Lacrimation and 5-fluorouracil

Punctal and Canalicular Stenosis Following Topical 1% 5-Fluorouracil Eye Drop Therapy for Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia

PURPOSE

To present the first known cases of punctal and canalicular stenosis following topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) eye drops for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with OSSN receiving topical 1% 5-FU eye drops as a primary or adjuvant treatment between 2013 and 2021 was performed. Individuals diagnosed with punctal or canalicular stenosis during or after topical 5-FU use were included in this study. Four individuals met these criteria; we report clinical findings and treatment course for each patient.

RESULTS

We reviewed 303 patients (316 eyes) with OSSN. All patients were treated with topical 1% 5-FU eye drops in cycles, given 4 times daily for 1 week with 3 weeks off. Four patients (5 eyes) developed punctal stenosis, for a frequency of 1.3%. The mean age at 5-FU initiation in the 4 individuals was 61 years (range 53-69). Most individuals were male (75%), White (75%), and non-Hispanic (100%). The most common presenting symptom of stenosis was epiphora, noted 4.6 ± 3 months after initiating topical 5-FU (after 4.9 ± 2.0 cycles). This occurred in 4 eyes while on therapy (3, 2, 4, and 4 months since 5-FU initiation) and in 1 eye after stopping therapy (10.3 months since 5-FU initiation). In 1 eye, punctal stenosis and epiphora resolved spontaneously after stopping 5-FU. Punctal dilation led to symptom resolution in 2 eyes. Surgical intervention (punctoplasty and external dacryocystorhinostomy) was needed in 2 eyes for punctal and canalicular stenosis, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Punctal or canalicular stenosis is a rare and previously unreported adverse effect of topical 5-FU that may require surgical treatment.

Bilateral lacrimal drainage obstruction and its association with secondary causes

PURPOSE

Etiologies of lacrimal obstruction requiring a dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) have been reviewed previously but most commonly are thought to result from "primary acquired" nasolacrimal duct obstruction, a process of chronic inflammation in a narrowed duct. The authors have observed that secondary causes are frequently associated with bilateral lacrimal outflow disease. The purpose of this study is to investigate this relationship to help the clinician prioritize which patients to evaluate for secondary causes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-controlled review of patients who underwent bilateral DCR from 1986 to 2012 at this institution. They are compared with an age and gender-matched control group who underwent unilateral DCR. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the Pearson chi-square test for p value, except for age, which used the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Logistic regression was used for comparing prevalence of secondary issues in bilateral disease versus unilateral disease, with age as covariate.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-five patients underwent bilateral (91) or unilateral DCR (144). Twice as many patients undergoing bilateral DCR had an underlying secondary cause compared with the patients undergoing unilateral DCR. (38%, 19%, p= 0.001, odds ratio 2.59). In patients <50, the odds ratio of a secondary cause in bilateral disease would be 5.34 compared with patients older than 80. (p = 0.0002) Patients in the bilateral DCR group underwent revisions at more than twice the rate as patients in the unilateral DCR group (26%, 12%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Ophthalmologists should have a high index of suspicion for secondary conditions underlying bilateral lacrimal outflow obstruction, especially in patients <50. These patients should undergo laboratory workup and intraoperative biopsy. They should also be counseled regarding a higher failure rate.

Docetaxel-associated epiphora

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane indicated for the treatment of advanced breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancers; it is also used for the treatment of various other solid tumors. The standard intermittent dosage of docetaxel is 60-100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. At this dose and schedule, myelosuppression is common and neutropenia is usually the dose-limiting toxicity. Weekly administration of docetaxel 20-42 mg/m2 is being tested in the treatment of advanced solid tumors in order to improve patient tolerance by reducing the interval dose and to maintain therapeutic efficacy by increasing overall dose intensity. Asthenia and peripheral neuropathy can limit continued administration of weekly docetaxel. Epiphora (excess tearing due to narrowing or blockage of the lacrimal outflow passages) is associated with repeated weekly administration of docetaxel. This adverse effect can interfere with activities of daily life and negatively affect quality of life. Epiphora may be an underreported adverse effect of treatment because of underrecognition by clinicians and patient embarrassment with respect to seemingly uncontrolled tearing. The use of weekly docetaxel administration is expanding; therefore, patients should be educated to recognize and report signs and symptoms of epiphora. It is important for clinicians participating in the care of patients undergoing treatment with docetaxel to monitor for excess tearing and signs of eye irritation to ensure timely management of treatment-related epiphora.

Ocular surface, ocular adnexal, and lacrimal complications associated with the use of systemic 5-fluorouracil

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence rates and associated characteristics of patients who have ocular surface, ocular adnexal, and lacrimal complications associated with the systemic use of the cancer chemotherapeutic agent 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU).

