Nosocomial Infection Outbreak due to SARS-COV-2 in a Hospital Unit of Particularly Vulnerable Patients

Factors associated with extent of COVID-19 outbreaks: A prospective study in a large hospital network

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated numerous hospital outbreaks. This study aimed to identify factors related to the extent of nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks in the largest French public health institution.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted from July 2020 to September 2021. Outbreaks were defined as at least 2 cases, patients and/or health care workers (HCWs), linked by time and geographic location. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for large outbreaks among nine variables: variant, medical ward, COVID-19 vaccination rate and incidence among HCWs and Paris population, number of weekly COVID-19 tests among HCWs and the positivity rate, epidemic waves.

RESULTS

Within 14 months, 799 outbreaks were identified: 450 small ones (≤6 cases) and 349 large ones (≥7 cases), involving 3,260 patients and 3,850 HCWs. In univariate analysis, large outbreaks were positively correlated to geriatrics wards, COVID-19 incidence, and rate of weekly positive tests among HCWs; and negatively correlated to intensive care units, variant Delta, fourth wave, vaccination rates of the Paris region's population and that of the HCWs. In multivariate analysis, factors that remained significant were the type of medical ward and the vaccination rate among HCWs.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive care unit and high vaccination rates among HCWs were associated with a lower risk of large COVID-19 outbreaks, as opposed to geriatric wards, which are associated with a higher risk.

Nosocomial SARS-COVID-19 Outbreak During the Third Wave of COVID-19 in an Oncology Facility at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kashmir, India

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a life-threatening respiratory condition, especially in immunocompromised patients, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Initially detected in China in December 2019, the first case in India was diagnosed on January 30, 2020. Here we report a nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak among cancer patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) in a medical oncology unit of a tertiary care hospital from our region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive study of the nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak and was conducted in the month of January 2022 at the medical oncology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), India. The study included 25 COVID-19 cases, including patients and HC/non-HCWs (NHCWs). The confirmation of diagnosis was done through real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs as the test sample.

RESULTS

Twenty-five COVID-19 cases, including 14 admitted patients, nine HCWs, and two NHCWs were confirmed by COVID-19 RT-PCR in a span of 11 days. The first case was a positive HCW. The patients were admitted for management of various hematological as well as solid organ malignancies. Of the 14 patients, eight were in the pediatric age group with a mean age of 6.9 years, and six were adults with a mean age of 55.2 years. Thirteen patients were on different chemotherapy protocols, and one was undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant. Of the 14 patients, four were asymptomatic for COVID-19 symptoms, eight had mild disease, and two had severe disease with respiratory failure. Two patients with severe diseases needed COVID-19-designated high-dependency unit (HDU) admission. There was one COVID-19-related death. Among the healthcare workers, the mean age was 33.8 years, of which six were males and three were females. All the HCWs and NHCWs had mild disease, and all of them recovered completely.

CONCLUSION

Nosocomial COVID-19 illness is a new entity and is preventable. COVID-19 illness will remain in society after the pandemic is over, like the influenza B viral illness, and there can be seasonal flares in the future. Proper measures should be taken to prevent its clustering in hospital settings.

Infection control strategies for healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic in German hospitals: A cross-sectional study in march-april 2021

Background

Healthcare workers (HCW) are at risk of getting infected with COVID-19 at work. To prevent such incidents and provide a safe environment in hospitals, comprehensive infection control strategies are necessary. We aimed to collect information on COVID-19 infection control strategies regarding personal protective equipment (PPE), regulations during breaks for HCW and dissemination of pandemic-related information.

Methods

We invited infection control practitioners from 987 randomly selected German hospitals in March-April 2021 to participate in our cross-sectional online survey. We categorized the hospital based on bed capacity (≤499 beds = small; ≥500 beds = large). Fisher's exact test was performed and p < 0.05 defined as statistically significant.

Findings

100 participants completed the questionnaire. Small hospitals were more directive about requiring FFP2 respirators (63%), whereas larger hospitals more often gave their HCW a choice between these and medical masks (67%). For the care of COVID-19 and suspected COVID-19 cases, >90% of the participants recommended the use of gloves. Notably, gloves were recommended beyond COVID-19 in 30% of the hospitals. During meal breaks various strategies were followed.

Conclusion

Recommendations for PPE varied across hospital sizes, which could be due to different assessments of necessity and safety. Regulations during breaks varied strongly which illustrates the need for clear official guidelines.

Nosocomial Omicron Outbreak in a Medical Ward During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Background

The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is 2 to 3 times more contagious than the Delta variant and poses a new challenge in containing transmission in community and health care settings. Transmission in hospitals can cause nosocomial outbreak infections and affect patients and health care workers. This study describes a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in a medical ward. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the transmission source of the outbreak, as well as the measures implemented to prevent and control it.

Methods

A cluster of SARS-CoV-2 infections that affected health care workers, inpatients, and caregivers was thoroughly researched in a medical ward. There were several strict outbreak measures implemented in our hospital, and these measures controlled the nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak in this study.

