Timing of thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer: results of early versus late irradiation from a single institution in Turkey

Thoracic radiotherapy timing and prognostic factors in elderly patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer

Objective

This study assessed the outcomes of elderly patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), which may be linked to the timing of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) following chemotherapy.

Methods

Elderly patients (n = 78) with LS-SCLC were divided into three groups depending on the timing of radiotherapy. The patients in the TRT group were stratified into early (TRT after 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 29), medium-term (TRT after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 33), and late (TRT after 5-6 cycles of chemotherapy, n = 16) TRT groups. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed and compared.

Results

The medium-term TRT group demonstrated significantly longer mPFS (20.12 months) and better mOS (35.97 months) than those in the other groups (PFS: P = 0.021;OS: P = 0.035). A pairwise comparison of the three groups revealed that those who received medium-term TRT exhibited significantly improved PFS than the early (mPFS: 20.12 vs. 10.36 mouths, P = 0.018) and late (mPFS: 20.12 vs. 9.17 months, P = 0.016) TRT. The medium-term TRT group demonstrated significantly improved OS than the early TRT (mOS: 35.97 vs. 25.22 months, P = 0.007) but not in comparison with the late TRT (mOS: 35.97 vs. 21.63 months, P = 0.100).

Conclusion

In elderly patients with LS-SCLC, the addition of TRT after 3-4 cycles of chemotherapy appears to be a viable and potentially beneficial treatment approach.

Progress in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor that is prone to spread extensively. Compared to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC treatment progresses slowly. Although SCLC is highly sensitive to chemotherapy during the initial treatment, most patients still experience resistance and recurrence after receiving chemotherapy. A meta-analysis demonstrated that thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) improves overall survival in SCLC. The results of the CALGB and CONVERT trials provide evidence for the efficacy of once-daily high-dose TRT. TRT at 60 Gy administered twice daily significantly improved survival without increasing toxicity. The long-standing debate over the optimal timing of radiotherapy has not been fully resolved. SBRT has excellent local control rates and is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with stage I or II SCLC. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is used to reduce treatment-related neurotoxicity to the extent that there has been a recent discussion on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring can replace PCI. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improves the survival rate of patients with NSCLC; however, its clinical effectiveness has not been systematically explored in patients with SCLC. Therefore, we summarize the evolving therapeutic strategies, (TRT for limited stage-SCLC and consolidative TRT for extensive stage-SCLC) and improved radiotherapy techniques (role of SBRT in stage I or II node-negative SCLC, progress of PCI, and stereotactic radiosurgery), and discuss the possibilities and prospects of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for SCLC.

No survival benefit with early incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy using daily fractionation in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy in the modern era: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

When concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is administered for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), the early incorporation of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is generally recommended. However, it is controversial if this approach is really beneficial with most commonly used daily fractionated TRT in the modern era.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using several databases following the PRISMA guidelines from Jan 2000 to Nov 2022. We excluded twice-daily TRT-based studies. The hazard ratio (HR) for survival following late TRT as a primary effect size was pooled from comparisons within individual studies according to the timing of daily fractionated TRT (early vs. late).

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies including 10,164 analyzable patients met all inclusion criteria. 'Early' timing usually referred to TRT within 1-2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. The pooled results demonstrated that the risk of death was not significantly increased following late TRT compared with early TRT (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84-1.20, p = 0.94). All sensitivity analysis and planned subgroup analyses showed similar results. In comparison with early TRT, late TRT did not significantly increase the risk of progression (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11, p = 0.48). Furthermore, late TRT was beneficial in alleviating grade 3 or higher esophagitis (OR 0.42, p = 0.01), but no significant differences was found in pneumonitis (OR 0.62, p = 0.38), and neutropenia (OR 0.57, p = 0.11). No evidence of publication bias was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first meta-analysis to support the late incorporation of TRT in managing patients with LS-SCLC undergoing daily fractionated CCRT in the modern era. This approach may not compromise survival and can prevent severe acute toxicities. Further prospective studies of the daily fractionated TRT timing are warranted.

