Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma - a Case Series of Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Primary Sites Treated with Chemo-Radiotherapy

A comparison of the outcomes of pulmonary versus extrapulmonary extensive-stage small cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas (EPSCCs) are rare cancers, comprising 0.1-0.4% of all cancers. The scarcity of EPSCC studies has led current treatment strategies to be extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC), justified by analogous histological and clinical features.

AIMS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes of extensive-stage (ES) SCLC and EPSCC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ES SCLC or EPSCC between 2010 and 2020 from four hospitals in Sydney were identified. Patients who received active treatment and best supportive care were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rates (ORRs).

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-four patients were included (43 EPSCC vs. 340 SCLC). EPSCC were of genitourinary (n = 15), unknown primary (n = 13) and gastrointestinal (n = 12) origin. Treatment modalities for EPSCC compared to SCLC included palliative chemotherapy (56% vs 73%), palliative radiotherapy (47% vs 59%) and consolidation chest radiotherapy (10% of SCLC). Overall, median OS was 6.4 versus 7 months for EPSCC versus SCLC respectively, but highest in prostate EPSCC (25.6 months). Of those who received chemotherapy (22 EPSCC vs 233 SCLC), median OS was 10.4 versus 8.4 months (HR OS 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5-1.31, P = 0.38); PFS was 5.4 versus 5.5 months (HR PFS 0.93, 95% CI: 0.58-1.46, P = 0.74) and ORR were 73% versus 68%.

CONCLUSIONS

EPSCC and SCLC appeared to have comparable OS and treatment outcomes. However, the wide range of OS in EPSCC highlights the need for an improved understanding of its genomics to explore alternative therapeutics.

An online tool for survival prediction of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma with random forest

Purpose

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC) is rare, and its knowledge is mainly extrapolated from small cell lung carcinoma. Reliable survival prediction tools are lacking.

Methods

A total of 3,921 cases of EPSCC were collected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, which form the training and internal validation cohorts of the survival prediction model. The endpoint was an overall survival of 0.5-5 years. Internal validation performances of machine learning algorithms were compared, and the best model was selected. External validation (n = 68) was performed to evaluate the generalization ability of the selected model.

Results

Among machine learning algorithms, the random forest model performs best on internal validation, whose area under the curve (AUC) is 0.736-0.800. The net benefit is higher than the TNM classification in decision curve analysis. The AUC of this model on the external validation cohort is 0.739-0.811. This model was then deployed online as a free, publicly available prediction tool of EPSCC (http://42.192.80.13:4399/).

Conclusion

This study provides an excellent online survival prediction tool for EPSCC with machine learning and large-scale data. Age, TNM stages, and surgery (including potential performance status information) are the most critical factors for the prediction model.

Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma, chemotherapy sequential immunotherapy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma (PSCEC) is aggressive and rare, with a worse prognosis than other subtypes esophageal carcinoma. No definitive and optimum standard guidelines are established for treating it. Herein, we report a case of PSCEC, including a current literature review of PSCEC.

CASE SUMMARY

A 79-year-old male was diagnosed PSCEC with multiple lymph node metastasis thorough computed tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, endoscopy and pathology. Surgery was not suitable for this patient. He was treated with etoposide 100 mg/m² and cisplatin 25 mg/m² on days 1-3, every 3 wk for 4 cycles. The tumor and lymph nodes became smaller and dysphagia and vomiting symptoms improved. The patient could not tolerate subsequent chemotherapy (CT) because of hematological toxicity; therefore, we performed immunotherapy (durvalumab, 1500 mg) every 4 wk. At present the patient has received 12 cycles immunotherapy over about 1 year. He is still receiving treatment and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PSCEC with multiple lymph nodes metastasis does not always indicate surgery. CT may extend survival time and improve the quality of life in the absence of surgery. Immunotherapy or immunotherapy plus CT may also work as a treatment for PSCEC.

p16 positive oropharyngeal small cell cancer: A case report

Extra-pulmonary small cell carcinomas (EPSCC) are rare malignancies. Like small cell lung cancer (SCLC), they are aggressive malignancies with dismal prognosis. We here report a case of a middle-aged man who presented with odynophagia and cervical lymphadenopathy. Diagnostic workup confirmed the diagnosis of locally-advanced p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) with a surprising histology of small cell cancer, suggesting a human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer with small cell differentiation. HPV oropharynx infection is a well-known risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, but it is unknown if it may increase the risk of other OPC histology.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the esophagus - Report of 14 cases from a single institute and review of the literature

BACKGROUND:

Most prevalent esophageal neoplasm is squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Other tumors are uncommon and poorly studied. Primary neuroendocrine esophageal neoplasm is a rare carcinoma and most of its therapy management is based on lung neuroendocrine studies. Neuroendocrine tumors can be clustered in the following subtypes: high grade (small cell carcinoma or large cell carcinoma) and low grade (carcinoids).

OBJECTIVE:

The present study aims to assess clinical and pathological neuroendocrine esophageal tumors in a single oncologic center.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of patients and review of the literatures was performed.

RESULTS:

Fourteen patients were identified as neuroendocrine tumors, 11 male and 3 female patients. Mean age was 67.3 years old. Ten patients were classified as small cell, 3 as large cell and 1 as carcinoid. Four patients presented squamous cell carcinoma simultaneously and 1 also presented adenocarcinoma. Main sites of metastasis were liver, peritoneum, lung and bones. Most patients died before 2 years of follow-up. Patient with longer survival died at 35 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

Neuroendocrine esophageal tumors are rare; affect mainly men in their sixties or seventies. High grade tumors can be mixed to other subtypes neoplasms, such as adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Most of these patients have poor overall survival rates.