Results

Seven cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were diagnosed within 2 days in the medical ward. The infection control team declared a nosocomial outbreak of the COVID-19 Omicron variant. Several strict outbreak measures were implemented as follows: 1. The medical ward was closed and cleaning and disinfection were performed. 2. All patients and caregivers with negative test results were transferred to a spare COVID-19 isolation ward. 3. Relatives' visits were not allowed, and no new patient was admitted during the outbreak period. 4. Health care workers were retrained on wearing personal protective equipment and enhanced techniques and practices of hand hygiene, social distancing, and self-monitoring of fever and respiratory symptoms.

Conclusion

This outbreak occurred in a non-COVID-19 ward during the COVID-19 Omicron variant phase of the pandemic. Our strict outbreak measures halted and contained the nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak in 10 days. Future studies are needed to establish a standard policy of COVID-19 outbreak measure implementation.

Healthcare-associated COVID-19 outbreaks: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Background

Aim

Methods

Findings

Conclusion

Hospital acquired COVID-19 infections amongst patients before the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations, a scoping review

Background

Hospital settings are at increased risk of spreading Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, hence non-pharmaceutical prevention interventions (NPPIs) and prioritized vaccination of healthcare workers and resident patients are critical. The status of COVID-19 hospital acquired infections (HAIs) in low-income settings is unclear. We aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence on COVID-19 HAIs amongst patients, prior to the rollout of vaccines in countries worldwide.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review of English peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus using a combination of selected search terms. Full texts articles presenting results on COVID-19 HAIs in hospitalised patients before the rollout of vaccines in countries worldwide were eligible. Data extracted from eligible articles included estimates of COVID-19 HAIs, country, and type of hospital setting, and was summarized narratively. Quality assessment of included articles was not possible.

Results

Literature searches generated a total of 5920 articles, and 45 were eligible for analysis. Eligible articles were from Europe, North America, Asia, and Brazil and none were from low-income countries. The proportion of COVID-19 HAIs ranged from 0% when strict NPPIs were applied, to 65% otherwise. The estimates of COVID-19 HAIs did not differ by country but were lower in studies conducted after implementation of NPPIs and in specialized hospital settings for operative surgery. Studies conducted before the implementation of NPPIs or in long-term care and psychiatric wards often reported high estimates of HAI. Although there was no clear trend in general wards, those situated in academic hospitals managed to reduce HAI rates under strict NPPI protocols. Operative surgery settings, unlike psychiatric settings, effectively prevented COVID-19 HAI using tailored NPPIs.

Conclusion

The available evidence shows a high risk of COVID-19 HAIs, the feasibility of preventing HAIs in different healthcare settings and the importance of appropriately tailored NPPIs. There were no data from low-income settings, therefore, it is unclear whether the reported NPPI approaches could be equally effective elsewhere. We recommend routine monitoring of COVID-19 HAIs in countries with low vaccination coverage, to identify and close gaps in NPPIs and understand gains made from vaccinating healthcare workers and hospitalized patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07128-5.

Ethical review of COVID-19 vaccination requirements for transplant center staff and patients

Transplant centers seeking to increase coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine coverage may consider requiring vaccination for healthcare workers or for candidates. The authors summarize current data to inform an ethical analysis of the harms, benefits, and individual and societal impact of mandatory vaccination, concluding that vaccine requirements for healthcare workers and transplant candidates are ethically justified by beneficence, net utility, and fiduciary duty to patients and public health. Implementation strategies should mitigate concerns about respect for autonomy and transparency for both groups. We clarify how the same arguments might be applied to related questions of caregiver vaccination, allocation of other healthcare resources, and mandates for non-COVID-19 vaccines. Finally, we call for effort to achieve global equity in vaccination as soon as possible.

SARS-CoV-2 transmission among health care workers in Iran: an urgent need for early identification and management

INTRODUCTION

By increasing the rate of COVID-19, particularly in developing countries such as Iran, high numbers of frontline service providers, including doctors and nurses, die and makes frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) more vulnerable to the psychological disorders, fear and anxiety of secondary transmission to others, especially their family members. In this study, we aimed to report the incidence of COVID-19 infection among HCWs in an Iranian referral pediatrics hospital between April 2020 and July 2020.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, HCWs and hospital staff working at Children's Medical Center, Tehran, Iran with positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test results were evaluated between April 2020 and July 2020.

RESULTS

Sixty-one out of the 1085 personnel (5.6%) including 14 pediatricians (23%), 24 nurses (39%), 9 paramedics (15%), and 14 HCWs without direct patient contact (23%) had a nasopharyngeal specimen positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. The mean age was 39.8±10.6 years. Eleven cases (18%) had underlying diseases such as hypertension and asthma. The most common symptoms were fatigue (67%, n=41), dry cough (61%, n=37), fever (52%, n=32), headache (46%, n=28), dyspnea (43%, n=24), anosmia (28%, n=17), chills (26%, n=16), sore throat (26%, n=16), gastrointestinal symptoms (23%, n=14), and productive cough (3%, n=2). Eleven cases (18%) showed lung involvement in their chest X-rays and/or CT scans. Eighteen cases (29.5%) had lymphopenia, and 20 individuals (33%) had a high level of C-reactive protein.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, in the early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak, a substantial proportion of HCWs with fever, respiratory, and other prevalent symptoms including fatigue and headache were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, implementation of infection prevention measures, isolation of confirmed HCWs, disinfection of the environment, and regular COVID-19 prevention training for HCWs are strongly recommended for the wellbeing of health workers and minimizing the spread of infection.