Contribution of the MLH1 -93G>a promoter polymorphism in modulating susceptibility risk in Malaysian colorectal cancer patients

DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variants in Sporadic Solid Cancers

The phenotypic effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the development of sporadic solid cancers are still scarce. The aim of this review was to summarise and analyse published data on the associations between SNPs in mismatch repair genes and various cancers. The mismatch repair system plays a unique role in the control of the genetic integrity and it is often inactivated (germline and somatic mutations and hypermethylation) in cancer patients. Here, we focused on germline variants in mismatch repair genes and found the outcomes rather controversial: some SNPs are sometimes ascribed as protective, while other studies reported their pathological effects. Regarding the complexity of cancer as one disease, we attempted to ascertain if particular polymorphisms exert the effect in the same direction in the development and treatment of different malignancies, although it is still not straightforward to conclude whether polymorphisms always play a clear positive role or a negative one. Most recent and robust genome-wide studies suggest that risk of cancer is modulated by variants in mismatch repair genes, for example in colorectal cancer. Our study shows that rs1800734 in MLH1 or rs2303428 in MSH2 may influence the development of different malignancies. The lack of functional studies on many DNA mismatch repair SNPs as well as their interactions are not explored yet. Notably, the concerted action of more variants in one individual may be protective or harmful. Further, complex interactions of DNA mismatch repair variations with both the environment and microenvironment in the cancer pathogenesis will deserve further attention.

Genetic Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Pathways in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinogenesis

DNA repair systems play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and stability of the genome, which mainly include base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR) and double-strand break repair (DSBR). The polymorphisms in different DNA repair genes that are mainly represented by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can potentially modulate the individual DNA repair capacity and therefore exert an impact on individual genetic susceptibility to cancer. Sporadic colorectal cancer arises from the colorectum without known contribution from germline causes or significant family history of cancer or inflammatory bowel disease. In recent years, emerging studies have investigated the association between polymorphisms of DNA repair system genes and sporadic CRC. Here, we review recent insights into the polymorphisms of DNA repair pathway genes, not only individual gene polymorphism but also gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, in sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis.

Relevance of hMLH1 -93G>A, 655A>G and 1151T>A polymorphisms with colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 38 case-control studies

OBJECTIVE

There has been increasing interest in the study of the association between human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) gene polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, results from previous studies are inconclusive. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to derive a more precise estimation of the effects of this gene.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature databases until January 1, 2018. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the strength of the association.

RESULTS

Finally, 38 case-control studies in 32 publications were identified met our inclusion criteria. There were 14 studies with 20668 cases and 19533 controls on hMLH1 -93G>A, 11 studies with 5,786 cases and 8,867 controls on 655A>G and 5 studies with 1409 cases and 1637 controls on 1151T>A polymorphism. The combined results showed that 655A>G and 1151T>A polymorphisms were significantly associated with CRC risk, whereas -93G>A polymorphism was not significantly associated with CRC risk. As for ethnicity, -93G>A and 655A>G polymorphisms were associated with increased risk of CRC among Asians, but not among Caucasians. More interestingly, subgroup analysis indicated that 655A>G might raise CRC risk in PCR-RFLP and HB subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Inconsistent with previous meta-analyses, this meta-analysis shows that the hMLH1 655A>G and 1151T>A polymorphisms might be risk factors for CRC. Moreover, the -93G>A polymorphism is associated with the susceptibility of CRC in Asian population.

Pooling-analysis on hMLH1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: evidence based on 31,484 cancer cases and 45,494 cancer-free controls

To elucidate the veritable relationship between three hMLH1 polymorphisms (rs1800734, rs1799977, rs63750447) and cancer risk, we performed this meta-analysis based on overall published data up to May 2017, from PubMed, Web of knowledge, VIP, WanFang and CNKI database, and the references of the original studies or review articles. 57 publications including 31,484 cancer cases and 45,494 cancer-free controls were obtained. The quality assessment of six articles obtained a summarized score less than 6 in terms of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). All statistical analyses were calculated with the software STATA (Version 14.0; Stata Corp, College Station, TX). We found all the three polymorphisms can enhance overall cancer risk, especially in Asians, under different genetic comparisons. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we found a moderate association between rs1800734 and the risk of gastric cancer (allele model: OR = 1.14, P = 0.017; homozygote model: OR = 1.33, P = 0.019; dominant model: OR = 1.27, P = 0.024) and lung cancer in recessive model (OR = 1.27, P = 0.024). The G allele of rs1799977 polymorphism was proved to connect with susceptibility of colorectal cancer (allele model: OR = 1.21, P = 0.023; dominate model: OR = 1.32, P <0.0001) and prostate cancer (dominate model: OR = 1.36, P <0.0001). Rs63750447 showed an increased risk of colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer and gastric cancer under all genetic models. These findings provide evidence that hMLH1 polymorphisms may associate with cancer risk, especially in Asians.

