Diagnostic efficacy of impedance plethysmography for clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. A randomized trial

The usage and outcomes of dextran in the treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis treated with dextran 40 infusion and unfractionated heparin with those of patients treated with unfractionated heparin alone.

METHODS

We evaluated 104 patients with the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis. The pain complaints of the patients at the time of admission and the pain complaints in the calf with dorsiflexion of the foot were evaluated with the visual analogue pain scale, and the calf diameter of affected limbs was measured. Fifty five patients had dextran 40 infusion and unfractionated heparin treatment concomitantly (Group HD), while 49 patients had unfractionated heparin treatment (Group H). Heparin dose was adjusted to obtain 1.5- to 2.5-fold of normal activated partial thromboplastin time in both groups. Oral anticoagulant, warfarin sodium, was administered in the first day and resumed. Unfractionated heparin infusion therapy was resumed until international normalized ratio values of 2-2.5 were obtained. Dextran 40 infusion therapy was administered for 3 days. Calf diameters, current pain, and calf pain at foot dorsiflexion were recorded at 48 h and 72 h. 65 patients were distal, and 39 patients were proximal and popliteal acute DVT. None of the patients had phlegmasia. All were acute DVT.

RESULTS

At 48 and 72 h of therapy, it was determined that the decrease of the calf diameter and the pain were more significant both at 48th and 72nd hours in the Group HD. The calf circumference change, especially at 72 h, was 2.58 ± 0.39 cm in the group receiving heparin + dextran, while it was 1.76 ± 0.56 cm in the group receiving only heparin. (p = 0.000). While there were only 1.24 ± 1.02 people in the group that received dextran at 72 h, leg pain persisted in 3.35 ± 1.11 people in the other group. (p = 0.000). Evaluation was made only with calf vein diameter measurement. When patients with Homan's sign were evaluated for their calf pain at foot dorsiflexion; both groups had decreased pain at 48th and 72nd hours.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed that the use of dextran 40 infusion therapy concomitantly with unfractionated heparin accelerates recovery substantially and decreases patient complaints significantly in early stages. In particular, reduction in leg pain and calf circumference reduction were more adequate in the dextran group. The early decrease in the calf circumference will have clinical consequences such as less heparin intake, earlier return to normal life, and a decrease in the total cost of treatment. Since the antithrombotic and anticoagulant effects of dextran are well known, we think that its use in this treatment as well as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis should be discussed.

Advances in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism: A Literature Review

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is increasing. The increase in suspicion for VTE has lowered the threshold for performing imaging studies to confirm diagnosis of VTE. However, only 20% of suspected cases have a confirmed diagnosis of VTE. Development of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) and update in pre-test probability have changed the paradigm of ruling-out patient with low index of suspicion. The D-dimer test in conjunction to the pre-test probability has been utilized in VTE diagnosis. The age appropriate D-dimer cutoff and inclusion of YEARS algorithm (signs of the DVT, hemoptysis and whether PE is the likely diagnosis) for the D-dimer cutoff have been recent updates in the evaluation of suspected PE. Multi-detector computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and compression ultrasound (CUS) are the preferred imaging modality to diagnose PE and DVT respectively. The VTE diagnostic algorithm do differ in pregnant individuals. The prerequisite of avoiding excessive radiation has recruited planar ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan as preferred in pregnant patients to evaluate for PE. The modification of CUS protocol with addition of the Valsalva maneuver should be performed while evaluating DVT in pregnant individual.

Vitamin K antagonists versus low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

People with venous thromboembolism (VTE) generally are treated for five days with intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), followed by three months of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Treatment with VKAs requires regular laboratory measurements and carries risk of bleeding; some patients have contraindications to such treatment. Treatment with LMWH has been proposed to minimise the risk of bleeding complications. This is the second update of a review first published in 2001.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long term treatment (three months) with LMWH versus long term treatment (three months) with VKAs for symptomatic VTE.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Specialised Register (last searched November 2016) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 10), The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialistalso searched clinical trials registries for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing LMWH versus VKA for long treatment (three months) of symptomatic VTE. Two review authors independently evaluated trials for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by discussion and performed meta-analysis using fixed-effect models with Peto odds ratios (Peto ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes of interest were recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and mortality. We used GRADE to assess the overall quality of evidence supporting these outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials, with a combined total of 3299 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. According to GRADE, the quality of evidence was moderate for recurrent VTE, low for major bleeding, and moderate for mortality. We downgraded the quality of the evidence for imprecision (recurrent VTE, mortality) and for risk of bias and inconsistency (major bleeding).We found no clear differences in recurrent VTE between LMWH and VKA (Peto OR 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.15; P = 0.27; 3299 participants; 16 studies; moderate-quality evidence). We found less bleeding with LMWH than with VKA (Peto OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.80; P = 0.004; 3299 participants; 16 studies; low-quality evidence). However, when comparing only high-quality studies for bleeding, we observed no clear differences between LMWH and VKA (Peto OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.07; P = 0.08; 1872 participants; seven studies). We found no clear differences between LMWH and VKA in terms of mortality (Peto OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.56; P = 0.68; 3299 participants; 16 studies; moderate-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-quality evidence shows no clear differences between LMWH and VKA in preventing symptomatic VTE and death after an episode of symptomatic DVT. Low-quality evidence suggests fewer cases of major bleeding with LMWH than with VKA. However, comparison of only high-quality studies for bleeding shows no clear differences between LMWH and VKA. LMWH may represent an alternative for some patients, for example, those residing in geographically inaccessible areas, those who are unable or reluctant to visit the thrombosis service regularly, and those with contraindications to VKA.

Clinical Utility of Real-Time Compression Ultrasonography for Diagnostic Management of Patients with Recurrent Venous Thrombosis

In the diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected recurrent deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), there are potential limitations to all available diagnostic techniques. Since venous abnormalities may persist for some time after an acute thrombosis, the usefulness of compression ultrasonography (US) for the detection of recurrent DVT may be jeopardized. We determined the rate of normalization of an abnormal compression US test of the popliteal and the common femoral veins in patients after a first episode of proximal DVT. In a cohort of 60 consecutive patients, the test result was normalized in only 29, 44, 54, and 60% of patients at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. The investigation shows that for the detection of recurrent DVT of the leg, real-time compression US (using the single criterion of compression of the common femoral and popliteal vein) is of limited value. Future studies need to be performed, using more subtle interpretation of the compression US result, by quantifying the extent of residual thrombus, which may increase the usefulness of this test in patients with recurrent symptoms.

