Impact of body mass index on long-term survival outcome in Asian populations with solid cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery: A six-year multicenter observational cohort study

The association of different body weight classes and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The relationship between different weight class and mortality risk remained uncertain in cervical cancer patients. Thus, we conducted the study to assess the association between different body weight classes and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including 6908 cervical cancer patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. A COX regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between different weight classes and time-to-event outcomes of overall survival and cancer-specific survival at three years.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 4.64 ± 2.55 years. Our study revealed that the underweight group had a significantly higher risk of overall death [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.65, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.37, 1.99] than the normal-weight group. Overweight patients had a significantly lower risk of overall death (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.71, 0.93), whereas the obesity group had an insignificant lower risk of overall death (HR = 0.92, 95 % CI = 0.75, 1.13) compared with the reference group.

CONCLUSION

After controlling for confounding factors, underweight patients with cervical cancer had a higher risk of overall death than normal-weight patients with cervical cancer. Our study indicates that underweight cervical cancer patients had a higher risk of overall death compared with normal-weight cervical cancer patients. Furthermore, the overweight patients had a significantly lower risk of overall death. More strategies are needed to be addressed especially in public health field regarding women's weight class and cancer mortality issues.

Underweight as a Risk Factor for Major Intra-abdominal Malignancy Surgeries

Purpose The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative outcomes for oncology surgeries among the Asian population remains controversial. A prevailing perception suggests that excess adiposity is associated with reduced cancer survival. However, several reports have shown that overweight or early obese states confer better survival outcomes. It is hypothesized that patients with better nutrition and surplus calories grant survival advantages to radical cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between BMI and postoperative 30-day and one-year mortality in the Asian population. Methods This retrospective review investigates the postoperative mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and length of hospital stay following major abdominal cancer surgeries within the Asian population. Patients were stratified into three groups based on their BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI 18.5-27.5 kg/m2), and obese (BMI > 27.5 kg/m2). Results A total of 646 patients were included in this study. At 30 days, the underweight group presents an 8% mortality compared to 1% and 3% mortality in the normal BMI and obese groups, respectively. At one year, the low BMI group presents a significant increase in mortality of 53% as opposed to the normal BMI and obese group with mortality rates of 14% and 12%, respectively (p < 0.001). There is a significant increase in the ICU admission rate in the underweight group (n = 13, 25%) compared to the normal BMI and obese groups (n = 26, 6%; n = 8, 6% p < 0.001). Similarly, the group with lower BMI was observed to require a longer hospital stay postoperatively (median (IQR) 11.0 (4.0-24.0)) compared to the normal (median (IQR) 4.0 (3.0-9.0)) and obese (median (IQR) 4.5 (3.0-8.0)) patients. Conclusion Concordant results were observed in the underweight patient group with increased one-year mortality, ICU admission rate, and hospital stay postoperatively. Low BMI presents as an independent risk factor for major radical surgeries.

Association of Obesity With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30, is associated with a significant increase in the risk of many cancers and in overall mortality. However, various studies have suggested that patients with cancer and no obesity (ie, BMI 20-25) have worse outcomes than patients with obesity.

Objective

To assess the association between obesity and outcomes after a diagnosis of cancer.

Data Sources

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to January 2020.

Study Selection

Studies reporting prognosis of patients with obesity using standard BMI categories and cancer were included. Studies that used nonstandard BMI categories, that were limited to children, or that were limited to patients with hematological malignant neoplasms were excluded. Screening was performed independently by multiple reviewers. Among 1892 retrieved studies, 203 (17%) met inclusion criteria for initial evaluation.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were reporting guideline was followed. Data were extracted by multiple independent reviewers. Risk of death, cancer-specific mortality, and recurrence were pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI . A random-effects model was used for the retrospective nature of studies.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer, with and without obesity. Secondary end points were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) or disease-free survival (DFS). The risk of events was reported as HRs with 95% CIs, with an HR greater than 1 associated with a worse outcome among patients with obesity vs those without.

Results

A total of 203 studies with 6 320 365 participants evaluated the association of OS, CSS, and/or PFS or DFS with obesity in patients with cancer. Overall, obesity was associated with a reduced OS (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19; P < .001) and CSS (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.23; P < .001). Patients were also at increased risk of recurrence (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19; P < .001). Conversely, patients with obesity and lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma had better survival outcomes compared with patients without obesity and the same cancer (lung: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98; P = .02; renal cell: HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89; P = .02; melanoma: HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57-0.96; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, obesity was associated with greater mortality overall in patients with cancer. However, patients with obesity and lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma had a lower risk of death than patients with the same cancers without obesity. Weight-reducing strategies may represent effective measures for reducing mortality in these patients.