Primary Care of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the U.S. Military in the Post-Don't Ask, Don't Tell Era: A Review of Recent Progress, Health Needs, and Challenges

HIV Prevention Research With U.S. Military Service Members: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

With the goal of maintaining mission readiness, the U.S. Department of Defense monitors a variety of health behaviors among its active duty military service members, including sexual health, HIV, and other sexually transmitted infections. Newer biomedical approaches to HIV prevention and care (e.g., Treatment as Prevention (TasP) via Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and undetectable = untransmissible of antiretroviral therapy (ART/U = U) have evolved over the last few years and are now available. However, the last systematic review on HIV prevention among military populations was published in 2005, calling for the need to provide an update on what HIV prevention research has been conducted with U.S. active duty service members.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed to identify articles that met pre-determined eligibility criteria. Several electronic databases were searched, including PubMed. The review focused on HIV prevention research conducted with the U.S. Military (i.e., active duty service members). Inclusion criteria for articles centered on population (U.S. active duty service members aged 17 years and older), language (published in English), study focus (epidemiological, intervention), study design (descriptive, quasi-experimental, and experimental), date of publication, and research focus. Studies with a descriptive focus to understand HIV-related risk behaviors, use of prevention strategies (e.g., condoms, testing, PrEP), and prescribing practices for uptake of prevention strategies among U.S. military service members (i.e., by providers, uptake from nonproviders) were included. Studies that focused on intervening or changing HIV risk (i.e., interventions) among U.S. military service members were also included.

RESULTS

The findings in this review were reported based on the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 2,270 articles were identified through electronic databases. Of the 2,270 articles, 809 articles were removed for duplication. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for the remaining 1,461 articles. Of the 1,461 articles, 1,432 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria. In total, 29 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Studies were organized into 3 tables based on study focus and target population (e.g., active duty, U.S. Military service members who were providers vs. nonproviders).

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review describes 29 HIV prevention studies that have been conducted with active duty service members in the U.S. Military since 2000. Overall, most included studies were descriptive, epidemiological studies conducted with active duty service members who were not providers. There were few interventions that reported some success in improving prevention knowledge and condom use. None of the interventions included newer evidence-based strategies of TasP. Although some research had been conducted about PrEP, particularly with providers, there is a clear need for additional studies and interventions to include TasP, given the evidence base of these approaches for reducing acquisition and/or onward transmission of HIV.

PrEP Prescription Among MSM U.S. Military Service Members: Race and Sexual Identification Matter

An estimated 20.9% of U.S. service members report a high risk of HIV infection; however, only 2,000 service members had accessed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as of 2017. This study used a cross-sectional design to explore PrEP prescription predictors among service members who identify as a man who have sex with other men (MSM) (n = 354). Logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of four predictor variables: partner HIV status, race/ethnicity, primary partner gender, and sexual orientation on the odds participants' report being prescribed PrEP. A majority identified as gay (n = 246, 69.5%) and 23.4% (n = 83) identified as bisexual. Bisexual participants were 2.1 times (p = <.04) less likely to be prescribed PrEP. Accordingly, those who identify their primary sex partner as female were 5.1 times less likely to be prescribed PrEP (p < .001). MSM service members who had a partner disclose their HIV-positive status were 4.1 times more likely to have been prescribed PrEP (p = .013). Finally, participants who identify as Black were 3 times more likely (p = .001), and Latinx MSM were 3.6 times more likely (p = .003) to have been prescribed PrEP.

"That's kind of like the big struggle right now is can we get PrEP?": Facilitators and Barriers to PrEP Uptake Among Active Duty Gay and Bisexual Men

Introduction

The US Military is experiencing a rise in HIV infections among gay and bisexual men (GBM) serving on active duty, yet little is known about this population's uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an evidence-based intervention for HIV prevention. This mixed methods study examines the facilitators and barriers to PrEP access and uptake among active duty GBM.

Methods

Active duty GBM were recruited using respondent-driven sampling (2017 and 2018). Participants (n = 93) answered quantitative survey questions on PrEP interest and accessibility. Another set of participants (n = 10) discussed their PrEP experiences in qualitative interviews. We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses of quantitative data, while qualitative data were analyzed using structural and descriptive coding techniques.

Results

Approximately 71% of active duty GBM indicated interest in accessing PrEP. A greater proportion of those who disclosed (vs. did not disclose) their sexual orientation to their military doctor discussed (p < 0.001) or accessed (p = 0.017) PrEP. The following qualitative themes emerged: (1) providers' negative views and knowledge gaps related to PrEP; (2) lack of a systems approach to PrEP access; (3) confidentiality concerns; and (4) reliance on peer networks for PrEP guidance and support.

Conclusions

Study results indicate that active duty GBM are interested in and want to discuss PrEP with their military doctors, but gaps in providers' PrEP-related knowledge and skills, as well as mistrust in the military health care system, remain.

Policy Implications

A system-wide approach that addresses confidentiality concerns and removes procedural barriers to PrEP access is recommended to improve PrEP uptake in this population.

Challenges for accessing and maintaining good quality of HIV care among men who have sex with men living with HIV in China: a qualitative study with key stakeholders

HIV care in China is shifting toward a community-based model involving a wide range of stakeholders. We aimed to understand key stakeholders' perceived challenges of providing high-quality care for men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV. In-depth interviews were conducted with a diverse sample of stakeholders (N = 17) in two Chinese cities, including providers, policymakers, and community workers. Interviews focused on stakeholders' challenges in HIV-related work and perceived barriers for MSM in accessing and maintaining HIV care. Thematic analysis strategies were used. Three cross-cutting themes related to accessibility and quality of care (QoC) emerged. First, MSM- and HIV-related stigma were perceived to increase the risk of MSM dropping out of care. While acknowledging stigma, some providers also expressed discriminatory views such as stereotypes of the MSM community. Second, stakeholders expressed concerns about QoC including healthcare workforce shortages, limited training opportunities, and high work stress while facing increasingly unmet needs from clients. Third, stakeholders shared challenges in mobilizing community resources to expand HIV care including unclear division of responsibility and strict auditing. Supportive policies and resources may be needed to bolster China's primary care workforce and MSM-competent care and, more broadly, high QoC for sexual and gender minority patients.

Military Healthcare Providers' Knowledge and Comfort Regarding the Medical Care of Active Duty Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Patients

Purpose: This study assessed military healthcare providers' knowledge, clinical practice, and comfort in caring for active duty (AD) lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) patients.

Methods: Primary care providers at Fort Bragg, North Carolina were surveyed anonymously.

Results: The response rate was 28% (n = 40). Almost two-thirds of the respondents felt comfortable discussing sexual health with AD patients, but only 5% inquired about same-sex sexual activity. Slightly less than one-third reported prior training in LGB healthcare topics and nearly four-fifths desired clear guidance from the Department of Defense regarding the process for screening and documentation of AD same-sex sexual activity.

Conclusion: The findings highlight providers' need and desire for training in LGB patient care.