PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can either be examined with hybrid PET/MR imaging systems or sequentially, using PET/CT and MR imaging. Regardless of the acquisition technique, the superiority of MR imaging compared to CT lies in its potential to interrogate tumor and surrounding tissues with different sequences, including perfusion and diffusion. For this reason, PET/MR imaging is preferable for the detection and assessment of locoregional residual/recurrent HNSCC after therapy. In addition, MR imaging interpretation is facilitated when combined with PET. Nevertheless, distant metastases and distant second primary tumors are detected equally well with PET/MR imaging and PET/CT.

Biological target volume based on fluorine-18-fluorode-oxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging: a spurious proposition?

PURPOSE

To assess whether the high metabolic region of fluorine-18-fluorode-oxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) in the primary lesion is the crux for recurrence in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), to assess the feasibility and rationale for use of biological target volume (BTV) based on ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT).

METHODS

The retrospective study included 33 patients with NPC who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT at the time of initial diagnosis as well as the time of diagnosis of local recurrence. Paired ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT images for primary and recurrent lesion were matched by deformation coregistration method to determine the cross-failure rate between two lesions.

RESULTS

The median volume of the V_pri (primary tumor volume using the SUV thresholds of 2.5), the V_high (the volume of high FDG uptake using the SUV50%max isocontour), and the V_recur (the recurrent tumor volume using the SUV thresholds of 2.5) were 22.85, 5.57, and 9.98 cm³, respectively. The cross-failure rate of V_recur∩high showed that 82.82% (27/33) of local recurrent lesions had < 50% overlap volume with the region of high FDG uptake. The cross-failure rate of V_recur∩pri showed that 96.97% (32/33) of local recurrent lesions had > 20% overlap volume with the primary tumor lesions and the median cross rate was up to 71.74%.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT may be a powerful tool for automatic target volume delineation, but it may not be the optimal imaging modality for dose escalation radiotherapy based on applicable isocontour. The combination of other functional imaging could delineate the BTV more accurately.

PET/MR in Head and Neck Cancer - An Update

In academic centers, PET/MR has taken the road to clinical nuclear medicine in the past 6 years since the last review on its applications in head and neck cancer patients in this journal. Meanwhile, older sequential PET + MR machines have largely vanished from clinical sites, being replaced by integrated simultaneous PET/MR scanners. Evidence from several studies suggests that PET/MR overall performs equally well as PET/CT in the staging and restaging of head and neck cancer and in radiation therapy planning. PET/MR appears to offer advantages in the characterization and prognostication of head and neck malignancies through multiparametric imaging, which demands an exact preparation and validation of imaging modalities, however. The majority of available clinical PET/MR studies today covers FDG imaging of squamous cell carcinoma arising from a broad spectrum of locations in the upper aerodigestive tract. In the future, specific PET/MR studies are desired that address specific histopathological tumor entities, nonepithelial malignancies, such as major salivary gland tumors, squamous cell carcinomas arising in specific locations, and malignancies imaged with non-FDG radiotracers. With the advent of digital PET/CT scanners, PET/MR is expected to partake in future technical developments, such as novel iterative reconstruction techniques and deviceless motion correction for respiration and gross movement in the head and neck region. Owing to the still comparably high costs of PET/MR scanners and facility requirements on the one hand, and the concentration of multidisciplinary head and neck cancer treatment mainly at academic centers on the other hand, a more widespread use of this imaging modality outside major hospitals is currently limited.