Early and Midtreatment Mortality in Palliative Radiotherapy: Emphasizing Patient Selection in High-Quality End-of-Life Care

What enlightenment has the development of lung cancer bone metastasis brought in the last 22 years

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer bone metastasis (LCBM) is a disease with a poor prognosis, high risk and large patient population. Although considerable scientific output has accumulated on LCBM, problems have emerged, such as confusing research structures.

AIM

To organize the research frontiers and body of knowledge of the studies on LCBM from the last 22 years according to their basic research and translation, clinical treatment, and clinical diagnosis to provide a reference for the development of new LCBM clinical and basic research.

METHODS

We used tools, including R, VOSviewer and CiteSpace software, to measure and visualize the keywords and other metrics of 1903 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection. We also performed enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses of gene expression datasets from LCBM cases worldwide.

RESULTS

Research on LCBM has received extensive attention from scholars worldwide over the last 20 years. Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have evolved into the mainstream basic and clinical research directions. The basic aspects of drug resistance mechanisms and parathyroid hormone-related protein may provide new ideas for mechanistic study and improvements in LCBM prognosis. The produced molecular map showed that ribosomes and focal adhesion are possible pathways that promote LCBM occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Novel therapies for LCBM face animal testing and drug resistance issues. Future focus should centre on advancing clinical therapies and researching drug resistance mechanisms and ribosome-related pathways.

Stable use of radiotherapy in lymphoma patients over time - A comprehensive national overview of radiotherapy use in Sweden with focus on older patients

Background and purpose

The role of radiotherapy (RT) in lymphoma is constantly refined with the advent of novel treatments. However, RT is still an effective treatment and tolerability is high. Therefore, we aimed to describe the use of RT in primary treatment of lymphoma over calendar time, with a specific focus on older patients (age ≥ 70 years) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes.

Materials & Methods

All adult patients diagnosed with lymphoma from 2007 to 2018 in Sweden were included and followed for survival until end of 2020. Patient characteristics and relative survival (RS) were described for patients with NHL by subtype and RT use.

Results

In the cohort of lymphoma patients aged ≥ 70 years (n = 12,698) 11 % received RT as part of primary treatment. No decline in use of RT over calendar period was seen. Use of RT as monotherapy was associated with stage I-II disease and older age among patients with stage III-IV disease. Patients with indolent lymphomas aged ≥ 70 years who were selected for treatment with RT as monotherapy with a dose of ≥ 20 Gy had 2-year RS rate of 100 % which remained similar at five years. For patients with DLBCL, RT as monotherapy with a dose of ≥ 20 Gy was mostly administered to patients aged ≥ 85 years with a 2-year RS rate of 68 %.

Conclusion

The use of RT in first-line lymphoma treatment was stable over calendar time. RT monotherapy is associated with encouraging outcomes among patients with NHL aged ≥ 70 years who were selected to receive this.

Landscape of mortality during and within thirty days after non-palliative radiotherapy across eleven major cancer types

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Peri-RT mortality (death during or within 30 days of non-palliative radiotherapy) has been historically overlooked, and rates and risk factors are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic cancer, treated with non-palliative external beam radiation (RT) 2004-2016, were identified in the National Cancer Database for 11 cancer types: breast, prostate, non-prostate genitourinary, bone/soft tissue, gynecological, head/neck, lymphoma, gastrointestinal (GI), small cell lung, non-small cell lung, and central nervous system (CNS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of peri-RT mortality controlled for 17 covariates, including patient, tumor, and treatment factors.

RESULTS

Approximately 1.53 million patients were identified. Peri-RT mortality was 2.46% overall, spanning two orders of magnitude from 0.14% for breast to 8.52% for CNS. Peri-RT mortality steadily improved from 3.13% in 2004 to 1.78% in 2016 (P < .0001). Major predictors of peri-RT mortality included age, baseline comorbidity, male sex, and stage (P < .0001). Conversely, higher patient volume at the treating facility and use of more conformal RT planning techniques were moderately protective (P < .0001). Racial disparities varied based on disease site, as Black patients had increased peri-RT mortality for breast, lymphoma, and GI cancers, but not for other cancer types. Lack of private insurance was associated with substantially increased peri-RT mortality regardless of cancer type.

CONCLUSION

Peri-RT mortality varied considerably according to multiple factors. Sociodemographic differences highlight areas of health disparities and opportunities for quality improvement. Early recognition of patients at increased risk may facilitate implementation of closer monitoring or other preventive measures.