Computer tomography and magnetic resonance image manifestations of primary hepatic neuroendocrine cell carcinomas

Comparison of primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-hepatitis B non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the sonographic features of primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNETs) to those of non-hepatitis B and non-hepatitis C hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Materials and methods

Fourteen patients with a mean age of 56.9 ± 12.2 (SD) years with histopathologically confirmed PHNET were included in the study. Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 58.5 ± 10.4 years with histopathologically confirmed NBNC-HCC were randomly selected as the control group. The clinical data, conventional ultrasound and CEUS features were retrospectively analyzed between PHNET and NBNC-HCC.

Results

PHNET was more common in women (57.1%, 8/14 cases), and NBNC-HCC was more common in men (75.0%, 21/28) (P=0.040). No significant differences were observed in etiology, tumor marker, and liver function between the two group (P>0.05). Conventional ultrasound revealed that the tumor size of PHNET (10.1 ± 4.7 cm) was larger than that of NBNC-HCC (5.9 ± 3.8 cm) (P=0.006). NBNC-HCC was predominantly hypoechoic, while the echogenicity of PHNET varied (P=0.001). On CEUS, 57.1% (8/14) of PHNETs showed heterogeneous hyperenhancement, whereas 77.0% (21/28) of NBNC-HCC presented homogeneous hyperenhancement (P=0.015). Furthermore, 35.7% (5/14) of PHNETs showed early washout (onset of washout <60 s), which was significantly different from that of NBNC-HCC (3.7%, 1/28) (P=0.005).

Conclusion

CEUS is helpful in discriminating between PHNET and NBNC-HCC. PHNETs mainly present as a single mass with a large size (>10 cm) in the liver. The CEUS showed that most PHNETs exhibited heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase, washout in the portal venous and late phases and early washout being more likely than NBNC-HCC. However, more imaging features need to be evaluated in a larger sample.

Three-in-one incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, and neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is rare, and a combination with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is extremely rare. To date, only four combination cases have been reported. The present paper describes the fifth patient.

CASE SUMMARY

A 32-year-old Chinese man with chronic hepatitis B was hospitalized for persistent upper abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) examination revealed a liver mass. The tumor was located in the 7th and 8th segments of the liver, and CT and magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with the diagnosis of HCC. Laboratory examinations revealed the following: Alanine aminotransferase, 243 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase, 167 U/L; alpha-fetoprotein, 4519 μg/L. Laparoscopic right lobe hepatectomy was performed on the liver mass. Postoperative pathology showed low differentiation HCC plus medium and low differentiation CCA combined with NEC. One month after the surgery, the patient suffered from epigastric pain again. Liver metastasis was detected by CT, and tumor transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed. Unfortunately, the liver tumor was progressively increased and enlarged, and after 1 mo, the patient died of liver failure.

CONCLUSION

This is a rare case, wherein the tumor is highly aggressive, grows rapidly, and metastasizes in a short period. Imaging and laboratory tests can easily misdiagnose or miss such cases; thus, the final diagnosis relies on pathology.

A fat containing combined neuroendocrine carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver: A case report

A 79-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of increased hepatobiliary enzyme levels. Dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a liver tumor measuring 60mm containing fat foci at the cranial aspect of the tumor. We diagnosed the patient with hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and fat deposition, and performed a caudate lobe resection. Pathology examination revealed two intermingled components: moderately differentiated HCC with fat deposition and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Primary combined NEC and HCC is extremely rare. To our knowledge, this is the first report of combined NEC and HCC including a fat component. HCC is the most common primary hepatic malignancy with fat. HCC might include fat, even if HCC coexists with another type of cancer. The imaging characteristics of and HCC with another type of cancer vary depending on the amount of each component. We should not simply diagnose such tumors as HCC, but think about the possibilities of HCC with another type of cancer, because there is a fat component.