Air Plethysmography for the Detection of Acute DVT: New Criteria

In order to determine the value of air plethysmography (APG) in the detection of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the authors studied prospectively 79 consecutive patients referred for suspected acute DVT. All patients were examined with venography and APG.

Venography demonstrated acute DVT in 38 patients. In 8 patients the DVT was confined to the calf and in 30 this was in the popliteal and/or more proximal veins. Venography was negative in 41 patients. An outflow fraction value with superficial occlusion of the long saphenous vein at the knee of less than 28% in combination with a venous volume of less than 50 mL identified all patients with acute proximal DVT. There was one false-positive result. However, isolated calf vein thrombi were equally distrib uted, and half of them were not detected.

Air plethysmography is a reliable, inexpensive, easy to perform, and accurate nonin vasive test for the diagnosis of proximal acute DVT. It may be a useful screening test when there is a big demand for noninvasive tests, and relatively little time is available on a duplex scanner.

Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Trauma Patients

Trauma patients are at exceedingly high risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis and pulmo nary embolism. The incidence, pathophysiology, diag nosis, prophylaxis, and therapy of deep venous throm bosis and pulmonary embolism in the trauma patient are reviewed. The type of injury, systemic pertubations, and enforced immobility are important factors in pathogenesis. Patients with lower extremity injuries and spine fractures with paraplegia appear to be at highest risk. Orthopedic devices used to treat these injuries of ten preclude the conventional noninvasive diagnostic modalities. Further, hemorrhagic risk often impacts the judgment regarding the use of prophylactic measures as well as the therapy once deep venous thrombosis is diagnosed. Better data regarding the incidence of ve nous thromboembolism and the applicability of existing diagnostic, prophylactic, and treatment approaches in this population are needed.

Accidents are responsible for over 140,000 deaths and approximately 70 million nonfatal injuries an nually in the United States [1]. Most of the fatalities occur within hours of injury as a result of exsangui nation or a lethal head injury, but approximately 20% survive for days or weeks [2], usually in the intensive care unit. The primary causes of late death are sepsis and multiple-organ failure [2]. Increasing evidence, however, suggests that pulmonary embo lism (PE) is now becoming a leading cause of late death, especially in some high-risk groups [3-5]. The increase in the incidence of PE is due in part to improvements in trauma care, which have lowered the early mortality rate [6-8], leaving more patients at risk for late death. In addition, autopsy examina tions, used more frequently to audit trauma care systems [6,9], have documented an increase in clini cally unsuspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE.

This review was prompted because of the appar ent increase in DVT and PE in the trauma popula tion, and because the trauma patient presents very difficult and unique problems compared with the nontrauma patient with regard to the diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of these disorders. In this review, we address the incidence, pathophys iology, diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis of DVT and PE in the trauma patient. We do not con sider the entities of fat embolism or pulmonary microemboli as a cause of late pulmonary failure.

Calf Vein Thrombosis: Diagnosis and Treatment

Objective:

To demonstrate the difficulties of the clinical diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and demonstrate the utility of ultrasound imaging as a diagnostic technique in suspected deep vein thrombosis.

Design:

Series of three case reports.

Setting:

Grondin Clinic, Calgery, Alberta, Canada.

Patients:

Three patients with symptoms suggestive of deep vein thrombosis of the calf.

Interventions:

Duplex ultrasound imaging in all patients combined with phlebography of the lower limb in one patient.

Main outcome measure:

Presence of deep vein thrombosis or soft tissue abnormalities of the lower limb on ultrasound imaging or venography.

Results:

A Baker cyst was found in one patient, an intramuscular haematoma in a further patient, both detected by ultrasound imaging, but not by venography. In the third patient a venogram failed to demonstrate deep vein thrombosis in the calf, but this was detected on ultrasound imaging.

Conclusions:

Ultrasound imaging is a valuable tool in reaching a diagnosis in patients presenting with symptoms suggesting deep vein thrombosis in the calf.

Historical Evolution of Imaging Techniques for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

As we celebrate the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), it seems fitting to look back at the major accomplishments of the radiology community in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Few diseases have so consistently captured the attention of the medical community. Since the first description of pulmonary embolism by Virchow in the 1850s, clinicians have struggled to reach a timely diagnosis of this common condition because of its nonspecific and often confusing clinical picture. As imaging tests started to gain importance in the 1900s, the approach to diagnosing pulmonary embolism also began to change. Rapid improvements in angiography, ventilation-perfusion imaging, and cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have constantly forced health care professionals to rethink how they diagnose pulmonary embolism. Needless to say, the way pulmonary embolism is diagnosed today is distinctly different from how it was diagnosed in Virchow's era; and imaging, particularly CT, now forms the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation. Currently, radiology offers a variety of tests that are fast and accurate and can provide anatomic and functional information, thus allowing early diagnosis and triage of cases. This review provides a historical journey into the evolution of these imaging tests and highlights some of the major breakthroughs achieved by the radiology community and RSNA in this process. Also highlighted are areas of ongoing research and development in this field of imaging as radiologists seek to combat some of the newer challenges faced by modern medicine, such as rising health care costs and radiation dose hazards.

Vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

People with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are generally treated for five days with intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by three months of vitamin K antagonist treatment. Treatment with vitamin K antagonists requires regular laboratory measurements and some patients have contraindications to treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2000 and updated in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long term treatment of VTE with LMWH compared to vitamin K antagonists.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched their Specialised Register (last searched February 2012) and CENTRAL (2012, Issue 1).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two authors evaluated trials independently for methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors extracted data independently. Primary analysis included all trial participants randomised to the allocated treatment groups. Separate analyses were performed according to the quality of the trials and for subgroups such as trials initially using similar treatments in both trial arms and those that did not, trials concerning deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and the different periods of follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

All 15 trials, with a combined total of 3197 patients, fulfilling our criteria were combined in a meta-analysis. We found a non-statistically significant reduction in the risk of recurrent VTE between the two treatments (odds ratio (OR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.13). Analysis of pooled data for category I trials (those with a high methodological quality) showed a non-significant reduction in the odds of recurrent VTE favouring LMWH treatment (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18).For all trials combined, the difference in bleeding significantly favoured treatment with LMWH (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.79). Considering only category I trials, a non-significant trend favouring LMWH remained (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.07). No difference was observed in mortality (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.54).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LMWHs are possibly as effective as vitamin K antagonists in preventing symptomatic VTE after an episode of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, but are much more expensive. Treatment with LMWH is significantly safer than treatment with vitamin K antagonists. LMWH may result in fewer episodes of bleeding and is possibly a safe alternative in some patients, especially those in geographically inaccessible areas, are reluctant to visit the thrombosis service regularly, or with contraindications to vitamin K antagonists. However, treatment with vitamin K antagonists remains the treatment of choice for the majority of patients.

Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Objective testing for DVT is crucial because clinical assessment alone is unreliable and the consequences of misdiagnosis are serious. This guideline focuses on the identification of optimal strategies for the diagnosis of DVT in ambulatory adults.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow those described in Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

RESULTS

We suggest that clinical assessment of pretest probability of DVT, rather than performing the same tests in all patients, should guide the diagnostic process for a first lower extremity DVT (Grade 2B). In patients with a low pretest probability of first lower extremity DVT, we recommend initial testing with D-dimer or ultrasound (US) of the proximal veins over no diagnostic testing (Grade 1B), venography (Grade 1B), or whole-leg US (Grade 2B). In patients with moderate pretest probability, we recommend initial testing with a highly sensitive D-dimer, proximal compression US, or whole-leg US rather than no testing (Grade 1B) or venography (Grade 1B). In patients with a high pretest probability, we recommend proximal compression or whole-leg US over no testing (Grade 1B) or venography (Grade 1B).

CONCLUSIONS

Favored strategies for diagnosis of first DVT combine use of pretest probability assessment, D-dimer, and US. There is lower-quality evidence available to guide diagnosis of recurrent DVT, upper extremity DVT, and DVT during pregnancy.

Predictive Value of the Rapid Whole Blood Agglutination D-Dimer Assay (AGEN SimpliRED) in Community Outpatients with Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis

CONTEXT

D-dimer assay has been used to screen patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Because both the predictive value and sensitivity/specificity of the test vary according to the type of assay, prevalence, and pretest probability of DVT, clinicians must know the local performance of the d-dimer assay.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive value of the rapid whole blood agglutination d-dimer Assay (AGEN SimpliRED) in community outpatients with suspected DVT in the Kaiser Permanente (KP) Mid-Atlantic Region.

DESIGN

Retrospective, randomized, cross-sectional review of electronic medical records of patients with suspected DVT who underwent d-dimer testing for venous thromboembolism.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 5104 patients with suspected venous thromboembolism underwent d-dimer testing using AGEN SimpliRED from April 2001 to December 2002. A total of 551 electronic medical records were reviewed, and results of d-dimer assay and compression ultrasonography were tabulated. Records were analyzed to determine later diagnosis of DVT or unexplained death occurring as late as six months after initial testing.

RESULTS

Electronic records showed a 5.3% disease prevalence. Ten patients were excluded from data analysis. A total of 129 (23.8%) patients had positive d-dimer; the positive predictive value was 20.2% (CI, 13.2% to 27%). A total of 412 (76.1%) patients had negative test results; three of these patients had DVT shown by compression ultra-sonography; negative predictive value was 99.3% (CI, 98.4% to 100%). Calculated sensitivity was 89.7%; specificity was 79.9%.

CONCLUSION

In the outpatient setting, the rapid whole blood agglutination d-dimer assay (AGEN SimpliRED) used in combination with both clinical judgment and compression ultrasonography exhibited a high negative predictive value comparable with previously reported values.

Long-term sequelae of calf vein thrombosis treated with heparin or low-dose streptokinase

A prospective randomized study was performed to investigate the long-term sequelae of calf vein thrombosis (CVT) and correlate them to the success of the initial treatment. Thirty-six patients with symptomatic CVT, verified by venography, were treated with heparin or low-dose streptokinase (SK) combined with low-dose heparin. Venography was repeated after 1 week, and long-term follow-up was performed clinically and with foot volumetry after an average of 5 years. Since the low-dose SK regimen led to serious hemorrhagic side-effects in a parallel study, the present investigation was discontinued prematurely. The thrombolysis achieved was greater with SK but, since the initial thrombi were somewhat larger in this group, no significant difference in the average size of the thrombi after therapy could be displayed between the groups. The long-term sequelae and results of foot volumetry were also equal. Signs or symptoms of venous insufficiency were found in 37%, and foot volumetry showed deep venous insufficiency in 26% of the cases. There was a correlation between the hemodynamic change, as assessed by foot volumetry, and the venographic severity. This relation was stronger for the size of the thrombus after treatment than for the initial size. Thus, it seems important to limit the extent of a CVT in order to minimize the long-term sequelae, but administration of SK is not justified due to side-effects.

Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin after arthroscopic surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin for 20 days in the outpatient setting with in-hospital thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin (3 to 8 days) only in patients who had undergone arthroscopic surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial investigating 175 ACL surgery patients. All patients received subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily 12 to 18 hours presurgery and 3 to 8 days postsurgery during hospitalization. After discharge, patients were randomized to 40 mg enoxaparin (n = 87) or placebo (n = 88) self-administered once daily subcutaneously for 20 days. The primary efficacy end-points were the incidences of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Primary safety endpoints were the incidences of major and minor bleeding.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were excluded because of noncompliance with the predefined protocol. No patient had DVT confirmed by magnetic resonance venography (MRV) at discharge. Of 140 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 2 (2.8%) who received postdischarge enoxaparin (n = 72) and 28 (41.2%) who received placebo (n = 68) had DVT confirmed by MRV (P < .001). No patients were diagnosed with PE. No major bleeds occurred. Minor bleeding occurred in 13 (2.5%) out of 513 postdischarge enoxaparin injections and 10 (2.0%) out of 492 placebo injections (P = .595). Risk factors for DVT during the 20 days postdischarge were age >30 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.241; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.015 to 10.349) and immobilization before surgery (OR 18.195; 95% CI, 2.046 to 161.837).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended-duration postdischarge thromboprophylaxis for 20 days with enoxaparin in the outpatient setting significantly reduced the incidence of DVT in ACL surgery patients compared with enoxaparin limited to in-hospital thromboprophylaxis without increasing major or minor bleeding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, high-quality randomized controlled trial.