Intronic and promoter polymorphisms of hMLH1/hMSH2 and colorectal cancer risk in Heilongjiang Province of China

PURPOSE

Given that mismatch repair (MMR) system plays an important role in recognizing and removing insertion/deletion mutations which occur during DNA replication, common variants associated with impaired MMR system may thus increase risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate the associations between common variants in two MMR genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2) and CRC risk.

METHODS

We genotyped 10 intronic/promoter single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in 451 CRC patients and 630 controls. Associations between genotypes and CRC risk were estimated using odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals. Gene-gene interactions, as well as gene-environment interactions on CRC risk were also investigated.

RESULTS

We found that IVS15-214T>C and IVS11 + 107A>G of hMSH2 were significantly associated with CRC risk. In dominant model, variant carriers of the two SNPs could decrease risk of CRC by 31 % (ORadj = 0.69, 95 % CI 0.53-0.91, p < 0.01) and 33 % (ORadj = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47-0.95, p = 0.02), respectively. In addition, IVS7-212T>A, IVS11+183A>G and IVS8+719T>C of hMSH2 were associated with the susceptibility to colon cancer rather than rectal cancer. ATTTGGGT and TCTTAGAC haplotypes were associated with 44 and 45 % decreased risk of CRC, respectively, while ATTTGAGT and TTTCAGAC haplotypes were associated with 1.37-fold and 2.49-fold increased risk of CRC, respectively. There was a significant three-way gene-gene interaction among hMSH2 IVS11+107A>G, IVS11+183A>G and IVS8+719T>C (p < 0.01). Significant gene-environment interactions were observed between hMSH2 IVS15-214T>C and IVS11+107A>G and cereals consumption (both with p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that intronic SNPs, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in hMSH2 might be associated with susceptibility to CRC.

Association of DCC, MLH1, GSTT1, GSTM1, and TP53 gene polymorphisms with colorectal cancer in Kazakhstan

This study presents the first results of a molecular-genetic study of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Kazakhstan. Blood samples were collected from patients diagnosed with rectal or colon cancer (249 individuals) as well as a control cohort of healthy volunteers (245 individuals), taking into account the age, gender, ethnicity, and smoking habits of the CRC patients. Combined analysis of data obtained from individuals of either Kazakh or Russian decent showed a significant association with increased CRC risk in the following genotypes: DCC (32008376G/G and G/A versus A/A; OR = 3.45, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) = 1.75-6.81, χ (2) = 14.07, p < 0.0002), MLH1 (-93G/G versus G/A and A/A; OR = 1.45, 95 %CI = 1.02-2.07, χ (2) = 4.21, p < 0.04), TP53 (Pro72Pro; OR = 3.80, 95 %CI = 2.46-5.88, χ (2) = 61.27, p < 0.0001), combination GSTT1 deletions with heterozygotes versus normal homozygotes (OR = 1.43, 95 %CI = 1.00-2.04, χ (2) = 3.90, p < 0.05), and GSTM1 deletions (OR = 1.83, 95 %CI = 1.28-2.63, χ (2) = 11.04, p < .001). Analysis for ethnicity and smoking for each of the investigated polymorphisms showed that some genotypes can have a predictive value for susceptibility to CRC, at least those that demonstrate statistically significant ORs either for the combined mixed population of Kazakhstan or for both main ethnic groups separately (Kazakhs and Russians): TP53 Pro72Pro homozygous (for Kazakh-OR = 3.40, 95 %CI = 1.63-7.06, χ (2) = 11.35, p < 0.003; for Russian-OR = 4.69, 95 %CI = 2.53-8.66, χ (2) = 53.19, p < 0.0001) and GSTM1 deletions (for Kazakh-OR = 2.30, 95 %CI = 1.21-4.40, χ (2) = 8.42, p < 0.01; for Russian-OR = 1.64, 95 %CI = 1.01-2.66, χ (2) = 7.82, p < 0.02).

Evaluation of endoscopic characteristics of upper gastrointestinal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a disease inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. Most FAP patients develop upper gastrointestinal polyps; especially those in the antrum and duodenum are usually neoplastic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of gastroduodenal polyps in Iranian FAP patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

28 patients affected by FAP underwent front-view and side-view endoscopy. Papillary biopsies were performed in all patients. Location of polyps, their number and size, pathology study, patient general information (gender, age, family history of FAP or colorectal cancer and gastroduodenal polyps) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Gastric polyps were seen in 39.3 % of patients. Some 72.7% of the affected individuals had fundic gland polyps and 36.36% had hyperplastic polyps. Duodenal adenoma was observed in 25% of patients. While 57% of patients had tubular adenoma with low grade dysplasia, 42.8% showed tubulovillous adenoma with low grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this study indicated that the prevalence of gastroduodenal polyps in FAP patients is high and dysplasia may be evident in duodenal polyps. Therefore, it appears that routine gastroduodenal endoscopy in FAP patients is necessary.