transplant candidacy in an interdisciplinary setting. METHODS A retrospective database review of 10 cases of abdominal panniculectomies performed in patients with ESRD prior to kidney transplantation was conducted. RESULTS The median body mass index was 35.2 kg/m2 (range 28.5-53.0 kg/m2) at first transplant-assessment versus 31.0 kg/m2 (range 28.0-34.4 kg/m2) at panniculectomy, and 31.6 kg/m2 (range 30.3-32.4 kg/m2) at kidney transplantation. We observed no major postoperative complications following panniculectomy and minor wound-healing complications in 2 patients. All aside from 1 patient became active transplant candidates 6 weeks after panniculectomy. No posttransplant wound complications occurred in the transplanted patients. CONCLUSION Abdominal panniculectomy is feasible in patients suffering ESRD with no major postoperative complications, thus converting previously ineligible patients into kidney transplant candidates. An interdisciplinary approach is advisable in this selective patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Promny
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany,
| | - Theresa Hauck
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Aijia Cai
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Arkudas
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Katharina Heller
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Transplant Center Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Transplant Center Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Hendrik Apel
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.,Transplant Center Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Raymund E Horch
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ingo Ludolph
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery and Laboratory for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Daglilar E, Connolly SE, Tahan V, Cohen A, Therapondos G. The Utilization and Diagnostic Yield of Upper Endoscopy for Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Within the First Year After Liver Transplantation. Cureus 2020; 12:e11323. [PMID: 33282596 PMCID: PMC7717078 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms impact quality of life and increase health care utilization after liver transplantation (LTx). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used to investigate these symptoms. Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic yield and utilization of EGD after LTx for common GI symptoms. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large liver transplant center and included all adults who underwent EGD within the first year after receiving LTx between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Biliary procedures were excluded. Results Of 437 patients who underwent LTx during the study period, 64 (15%) underwent EGD for the evaluation of GI symptoms within the first year of transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 57 (13%) cases were analyzed. GI hemorrhage (hematemesis/melena) was the most common reason (4%; n=18) for evaluation with EGD followed by nausea/anorexia (3%; n=12). Symptoms were investigated with EGD, including epigastric/abdominal pain (2%; n=9), dysphagia/odynophagia (2%; n=8), anemia (1%; n=5), diarrhea (1%; n=4), and heartburn (0.2%; n=1). The diagnostic yield of EGD was highest with GI hemorrhage (83%) followed by dysphagia/odynophagia (75%). EGD diagnostic yield was lower for the other symptoms, ranging from 0% to 25%. Conclusions EGD was commonly utilized within the first year of LTx, with the highest diagnostic yields for GI hemorrhage and dysphagia/odynophagia. Because of the low diagnostic yield of EGD for other symptoms, we recommend a careful selection of patients for EGD following LTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebubekir Daglilar
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA
| | - Sean E Connolly
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, USA
| | - Veysel Tahan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA
| | - Ari Cohen
- Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|