Edema in the lower limb of patients operated on for proximal femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

Patients with proximal femoral fracture (PFF) often develop postoperative edema in the operated limb. This may lead to reduced mobilization, increasing the length of hospitalization. It is therefore relevant to gain information about the extent and pathogenesis of this edema formation.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with PFF (30 women and 11 men) were studied pre- and postoperatively. Patients were grouped into pertrochanteric fractures and femoral cervical fractures, according to the AO/ASIF classification of PFF. Thigh and calf volumes were calculated in both fractured and contralateral limbs preoperatively and on postoperative days 3, 5, 7, and 30.

RESULTS

All patients with PFF developed edema in the operated limb. The greatest volume increase occurred on postoperative day 7 (p < 0.0005). The magnitude of edema in the thigh and the leg of patients with pertrochanteric fractures as compared with the nonoperative side was approximately twice as great as in those with femoral cervical fractures (p < 0.0001). There was a statistically significant daily increase in the volume of the operative limb as compared with the nonoperative side. Age and sex were not correlated with the extent of edema formation. Functionally significant deep venous thrombosis and local infection could be excluded as causative factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative edema in the thigh and leg of the operated limb was considerable. The magnitude of edema formation was related to the severity of primary trauma and the type of osteosynthesis. Therefore, the operation performed for PFF should be minimally traumatic.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing cancer surgery and options for thromboprophylaxis

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to a hypercoagulable state associated with malignancy. This risk is further complicated in patients undergoing cancer-related surgery due to immobility, other cancer treatments, and biologic changes associated with surgery. Despite this relatively high risk of VTE, many patients are not prescribed adequate prophylaxis in the pre- or post-operative periods. This article reviews available measures for thromboprophylaxis in light of current guidelines.

Air travel and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude of risk and what can be done to lower it.

OBJECTIVES

To review the methodologic strength of the literature, estimate the risk of travel-related VTE, evaluate the efficacy of preventive treatments, and develop evidence-based recommendations for practice.

DATA SOURCES

Studies identified from MEDLINE from 1966 through December 2005, supplemented by a review of the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and relevant bibliographies.

STUDY SELECTION

We included all clinical studies that either reported primary data concerning travel as a risk factor for VTE or tested preventive measures for travel-related VTE.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers reviewed each study independently to assess inclusion criteria, classify research design, and rate methodologic features. The effect of methodologic differences, VTE risk, and travel duration on VTE rate was evaluated using a logistic regression model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-four published reports, totaling 25 studies, met inclusion criteria (6 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies, and 9 randomized controlled trials). Method of screening for VTE [screening ultrasound compared to usual clinical care, odds ratio (OR) 390], outcome measure [all VTE compared to pulmonary embolism (PE) only, OR 21], duration of travel (<6 hours compared to 6-8 hours, OR 0.011), and clinical risk ("higher" risk travelers compared to "lower," OR 3.6) were significantly related to VTE rate. Clinical VTE after prolonged travel is rare [27 PE per million flights diagnosed through usual clinical care, 0.05% symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed through screening ultrasounds], but asymptomatic thrombi of uncertain clinical significance are more common. Graduated compression stockings prevented travel-related VTE (P < 0.05 in 4 of 6 studies), aspirin did not, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) showed a trend toward efficacy in one study.

CONCLUSIONS

All travelers, regardless of VTE risk, should avoid dehydration and frequently exercise leg muscles. Travelers on a flight of less than 6 hours and those with no known risk factors for VTE, regardless of the duration of the flight, do not need DVT prophylaxis. Travelers with 1 or more risk factors for VTE should consider graduated compression stockings and/or LMWH for flights longer than 6 hours.

Use of Antithrombotic Agents During Pregnancy

This chapter about the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for women requiring long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy who are attempting pregnancy, we suggest performing frequent pregnancy tests and substituting unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for warfarin when pregnancy is achieved (Grade 2C). In women with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), we recommend adjusted-dose LMWH throughout pregnancy or IV UFH for at least 5 days, followed by adjusted-dose UFH or LMWH for the remainder of the pregnancy and at least 6 weeks postpartum (Grade 1C+). In patients with a single episode of VTE associated with a transient risk factor that is no longer present, we recommend antepartum clinical surveillance and postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 1C). In patients with a single episode of VTE and thrombophilia or strong family history of thrombosis and not receiving long-term anticoagulants, we suggest antepartum prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH or minidose or moderate-dose UFH, plus postpartum anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with multiple (two or more) episodes of VTE and/or women receiving long-term anticoagulants, we suggest antepartum adjusted-dose UFH or adjusted-dose LMWH followed by long-term anticoagulants postpartum (Grade 2C). For pregnant patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) and a history of two or more early pregnancy losses or one or more late pregnancy losses, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation, or abruption, we suggest antepartum aspirin plus minidose or moderate-dose UFH or prophylactic LMWH (Grade 2B). We suggest one of the following approaches for women with APLAs without prior VTE or pregnancy loss: surveillance, minidose heparin, prophylactic LMWH, and/or low-dose aspirin, 75 to 325 mg/d (all Grade 2C). In women with prosthetic heart valves, we recommend adjusted-dose bid LMWH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), aggressive adjusted-dose UFH throughout pregnancy (Grade 1C), or UFH or LMWH until the thirteenth week and then change to warfarin until the middle of the third trimester before restarting UFH or LMWH (Grade 1C). In high-risk women with prosthetic heart valves, we suggest the addition of low-dose aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d (Grade 2C).

D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis

BACKGROUND

The use of D-dimer assays as a rule-out test for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is controversial. To clarify this issue we performed a systematic review of the relevant literature.

METHODS

We identified eligible studies, using MEDLINE entries from February 1995 through October 2003, supplemented by a review of bibliographies of relevant articles. Studies reporting accuracy evaluations comparing D-dimer test results with lower extremity ultrasound or venography in symptomatic patients with suspected acute DVT were selected for review. Two reviewers critically appraised each study independently according to previously established methodologic standards for diagnostic test research. Those studies judged to be of highest quality were designated Level 1.

RESULTS

The 23 Level 1 studies reported data on 21 different D-dimer assays. There was wide variation in assay sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values, and major differences in methodology of reviewed studies. A multivariate analysis of assay performance, controlling for sample size, DVT prevalence, reference standard, and patient mix, found few differences among the assays in effect on test performance as measured by diagnostic odds ratio. Increasing prevalence of DVT was associated with poorer test performance (P = 0.01), whereas the choice of venography as the reference standard was associated with better test performance (P <0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Explanations for the wide variation in assay performance include differences in biochemical and technical characteristics of the assays, heterogeneity and small size of patient groups, and bias introduced by choice of reference standards. Assay sensitivity and negative predictive value were frequently <90%, uncharacteristic of a good rule-out test. General use of D-dimer assays as a stand-alone test for the diagnosis of DVT is not supported by the literature.

