Comparative effectiveness of warfarin and new oral anticoagulants for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

Factors influencing nurses' knowledge and competence in warfarin-drug and nutrient interactions and patient counseling practices

BACKGROUND

Warfarin therapy is commonly used to prevent thromboembolic events and cardiovascular disorders, but its effectiveness can be influenced by interactions with drugs and foods. Nurses play a crucial role in managing warfarin therapy and counseling patients on these interactions. This study aimed to assess the predictors of nurses' knowledge regarding warfarin-nutrient and drug interactions and their competence in counseling patients on warfarin therapy.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate nurses' knowledge and counseling practices related to warfarin therapy across various healthcare institutions in Amman, Jordan. Participants included 176 registered nurses with at least one year of experience, recruited through convenience sampling from governmental, private, and educational hospitals. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire that assessed demographic characteristics, work-related factors, exposure to health education, and knowledge of warfarin-drug and food interactions, as well as counseling practices.

RESULTS

The study found that most participants were female (58.6%) and held a bachelor's degree (72.7%). Nurses demonstrated moderate knowledge of warfarin-drug interactions, with a mean score of 8.76 ± 2.26 out of 26. Knowledge was better for cardiac agents like atenolol (53.4%) and gastrointestinal agents (53.4%), but gaps were observed for anti-inflammatory and CNS drugs. The mean score for knowledge of warfarin-food interactions (out of 18) was 12.27 ± 3.84, with strong knowledge of non-interfering foods, but gaps in understanding foods like leafy greens, high in vitamin K. Nurses' knowledge of counseling practices for warfarin therapy was moderate, with a mean score of 8.07 ± 2.31 out of 15. While knowledgeable about diet and adherence, gaps existed in counseling patients on missed doses and dietary restrictions. Regression analysis identified key predictors of knowledge, including education, work experience, direct patient care, self-confidence, exposure to health education, and anticoagulant training, explaining 35% of the variance in knowledge scores. A postgraduate degree, work experience, and confidence in warfarin care positively impacted knowledge, while demographic factors like age, gender, and job position had no significant effect. The findings highlight the need for educational programs and confidence-building initiatives.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights significant gaps in nurses' knowledge of warfarin interactions, particularly with certain drugs and foods, and underscores the need for targeted education and training. However, the study is limited by its reliance on self-reported data and a convenience sampling approach, which may impact generalizability. Strengthening nurses' understanding of warfarin management, especially regarding high-risk interactions, is essential for improving patient safety and the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy. Future initiatives should focus on structured educational programs, introducing interactive e-learning modules, regular workshops, and case-based training, as well as promoting multidisciplinary teamwork to enhance nurses' competency in warfarin counseling and patient care.

Multiorgan Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism in a Critically Ill Patient

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Multiorgan ultrasound offers a non-invasive, bedside alternative to computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for rapid diagnosis and management, particularly in critically ill patients. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with a high intermediate risk pulmonary embolism (PE), with Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class IV, multimodal ultrasound identified right ventricular dysfunction, elevated pulmonary artery pressures, and extensive lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, guiding timely diagnosis and management. This case highlights the utility of multimodal ultrasound as a non-invasive, bedside available diagnostic tool that facilitates effective management, particularly in critically ill patients when conventional imaging is not feasible.

Treatment with Antithrombotics in the Last Year of Life-Incidence of Bleeding and Side Effects After Deprescribing

Background: Patients in palliative care are often treated with antithrombotics, even in the late stages of disease. Clear guidelines regarding deprescribing are lacking. Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate bleeding as a side effect of antithrombotic treatments the last year in life and map the timing of deprescribing. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. All medical records were screened for deceased patients admitted to a palliative care unit in Stockholm, Sweden, over a 3-year period. Patients with antithrombotics were identified; data on bleeding, and on side effects due to deprescribing, were extracted from the medical records. Log-binomial models were used to explore factors associated with bleeding. Results: Of 1501 patients, 897 were treated with antithrombotics during the last year of life (mean age 75 years, 41% women). Of these, 56% continued treatment up until the last 3 days of life. Of the 897 patients, 144 (16%) had at least one bleeding during the treatment. The risk for bleeding was significantly higher for men with prostate cancer compared to other cancer forms, adjusted relative risk 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.2). No difference in risk for bleeding was found between sex, age groups, type of antithrombotics, or indication. Two patients (0.2%) developed strokes after antithrombotics were deprescribed. Conclusions: Treatment with antithrombotics during the last year of life is associated with a high risk of bleeding. In this cohort, men with prostate cancer seemed to have more side effects of bleeding than other groups. Few experienced side effects from deprescribing.

Anticoagulation and compression therapy for proximal acute deep vein thrombosis

The treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs includes an initial management phase, covering the first 1 to 3 weeks, a primary treatment phase, lasting a minimum of 3 months, and a secondary treatment phase for those patients requiring continuing anticoagulation beyond the first 3 to 6 months. During the initial phase most patients with DVT can be managed as outpatients. Exclusion criteria for home treatment include high risk of bleeding, limb threatening DVT or other conditions requiring hospitalisation. Anticoagulant drugs represent the mainstay of treatment and include parenteral drugs such as unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin, and oral drugs such as the vitamin K antagonists and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs are currently recommended as the first line of treatment for proximal DVT of the lower limbs, with no preference for one DOAC over another. Factors to consider when choosing the anticoagulant strategy include, among others, renal and liver function, underlying diseases such as cancer or the antiphospholipid syndrome, and patient preferences. Indefinite duration of anticoagulation beyond the first 3 to 6 months is recommended for patients with unprovoked DVT and patients with permanent, chronic risk factors. Two DOACs, namely apixaban and rivaroxaban, can be administered at low doses for the secondary prevention of DVT. Elastic compression stockings (ECS) have been used for decades in patients with proximal DVT with the aim of counteracting the venous hypertension generated by the vascular disorder and reducing leg edema and to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome.