METHODS

An exposure-based cohort study was designed. Adult patients who had completed at least 3 months of systemic 5-FU therapy within the past 5 years were eligible for enrollment. Study subjects had a detailed medical history taken with emphasis on preexisting conditions known to be associated with the development of ocular surface, ocular adnexal, and lacrimal complications. An ocular examination was then performed. A complete nasolacrimal system evaluation was performed if symptoms or findings were identified. The prevalence was then determined for each ocular symptom and each ocular finding identified that was not present pretreatment. An exploratory analysis was then performed to identify patient characteristics that might influence the likelihood of developing any of the above complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The prevalence rates of the following ocular abnormalities were calculated: ocular irritation, 5.8%; blepharitis, 3.8%; conjunctivitis, 3.8%; keratitis, 3.8%; eyelid dermatitis, 5.8%; cicatricial ectropion, 1.9%; tearing, 26.9%; punctal-canalicular stenosis, 5.8%; and blurred vision, 11.5%. Blacks had tearing at a significantly higher rate when compared with whites (P = 0.022, 2-sided Fisher exact test). Three patients had permanent complications that will require surgery for correction. Of the 7 patients who had a single abnormality, 6 had tearing and one had eyelid dermatitis. All of the 8 patients who had multiple findings had tearing as one of their abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Ninety-three percent of the patients who had an ocular abnormality had tearing as one of the complications. Patients who are receiving systemic 5-FU and begin to tear should have an ocular examination, looking for ocular surface, ocular adnexal, and lacrimal complications.

Lacrimal duct stenosis and other ocular toxicity associated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer

Certain side-effects of chemotherapy are well recognized but ocular toxicity is often underestimated. This retrospective study was undertaken after we became aware of a case of irreversible lacrimal duct stenosis in a woman receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. Using the chemotherapy records, 128 patients who received adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer over a 2 1/2-year period were identified. The case notes of these patients were reviewed and an 18% incidence of ocular side-effects, including four other cases of epiphora, was identified. The epiphora resolved fully on completion of chemotherapy in these four patients but not in the index patient. The optimal management of these side-effects is unclear but it needs to be tailored to the particular toxicity experienced by the patient.

Ocular toxicity and cancer chemotherapy. A review

BACKGROUND

Systemic anticancer therapies can produce acute and chronic organ damage, but the eye is usually considered a protected site. Nonetheless, the oculo-visual system has a potentially high degree of sensitivity to toxic substances. Ocular toxicity induced by cancer chemotherapy includes a broad spectrum of disorders, reflecting the unique anatomic, physiologic, and biochemical features of this essential organ.

METHODS

A review of the literature regarding the ocular toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, hormonal agents, biologic agents, and high dose chemotherapy with allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation was conducted.

RESULTS

Ocular toxicity induced by anticancer chemotherapy is not uncommon. The development of more aggressive regimens as well as new agents and combination chemotherapies have resulted in a significant increase of reported cases of chemotherapy-induced ocular side effects. In most instances, the mechanisms of ocular toxicity continue to be poorly understood.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular toxicities induced by chemotherapeutic agents are generally not preventable; therefore, clinicians must be aware of potential vision-threatening complications. Prompt consultation with an ophthalmologist can lead to early detection, proper diagnosis, and appropriate therapeutic measures. Dose reduction or discontinuation of incriminated drugs may help in reducing the severity and the duration of side effects.

Punctal and canalicular stenosis associated with systemic fluorouracil therapy. Report of five cases and review of the literature

Ocular side effects of systemic fluorouracil include excessive lacrimation, due to punctal and canalicular stenosis and fibrosis. Obstruction of the tear ducts after systemic therapy with fluorouracil is more frequent than is assumed. Five patients with breast cancer and punctal or canalicular stenosis are presented. Although complaints of epiphora usually resolve two weeks after cessation of systemic therapy, local antibiotics and steroids may be indicated. In patients with persisting complaints, and patients treated with fluorouracil for a prolonged period of time, prophylactic intubation of the tear ducts with silastic tubes has been advocated. (Conjunctivo)dacryocystorhinostomy may be unavoidable.

Ocular complications of systemic cancer chemotherapy

Cancer chemotherapy has changed rapidly in recent years. New agents are constantly being developed. Established agents are being used with increased frequency, in new combinations, at higher dosages, and via new routes of administration. Enhanced survival, as well as increased drug toxicity, has resulted. Ocular toxicity is not uncommon and can greatly impact on quality of life. Practitioners in all fields are increasingly caring for patients who are receiving cancer chemotherapy. The recognition of eye disease resulting from chemotherapy is essential to appropriate patient management. We provide a review of the rapidly growing body of literature on the ocular toxicity of systemic cancer chemotherapy with particular attention to context, clinical course, mechanism, prevention and treatment.

Ocular side effects of cancer chemotherapy

The ocular side effects of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs are relatively uncommon. Patients with cancer may develop ocular problems due to metastases to the eye or central nervous system, side effects and radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or totally independent eye disorders. We present a review of the reported ocular toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents to assist the oncologist caring for such patients.