Thromboprophylaxis and thrombosis in medical, surgical, trauma, and obstetric/gynecologic patients

The International Consensus and the ACCP Sixth Consensus had a great impact on the clinical acceptance of LMWHs. These recommendations have been instrumental in initiating further clinical trial to answer key questions regarding thromboprophylaxis and in setting a new standard for patient care. Also, the key to cost containment in management of DVT/PE is to (1) define the etiology (blood coagulation protein or platelet defect), institute appropriate long-term therapy as indicated, and assess appropriate family members as indicated if a hereditary defect is found and (2) use LMWH as inpatient management. saving a minimum of 210,000.00 dollars per 1000 patients simply from cost savings of recurrence, saving 17 lives per 1000 patients, and saving exorbitant costs of care for patients with recurrence and development of chronic venous insufficiency. The use of outpatient LMWH will save 4,900,000.00 dollars per 1000 patients if applied to the 70% of patients with DVT who fit the criteria of no comorbid condition requiring hospitalization and who arrive early enough to allow a diagnosis to be sent home or hospitalized for 24 hours or less. The simple defining of defects leading to unexplained thrombosis will add another 3,000,000.00 dollars in savings per 1000 patients with DVT and approximately 350,000.00 dollars per 100 patients with thrombotic stroke. In those with transient ischemic attacks, defining the defect and instituting appropriate antithrombotic therapy, thereby potentially saving approximately 30% from developing a thrombotic stroke, amounts to approximately 350,500.00 dollars (= 30% of 1,168,500.00 dollars) in savings per 100 patients.

How we manage venous thromboembolism during pregnancy

During pregnancy, physiologic and anatomic changes can complicate the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as the management of patients with a high risk of or established VTE. As in nonpregnant subjects, clinical diagnosis of VTE by itself is unreliable and accurate objective testing is essential. Few diagnostic studies of VTE have been performed in pregnant women and, therefore, approaches are largely extrapolated from those used in nonpregnant subjects with modifications to limit the radiation exposure and overcome the limitations of diagnostic testing in pregnancy. Therapy of established VTE during pregnancy consists of therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), generally given throughout pregnancy subcutaneously and for 4 to 6 weeks after childbirth. A key unresolved issue includes the optimum dosing of LMWH therapy. Maternal warfarin can be safely used after childbirth because it is safe to use in the breast-fed infant of a mother receiving warfarin. Finally, pregnant women with prior VTE (with or without a hypercoagulable state) have an increased risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. A recent study has demonstrated that for women with a single episode of prior VTE, many can be managed without anticoagulants. However, for many, anticoagulant therapy with prophylactic UFH or LMWH is a reasonable option.

Superficial thrombophlebitis and low-molecular-weight heparins

The current status of superficial thrombophlebitis, including incidence, diagnosis, and management, are reviewed. Treatment options are assessed in the light of data from the main studies reported in the literature. These include compression, ambulation, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and surgical management with high saphenous ligation (with or without saphenous vein stripping) with or without anticoagulants, ranging from aspirin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The advantage of the surgical approach is that by ligation with or without stripping of the superficial veins the underlying pathesis (i.e., varicose veins) is also eradicated. In the presence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), surgery could be combined with anticoagulants. The extensive current literature for DVT treatment shows that the LMWHs are at least as effective and safe as the unfractionated heparins. On this basis, one could reasonably recommend LMWH for the treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis with involvement of the deep veins. Pentasaccharide, a drug that has been recently explored for the prophylaxis and treatment of DVT could be another option. However, there are as yet no data for recommended dosages or duration of treatment for the latter two options.

[Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs: performance of diagnostic tests]

Deep-vein thrombosis is a frequent affection that needs precise diagnosis. Indeed, the clinical complications (from post-thrombotic syndrome to fatal pulmonary embolism) as well the risk of anticoagulant treatment require a precise diagnosis. Since clinical evaluation cannot assure reliably diagnosis by lack of sensitivity and specificity, complementary exams are needed. However, clinical assessment is an important part to decide further examinations. D-dimers assessment allows to role out the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in a number of cases. Plethysmography and continuous Doppler are progressively given up. Compressive venous ultrasonography is now the exam of first choice. Scintigraphy, scanner and RMI must still be validated. Phlebography remains the gold standard in case of negative compressive venous ultrasonography and a high clinical probability.

Prevention of deep-vein thrombosis in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery: A randomized trial of prophylaxis with low--molecular weight heparin

PURPOSE

The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery is not well known. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DVT, to demonstrate the efficacy of a perioperative and postoperative prophylaxis against thromboembolism with use of low--molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and to show the safety and feasibility of LMWH administration.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

There were 218 consecutive outpatients scheduled for ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery eligible. Of these, 130 patients were randomized to a treatment group with LMWH (dalteparin: 2,500 IU less-than-or-equal70 kg and 5,000 IU >70 kg, started perioperatively and given once daily for 4 weeks; n = 66) and a control group (n = 64) with no prophylaxis. To detect DVT, all patients underwent bilateral compression ultrasonography before and 12 and 31 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 130 patients studied, thromboembolism was significantly lower in the treatment than in the control group: 1 of 66 (1.5%) versus 10 of 64 (15.6%); 95% confidence interval, 7.8% to 26.8%; P =.004. Eighty percent of DVT occurred within the first 14 postoperative days. No severe side effects of LMWH were observed. Only 5% of patients refused continued subcutaneous LMWH injections.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery without antithrombotic prophylaxis, the risk of DVT is high. Perioperative and postoperative prophylaxis with dalteparin is an effective and safe means of reducing this risk.

Vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin for the long term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

People with venous thromboembolism are generally treated for five days with intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin followed by three months of vitamin K antagonists treatment. Treatment with vitamin K antagonists requires regular laboratory measurements and some patients have contraindications for treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparins compared to vitamin K antagonists.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science, the Specialised Trials Register of the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Disease Group and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were made and relevant journals were hand-searched. Additional trials were sought through communication with colleagues and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two reviewers evaluated studies independently for methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently. Primary analysis concerned all trial participants during the period of randomized treatment. Separate analyses were performed for category I and category II studies; i.e. studies using similar treatments initially in both study arms, and those that did not; and the different periods of follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

All seven studies fulfilling our criteria combined, a statistically non-significant reduction in the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism favoring low-molecular-weight heparin treatment (OR 0.70; 95% CI [0.42, 1.16]) was found. Analysis of pooled data for category I studies showed a non-significant reduction in the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism favoring low-molecular-weight heparin treatment (OR 0.75; 95% CI [0.40, 1.39]). Omitting a potentially-confounded study, a statistically non-significant reduction in the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism favoring vitamin K antagonist treatment remained (OR 1.95; 95% CI [0.74, 5.19]). All studies combined, the difference in bleeding significantly favored treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (OR 0.38; 95% CI [0.15, 0.94]), however, considering only category I studies a non-significant trend favoring low-molecular-weight heparin remained (OR 0.80; 95% CI [0.21, 3.00]). No difference was observed in mortality (OR 1.13; 95% CI [0.47, 2.69]).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Low-molecular-weight heparins are possibly as effective as vitamin K antagonists in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism after an episode of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, but are much more expensive. Treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin is significantly safer than treatment with vitamin K antagonists and is possibly a safe alternative in some patients; especially those in geographically inaccessible places, reluctant to visit the thrombosis service regularly, or with contraindications to vitamin K antagonists. However, treatment with vitamin K antagonists remains the treatment of choice for the majority of patients.

Management of venous thromboembolic disease in the lower limb

Thromboembolic disease continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in our community, despite extensive research into the aetiological factors and significant resources invested in the development of pharmacological agents for treating this condition. Development of more sensitive and specific modalities for identifying venous thromboses has improved their early detection, particularly in the commonest site, the lower limb. A rational evidence-based management pathway has not been formulated as debate continues over the most appropriate method of treatment. This review outlines the pathophysiology of the disease, provides a clinical pathway for the management of lower limb thromboembolic disease using reliable available evidence and briefly discusses the efficacy of drug therapy.

Radiolabeled peptides in the detection of deep venous thrombosis

Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are major clinical problems that result in significant morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that 600,000 cases of pulmonary embolism occur each year in the United States, resulting in the death of approximately 100,000 patients. Most of these pulmonary emboli arise from deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The clinical diagnosis of DVT is unreliable. Only a third of patients with a clinical suspicion of DVT have objective evidence of the disease, and half of patients with proven DVT do not have any clinical symptoms. Although ascending contrast venography is the present standard for the diagnosis of DVT, duplex ultrasonography, which is increasingly used in combination with color Doppler flow imaging, is accepted as a useful clinical afternative to contrast venography. Both contrast venography and ultrasonography are imaging procedures that detect changes in venous anatomy that are caused by the presence of an intraluminal thrombus that is sufficiently formed either to reduce vascular filling with contrast medium or to resist compression. However, these imaging procedures do not reflect the metabolic activity of the clot, and therefore, they may overestimate the presence of active clots. The sensitivity of ultrasonography is also limited by various disease-related and technical factors. An alternative approach to the diagnosis of acute DVT is to detect a molecular marker of acute DVT that is not present in old, organized DVT. Recent advances in biotechnology permit the use of highly specific synthetic peptide or small molecular markers, which are involved in the acute stages of DVT formation and can be labeled efficiently with 99mTc. 99mTc-apcitide, a glycoprotein (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor antagonist previously known as 99mTc-P280, has been approved recently by the Food and Drug Administration for the clinical detection of acute DVT. Two other agents are currently under clinical investigation: 99mTc-DMP 444, which is another GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, and 99mTc-Fibrin-Binding Domain (FBD), a radio-labeled fibrin-binding domain of fibronectin. Different clinical studies have shown a high diagnostic accuracy with these synthetic 99mTc-labeled peptides in the detection of acute DVT. Although further studies are needed to fully appreciate all of the diagnostic potential of these radiopharmaceuticals, the clinical introduction of 99mTcapcitide scintigraphy will certainly be helpful in expanding the use of nuclear medicine in a specific field in which it used to play a relatively marginal role.

Pathophysiology and diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis

Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) affects between 1% to 2% of hospitalized patients. These thrombi disrupt the vascular integrity of the lower limbs and are the source of emboli that kill approximately 200,000 patients each year in the United States. The causes of thrombosis include vessel wall damage, stasis or low flow, and hypercoagulability. These factors favor clot formation by disrupting the balance of the opposing coagulative and fibrinolytic systems. The symptoms and signs of venous thrombosis are caused by obstruction to venous outflow, vascular inflammation, or pulmonary embolization. About 70% of patients referred for clinically suspected venous thrombosis, however, do not have the diagnosis confirmed by objective testing. Among the 30% who have venous thrombosis, about 85% have proximal vein thrombosis, and the remainder have thrombosis confined to the calf. Physicians cannot rely on signs and symptoms to make the diagnosis of DVT and must depend on imaging studies to guide treatment. Patients with proximal vein thrombosis who are inadequately treated have a 47% frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism over 3 months. In contrast, clinically detectable recurrence occurs in less than 2% of patients with proximal vein thrombosis if an adequate anticoagulant response is achieved. Of the diagnostic procedures for DVT, venography is the only invasive test of proven value, and ultrasonographic (US) studies are the most commonly used noninvasive modaity. Other procedures are occasionally used to diagnose DVT, including impedance plethysmography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. US examinations are noninvasive, they are rapidly obtained, and they can be performed serially. In symptomatic patients, venous US is sensitive and specific for proximal DVT; however, US is insensitive to calf vein thrombosis and to asymptomatic DVT occurring after surgery. Patients with symptoms of recurrent DVT also can present a difficult diagnostic problem. Only about 20% to 30% of these individuals actually have the disease; the rest have symptoms arising from chronic venous insufficiency or from any of the causes of lower extremity pain. After an acute episode, up to 50% of patients have compression ultrasound abnormalities for 6 months that are indistinguishable from the original findings of DVT. Hence, there are a significant number of patients and clinical circumstances in which the diagnosis of DVT is difficult. 99mTc-radiolabeled peptides that target the molecular biology of thrombosis should aid in the management of the disease, particularly in asymptomatic patients at high risk, in patients with recurrent symptoms, in patients with active DVT in the calf and/or pelvis, and in patients with intermediate- or low-probability lung scans.

