Curative-Intention Surgery with Lobe-Specific Versus Systematic Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IA-IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Our Experience and Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The benefit of lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LS-LND) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debated, especially in early-stage disease. Previous reviews often included all stages, leaving a gap in focused evaluations of clinical stage IA-IB NSCLC. This systematic review, supplemented by our institutional experience, aimed to compare overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and postoperative complications between LS-LND and systematic lymph node dissection (S-LND) in clinical stage IA-IB NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients treated at our institution (14 S-LND vs. 10 LS-LND). Data on patient demographics, operative details, OS, RFS, and postoperative complications were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using established methodological tools. A targeted literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to 14 April 2022. Only three articles (total n = 1101 patients) met inclusion criteria focusing on clinical stage IA-IB NSCLC who underwent curative-intent resection.

RESULTS

LS-LND demonstrated comparable or slightly improved 5-year OS (range: 69.7-96.7%) versus S-LND (64.9-92.0%), and similar or slightly higher RFS (66.0-95.6% in LS-LND vs. 60.8-88.8% in S-LND). In our cohort, the 5-year OS was 78.6% in S-LND vs. 80.0% in LS-LND, and the 5-year RFS was 71.4% vs. 70.0%, respectively. Postoperative complications such as arrhythmias were less frequent in LS-LND groups overall. Our data showed a low rate of pneumonia in S-LND compared to LS-LND (7.1% vs. 10.0%); however, arrhythmias accounted for 14.3% in S-LND vs. 10.0% in LS-LND).

CONCLUSIONS

For clinical stage IA-IB NSCLC, LS-LND offers oncologic outcomes that are comparable to S-LND, with a potential for reduced postoperative complications. The findings from our institution align with these trends observed in the literature. While these results suggest potential advantages of lobe-specific approaches, definitive conclusions require further validation through larger, prospective randomized studies to confirm the clinical benefits of LS-LND in early-stage NSCLC.

EarlyCDT Lung blood test for risk classification of solid pulmonary nodules: systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

EarlyCDT Lung (Oncimmune Holdings plc, Nottingham, UK) is a blood test to assess malignancy risk in people with solid pulmonary nodules. It measures the presence of seven lung cancer-associated autoantibodies. Elevated levels of these autoantibodies may indicate malignant disease. The results of the test might be used to modify the risk of malignancy estimated by existing risk calculators, including the Brock and Herder models.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EarlyCDT Lung; and to develop a conceptual model and identify evidence requirements for a robust cost-effectiveness analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (including Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Citation Index, EconLit, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment database, NHS Economic Evaluation Database ( NHS EED ) and the international Health Technology Assessment database were searched on 8 March 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review was performed of evidence on EarlyCDT Lung, including diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Study quality was assessed with the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 tool. Evidence on other components of the pulmonary nodule diagnostic pathway (computerised tomography surveillance, Brock risk, Herder risk, positron emission tomography-computerised tomography and biopsy) was also reviewed. When feasible, bivariate meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy were performed. Clinical outcomes were synthesised narratively. A simulation study investigated the clinical impact of using EarlyCDT Lung. Additional reviews of cost-effectiveness studies evaluated (1) other diagnostic strategies for lung cancer and (2) screening approaches for lung cancer. A conceptual model was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 47 clinical publications on EarlyCDT Lung were identified, but only five cohorts (695 patients) reported diagnostic accuracy data on patients with pulmonary nodules. All cohorts were small or at high risk of bias. EarlyCDT Lung on its own was found to have poor diagnostic accuracy, with a summary sensitivity of 20.2% (95% confidence interval 10.5% to 35.5%) and specificity of 92.2% (95% confidence interval 86.2% to 95.8%). This sensitivity was substantially lower than that estimated by the manufacturer (41.3%). No evidence on the clinical impact of EarlyCDT Lung was identified. The simulation study suggested that EarlyCDT Lung might potentially have some benefit when considering intermediate risk nodules (10-70% risk) after Herder risk analysis. Two cost-effectiveness studies on EarlyCDT Lung for pulmonary nodules were identified; none was considered suitable to inform the current decision problem. The conceptualisation process identified three core components for a future cost-effectiveness assessment of EarlyCDT Lung: (1) the features of the subpopulations and relevant heterogeneity, (2) the way EarlyCDT Lung test results affect subsequent clinical management decisions and (3) how changes in these decisions can affect outcomes. All reviewed studies linked earlier diagnosis to stage progression and stage shift to final outcomes, but evidence on these components was sparse.

LIMITATIONS

The evidence on EarlyCDT Lung among patients with pulmonary nodules was very limited, preventing meta-analyses and economic analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence on EarlyCDT Lung among patients with pulmonary nodules is insufficient to draw any firm conclusions as to its diagnostic accuracy or clinical or economic value.

FUTURE WORK

Prospective cohort studies, in which EarlyCDT Lung is used among patients with identified pulmonary nodules, are required to support a future assessment of the clinical and economic value of this test. Studies should investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of EarlyCDT Lung in combination with Brock and Herder risk assessments. A well-designed cost-effectiveness study is also required, integrating emerging relevant evidence with the recommendations in this report.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021242248.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Early diagnosis of lung cancer: which is the optimal choice?

The prognosis of lung cancer patients with different clinical stages is significantly different. The 5-year survival of stage IA groups can exceed 90%, while patients with stage IV can be less than 10%. Therefore, early diagnosis is extremely important for lung cancer patients. This research focused on various diagnosis methods of early lung cancer, including imaging screening, bronchoscopy, and emerging potential liquid biopsies, as well as volatile organic compounds, autoantibodies, aiming to improve the early diagnosis rate and explore feasible and effective early diagnosis strategies.

Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses

Purpose

Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database from January 2010 through March 2020 about the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious LC or PT was performed. This combination of keywords was used: (A) “PET” OR “positron emission tomography” AND (B) “lung” OR “pulmonary” OR “pleur^∗” AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on PET or PET/CT in patients with suspicious LC or PT were selected.

Results

We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) and other radiotracers taking into account 17 meta-analyses. Evidence-based data demonstrated a good diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) or pleural lesions with overall higher sensitivity than specificity. Evidence-based data do not support the routine use of dual time point (DTP) ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT or fluorine-18 fluorothymidine (¹⁸F-FLT) PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of SPNs. Even if ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity as a selective screening modality for LC, its role in this setting remains unknown.

Conclusions

Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with different radiotracers for suspicious LC or PT are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.