Cimetidine and effect of warfarin

Drug interactions through binding to cytochrome p 450: the experience with h2-receptor blocking agents

H2-receptor blocking agents, such as cimetidine, ranitidine or oxmetidine, are consumed in large amounts often together with a variety of other drugs. There is increasing evidence that cimetidine interferes with the hepatic elimination of several drugs, thereby aggravating the effects of the comedication. Microsomal studies in vitro revealed that cimetidine binds in therapeutic concentrations to cytochrome P450, which may represent the primary mechanism for its ability to inhibit drug metabolism and thereby interact with other drugs. The structurally different ranitidine (replacement of the imidazole in cimetidine by a furan ring) is about five times as potent as a H2-receptor blocker and displays low affinity for binding sites on cytochrome P 450. Therefore, therapeutic doses of ranitidine do not impair the metabolism of other drugs. Preliminary data with oxmetidine suggest that it too does not interfere at the level of hepatic elimination. Thus, it is concluded that new therapeutic agents should be tested for their ability to bind to cytochrome P 450 to determine possible risks of drug interactions.

Suboptimal prescribing in elderly outpatients: potentially harmful drug-drug and drug-disease combinations

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence and correlates of potentially harmful drug-drug combinations and drug-disease combinations prescribed for elderly patients at outpatient settings.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the 1995-2000 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS).

SETTING

Physician offices and hospital outpatient departments.

PARTICIPANTS

Outpatient visits by patients aged 65 and older in the NAMCS and NHAMCS (n=70,203).

MEASUREMENTS

Incidences of six drug-drug combinations and 50 drug-disease combinations that can place elderly patients at risk for adverse events according to expert consensus panels.

RESULTS

Overall, 0.74% (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.65-0.83) of visits with two or more prescriptions had at least one inappropriate drug-drug combination, and 2.58% (95% CI=2.44-2.72) of visits with at least one prescription had one or more inappropriate drug-disease combinations. Of visits with a prescription of warfarin, 6.60% (95% CI=5.46-7.74) were prescribed a drug with potentially harmful interaction. Of patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy, 4.06% (95% CI=3.06-5.06) had at least one of six drugs that should be avoided. The number of drugs prescribed is most predictive of inappropriate drug-drug and drug-disease combinations.

CONCLUSION

Potentially harmful drug-drug and drug-disease combinations occur in various degrees in outpatient care in the elderly population. Targeting combinations such as those involving warfarin that are high in prevalence and potential harm offers a practical approach to improving prescribing and patient safety.

Clinically significant drug interactions with the oral anticoagulants

Oral anticoagulants were introduced in the late 1940s and remain widely used today. Indications include prevention of thrombosis associated with atrial fibrillation, structural cardiac diseases and following prosthetic valvular replacement. They have been used for both treatment and prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis and in efforts to decrease the frequency and rate of second myocardial infarction. These compounds include the coumarin derivatives [dicoumarol (bishydroxycoumarin), phenprocoumon, nicoumalone (acenocoumarol)] and the indanedione derivatives (diphenadione, phenindione, anisindione) which, because of adverse reactions, are largely unavailable. The oral anticoagulants, and warfarin in particular, are highly interactive with other drugs. Mechanisms of those interactions include both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms and may result in either hyper- or hypoprothrombinaemia. Because their principal adverse reaction is haemorrhage, and interactions are widespread across many therapeutic specialties, it becomes imperative for the practising physician to be aware of the possibility of interaction whenever these agents are coadministered with other drugs.