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Current Literature and Views

Atrial fibrillation is a common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with uncoordinated atrial activation and ineffective atrial contraction. This leads to an increased risk of atrial thrombi, most commonly in the left atrial appendage, and increased risks of embolic strokes and/or peripheral thromboembolism. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To meet the concerns of thrombi and stroke, anticoagulation has been the mainstay for prevention and treatment thereof. Historically, anticoagulation involved the use of aspirin or vitamin K antagonists, mainly warfarin. Since early 2010s, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been introduced and approved for anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation. DOACs demonstrated a dramatic reduction in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage as compared to warfarin, and offer the advantages of absolution of monitoring therefore avoid the risk of hemorrhages in the context of narrow therapeutic window and under-treatment characteristic of warfarin, particularly in high-risk patients. One major concern and disadvantage for DOACs was lack of reversal agents, which have largely been ameliorated by the approval of Idarucizumab for dabigatran and Andexanet alfa for both apixaban and rivaroxaban, with Ciraparantag as a universal reversal agent for all DOACs undergoing Fast-Track Review from FDA. In this article, we will be providing a broad review of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation with a focus on risk stratification schemes and anticoagulation agents (warfarin, aspirin, DOACs) including special clinical considerations.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives

Atrial fibrillation is common in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. However, the optimal anticoagulation strategy to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature review to identify clinical studies of anticoagulation therapies for patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes of major bleeding and thrombotic events were reported using random effects risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Our search yielded 97 potential studies and evaluated 14 full-text articles based on title and abstract. We excluded 10 studies that were review articles or did not compare anticoagulation. We included 4 studies reporting on 1,579 patients. The pooled estimates are likely underpowered due to small sample sizes. There was no difference in bleeding events for patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs compared to VKAs with a RR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.38-1.10; p=0.10). There were decreased thrombotic events for patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs compared to VKAs with a RR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.32-0.79; p=0.003).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that DOACs are as safe and effective as VKAs in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation. However, more data are needed to investigate clinical differences in anticoagulation therapy in this patient population.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Prior Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin for secondary stroke prevention among adult patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke.

METHODS

Major repositories were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT subgroups, and observational studies (OBSs, divided in claims and non-claims). Occurrences of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and major bleeding were outcomes of interest. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their confidence intervals (95%CIs) were pooled using random-effects models for each study design. Claims studies were analyzed separately from non-claims, while RCT subgroups were grouped with OBSs (non-claims) as the randomization was broken.

RESULTS

Of 8647 articles, 20 were included (one RCT, six RCT subgroups, nine claims, and four non-claims). Comparing DOACs to warfarin, pooled HRs (95%CI) were consistently in favor of DOACs although some did not reach statistical significance: for ischemic stroke, 0.84 (0.66-1.07) in claims; 0.90 (0.77-1.06) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; for systemic embolism, 0.77 (0.62-0.96) in claims; 0.86 (0.77-0.96) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; for all-cause mortality, 0.57 (0.33-0.99) in claims; 0.87 (0.79-0.96) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; for ICH, 0.72 (0.39-1.33) in claims; 0.51 (0.38-0.67) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; and for major bleeding, 0.86 (0.71-1.03) in claims; 0.90 (0.76-1.08) for non-claims and RCT subgroups.

CONCLUSION

DOACs were associated with better efficacy and safety profiles than warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with prior stroke, more specifically a lower risk of systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and ICH.

Studies on Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism in the Past 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis Via CiteSpace and VOSviewer

The conjunction of atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in clinical practice. Over the last 2 decades, a significant number of articles (2500) have been published about AF and VTE. To effectively analyze and present these vast amounts of information, this study uses bibliometric research methods to categorize and consolidate these publications. The number of publications has increased yearly, especially since 2012. The United States was the most prolific country, with 1054 studies published. The most productive institution was McMaster University. Gregory Y.H. Lip was the most prolific author. The keyword analysis identified that the research focuses from 2003 to 2014 were factor Xa inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, direct thrombin inhibitor, double-blind, deep vein thrombosis, molecular weight heparin, stroke prevention, etc. From 2015 to 2016, research mainly focused on venous thromboembolism, antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulant, warfarin, atrial fibrillation, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. Studies during 2017 to 2022 focused on apixaban, direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, hemorrhage, edoxaban, medicine efficacy and safety, risk factors, clinical management, and vitamin K antagonists. Since 2018, novel oral anticoagulants have been the most commonly used keywords. On the whole, most studies of AF and VTE focus on pathogenesis and therapeutic drugs. The causal relationship between AF and VTE, the effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants in the treatments, the anticoagulant regimen of AF and VTE co-disease, and the treatment regimen for vulnerable populations such as the elderly or obese people were the focus of current research and will continue to be the central point of future research.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Laboratory Challenges and Antidotes

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing in patients needing treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). This is due to the net clinical benefit in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The rise in DOAC use is accompanied by a remarkable reduction in heparin and VKA prescriptions. However, this rapid change in anticoagulation patterns brought new challenges to patients, prescribers, laboratories, and emergency physicians. Patients have new liberties concerning nutritional habits and comedication and no longer need frequent monitoring or dose adjustments. Still, they have to comprehend that DOACs are potent anticoagulants that may cause or contribute to bleeding. Challenges for the prescriber include decision pathways for choosing the right anticoagulant and dosage for a specific patient and to change bridging practice in case of invasive procedures. Laboratory personnel are challenged by DOAC due to limited 24/7 availability of specific DOAC quantification tests and by the impact of DOAC on routine coagulation assays and thrombophilia tests. Challenges for the emergency physician result from the increasing age of DOAC anticoagulated patients, the difficulties to establish last intake of DOAC type and dosage, to interpret coagulation test results in emergency situations, and to make decisions for or against DOAC reversal strategies in acute bleeding or urgent surgery. In conclusion, although DOACs make long-term anticoagulation safer and more convenient for patients, DOACs pose challenge to all healthcare providers involved in anticoagulation decisions. The key to correct patient management and optimal outcome therefore lies in education.

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group - two DVTs and one ischemic stroke - and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005-1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.

Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence

Background and Purpose

Carotid stenosis is arterial disease narrowing of the origin of the internal carotid artery (main brain artery). Knowing how to best manage this is imperative because it is common in older people and an important cause of stroke. Inappropriately high expectations have grown regarding the value of carotid artery procedures, such as surgery (endarterectomy) and stenting, for lowering the stroke risk associated with carotid stenosis. Meanwhile, the improving and predominant value of medical intervention (lifestyle coaching and medication) continues to be underappreciated.

Methods and Results

This article aims to be an objective presentation and discussion of the scientific literature critical for decision making when the primary goal is to optimize patient outcome. This compilation follows from many years of author scrutiny to separate fact from fiction. Common sense conclusions are drawn from factual statements backed by original citations. Detailed research methodology is given in cited papers. This article has been written in plain language given the importance of the general public understanding this topic. Issues covered include key terminology and the economic impact of carotid stenosis. There is a summary of the evidence-base regarding the efficacy and safety of procedural and medical (non-invasive) interventions for both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Conclusions are drawn with respect to current best management and research priorities. Several "furphies" (misconceptions) are exposed that are commonly used to make carotid stenting and endarterectomy outcomes appear similar. Ongoing randomized trials are mentioned and why they are unlikely to identify a routine practice indication for carotid artery procedures. There is a discussion of relevant worldwide guidelines regarding carotid artery procedures, including how they should be improved. There is an outline of systematic changes that are resulting in better application of the evidence-base.

Conclusion

The cornerstone of stroke prevention is medical intervention given it is non-invasive and protects against all arterial disease complications in all at risk. The "big" question is, does a carotid artery procedure add patient benefit in the modern era and, if so, for whom?

Racial and sex differences in optimizing anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation

Study objective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder, responsible for 15 % of strokes in the United States. Studies continue to document underuse of anticoagulation therapy in minority populations and women. Our objective was to compare the proportion of AF patients by race and sex who were receiving non-optimal anticoagulation as determined by an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST).