Optimal timing of thoracic irradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future prospects

Lung cancer is a global health concern as the leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) poses a formidable challenge to the treating physicians with the worst prognosis among all lung cancers. However, limited stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) has a relatively better outcome with multimodality management. Efforts have been focused on optimal integration of treatment modalities to achieve an improved therapeutic ratio for patients with LS-SCLC. While chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) are primary components of initial management for LS-SCLC, there is no consensus on optimal timing of TRT. Within this context, we herein provide a concise overview of current evidence and future prospects regarding the optimal timing of thoracic irradiation for LS-SCLC in light of the literature.

The Addition of Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Indexes to Nomogram Improves the Predictive Accuracy of Survival in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

Accumulated evidence for systemic inflammation response in several solid tumors prompts a possibility of prediction of patients’ prognosis in a more accessible and valuable manner. However, the prognostic value of peripheral blood inflammatory markers in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic values of pretreatment inflammatory indexes in LS-SCLC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 334 patients with LS-SCLC and collected their pretreatment serum levels of neutrophil, platelet, lymphocyte, leukocyte, hemoglobin, and albumin, then neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic inflammation index (SII) were calculated. Patients were dichotomized as low-Risk or high-Risk group based on their corresponding cutoff values. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted with a Cox proportional hazards model. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis was performed to construct the inflammation-related prognostic scoring system named Risk for OS. Nomograms were established to provide prognostic information, allowing for more individualized prediction of survival.

Results

Higher pretreatment platelet, lymphocyte, and albumin were indicators of favorable overall survival (OS), whereas higher NLR and SII were accompanied by inferior OS. The prognosis of patients with high Risk was significantly worse than that with low Risk in both the training group and the validation group (both p < 0.001). Comparable area under the curve (AUC) values between the training group and the validation group were observed, yielding 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates of 67.3% vs. 69.2%, 66.8% vs. 69.5%, and 66.7% vs. 71.4%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that Risk [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.551, p < 0.001] was an independent negative prognostic indicator for OS, which was further verified in the validation set. The addition of Risk to nomogram (C-index = 0.643) harbored improved predictive accuracy for OS when compared with that of clinical factors alone (C-index = 0.606); the AUC values of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 71.7% vs. 66.4%, 73.5% vs. 66.6%, and 71.9% vs. 65.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Pretreatment peripheral blood inflammatory indexes may be a noninvasive serum biomarker for poor prognosis in LS-SCLC. The addition of Risk to the nomogram model could serve as a more powerful, economical, and practical method to predict survival for patients with LS-SCLC.

Sequential Versus Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy in Combination With Cisplatin and Etoposide for N3 Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

At present, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered the standard treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, LS-SCLC is highly heterogeneous in the T stage, N stage, and prognosis. Increasing evidence has shown that individual treatment should be considered when treating LS-SCLC patients. The aim of the present study was to explore the optimal combination model of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and chemotherapy in N3 LS-SCLC. We retrospectively analyzed 93 N3 LS-SCLC patients treated in the Department of Oncology of Binzhou Medical University Hospital (Shandong, China) between March 2010 and October 2015. A total of 52 (52/93; 55.9%) patients received sequential CRT, and 41 (41/93; 44.1%) patients received concurrent CRT. All patients received 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy and TRT (50-60 Gy). The median follow-up time was 25.4 months (range was 6-65 months).The overall response rate was 88.5% in the sequential CRT group (9.6% complete response rate and 78.8% partial response rate) and 90.2% in the concurrent CRT group (14.6% complete response rate and 75.6% partial response rate). The PFS and OS were 15.4 months and 19.1 months in sequential CRT group, and 16.9 months and 20.5 months in concurrent CRT group. There was no significant difference in treatment response rate, PFS, and OS between sequential and concurrent CRT patients. The most common treatment-related toxicities were nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and esophagitis. In conclusion, when concurrent CRT is performed in N3 LS-SCLC patients, tolerance to treatment should be fully considered. In our study, sequential CRT and concurrent CRT showed the same efficacy, and sequential CRT demonstrated better tolerance. However, these results require confirmation in future follow-up studies.