1
|
Kim J, Park W, Kim JH, Choi DH, Kim YJ, Lee ES, Shin KH, Kim JH, Kim K, Kim YB, Ahn SJ, Lee JH, Chun M, Lee HS, Kim JS, Cha J. Clinical Significance of Lymph-Node Ratio in Determining Supraclavicular Lymph-Node Radiation Therapy in pN1 Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Breast-Conserving Treatment (KROG 14-18): A Multicenter Study. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11050680. [PMID: 31100839 PMCID: PMC6562682 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the clinical significance of the lymph-node ratio (LNR) and its usefulness as an indicator of supraclavicular lymph-node radiation therapy (SCNRT) in pN1 breast cancer patients with disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with pN1 breast cancer who underwent partial mastectomy and taxane-based sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with postoperative radiation therapy in 12 hospitals (n = 1121). We compared their DFS according to LNR, with a cut-off value of 0.10. The median follow-up period was 66 months (range, 3–112). Treatment failed in 73 patients (6.5%) and there was no significant difference in DFS between the SCNRT group and non-SCNRT group. High LNR (>0.10) showed significantly worse DFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses (0.010 and 0.033, respectively). In a subgroup analysis, the effect of SCNRT on DFS differed significantly among patients with LNR > 0.10 (p = 0.013). High LNR can be used as an independent prognostic factor for pN1 breast cancer patients treated with partial mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. It may also be useful in deciding whether to perform SCNRT to improve DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea.
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea.
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
| | - Yeon-Joo Kim
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea.
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul 07804, Korea.
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea.
| | - Sung-Ja Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Korea.
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul 06591, Korea.
| | - Mison Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea.
| | - Hyung-Sik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University School of Medicine, Busan 49201, Korea.
| | - Jung Soo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju 54907, Korea.
| | - Jihye Cha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju 26426, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Strom T, Torres-Roca JF, Parekh A, Naghavi AO, Caudell JJ, Oliver DE, Messina JL, Khushalani NI, Zager JS, Sarnaik A, Mulé JJ, Trotti AM, Eschrich SA, Sondak VK, Harrison LB. Regional Radiation Therapy Impacts Outcome for Node-Positive Cutaneous Melanoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15:473-482. [PMID: 28404758 PMCID: PMC7771284 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Background: Regional radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to reduce the risk of regional recurrence with node-positive cutaneous melanoma. However, risk factors for regional recurrence, especially in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), are less clear. Our goals were to identify risk factors associated with regional recurrence and to determine whether a radiosensitivity index (RSI) gene expression signature (GES) could identify patients who experience a survival benefit with regional RT. Methods: A single-institution, Institutional Review Board-approved study was performed including 410 patients treated with either SLNB with or without completion lymph node dissection (LND; n=270) or therapeutic LND (n=91). Postoperative regional RT was delivered to the involved nodal basin in 83 cases (20.2%), to a median dose of 54 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy) in 27 fractions (range, 5-30). Primary outcomes were regional control and overall survival by RSI GES status. Results: Median follow-up was 69 months (range, 13-180). Postoperative regional RT was associated with a reduced risk of regional recurrence among all patients on univariate (5-year estimate: 95.0% vs 83.3%; P=.036) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio[HR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.43; P<.001). Among higher-risk subgroups, regional RT was associated with a lower risk of regional recurrence among patients with clinically detected lymph nodes (n=175; 5-year regional control: 94.1% vs 69.5%; P=.003) and extracapsular extension (ECE) present (n=138; 5-year regional control: 96.7% vs 62.2%; P<.001). Among a subset of radiated patients with gene expression data available, a low RSI GES (radiosensitive) tumor status was associated with improved survival compared with a high RSI GES (5-year: 75% vs 0%; HR, 10.68; 95% CI, 1.24-92.14). Conclusions: Regional RT was associated with a reduced risk of regional recurrence among patients with ECE and clinically detected nodal disease. Gene expression data show promise for better predicting radiocurable patients in the future. In the era of increasingly effective systemic therapies, the value of improved regional control potentially takes on greater significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobin Strom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Javier F. Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Akash Parekh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O. Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jimmy J. Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Daniel E. Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jane L. Messina
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Dermatology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Nikhil I. Khushalani
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jonathan S. Zager
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Amod Sarnaik
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - James J. Mulé
- Center for Translational Research, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Andy M. Trotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Steven A. Eschrich
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Vernon K. Sondak
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Pathology & Cell Biology and Dermatology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Louis B. Harrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu H, Li M, Zhou Y, Wang F, Li X, Wang L, Fan Q. S100A4 participates in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer via targeting MMP2. Tumour Biol 2015; 37:2925-32. [PMID: 26409452 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3709-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that S100A4 acquires its metastasis-promoting effects via inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, its role and mechanism in EMT in breast cancer had not been clearly elucidated. Herein, we showed that the knockdown of S100A4 expression in breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468, inhibited not only cell invasion ability greatly, but also the occurrence of EMT significantly. In addition, S100A4 knockdown could also decrease the expression of MMP2, a promoter and a mediator of the EMT processes in cancer. Above all, restoring the expression of MMP2 in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 could not only rescue the invasion ability inhibited by knockdown of S100A4, but also reverse the EMT suppressed by knockdown of S100A4. In summary, our results indicated that S100A4 could promote the invasion ability of breast cancer cells via EMT, more importantly, it could participate in EMT via regulating MMP2 in breast cancer. Therefore, S100A4 could be a candidate biomarker for defining breast cancer metastasis and useful target for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Xu
- Department of Breast Disease Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengquan Li
- Department of Breast Disease Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangke Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Liuxing Wang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingxia Fan
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He ZY, Wu SG, Zhou J, Sun JY, Li FY, Lin Q, Guo L, Lin HX. Benefit of post-mastectomy radiotherapy of the supra-/infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area in breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 15:5557-63. [PMID: 25081664 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.14.5557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the survival benefit of radiotherapy (RT) of the supra- and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area in Chinese women with T1-2N1M0 breast cancer receiving mastectomy. METHODS A total of 593 cases were retrospectively reviewed from 1998 to 2007. The relationship between supra- or infraclavicular fossa relapse (SCFR) and post-operative RT at the supra-/infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area was evaluated. RESULTS The majority of patients (532/593; 89. 8%) received no RT while 61 patients received RT. The median follow-up was 85 months. Among patients without RT, 54 (10. 2%) developed recurrence in the chest wall or ipsilateral SCFR. However, none of the 61 patients who underwent RT demonstrated SCFR. One patient who received RT (1. 6%) experienced recurrence in the chest wall. Univariate analysis revealed that age and molecular subtype (both P < 0. 05) were two prognostic factors related to supraclavicular and infraclavicular fossa relapse-free survival (SFRFS). Multivariate analysis revealed that only Her-2 positive status (P = 0. 011) was an independent predictor of SFRFS. RT had no influence on distant metastasis (P = 0. 328) or overall survival (P = 0. 541). SCFR significantly affected probability of distant metastasis (P < 0. 001) and overall survival (P < 0. 001). CONCLUSION Although RT was not significantly associated with SFRFS, postoperative RT was significantly associated with a lower locoregional (i. e. , supraclavicular/infraclavicular and chest wall) recurrence rate. SCFR significantly influenced distant metastasis-free survival, which significantly influenced the overall survival of T1- 2N1M0 breast cancer patients after mastectomy. Thus, prophylactic RT is recommended in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients, especially those who have Her-2 positive lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China E-mail : hezhy@sysucc. org. cn
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|