Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis About Helminth Immunotherapy

Patient listening on social media for patient-focused drug development: a synthesis of considerations from patients, industry and regulators

Patients, life science industry and regulatory authorities are united in their goal to reduce the disease burden of patients by closing remaining unmet needs. Patients have, however, not always been systematically and consistently involved in the drug development process. Recognizing this gap, regulatory bodies worldwide have initiated patient-focused drug development (PFDD) initiatives to foster a more systematic involvement of patients in the drug development process and to ensure that outcomes measured in clinical trials are truly relevant to patients and represent significant improvements to their quality of life. As a source of real-world evidence (RWE), social media has been consistently shown to capture the first-hand, spontaneous and unfiltered disease and treatment experience of patients and is acknowledged as a valid method for generating patient experience data by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). While social media listening (SML) methods are increasingly applied to many diseases and use cases, a significant piece of uncertainty remains on how evidence derived from social media can be used in the drug development process and how it can impact regulatory decision making, including legal and ethical aspects. In this policy paper, we review the perspectives of three key stakeholder groups on the role of SML in drug development, namely patients, life science companies and regulators. We also carry out a systematic review of current practices and use cases for SML and, in particular, highlight benefits and drawbacks for the use of SML as a way to identify unmet needs of patients. While we find that the stakeholders are strongly aligned regarding the potential of social media for PFDD, we identify key areas in which regulatory guidance is needed to reduce uncertainty regarding the impact of SML as a source of patient experience data that has impact on regulatory decision making.

Axenic Caenorhabditis elegans antigen protects against development of type-1 diabetes in NOD mice

Studies in humans and animals have demonstrated that infection with helminths (parasitic worms) is protective against a range of hyperinflammatory diseases. A number of factors limit translation into clinical use, including: potential contamination of helminths obtained from infected humans or animals, lack of batch to batch stability, and potential pathological risks derived from live worm infections. To overcome these limitations we tested whether an antigen homogenate of the non-pathogenic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans confers protection against type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) using the Non Obese Diabetic (NOD) mouse model.

Our study demonstrates that twice weekly intraperitoneal injections of axenically cultured C. elegans antigen (aCeAg) confers substantial protection against type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Whereas 80% of control mice (PBS-injected) developed clinical disease, only 10% of aCeAg-treated mice became diabetic. Additionally, aCeAg treated mice had significantly greater numbers of insulin-producing pancreatic islets and greater numbers of islets negative for lymphocyte infiltration. Immunological changes observed in aCeAg treated mice included increases in total IgE and total IgG1, consistent with induction of a type 2 immune response similar to that typically seen in parasitic worm infection. Although evidence suggests that helminth infections induce strong immunoregulatory signals, we did not observe significant changes in regulatory T cell numbers or in production of the regulatory cytokines TGFβ and IL-10. The lack of a regulatory response may be due to our time point of observation, or perhaps the mechanism of aCeAg efficacy may differ from that of helminth infection.

Discovery that antigens obtained from a non-parasitic environmental nematode replicate the protective phenotype induced by parasitic worm infections may accelerate our ability to develop nematode-derived therapies for allergy and autoimmune diseases.

•

Axenically cultured C. elegans is protective against T1D in NOD mice.

•

aCeAg protection is comparable to helminth immune therapy in NOD mice.

•

aCeAg administration induces total IgE and total IgG similar to helminth infection.

•

aCeAg does not induce TLR4 nor antigen-specific IgE activity.

•

aCeAg efficacy finding may aid in nematode therapy for hyperinflammatory diseases.