Design setting and participants

Retrospective cohort study including 14,942 patients within University of Cincinnati Health Care system. Data were analyzed between November 18, 2020, and November 20, 2021.

Main outcomes and measures

Discordance between current therapy and that recommended by the AFDST.

Results

In our two-category analysis 6107 (41 %) received non-optimal anticoagulation therapy, defined as current treatment category ≠ AFDST-recommended treatment category. Non-optimal therapy was highest in Black (42 % [n = 712]) and women (42 % [n = 2668]) and lower in White (39 % [n = 4748]) and male (40 % [n = 3439]) patients. Compared with White patients, unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of receiving non-optimal anticoagulant therapy for Black patients were 1.13; 95 % CI, 1.02-1.30, p = 0.02; and 1.17; 95%CI, 1.04-1.31, p = 0.01; respectively, and 1.10; 95 % CI 1.03-1.18, p = 0.005; and 1.36; 95 % CI, 1.25-1.47, p < 0.001; for females compared with males.

Conclusions and relevance

In patients with atrial fibrillation in the University of Cincinnati Health system, Black race and female sex were independently associated with an increased odds of receiving non-optimal anticoagulant therapy.

Electronic health record-embedded decision support to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation - Study protocol

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common significant cardiac rhythm disorder and is a powerful common risk factor for stroke. Randomized trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation can reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF. Yet, there continues to be widespread underutilization of this therapy. To address this practice gap locally and improve efforts to reduce the risk of stroke for patients with AF in our health system, we have designed a study to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) embedded within our electronic health record.

METHODS

Our intervention is provider-facing and focused on decision support. The clinical setting is ambulatory patients being seen by primary care physicians. Patients include those with both incident and prevalent AF. This randomized, prospective trial will enroll 800 patients in our University of Cincinnati Health System who are currently receiving less than optimal anticoagulation therapy as determined by the AFDST. Patients will be randomized to one of two arms - 1) usual care, in which the AFDST is available for use; 2) addition of a best practice advisory (BPA) to the AFDST notifying the clinician that their patient stands to gain a significant benefit from a change in their current thromboprophylactic therapy.

RESULTS

The primary outcome is effectiveness of the BPA measured by change to "appropriate thromboprophylaxis" based on the AFDST recommendation at 3 months post randomization. Secondary endpoints include Reach and Adoption, from the RE-AIM framework for implementation studies. Sample size is based upon an improvement from inappropriate to appropriate anticoagulation therapy estimated at 4% in the usual care arm and ≥10% in the experimental arm.

CONCLUSION

Our goal is to examine whether addition of a BPA to an AFDST focused on primary care physicians in an ambulatory care setting will improve "appropriate thromboprophylaxis" compared with usual care. Results will be examined at 3 months post randomization and at the end of the study to evaluate durability of changes. We expect to complete patient enrollment by the end of June 2022.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04099485.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism patients: a meta-analysis of real-world studies

BACKGROUND

The real-world studies on recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in VTE patients have reported conflicting findings. Our study aimed to provide the direct comparison evidence of different NOACs for VTE patients in clinical practice settings.

METHODS

Search of the medical literature was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 22, 2021. Among the 19,996 citations retrieved, a total of 63,144 patients from 6 studies were analyzed. Clinical outcomes included recurrent VTE, death, and different bleeding events.

RESULTS

Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) analysis suggested that apixaban had significant lower bleeding riskthan rivaroxaban (major, minor and any bleeding: HR = 0.61, 0.56, 0.70; p = 0.008, < 0.0001, 0.006, respectively), but no statistics difference found in recurrent VTE events (HR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.47, p = 0.93). There was no significant difference of major bleeding between dabigatran and rivaroxaban (odds ratios (OR) = 0.41, 95% CI 0.09-1.90, p = 0.25), apixaban and dabigatran (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.15-2.72, p = 0.83). No significant difference was found in the comparison of edoxaban and other NOACs in VTE recurrence, major bleeding and composite outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In the prevention of bleeding events, apixaban was associated with a lower risk than rivaroxaban, but equivalent efficacy for different NOACs in prevention of recurrent VTE. Evidence generated from the meta-analysis based on real-world data can help to guide selection between apixaban and rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statements and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019140553).

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Assessment in High Risk of Bleeding Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly associated with advanced age and the presence of multiple, concomitant acute and chronic health conditions, placing this population at high risk for serious therapeutic side effects. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of NOAC in a group at high risk of bleeding complications, in a real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a high-risk cohort of 418 patients (pts) followed-up in our anticoagulation unit; data on patient characteristics, anticoagulation treatment, and bleeding and thrombotic complications were evaluated. The population had a median age of 77.8 ± 10.3 years and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.85 (SD ± 1.4). Overall, 289 (69.1%) were ≥75 years old. During a mean follow-up time of 51.2 ± 35.7 months, we observed a rate of any bleeding of 7, a clinically relevant non-major bleeding rate of 4.8, a major bleeding rate of 2.2, a stroke rate of 1.6, and a rate of thrombotic events of 0.28 per 100 patient-years. There were 59 hospitalizations due to any cause (14.1%) and 36 (8.6%) deaths (one due to ischemic stroke). A structured follow-up, with judicious prescribing and drug compliance, may contribute to preventing potential complications.

Is There a Role for Triple Therapy After ACS?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the subject of controversy. In this article, we review the current evidence for the use of triple therapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recently published trials of AF patients undergoing PCI have shown that combination of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with an antiplatelet agent is either superior or non-inferior to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in reducing bleeding complications with no difference in regard to thromboembolic events. Currently, the use of dual therapy (preferably with a NOAC and clopidogrel) is recommended over triple therapy in these patients. The optimal duration should be guided by the assessment of an individual's risk of thrombosis and bleeding events.

Derivation and validation of predictors of oral anticoagulant-related adverse events in seniors transitioning from hospital to home

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulant (OAC)-related adverse events are high post-hospitalization. We planned to develop and validate a prediction model for OAC-related harm within 30 days of hospitalization.

METHODS

We undertook a population-based study of adults aged ≥66 years who were discharged from hospital on an OAC from September 2010 to March 2015 in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was a composite of time to first hospitalization or emergency department visit for a hemorrhagic or thromboembolic event, or mortality within 30 days of hospital discharge. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to build the model.

RESULTS

We included 120,721 patients of which 5423 experienced the outcome. Most patients were aged ≥75 years (59.5%) and were female (55.6%). Sixty percent of the cohort had a follow-up visit with a healthcare provider within 7 days of discharge. Patients discharged on a direct acting OAC versus warfarin (apixaban: Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.94; dabigatran: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.84; rivaroxaban: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88), were prevalent users of the dispensed OAC versus incident users (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.96), had a joint replacement in the past 35 days (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33-0.50) or major surgery during index hospital stay (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80) had a lower risk for the outcome. The Cox model was stable with acceptable discrimination but poor goodness-of-fit.

