Does low total creatine kinase rule out myocardial infarction?

Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: natural history, patterns of treatment, and outcome

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian carcinosarcomas (OCS) are rare tumors composed of both malignant epithelial and mesenchymal elements. We compared the natural history and outcomes of OCS to serous carcinoma of the ovary.

METHODS

Patients with OCS and serous carcinomas registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2007 were analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using chi square tests while survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 27,737 women, including 1763 (6.4%) with OCS and 25,974 (93.6%) with serous carcinomas, were identified. Patients with carcinosarcomas tended to be older and have unstaged tumors (P<0.0001). After adjusting for other prognostic factors, women with carcinosarcomas were 72% more likely to die from their tumors (HR=1.72; 95% CI, 1.52-1.96). Five-year survival for stage I carcinosarcomas was 65.2% (95% CI, 58.0-71.4%) vs. 80.6% (95% CI, 78.9-82.2%) for serous tumors. Similarly, five-year survival for stage IIIC patients was 18.2% (95% CI, 14.5-22.4%) for carcinosarcomas compared to 33.3% (95% 32.1-34.5%) for serous carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovarian carcinosarcomas are aggressive tumors with a natural history that is distinct from serous cancers. The survival for both early and late stage carcinosarcoma is inferior to serous tumors.

Biochemical markers of myocardial damage

OBJECTIVE

To assess various biochemical markers of myocardial damage.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Before routinely using any test as a biochemical marker of myocardial damage, the published evidence for its diagnostic utility must be critically assessed. Such assessment includes receiver operator curve (ROC) curve analyses, confidence interval estimates of claimed sensitivity and specificity values, and the effects of testing in serial and parallel modes. It is also necessary to establish the test's rule-in (high specificity) and rule-out (high sensitivity) decision thresholds that may vary with time after the onset of symptoms. The spectrum of ischemic heart disease includes acute (sudden death, non-Q- and Q-wave infarctions) and chronic (stable, unstable, and variant angina) conditions. Biochemical markers of myocardial damage are of most value in the diagnosis of acute ischemic heart disease, although increasingly some of these markers are being found to possess a prognostic value in chronic ischemic heart disease. The markers of enzymatic activity include aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase (together with isoenzymes and isoforms), and lactate dehydrogenase and isoenzymes. Creatine kinase isoenzyme-2 may also be measured immunologically, and this type of assay is in increasing use both because of its speed and because its blood levels rise earlier than the corresponding activities. The commercially available nonenzymatic markers are myoglobin and troponin T; troponin I is expected to become available in late 1995. While myoglobin is a nonspecific indicator of myocardial damage, its diagnostic value is due to its early appearance in blood. Troponin T is more cardiac specific, but the published data appears to suggest that the cardiac specificity of troponin I is superior. Troponin levels become abnormal at about the same time after the onset of symptoms as mass assays of creatine kinase isoenzyme-2; therefore, they are not useful as early markers of myocardial damage.

CONCLUSION

The availability of these nonenzymatic markers of myocardial damage must force a reassessment of the continued use of the enzymatic markers. Are they necessary, and if so, which ones should be retained?