A randomized management study of impedance plethysmography vs. contrast venography in patients with a first episode of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVES

In this randomized management study, we examined the safety of withholding anticoagulation on the basis of negative impedance plethysmography (IPG) compared to negative contrast venography (CV) in symptomatic patients with a first episode of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and we determined the impact of the limitations of IPG or CV on their clinical utility.

METHODS

Patients at a university teaching hospital presenting with a first episode of clinically suspected DVT were randomized to one of two management strategies at study entry: (1) IPG: if positive, confirmatory CV was performed. If CV was positive, anticoagulants were administered, if CV was negative, anticoagulants were held. If negative, IPG was repeated serially and if it remained negative, anticoagulants were held (n = 165). (2) CV: if positive, anticoagulants were administered, if negative, anticoagulants were held (n = 159). The negative predictive value (NPV) of IPG and CV, positive predictive value (PPV) of IPG, and the failure rate of each strategy were assessed.

RESULTS

Among IPG patients, 28 of 37 with positive IPG initially or during serial testing and evaluable CV had confirmed DVT (PPV 76%; 95% confidence interval, CI [62%, 90%]). DVT was diagnosed during serial testing in 2.1% of patients with initially negative IPG who completed testing. The NPV overall of negative IPG was 98.3%. During follow-up, two patients in the IPG group (1.2%) and two patients in the CV group (1.3%) developed venous thromboembolism (VTE). Death during follow-up occurred in 11% of IPG patients compared to 6% of CV patients (P =.13) The investigation strategy failed in 25% of IPG patients and in 14% of CV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that the two diagnostic strategies we studied are equivalent methods for ruling out DVT in patients with a first episode of suspected DVT. The PPV of IPG was too low to permit its use alone as a test to rule in DVT. Both strategies had surprisingly high failure rates.

Management of venous thromboembolic disease in the chronically critically ill patient

Although PE is the most common preventable cause of death among U.S. hospital patients, proper treatment of thromboembolism and adequate prophylaxis in high-risk patients have been shown to be effective in saving lives. Because clinical symptoms and signs of thromboembolic disease are often nonspecific, early diagnosis and treatment rely on the capacity of physicians to adequately identify a patient at risk, choose the appropriate diagnostic modalities in a cost-effective fashion, and promptly initiate treatment. The diagnosis of VTE is particularly challenging in patients who are in the post acute period of a complex medical or surgical illness. Avenues that need to be further explored include various diagnostic tests such as spiral CT, MR imaging, and transesophageal echocardiography, which are less invasive than the present gold standard of pulmonary angiography. Also needed are better clinical data regarding the optimal choice of preventive therapy (e.g., unfragmented heparin or LMWH or mechanical devices) and clinical outcome of such therapy in patients with prolonged illness.

Use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy

Anticoagulant therapy is indicated during pregnancy for the prevention and treatment of VTE; for the prevention and treatment of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves; and, often in combination with aspirin, for the prevention of pregnancy loss in women with APLAs or thrombophilia and previous pregnancy losses. Several questions concerning anticoagulant therapy remain unanswered. It appears that LMWH will largely replace UFH. Oral anticoagulants are fetopathic, but the true risks of the warfarin embryopathy and CNS abnormalities remain unknown. There is considerable evidence that warfarin embryopathy occurs only when oral anticoagulants are administered between the sixth week and the 12th week of gestation and that oral anticoagulants may not be fetopathic when administered in the first 6 weeks of gestation. Oral anticoagulant therapy should be avoided in the weeks before delivery because of the risk of serious perinatal bleeding caused by the trauma of delivery to the anticoagulated fetus. The safety of aspirin during the first trimester of pregnancy is still a subject of debate. There is a concern about the efficacy of UFH in the prevention of arterial embolism in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Finally, the optimum management of pregnant women with thrombophilia (and prior pregnancy loss and/or prior VTE) is unknown, but trials of anticoagulant therapy are ongoing. Because it is safe for the fetus, LMWH (or UFH) is the anticoagulant of choice during pregnancy for situations in which its efficacy is established. There is some doubt that heparin is effective for the prevention of systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves. Low doses of heparin or poorly controlled heparin therapy are not effective in preventing systemic embolism in patients with mechanical heart valves.

Computer assisted strain-gauge plethysmography is a practical method of excluding deep venous thrombosis

AIM

To evaluate a computed strain-gauge plethysmograph (CSGP) as a screening tool to exclude above knee deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

The first phase took place in the Radiology department. One hundred and forty-nine patients had both Doppler ultrasound and CSGP performed. Discordant results were resolved by venography where possible. The second phase took place in an acute medical admissions ward using a modified protocol. A further 173 patients had both studies performed. The results were collated and analysed.

RESULTS

Phase 1. The predictive value of a negative CSGP study was 98%. There were two false-negative CSGP results (false-negative rate 5%), including one equivocal CSGP study which had deep venous thrombosis on ultrasound examination. Two patients thought to have thrombus on ultrasound proved not to have acute thrombus on venography. Phase 2. The negative predictive value of CSGP using a modified protocol was 97%. There were two definite and one possible false-negative studies (false-negative rate 4-7%).

CONCLUSION

Computer strain-gauge plethysmograph can provide a simple, cheap and effective method of excluding lower limb DVT. However, its use should be rigorously assessed in each hospital in which it is used. Goddard, A. J. P., Chakraverty, S. & Wright, J. (2001). Clinical Radiology56, 30-34.

Proficient and cost-effective approaches for the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and thromboembolism