CONCLUSIONS

A model for OAC-related harm in the early post-discharge period was developed. External validation studies are required to understand the model's poor calibration.

Perihematomal Edema and Clinical Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Related to Different Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

There is a need to examine the effects of different types of oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (OAC-ICH) on perihematomal edema (PHE), which is gaining considerable appeal as a biomarker for secondary brain injury and clinical outcome.

METHODS

In a large multicenter approach, computed tomography-derived imaging markers for PHE (absolute PHE, relative PHE (rPHE), edema expansion distance (EED)) were calculated for patients with OAC-ICH and NON-OAC-ICH. Exploratory analysis for non-vitamin-K-antagonist OAC (NOAC) and vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) was performed. The predictive performance of logistic regression models, employing predictors of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 4-6), was explored.

RESULTS

Of 811 retrospectively enrolled patients, 212 (26.14%) had an OAC-ICH. Mean rPHE and mean EED were significantly lower in patients with OAC-ICH compared to NON-OAC-ICH, p-value 0.001 and 0.007; whereas, mean absolute PHE did not differ, p-value 0.091. Mean EED was also significantly lower in NOAC compared to NON-OAC-ICH, p-value 0.05. Absolute PHE was an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome in NON-OAC-ICH (OR 1.02; 95%CI 1.002-1.028; p-value 0.027), but not in OAC-ICH (p-value 0.45).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative markers of early PHE (rPHE and EED) were lower in patients with OAC-ICH compared to those with NON-OAC-ICH, with significantly lower levels of EED in NOAC compared to NON-OAC-ICH. Increase of early PHE volume did not increase the likelihood of poor outcome in OAC-ICH, but was independently associated with poor outcome in NON-OAC-ICH. The results underline the importance of etiology-specific treatment strategies. Further prospective studies are needed.

Anticoagulation with warfarin compared to novel oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation in adults with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: comparison of thromboembolic events and major bleeding

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA). The optimal strategy to prevent strokes in patients with ATTR-CA and AF is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes in patients with ATTR-CA and AF treated with warfarin versus novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of patients with ATTR-CA stratified by presence or absence of AF and anticoagulation therapy. The primary outcome included a time to event analysis for the combined outcomes of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), major bleed, or death.

RESULTS

Of 290 patients, 217 patients (74.8%) had AF. Of those with AF (n = 217), 78 (35.9%) patients received warfarin compared with 116 (53.5%) patients who received NOACs. There were 17 thrombotic events, all in those diagnosed with AF compared with none in the patients without AF (p = .01). Over a mean follow-up of 2.4 years (range 0.1-12) there was no difference in primary outcome between those with AF treated with warfarin compared with NOACs (p = .35).

CONCLUSION

Patient with ATTR-CA and AF are at increased risk for stroke compared to patients with ATTR-CA and without AF. Thrombotic events and major bleeds did not differ between those who received warfarin and NOACs.

Neurological complications of cardiovascular drugs

Cardiovascular drugs are used to treat arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, arrhythmias, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. They also include antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs that are essential for prevention of cardiogenic embolism. Most neurologic complications of the cardiovascular drugs are minor or transient and are far outweighed by the anticipated benefits of treatment. Other neurologic complications are more serious and require early recognition and management. Overtreatment of arterial hypertension may cause lightheadedness or fatigue but often responds readily to dose adjustment or an alternative drug. Other drug complications may be more troublesome as in myalgia associated with statins or headache associated with vasodilators. The recognized bleeding risk of the antithrombotics requires careful calculation of risk/benefit ratios for individual patients. Many neurologic complications of cardiovascular drugs are well documented in clinical trials with known frequency and severity, but others are rare and recognized only in isolated case reports or small case series. This chapter draws on both sources to report the adverse effects on muscle, nerve, and brain associated with commonly used cardiovascular drugs.

Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS)

Background: To assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of oral anticoagulant therapy users, different types of instruments are available, either general or specific tools like Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS). These tools allow the clinician to adjust the treatment regimen to focus on increasing anticoagulation adherence and reduce adverse clinical outcomes. This study aims to validate the translated Arabic version of DASS to assess the satisfaction level of patients using oral anticoagulants in the Arab population. Methods: The Duke Anticoagulation satisfaction scale (DASS) was translated into the Arabic language using MAPI group services. DASS was administered to 505 patients receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or apixaban. The generic scale measuring the quality of life EQ-5D-5L was also administered. Psychometric properties were assessed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha), exploratory factor analysis, convergent and divergent validity, and the correlation between the DASS and demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Results: 439 subjects answered all the questions. From a total of 25 items, 22 grouped into three factors (limitations, positive impact, and negative impact). Each factor had good internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha 0.78-0.88). All the three factors correlated consistently with EQ-5D-5L measuring generic quality of life. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Arabic DASS version were comparable to the original English version. The Arabic version of the DASS showed very good reliability and validity. It can be used by health care professionals in other settings of anticoagulation clinics to assess patient's satisfaction and limitations to anticoagulant treatment.

Advances in the management of atrial fibrillation with a special focus on non-pharmacological approaches to prevent thromboembolism: a review of current recommendations

Atrial fibrillation (AFIB) is the most common heart rhythm abnormality and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While the treatment of AFIB involves strategies of rate with or without rhythm control, it is also essential to strategize appropriate therapies to prevent thromboembolic complications arising from AFIB. Previously, anticoagulation was the main treatment option which exposed patients to higher than usual risk of bleeding. However, with the advent of new technology, novel therapeutic options aimed at surgical or percutaneous exclusion or occlusion of the left atrial appendage in preventing thromboembolic complications from AFIB have evolved. This review evaluates recent advances and therapeutic options in treating AFIB with a special focus on both surgical and percutaneous interventions which can reduce and/or eliminate thromboembolic complications of AFIB.

American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs in ∼1 to 2 individuals per 1000 each year, corresponding to ∼300 000 to 600 000 events in the United States annually.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about treatment of VTE.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and adult patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 28 recommendations for the initial management of VTE, primary treatment, secondary prevention, and treatment of recurrent VTE events.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations include the use of thrombolytic therapy for patients with PE and hemodynamic compromise, use of an international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0 over a lower INR range for patients with VTE who use a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for secondary prevention, and use of indefinite anticoagulation for patients with recurrent unprovoked VTE. Conditional recommendations include the preference for home treatment over hospital-based treatment for uncomplicated DVT and PE at low risk for complications and a preference for direct oral anticoagulants over VKA for primary treatment of VTE.

