Incidence and risk of thromboembolism associated with bevacizumab in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma

Background

Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is effective for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, severe adverse events (AEs) have been reported in NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab. Currently, the contribution of Bevacizumab to thromboembolism is still controversial. We conducted a study to determine the overall risk and incidence of thromboembolism with bevacizumab in NSCLC patients.

Methods

Electronic databases such as the PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for related trials. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the overall incidence rates, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random-effect or fixed-effect models depending on the heterogeneity. We also used trial sequence analysis (TSA) to verify the pooled result.

Results

A total of 3,555 subjects from nine studies were included. The overall incidence of thromboembolism events in NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab was 4.8% (95% CI: 1.9-7.7%). Without bevacizumab, this incidence was 2.9% (95% CI: 0.6-5.1%). Bevacizumab use was associated with a significantly increased risk in thromboembolism events (OR =1.74; 95% CI: 1.15-2.62; P=0.008). Subgroup analysis based on the doses showed that bevacizumab administered at 15 mg/kg (OR =1.81; 95% CI: 1.14-2.86; P=0.012), but not 7.5 mg/kg (OR =1.32; 95% CI: 0.78-2.24; P=0.296), increased the risk of thromboembolism.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab is associated with a significantly increased risk of thromboembolism development in NSCLC patients. It may have dose-toxicity relationship and low dose of bevacizumab may be a better choice for NSCLC patients, with equal efficacy and low hazard of thromboembolism events.

Current FDA-approved treatments for non-small cell lung cancer and potential biomarkers for its detection

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading worldwide cancer with almost 1.5 million deaths every year. Some drugs for lung cancer treatment have been available on the market for decades, but novel drugs have emerged promising better outcomes, especially for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), which represents 75% of lung cancer cases. However, how much do drugs have evolved for NSCLC treatment? Are they sharing the same mechanism of action?

AIM

In this review we analyzed how the approved drugs by Federal Drug Agency for NSCLC have advanced in the last four decades identifying shared mechanism of action of medicines against NSCLC treatment and some of the potential biomarkers for early detection.

RESULTS

Cisplatin and its derivatives are still the most used therapy in combination with some other more specific drugs. However, increasing the survival rates seems to be a great challenge and research is moving into early detection through biomarkers but also trying to identify molecules such as those derived from the immune system, cell-free DNA, non-coding RNAs, but also polymorphisms to detect early tumor formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin and derivatives have been one of the most successful therapies in spite of their side effects and low specificity. Some of the drugs developed after cisplatin discovery, have been targeted the epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, programmed cell death 1 ligand and vascular endothelial growth factor. Since none of the pharmacological treatments in combination with radiation/surgery have extended dramatically the survival rate, research is now focused in early cancer detection in combination with precision medicine, which attempts to treat patients individually according to their stage and tumor characteristics.

XELOX plus bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab treatment for first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer: a retrospective study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology

BACKGROUND

XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%) , stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95%CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95%CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95%CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95%CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev.