Risk of serious neutropenic events in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab: a meta-analysis

Trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (FTD/TPI + BEV) has shown efficacy and tolerability in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because randomized controlled trial (RCT) data comparing FTD/TPI + BEV with FTD/TPI are lacking, this meta-analysis evaluated outcomes with both regimens.

Data Sources and Methods

Electronic databases, congress proceedings (past 3 years), trial registries, systematic review bibliographies, gray literature, and guidelines through June 2021 were searched for RCTs, non-RCTs, and prospective observational studies involving >20 previously treated patients with mCRC receiving FTD/TPI + BEV or FTD/TPI. Absolute and relative disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse event (AE) rates, and discontinuation rates due to AEs were evaluated using fixed-effects and random-effects models. Study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed.

Results

In all, 29 of 875 screened publications were selected (26 studies: 5 RCTs, 11 non-RCTs, and 10 prospective observational studies). One RCT compared FTD/TPI + BEV with FTD/TPI. FTD/TPI + BEV versus FTD/TPI had a higher absolute DCR [64% (6 studies; n = 289) versus 43% (10 studies; n = 2809)], median PFS [4.2 (5 studies; n = 244) versus 2.6 (6 studies; n = 1781) months], 12-month PFS [9% (5 studies; n = 244) versus 3% (6 studies; n = 1781)], median OS [9.8 (5 studies; n = 244) versus 8.1 (6 studies; n = 1814) months], and 12-month OS [38% (5 studies; n = 244) versus 32% (6 studies; n = 1814)]. Grade ⩾3 febrile neutropenia, asthenia/fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting rates were similar (1%-7%). Grade ⩾3 neutropenia rate was higher with FTD/TPI + BEV than with FTD/TPI [43% (6 studies; n = 294) versus 29% (12 studies; n = 7139)]. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar [8% (5 studies; n = 244) and 7% (10 studies; n = 3724)]. Low study quality, heterogeneity, and/or publication bias were detected in certain instances.

Conclusion

Despite fewer patients treated with the combination, this meta-analysis consistently suggested that FTD/TPI + BEV provides benefits over FTD/TPI in refractory mCRC and has similar safety, except for more frequent grade ⩾3 neutropenia.

Risk and Incidence of Infection with Bevacizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis suggested that use of bevacizumab is associated with an increased risk of infection in cancer patients. With the continuous accumulation of evidence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a focused meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials to quantify the relative risk and incidence of infectious complications in those individuals treated with bevacizumab.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies were prospective randomized clinical trials of NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab with toxicity data on infectious complications. Relative risk (RR), overall incidence rates, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 4,545 patients from 14 prospective RCTs (randomized controlled trials) were included for the meta-analysis. Treatment with bevacizumab was not associated with an increased risk of all grade (RR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.84 - 1.49) or high grade (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.86 - 1.41) infections, respectively. The summary incidences of all-grade and high-grade infection in patients receiving bevacizumab in the treatment group were 16.4% (95% CI: 15.7 - 17.2%) and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.0 - 6.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of bevacizumab is not associated with a significantly higher risk of infections in NSCLC patients. These data provide reassurance regarding the risk of incidence of infection in patients with NSCLC receiving bevacizumab.

Chemotherapy induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia among breast cancer patients in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria

Purpose

This study assessed the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) while identifying their associated factors.

Methods

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 113 female chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients over a 2-year period. Socio-demographic, clinical and haematological data were obtained via semi-structured interviews and from medical case files. Blood samples for complete blood count parameters were collected 2 weeks after each course of chemotherapy. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 was used to assess FN, neutropenia and their severity.

Results

The incidence of neutropenia and FN among the patients was 31.9% and 5.3%, respectively. Throughout all courses of chemotherapy (n = 502), there were 57 (11.4%) neutropenic episodes with 6.6% mild, 3.4% moderate and 1.4% severe neutropenia. The incidence of neutropenia decreased with increasing chemotherapy courses, with a rate of 14.2% and 4.9% after the first and last course, respectively. Factors associated with the risk of developing neutropenia include increasing age (p = 0.014), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≥ 1 at presentation (p = 0.033) and presence of bone metastasis (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

One in three breast cancer patients in this study developed neutropenia while on chemotherapy but no independent risk factors were identified for FN among these patients. This study has, therefore, provided the preliminary data necessary for further independent validation of the identified risk factors for FN in a more robust and well-designed study within our clinical practice setting in Nigeria.

Immune phenotype of tumor microenvironment predicts response to bevacizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of ER-positive breast cancer

Antiangiogenic drugs are potentially a useful supplement to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a subgroup of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer, but reliable biomarkers for improved response are lacking. Here, we report on a randomized phase II clinical trial to study the added effect of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FEC100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) and taxanes (n = 132 patients). Gene expression from the tumors was obtained before neoadjuvant treatment, and treatment response was evaluated by residual cancer burden (RCB) at time of surgery. Bevacizumab increased the proportion of complete responders (RCB class 0) from 5% to 20% among patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors (P = .02). Treatment with bevacizumab was associated with improved 8-year disease-free survival (P = .03) among the good responders (RCB class 0 or I). Patients treated with paclitaxel (n = 45) responded better than those treated with docetaxel (n = 21; P = .03). Improved treatment response was associated with higher proliferation rate and an immune phenotype characterized by high presence of classically activated M1 macrophages, activated NK cells and memory activated CD4 T cells. Treatment with bevacizumab increased the number of adverse events, including hemorrhage, hypertension, infection and febrile neutropenia, but despite this, the ECOG status was not affected.

Pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Phase 1 cohorts from the KEYNOTE-021 study

OBJECTIVES

Platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has modest benefit overall, but has the potential to amplify immune responses. In cohorts A-C of the multicohort phase 1/2 study KEYNOTE-021 (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02039674), we evaluated combinations of platinum-doublet chemotherapy with the anti-programmed death 1 monocloncal antibody pembrolizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations were randomized to pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W plus carboplatin area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 mg/mL/min plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m² (cohort A, any histology), carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m² plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (cohort B, non-squamous), or carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² (cohort C, non-squamous) for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pembrolizumab (cohort A), pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab (cohort B), or pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed (cohort C). Response was assessed by blinded independent central review.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients were randomized; median follow-up was 21.4, 16.4, and 17.4 months in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in any cohort at either pembrolizumab dose. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were alopecia, fatigue, and nausea. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 40%, 42%, and 46% of patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively; AEs with possible immune etiology occurred in 24%, 50%, and 38% of patients, respectively. Objective response rates were 48%, 56%, and 75% in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel and with pemetrexed-carboplatin yielded encouraging antitumor activity and toxicity consistent with known toxicities of platinum-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Risk of hematological toxicities in patients with solid tumors treated with ramucirumab: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis of the risk of hematological adverse events associated with ramucirumab.

METHODS

Eligible studies included randomized Phase II and III trials of patients with solid tumors on ramucirumab, describing events of anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

RESULTS

A total of 11 clinical trials were considered eligible for the meta-analysis. The relative risks of all-grade anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96; p = 0.007), 1.13 (95% CI: 0.85-1.49; p = 0.41), 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08-1.44; p = 0.002), 1.63 (95% CI: 1.30-2.06; p < 0.0001), 1.91 (95% CI: 1.52-2.42; p < 0.00001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis has demonstrated an increased risk of febrile neutropenia, all-grade and high-grade neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with ramucirumab-based treatment compared with control.