Barriers and facilitators to optimal oral anticoagulant management: a scoping review

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are high alert medications and require high-quality management to optimize health outcomes. The objective of this scoping review was to identify barriers and facilitators (B&Fs) associated with the quality of OAC management. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases until July 12, 2018, and cross-referenced the bibliographies of the retrieved studies. We included quantitative and qualitative studies that assessed B&Fs to OAC management. The study selection and data extraction processes were performed in duplicate. Analyses included measuring the prevalence of reported B&Fs from studies reporting quantitative data, identifying B&Fs in narrative analyses, and identifying their impact on important outcomes of OAC management. B&Fs were coded and aggregated to higher-level themes using a consensus approach. Factors were described as "key" if they were statistically associated with important outcomes in a randomized trial or observational study. We included 62 studies-three randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 46 observational studies (cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, and case-control studies), 11 qualitative studies, and two mixed-methods studies. Factors identified could be grouped into four themes-therapy-related, patient-related, healthcare provider-related, and health system-related. Key barriers to optimal OAC management were mostly patient-related, whereas interventions focused on education or implementing protocols were shown through RCTs to be effective at improving knowledge scores of OAC patients. While multiple barriers and some facilitators were identified in this review, none was proven to be associated with clinical outcomes. With this in mind, individual physicians may wish to address the key barriers in their practice as a quality improvement initiative but system-wide or policy changes should await high-quality evidence. Future trials should address these factors.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017069043.

Predictors of oral anticoagulant-associated adverse events in seniors transitioning from hospital to home: a retrospective cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are widely prescribed in older adults. High OAC-related adverse event rates in the early period following hospital discharge argue for an analysis to identify predictors. Our objective is to identify and validate clinical and continuity of care variables among seniors discharged from hospital on an OAC, which are independently associated with OAC-related adverse events within 30 days.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We propose a population-based retrospective cohort study of all adults aged 66 years or older who were discharged from hospital on an OAC from September 2010 to March 2015 in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome is a composite of the first hospitalisation or emergency department visit for a haemorrhage or thromboembolic event or mortality within 30 days of hospital discharge. A Cox proportional hazards model will be used to determine the association between the composite outcome and a set of prespecified covariates. A split sample method will be adopted to validate the variables associated with OAC-related adverse events.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The use of data in this project was authorised under section 45 of Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act, which does not require review by a research ethics board. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at conferences and will determine intervention targets to improve OAC management in upcoming randomised trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02777047; Pre-results.

Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and large prevalence of prior intracranial bleeding

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) represents an alternative approach for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and contraindication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). The aim of our study was to analyse the outcomes in patients treated with LAAO, with a focus on cases with previous intracranial bleeding.

METHODS

Sixty patients with NVAF underwent LAAO (75.4 ± 9 years); mean CHA2DS2-VASc was 4.4 ± 1.7, mean HAS-BLED 3.2 ± 0.9. Thirty-two patients (53.3%) reported previous intracranial bleeding. Ischaemic and bleeding events recorded during follow-up were compared with expected event rates according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

RESULTS

Device implantation was successful in 58 patients (96.7%). The antiplatelet therapy was tailored according to patients' bleeding risk. During follow-up (2.32 ± 1.5 years) 3 ischaemic strokes and 1 transient ischaemic attack occurred, versus 13 total expected thromboembolic events (P = 0.033); 5 major bleedings were observed, versus 7 expected ones, if the patients were under OAC. Considering the combined endpoint (thromboembolic and major bleeding events) 9 events were observed versus 20 expected major events (P = 0.031). In the prespecified subgroup of patients with previous intracranial bleeding, two ischaemic strokes and one transient ischaemic attack were observed during follow-up versus six total expected thromboembolic events; no intracranial bleeding recurrence was recorded. Regarding the combined endpoint four major events were recorded versus nine expected ones.

CONCLUSION

LAAO is an efficient and safe option for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with NVAF, high thromboembolic risk and contraindication to OAC, particularly in patients with previous intracranial bleeding.

Dual Versus Triple Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety and effectiveness of dual therapy (direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC] plus P2Y12 inhibitor) versus triple therapy (vitamin K antagonist plus aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of dual versus triple therapy on bleeding and ischemic outcomes in adults with AF after PCI.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (inception to 31 December 2019) and ClinicalTrials.gov (7 January 2020) without language restrictions; journal Web sites; and reference lists.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of dual versus triple therapy on bleeding, mortality, and ischemic events in adults with AF after PCI.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent investigators abstracted data, assessed the quality of evidence, and rated the certainty of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four trials encompassing 7953 patients were selected. At the median follow-up of 1 year, high-certainty evidence showed that dual therapy was associated with reduced risk for major bleeding compared with triple therapy (risk difference [RD], -0.013 [95% CI, -0.025 to -0.002]). Low-certainty evidence showed inconclusive effects of dual versus triple therapy on risks for all-cause mortality (RD, 0.004 [CI, -0.010 to 0.017]), cardiovascular mortality (RD, 0.001 [CI, -0.011 to 0.013]), myocardial infarction (RD, 0.003 [CI, -0.010 to 0.017]), stent thrombosis (RD, 0.003 [CI, -0.005 to 0.010]), and stroke (RD, -0.003 [CI, -0.010 to 0.005]). The upper bounds of the CIs for these effects were compatible with possible increased risks with dual therapy.

LIMITATION

Heterogeneity of study designs, dosages of DOACs, and types of P2Y12 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

In adults with AF after PCI, dual therapy reduces risk for bleeding compared with triple therapy, whereas its effects on risks for death and ischemic end points are still unclear.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Association of Oral Anticoagulants and Verapamil or Diltiazem With Adverse Bleeding Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Normal Kidney Function

IMPORTANCE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are purported to have fewer drug-drug interactions than warfarin. However, potential interactions with coprescribed medications are still a safety concern. Verapamil hydrochloride and diltiazem hydrochloride are combined P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 inhibitors and may be associated with increases in the risk of bleeding with DOACs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of bleeding with DOACs and verapamil or diltiazem using an active comparator design.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A comparative effectiveness active comparator cohort study was conducted using US population-based data (2010-2015) analyzed between January 1 and July 15, 2019. Data were obtained on 48 442 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who had received an index prescription of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban between October 19, 2010, through June 30, 2015, with final follow-up on October 1, 2015. Analysis was restricted to individuals with no history of kidney disease who were receiving standard doses of the DOACs.