Hepatic neuroendocrine tumors: gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings with an emphasis on differentiation between primary and secondary tumors

PURPOSE

To describe the findings of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (hNET) and to identify the features that differentiate secondary from primary tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between August 2008 and December 2014, 50 patients with pathologically proven hNETs who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging with diffusion-weighted images were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had primary (n = 17) or secondary (n = 33) hNETs. Qualitative values based on a consensus between two observers [morphologic findings, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern (poor or indeterminate; hepatocellular carcinoma-like or cholangiocarcinoma-like)], and quantitative values (apparent diffusion coefficient) were evaluated as predictors of secondary hNETs using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the presence of multiple lesions (p = 0.011), a tumor size less than 6.3 cm (p = 0.001), and a hepatocellular carcinoma-like enhancement pattern (p = 0.031) were significant independent factors for differentiating secondary from primary hNETs, and achieved a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 82%, and an accuracy of 88%, with a value of the area under the ROC curve of 0.931.

CONCLUSION

Using these specific MR imaging criteria, secondary hNETs could be differentiated from primary hNETs with a high degree of accuracy in patients with histopathologically proven hNETs.

Comparative Clinical Analysis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Liver Metastasis and Primary Hepatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Purpose

The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical features and prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) with liver metastasis and primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PHNECs), as these rare hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas have not been exhaustively studied.

Methods

The clinical data of 47 patients with hepatic NECs were retrospectively reviewed and categorized to analyze features and prognosis.

Results

The 47 studied cases comprised 13 cases of primary hepatic NECs (primary group) and 34 cases of metastatic hepatic NECs (metastatic group). Male patients were slightly dominant in both groups, while no age predilection was present. PHNECs were mostly single nodules located in the right lobe of the liver. Metastatic hepatic NECs originated mostly from the pancreas and stomach without distinction of the lobes of the liver. Univariate analysis showed that the treatment protocol (radical operation or others) was correlated with the overall survival (OS; p < 0.05) in the primary group, while treatment protocol and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) were associated with OS (p < 0.05) in the metastatic group. Cox proportional hazard regression showed that radical operation was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.05) for OS in the metastatic group.

Conclusions

No significant differences in the clinicopathological features between PHNECs and metastatic hepatic GEP NECs were found, but radical operation was significantly correlated with OS for both carcinomas. Radical operation is the first choice for patients who are eligible for operation.

Combination therapies for primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report

Background

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas are extremely rare. Because of the rarity of PHNEC, its clinical features and treatment outcomes are not well understood. A proper diagnosis and the correct therapeutic approach therefore remain clinically challenging.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old man was admitted to our department because of a liver tumor. Computed tomography revealed a single liver tumor 50 mm in diameter and located in the S3 region. Biopsy and imaging findings resulted in a diagnosis of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Left lateral segmentectomy was performed. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56. Ki-67 was positive in > 90% of the tumor cells. The final diagnosis was primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. The patient suffered two episodes of lymph node recurrence. Nonetheless, the tumor was excised to prolong survival. Thus, after lymphadenectomy, he received adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. Two years after surgery, the patient remains alive and in good general condition.

Conclusions

In most cases, primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma, while extremely rare, has a poor prognosis. At present, surgical resection is a priority for curative treatment, but in patients with recurrence, combined therapies are recommended.

MR imaging of primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm and metastatic hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a comparative study

PURPOSE

To investigate MR characteristics in differentiating primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PHNEN) from metastatic hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (MHNEN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with histopathologically proven liver neuroendocrine neoplasm were retrospectively analyzed. The morphological and MR signal features on T1, T2-weighted, dynamic-enhanced, and diffusion-weighted imaging were evaluated and compared between the PHNEN group (n = 12) and the MHNEN group (n = 27).

RESULTS

The tumor size (P = 0.0084), number (P = 0.017), distribution (P = 0.000), contour (P = 0.041), the presence of capsule-like enhancement (P = 0.034), tumor homogeneity (P = 0.018) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (P = 0.024) were different between PHNENs and MHNENs. Large, solitary or massive-growing nodules with lobulated or irregular contour, capsule-like enhancement, heterogeneous signals or lower ADC values supported the diagnosis of PHNEN compared with MHNEN. ROC analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.746, when the optimal cutoff value of 1.049 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was used, a sensitivity of 63.0 % (95 % CI, 44.2-79.4 %), a specitivity of 80.0 % (95 % CI, 50.1-96.4 %), a positive predictive value of 89.5 % (95 % CI, 70.9-98.2 %), and a negative predictive value of 44.4 % (95 % CI, 23.4-67.0 %) can be achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI may provide valuable information for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PHNENs and MHNENs.