Thrombosis is clearly a common cause of death in the US. It is obviously of major importance to define the aetiology of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as (i) many of these events are preventable if appropriate therapy, dependent upon the risk factors known is utilised; (ii) appropriate antithrombotic therapy will decrease risks of recurrence; (iii) the type of defect(s) and risk(s) will determine length of time the patient should remain on therapy for secondary prevention and (iv) if the defect is hereditary appropriate family members can be assessed. Aside from mortality, significant additional morbidity occurs from DVT including, but not limited to, stasis ulcers and other sequelae of post-phlebitic syndrome. Numerous studies have provided evidence that medical patients and patients undergoing surgery or trauma are at significant risk for developing DVT, including pulmonary embolism (PE). Thus, an important task for the clinician is to prevent DVT and its complications. It is important to define risk groups where prophylaxis must be considered. The attitudes and beliefs towards prophylaxis show great regional variations. This is true for the definition of risk groups, the proportion of patients receiving prophylaxis and prophylactic modalities used. For this reason, various 'consensus conference' groups have attempted to alleviate these problems; the primary mission of consensus guidelines is to provide optimal direction to the clinician in the setting of clinical practice. If the practice guidelines generated are successful they will assist clinicians in decision-making for their patients, and they will also provide protection against unjustified malpractice actions. Therapy may be complex, as clinical studies continue to identify more effective treatments. This review includes currently accepted approaches to the treatment of DVT. The clinical course of DVT is highly dynamic. When the response to therapy is not as expected, more than one cause of DVT may be present in a patient. Treatment must address the primary coagulopathy as well as any precipitating factors. The risk of pharmacological intervention must be balanced against potential benefit. If the incidence of DVT in a given disorder is low and if the mortality rate is similarly low, therapy with an agent known to be associated with a high risk for complications, such as warfarin, would not be indicated. If DVT is seen primarily after surgery or in other high-risk situations, therapy might be limited to a fixed time period. However, if the ongoing risk of DVT remains high or if a history of recurrent DVT dictates, lifelong therapy might be indicated. The recommendations presented are based upon published controlled trials; however, indications for therapy and therapeutic agents of choice will continually evolve. By applying the principles outlined in this review, substantial cost savings, reduction in morbidity and reductions in mortality should occur.

Withholding treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism who have a high risk of bleeding and negative serial noninvasive leg tests

PURPOSE

Patients who have nonmassive acute pulmonary embolism and a high risk of bleeding or contraindication to anticoagulants, such recent surgery or gastrointestinal bleeding, present a clinical dilemma. We sought to estimate whether such patients could be safely left untreated if serial compression ultrasound or serial impedance plethysmography were negative and cardiorespiratory reserve was adequate.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The frequency of recurrent pulmonary embolism among patients with nonmassive acute pulmonary embolism and negative serial noninvasive leg tests who were not treated was estimated from two prospective studies of the noninvasive management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. One of the studies used serial impedance plethysmography of the lower extremities; the other used serial compression ultrasound. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation/perfusion lung scans was determined from the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED).

RESULTS

The estimated frequency of fatal recurrent pulmonary embolism was 1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0% to 5%) among untreated patients with nonmassive pulmonary embolism who had negative serial impedance plethysmograms and 0% (95% CI, 0% to 4%) among those with negative serial compression ultrasonograms. The frequency of nonfatal recurrent pulmonary embolism among untreated patients was 3%, regardless of whether they had negative serial impedance plethysmograms or negative serial compression ultrasonograms. These results were comparable with the frequency of recurrent pulmonary embolism among patients treated with anticoagulants or with inferior vena cava filters.

CONCLUSION

Withholding treatment of nonmassive acute pulmonary embolism, if serial impedance plethysmograms or serial venous ultrasonograms are negative and cardiopulmonary reserve is adequate, is a possible strategy for the management of patients with a high risk of bleeding or other contraindication to anticoagulants. This strategy may be associated with fewer adverse events than treatment with anticoagulants or an inferior vena cava filter. Prospective trials comparing alternative treatments are needed.

Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in the year 2000

Deep-vein thrombosis is a relatively common disease, amenable to therapy but with a potentially fatal outcome if untreated. The diagnosis can be made in most patients with the noninvasive imaging procedure ultrasonography, but limitations exist. As with all tests, there is a potential for false-positive and false-negative results. The latter are especially an issue for calf vein thrombi, and this in part has led to the concept of serial testing of the proximal venous system and not imaging the calf. The premise of the repeat (serial) test is that only thrombi that extend to the proximal system are clinically relevant and such thrombi will be detected on the repeat test. However, despite the safety of the serial testing concept, it is inconvenient and expensive. In the last few years, the diagnostic process has been improved by the validation of a clinical model that accurately categorizes patients as having low, moderate, or high probability. Among the improvements this provides is the elimination of serial testing if the ultrasonogram is normal and the clinical probability low. The fibrin degradation product D-dimer has been demonstrated to have a high negative predictive value and has also proven useful in diagnostic algorithms. The combination of the D-dimer with clinical model assessment will enable diagnostic testing strategies that are more safe, effective, and convenient for patients.

Computerized strain-gauge plethysmography - An alternative method for the detection of lower limb deep venous thrombosis?

AIM

To test the ability of computerized strain-gauge plethysmography to act as a screening test for lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over an 8-month period, all patients referred to our Medical Assessment Unit with suspected lower limb DVT were considered for inclusion in the study. Each patient underwent both plethysmography and ascending venography within 24 h, and the presence or absence of thrombus in the popliteal, superficial femoral or iliac veins was noted. The results of the two tests were then used to determine the accuracy of computerized strain-gauge plethysmography in detecting above knee DVT.

RESULTS

The screening tests and venograms of 239 patients referred with clinically suspected lower limb DVT were compared. The false negative rate of plethysmography was 15.4%, which is significantly different from the 4.8% claimed by the manufacturers of this device (P = 0.00003).

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of acute admissions with suspected lower limb DVT, computerized strain-gauge plethysmography is not suitable for use as a screening test due to an unacceptably high proportion of false negative screens.

Deep-vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: diagnosis and management

Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities is a serious and potentially fatal disorder which often complicates the course of severely ill, hospitalized patients but may also affect ambulatory and otherwise healthy people. It is uncommon in young individuals and becomes more frequent with advancing age. The clinically important problems associated with DVT are death from pulmonary embolism (PE), morbidity resulting from the acute event, the post-thrombotic syndrome, and the inconvenience and side-effects of investigations and treatment. Furthermore, an often underemphasized problem is the anxiety that may occur in those patients who have suffered a thrombotic episode.

Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in pregnancy

Accurate diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is required because treatment can be lifesaving, although inappropriate anticoagulation exposes the mother and fetus to hemorrhage and other hazards. Clinicians must be aware of which patients are at risk, as deep venous thrombosis is frequently asymptomatic. Clinical diagnosis is unreliable for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism; therefore, objective tests are required. Venography is the gold standard test for deep venous thrombosis but is invasive. It has been superseded by less invasive tests such as compression ultrasound. This test, although not yet rigorously scrutinized in pregnancy, is now the first-line investigation. Where doubt remains, venography, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging have a role. Ventilation-perfusion scanning is the pivotal test for pulmonary thromboembolism for pregnancy, and it need not expose the fetus to excess radiation. If the results of this test are unclear, deep venous ultrasound can guide management of suspected pulmonary thromboembolism, thus avoiding pulmonary angiography.