EXPOSURES

Patients with initial prescriptions of DOACs who were receiving verapamil or diltiazem were compared with those receiving amlodipine or metoprolol.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall and gastrointestinal major, moderate, and minor bleeding using primary or secondary diagnoses. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weights in Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 48 442 patients reviewed, analysis was conducted on 1764 patients receiving DOACs with verapamil or diltiazem compared with 3105 receiving amlodipine and 1793 patients receiving DOACs with verapamil or diltiazem compared with 3224 receiving metoprolol. Depending on the comparison, approximately 60% of the cohort were younger than 65 years and male, which differed by treatment group. Rivaroxaban and apixaban were not associated with increased rates of bleeding for patients receiving verapamil or diltiazem compared with those receiving amlodipine or metoprolol. Among patients receiving dabigatran etexilate, the overall bleeding rate was 52% higher (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.05-2.20) with verapamil or diltiazem vs amlodipine and 43% higher (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.00) vs metoprolol. Bleeding rates for dabigatran with verapamil or diltiazem were higher overall for other bleeding types (244.9 vs 158.4 per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratios of overall GI bleeding: 2.16; 95% CI, 1.30-3.60; minor bleeding: 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07-2.27; and minor GI bleeding: 2.16; 95% CI, 1.29-3.63). Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results for dabigatran when used with verapamil and diltiazem, with magnitudes ranging from 50% to 100% increased hazard rates and no significant results for apixaban or rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Current US prescribing information only recommends prescribing changes with dabigatran and P-gp inhibitors with lower kidney function. This study found increased bleeding risk associated with dabigatran when used concomitantly with the P-gp inhibitors verapamil and diltiazem in individuals with normal kidney function. Clinicians and patients may need to consider these drug-drug interactions when choosing oral anticoagulation.

Thrombotic Risk in Cancer Patients: Diagnosis and Management of Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major health problem, especially in cancer patients, who experience a significantly higher incidence of both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism compared to the general population. Indeed, patients with cancer have a prothrombotic state resulting in both increased expression of procoagulants and suppression of fibrinolytic activity. In addition, VTE increases the morbidity and mortality of these patients. For all these reasons, the prevention and treatment of VTE in cancer setting represent major challenges in daily practice. In general, low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy is the standard of care for the management of cancer-associated VTE, as Vitamin K antagonists are less effective in this setting. Direct oral anticoagulants offer a potentially promising treatment option for cancer patients with VTE, since recent studies demonstrated their efficacy and safety also in this peculiar setting.

Vestibular Nerve Atrophy After Vestibular Neuritis - Results from a Prospective High-Resolution MRI Study

PURPOSE

 Sudden unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit is mostly termed vestibular neuritis (VN), even if its cause or the exact location of the lesion remains unclear. Thus, therapy is mostly symptomatic. We aimed to prove if there is peripheral atrophy after VN with persistent canal paresis.

METHODS

 After approval by the ethics committee and according to the declaration of Helsinki and with informed consent, ten patients with persistent canal paresis after VN and ten age-matched healthy controls were included. High-resolution measurement (in-plane resolution 0.2 mm) of the internal auditory canal (IAC) using a 3 D CISS sequence at 3 Tesla was performed. The course of the pertaining nerves was reconstructed in the 3 D dataset and the measurement was performed at 60 % of the length of the IAC. The cross-sectional areas of the superior (SVN) and inferior vestibular nerve (IVN) were taken independently by two blinded readers.

RESULTS

 The interrater difference regarding the area was 22 %. We found significant atrophy of the SVN with a 24 % smaller area (p = 0.026) and found a smaller ratio of SVN/IVN on the symptomatic side (p = 0.017). Concerning single subject data, only 5 patients showed extensive atrophy of the NVS, while 5 patients did not. The time since symptom onset did not significantly influence the atrophy.

CONCLUSION

 MRI measuring of the area of the NVS after VN could detect atrophy after VN. However, only 5 patients exhibited marked atrophy, while the other 5 patients did not. With the background of stringent inclusion criteria (more than 6 months of symptom duration and proven persistent canal paresis), one has to wonder if there might be different etiologies behind the apparently identical symptoms.

KEY POINTS

  · MRI measuring of the area of the NVS after VN could detect atrophy after VN. · Only half of the 10 researched patients showed atrophy, while the other patients did not. · There are different etiologies to be suspected for VN.

CITATION FORMAT

· Freund W, Weber F, Schneider D et al. Vestibular Nerve Atrophy After Vestibular Neuritis - Results from a Prospective High-Resolution MRI Study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 854 - 861.

"Implementation Is so Difficult": Survey of National Learning Health System Decision-makers Identifies Need For Implementation Information in Evidence Reviews

BACKGROUND

Evidence use within learning health care systems can improve patient health outcomes. Embedded in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) since 2007, the Veterans Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) provides tailored evidence synthesis services to support VHA's learning health care system goals. As part of the ESP's ongoing quality improvement efforts, we have been surveying our users since 2016.

METHODS

We reviewed data from a survey of end-users received between September 5, 2016, and June 10, 2019. The survey assessed: (1) nature of decision-making needs; (2) actions resulting from the report's findings; (3) implementation timeframe; and (4) overall perception of report content.

RESULTS

Feedback was received from 66 of the 138 operational partners requesting ESP products during the fiscal year 2015 through 2018. Requests commonly informed clinical guidance (58%), identified future research needs (58%), and determined VHA-specific implementation strategy (47%). A total of 91% of responders used reports, typically within 3 months after completion (82%). Use was typically for VHA publications and/or presentations to inform VHA policy or guidance (26%), to inform intervention/strategy adoption decisions (23%) and for medical device and therapy procurement decisions (21%). Over half (53%) of respondents indicated that it would be useful for ESP reports to include more guidance on implementing findings.

CONCLUSION

Our survey of learning health system decision-makers' actual patterns and timing of evidence use provides valuable new information that can further support development of other health system and evidence producer partnerships and identifies key needs for better supporting health systems' uptake of evidence.

Emergency Reversal of Anticoagulation

Owing to the propensity of anticoagulated patients to bleed, a strategy for reversal of anticoagulation induced by any of the common agents is essential. Many patients are anticoagulated with a variety of agents, including warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, and the direct oral anticoagulants such as factor Xa and factor IIa inhibitors. Patients may also be using antiplatelet agents. Recommendations to reverse bleeding in these patients are constantly evolving with the recent development of specific reversal agents. A working knowledge of hemostasis and the reversal of anticoagulation and antiplatelet drugs is required for every emergency department provider. This article reviews these topics and presents the currently recommended strategies for dealing with bleeding in the anticoagulated patient.

[Between precision medicine and symbolic mastery: What doctors want]

INTRODUCTION

Caring for patients is inevitably fraught with uncertainties. These may result from clinicians not having or not using the available knowledge, from the incompleteness of the medical science base as a whole, or from the inevitable randomness of biological, psychological and social phenomena. Advances in science promise to reduce uncertainty by making ever more precise diagnosis and treatment possible.

METHODS

Here, we discuss two typical examples of scientific progress and on how they impact on clinical uncertainty: first, the stratification of chemotherapy for early breast cancer by a 70-gene signature, and second, the interpretation of knee MRI regarding meniscal damage.

RESULTS

According to a large randomized trial, the 70-gene -signature successfully differentiates between strata for invasive treatments. The quantitative results and related trade-offs, however, pose considerable difficulties for patient information and shared decision-making, thus increasing uncertainty. Knee complaints are only weakly associated with MRI findings. Pathological findings are highly prevalent in symptom-free individuals.

CONCLUSION

Recent advances in diagnostic methods increase the cognitive demands on clinicians and thus their uncertainty. By uncritically using advanced technologies in their practice, physicians exploit their archetypical healing powers. In a paradoxical way, modern technologies reduce uncertainties felt by doctors and their patients in an archaic fashion.

