Patients' Communication Preferences Around Cancer Symptom Reporting During Cancer Treatment: A Phenomenological Study

Patient Perceptions of CAR-T Therapy in the USA: Findings from In-Depth Interviews

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized advanced blood cancer treatment. However, preparation, administration, and recovery from these therapies can be complex and burdensome to patients and their care partners. Utilization of an outpatient setting for CAR-T therapy administration could help improve convenience and quality of life.

METHODS

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 patients in the USA with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 10 of whom had completed investigational or commercially approved CAR-T therapy and 8 of whom had discussed it with their physicians. We aimed to better understand inpatient experiences and patient expectations regarding CAR-T therapy and to ascertain patient perspectives on the possibility of outpatient care.

RESULTS

CAR-T offers unique treatment benefits, particularly high response rates with an extended treatment-free period. All study participants completing CAR-T were very positive about their inpatient recovery experience. Most reported mild-to-moderate side effects; two experienced severe side effects. All said that they would opt to undergo CAR-T therapy again. Participants felt that the primary advantage of inpatient recovery was immediate access to care and on-going monitoring. Perceived advantages of the outpatient setting were comfort and familiarity. Because immediate access to care was seen as crucial, patients recovering in an outpatient setting would seek either a direct contact person or phone line for assistance if needed.

CONCLUSION

As institutions become more experienced with CAR-T therapies, outpatient care may help reduce financial strain. Patient input can help institutions improve the outpatient experience and ensure safety and effectiveness of CAR-T programs.

Examining characteristics of descriptive phenomenological nursing studies: A scoping review

AIM

To evaluate the characteristics and methodology consistency in nursing research with descriptive phenomenological design.

DESIGN

Scoping review methodology.

DATA SOURCES

Three electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PubMed) were systematically searched for qualitative studies with a descriptive phenomenological design published in nursing journals between January 2021 and December 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

Quality appraisal of each study was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data were extracted and presented narratively based on research objective, design justification and consistency, theoretical framework, sampling method and sample size, data collection method, data analysis approach and presentation of findings.

RESULTS

One hundred and three studies were included in the review. Overall, the characteristics of the studies are mostly consistent with Husserl's phenomenology approach in terms of research objectives, the use of other theoretical frameworks, sampling and data collection methods. However, the findings revealed several inconsistencies between research design and data analysis techniques, the lack of design justification and the lack of mention of bracketing.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from the need for more research and standardized guidelines to clarify the various qualitative research methods, future nurse researchers are urged to provide more methodological details when publishing a descriptive phenomenological study so that readers can examine the effectiveness and quality of the method.