Modeling the impact of real-world adherence to once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on stroke and major bleeding events among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the real-world (RW) impact of adherence to once-daily (QD: rivaroxaban and edoxaban) and twice-daily (BID: apixaban and dabigatran) non-vitamin K antagonist (NOACs) on the risk of stroke and major bleeding (MB) among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.

METHODS

First, claims from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (July 2012-December 2016) were analyzed. Adult NVAF patients with ≥2 NOAC dispensings (index date) were included. The relationship between NOAC adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and stroke/MB 1-year post-index was evaluated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Second, the natural logarithm of hazard ratios (HRs) was multiplied to a literature-derived mean adherence difference between QD and BID NOACs yielding stroke and MB rates. Third, these rates were multiplied by 1-year Kaplan-Meier rates of stroke and MB which yielded the number of strokes prevented and MBs caused. Annual cost savings were evaluated using literature-based stroke ($81,414/patient) and MB ($63,905/patient) cost estimates.

RESULTS

In total, 54,280 patients were included. HRs for adherent vs non-adherent patients were 0.67 (p < .001) for stroke and 1.09 (p = .179) for MB. The claims-derived 1-year Kaplan-Meier rates were 3.0% and 3.4% for strokes and MBs, respectively. For 100,000 AF patients, 64 strokes were prevented (p < .001), and a non-significant number of MBs (n = 15, p < .191) were caused by QD vs BID NOACs annually, which leads to cost savings estimated at $58 million for QD NOACs.

CONCLUSION

QD NOACs prevented a significant number of strokes and caused no significant increase in MBs compared to BID NOACs, which leads to significant net cost savings for NVAF patients in the US.

Real-world adherence for direct oral anticoagulants in a newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation cohort: does the dosing interval matter?

Background

Differences in adherence may represent drug properties (e.g. dosing interval) or patient experiences while on treatment. Adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is important to maintain effectiveness over the course of treatment.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using 2009–2015 Truven Health MarketScan Databases. New initiators of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban with NVAF were identified. Twelve months of continuous enrollment before treatment was required to assess demographics and medical history. Proportion of days cover (PDC) was used to measure adherence at 3, 6, 9 and 12-month. Gaps in therapy and treatment switches were also evaluated. Logistic regression was used to compare high adherence (PDC ≥0.80).

Results

A total of 14,864 dabigatran, 16,005 rivaroxaban, and 8078 apixaban users were identified. Apixaban users had the highest adherence overall, with mean PDC at 3, 6, 9, and 12-months of 0.83, 0.76, 0.72, and 0.69, while dabigatran had the lowest adherence of 0.78, 0.67, 0.61, and 0.57. Adherence to DOACs increased with increased stroke risk scores. Adherence was also higher when first days supplied was > 30 days compared to 30 days and when filled via mail order pharmacies. Switching was highest among dabigatran users. Apixaban users were the most likely to have high adherence versus dabigatran (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.60–1.88) and versus rivaroxaban (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.14–1.34) at 12-months.

Conclusions

Apixaban users had the highest overall adherence despite twice-daily dosing versus once-daily dosing for rivaroxaban. These findings can be useful for formulary decision-making and when assessing treatment options.

Alarming lack of knowledge about antithrombotic therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation

ABSTRACT Large population campaigns have been conducted in Brazil to improve knowledge about the signs and symptoms of stroke and the importance of time to care. Objective: Parallel to these important actions, we aimed to evaluate the lay knowledge of patients with atrial fibrillation, a well-recognized etiology of stroke, adequate treatment and management of which can prevent up to 30% of cerebrovascular events. Methods: We questioned 143 patients with atrial fibrillation about the risks associated with the disease. Results: Ninety-one percent were on anticoagulation treatment. Of the total, 63.6% reported having been informed about the risks and benefits of anticoagulants but only 46.9% were able to correctly mention one of these risks. Ischemic stroke was identified as a risk by only 25.9% and hemorrhagic stroke was not mentioned. A CHADS2 ≥ 2 was scored by 84.0% of the patients. Conclusions: Our study showed an alarming knowledge gap in patients with atrial fibrillation. Difficulty in adherence to treatment resulting from the failure of this communication is possibly one of the factors responsible for the high incidence and recurrence of stroke, and should not go unnoticed.

Cost Analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Warfarin in Patients with Blunt Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhages

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly gaining popularity as alternatives to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events because of the simplicity of their dosing and lack of monitoring requirement. Many physicians feared that these novel agents would be cost-prohibitive not only in their administration but also in their sequelae of bleeding, given the few reversal agents available. Whereas the medication itself is more expensive than traditional warfarin, the total cost of a hospital admission has not been compared between patients on DOACs and warfarin who have sustained a blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We conducted a retrospective review of our hospital's trauma database from June 2011 through September 2015 at our Level II trauma center of patients who suffered from an ICH who were anticoagulated at the time of their trauma. Patients who died during their hospital admission or were exclusively on antiplatelet agents were excluded. Of the 136 patients studied, 79 were on warfarin and 57 were on a DOAC at the time of their presentation for a traumatic ICH. The average charged cost for the hospital stay of a patient with an ICH was significantly higher for patients on warfarin compared with DOACs [$70,384.08 vs $49,226.66 (P = 0.02)]. The average reimbursement rate for the hospital was also significantly higher for those patients on warfarin as compared with those on DOACs [$23,922.93 vs $14,705.77 (P = 0.02)]. DOACs are associated with a significant cost benefit in patients admitted for blunt traumatic ICHs when compared with those on warfarin.

Economic evaluation of prescribing conventional and newer oral anticoagulants in older adults

INTRODUCTION

Anticoagulants refer to a variety of agents that inhibit one or more steps in the coagulation cascade. Generally, clinical conditions that require the prescribing of an oral anticoagulant increase in frequency with age. However, a major challenge of anticoagulation use among older patients is that this group of patients also experience the highest bleeding risk. To date, economic evaluation of prescribing of anticoagulants that includes the novel or newer oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in older adults has not been conducted and is warranted.

AREAS COVERED

A review of articles that evaluated the cost of prescribing conventional (e.g. vitamin K antagonists) and NOACs (e.g. direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors) in older adults.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

While the use of NOACs significantly increases the cost of the initial treatment for thromboembolic disorders, they are still considered cost-effective relative to warfarin since they offer reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhagic events. The optimum anticoagulation with warfarin can be achieved by providing specialised care; clinics managed by pharmacists have been shown to be cost-effective relative to usual care. There are suggestions that genotyping the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes is useful for determining a more appropriate initial dose and thereby increasing the effectiveness and safety of warfarin.

Shared decision-making tool for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation - A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Appropriate thromboprophylaxis for patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF) remains a national challenge.

METHODS

We hypothesized that a shared decision-making interaction facilitated by an Atrial Fibrillation Shared Decision Making Tool (AFSDM) would improve patient knowledge about atrial fibrillation, and the risks and benefits of various treatment options for stroke prevention; increase satisfaction with the decision-making process; improve the therapeutic alliance between patient and the clinical care team; and increase medication adherence. Using a pre- and post-visit study design, we enrolled 76 patients and completed 2 office visits and 1-month telephone follow-up for 65 patients being seen in our Arrhythmia Clinic over the 1-year period (July 2016 through June 2017). Our primary outcome measure was change in decisional conflict between the first and second clinical visit.

RESULTS

Decisional conflict decreased from an average of 31 to 9. Mean change was 22.3 (95% CI, 25.7 - 37.1), corresponding to an effect size of 0.94 standard deviations. Satisfaction with decision increased from 4.0 to 4.5, measures of therapeutic alliance with the care team (Kim Alliance scale) increased from 100.1 to 103.1, and satisfaction with provider increased from 4.2 to 4.5 (P < .0001 for all measures). AF knowledge assessment scores increased from 8.4 to 9.1, and knowledge about personal stroke and bleeding risk increased from 1 to 1.5 (P < .0001). Finally, medication adherence improved as reflected by an increase in the Morisky Medication Adherence scale from 5.9 to 6.4 (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A shared decision-making interaction, facilitated by an AFSDM can significantly improve multiple measures of decision-making quality, leading to improved medication adherence and patient satisfaction.

Current State of Left Atrial Appendage Closure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia, is a major cause of stroke and systemic embolism, and is increasing in prevalence. Device closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) represents a non-pharmacologic approach to stroke prevention in AF patients. This review presents the rationale for LAA closure (LAAC), describes current transcatheter approaches to LAAC, and summarizes the current evidence for LAAC for stroke prevention, highlighting the main randomized trials and the most recent data available.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrates similar rates of all-cause stroke with transcatheter LAAC compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy and significantly less bleeding with LAAC after cessation of mandated post-procedure pharmacology. Recent prospective observational studies, including those evaluating outcomes after commercial approval in the USA, show significantly improved procedure safety compared with earlier experiences. LAAC appears to be an attractive alternative strategy for stroke prevention in AF patients, particularly in those who can take short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC), but are not optimal candidates for long-term OAC. Recent data suggests the procedure can be safely performed in patients with contraindications to OAC. Further, robust studies are needed to evaluate safety and efficacy in OAC-contraindicated patients, to compare outcomes with non-vitamin K antagonist OACs, and to explore the relative safety and efficacy of different LAAC devices.

Development of a clinical prediction model for an international normalised ratio ≥ 4·5 in hospitalised patients using vitamin K antagonists

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease, increase the risk of bleeding complications. We developed and validated a model to predict the risk of an international normalised ratio (INR) ≥ 4·5 during a hospital stay. Adult patients admitted to a tertiary hospital and treated with VKAs between 2006 and 2010 were analysed. Bleeding risk was operationalised as an INR value ≥4·5. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between potential predictors and an INR ≥ 4·5 and validated in an independent cohort of patients from the same hospital between 2011 and 2014. We identified 8996 admissions of patients treated with VKAs, of which 1507 (17%) involved an INR ≥ 4·5. The final model included the following predictors: gender, age, concomitant medication and several biochemical parameters. Temporal validation showed a c statistic of 0·71. We developed and validated a clinical prediction model for an INR ≥ 4·5 in VKA-treated patients admitted to our hospital. The model includes factors that are collected during routine care and are extractable from electronic patient records, enabling easy use of this model to predict an increased bleeding risk in clinical practice.

Length of hospitalization and mortality for bleeding during treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban

Background

Different outcomes among patients hospitalized for bleeding after starting anticoagulation could influence choice of anticoagulant. We compared length of hospitalization, proportion of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay, and 30- and 90-day mortality for adults with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for bleeding after starting warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban.

Methods

An US commercial database of 38 million members from 1 November 2010 to 31 March 2014 was used to examine adults with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for bleeding after starting warfarin (2,446), dabigatran (442), or rivaroxaban (256). Outcomes included difference in mean total length of hospitalization, proportion of ICU admissions, mean length of ICU stay, and all-cause 30- and 90-day mortality.

Results

Warfarin users were older and had more comorbidities. Multivariable regression modeling with propensity score weighting showed warfarin users were hospitalized 2.0 days longer (95% CI 1.8–2.3; p < 0.001) than dabigatran users and 2.6 days longer (95% CI 2.4–2.9; p < 0.001) than rivaroxaban users. Dabigatran users were hospitalized 0.6 days longer (95% CI 0.2–1.0; p = 0.001) than rivaroxaban users. There were no differences in the proportion of ICU admissions. Among ICU admissions, warfarin users stayed 3.0 days (95% CI 1.9–3.9; p < 0.001) longer than dabigatran users and 2.4 days longer (95% CI 0.9–3.7; p = 0.003) than rivaroxaban users. There was no difference in ICU stay between dabigatran and rivaroxaban users. There were no differences in 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality.

Conclusions

Rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with shorter hospitalizations; however, there were no differences in 30- and 90-day mortality. These findings suggest bleeding associated with the newer agents is not more dangerous than bleeding associated with warfarin.

Atrial fibrillation decision support tool: Population perspective

BACKGROUND

Appropriate thromboprophylaxis for patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF) remains a national challenge. The recent availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with comparable efficacy and improved safety compared with warfarin alters the balance between risk factors for stroke and benefit of anticoagulation. Our objective was to examine the impact of DOACs as an alternative to warfarin on the net benefit of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in a real-world population of AF patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with paroxysmal or persistent nonvalvular AF. We updated an Atrial Fibrillation Decision Support Tool (AFDST) to include DOACs as treatment options. The tool generates patient-specific recommendations based upon individual patient risk factor profiles for stroke and major bleeding using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) calculated for each treatment strategy by a decision analytic model. The setting included inpatient and ambulatory sites in an academic health center in the midwestern United States. The study involved 5,121 adults with nonvalvular AF seen for any ambulatory visit or inpatient hospitalization over the 1-year period (January through December 2016). Outcome measure was net clinical benefit in QALYs.

RESULTS

When DOACs are a therapeutic option, the AFDST recommends OAT for 4,134 (81%) patients and no antithrombotic therapy or aspirin for 489 (9%). A strong recommendation for OAT could not be made in 498 (10%) patients. When warfarin is the only option, OAT is recommended for 3,228 (63%) patients and no antithrombotic therapy or aspirin for 973 (19%). A strong recommendation for OAT could not be made in 920 (18%) patients. In total, 1,508 QALYs could be gained if treatment were changed to that recommended by the AFDST.

CONCLUSIONS

Availability of DOACs increases the proportion of patients for whom oral anticoagulation therapy is recommended in a real-world cohort of AF patients and increased projected QALYs by more than 1,500 when all patients are receiving thromboprophylaxis as recommended by the AFDST compared with current treatment.