Effects of diltiazem and cimetidine on theophylline oxidative metabolism

The effect of diltiazem or cimetidine pretreatment on the inhibition of theophylline oxidative metabolism was investigated in nine healthy male nonsmokers. Diltiazem 60 mg, cimetidine 400 mg, or placebo was given orally three times daily for 3 days in a randomized three-way crossover manner. Both diltiazem and cimetidine pretreatment decreased the mean theophylline clearance (0.702 on placebo versus 0.641 on diltiazem, P < .05, and 0.542 mL/minute/kg on cimetidine, P < .01), resulting in prolonged mean theophylline half-life (7.58 on placebo versus 8.59 on diltiazem, P < .05, and 10.08 hours on cimetidine, P < .01) with no change in volume of distribution. The mean metabolic clearances for three major theophylline metabolites, 1-methyluric acid (1-MU), 1,3-dimethyluric acid (1,3-DMU), and 3-methylxanthine (3-MX), were reduced significantly by cimetidine (28%; P < .05, 32%; P < .01, and 33%; P < .01, respectively). Conversely, diltiazem significantly reduced only the mean metabolic clearance of 1,3-DMU by 21% (P < .05) without changes in that of 1-MU or 3-MX. These results suggest that cimetidine inhibited both N-demethylation and 8-hydroxylation of theophylline, whereas diltiazem exerted little influence on N-demethylation in spite of inhibition in 8-hydroxylation.

Clinical relevance of cimetidine drug interactions

The excellent efficacy and tolerability profiles of H2-antagonists have established these agents as the leading class of antiulcer drugs. Attention has been focused on drug interactions with H2-antagonists as a means of product differentiation and because many patients are receiving multiple drug therapy. The main mechanism of most drug interactions involving cimetidine appears to be inhibition of the hepatic microsomal enzyme cytochrome P450, an effect which may be related to the different structures of H2-antagonists. Ranitidine appears to have less affinity than cimetidine for this system. There have been many published case reports and studies of drug interactions with cimetidine, but many of these have provided pharmacokinetic data only, with little information concerning the clinical significance of these findings. Nevertheless, the coadministration of cimetidine with drugs that have a narrow therapeutic margin (such as theophylline) may potentially result in clinically significant adverse effects. The monitoring of serum concentrations of drugs coadministered with cimetidine may reduce the risk of adverse events but does not abolish the problem. However, for most patients, concomitant administration of cimetidine with drugs possessing a wide therapeutic margin is unlikely to pose a significant problem.

Do all histamine2-antagonists cause a warfarin drug interaction?

Cimetidine, the first marketed histamine2-receptor antagonist, has been shown to decrease the clearance of warfarin consistently through inhibition of cytochrome P-450 metabolism. The clinical significance of this drug-drug interaction has been questioned due to: (1) the lowering of the warfarin therapeutic range, (2) the lowering of the total daily therapeutic cimetidine dosage, (3) the advent of once-daily cimetidine dosing, and (4) the demonstration that the clearance of the less active warfarin R-enantiomer is decreased to a greater extent than the more active S-enantiomer. Ranitidine has been implicated in both increasing and decreasing warfarin's hypoprothrombinemic-effect (noted in the warfarin package insert), despite the majority of investigations demonstrating no warfarin clearance changes. Careful examination of the implicating data indicates that the majority of the warfarin pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variance that occurs with combined ranitidine-warfarin therapy cannot be attributed to a drug-drug interaction. No data are available to implicate the newer histamine2-antagonists, famotidine and nizatidine, in causing a decrease in warfarin metabolism.

Effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists on acute inflammatory of the rat paw oedema

The effect of three histamine H2-antagonists, cimetidine, ranitidine, and loxtidine, on acute rat paw oedema induced by histamine, carrageenan or complete Freund's adjuvant, have been examined. Administered intraperitoneally, all three antagonists inhibited histamine-induced paw oedema dose-dependently in the range 0.5-15 mumol kg-1. The highest dose of cimetidine produced an inhibition of 92% as against 38% with the same dose of mepyramine. Analysis of the concentration-effect curves produced IC50 values of 1.66, 5.12 and 12.30 mumol kg-1 for cimetidine, loxtidine, and ranitidine, respectively, on histamine-induced oedema. In carrageenan-induced inflammation 12.3 mumol kg-1 of each of the three drugs produced significant inhibition, whereas in adjuvant-induced inflammation, (acute phase), cimetidine was very active, loxtidine less so and ranitidine inactive. Thus the relative effectiveness of the antagonists (cimetidine greater than loxtidine greater than ranitidine) appears to differ from their known potency relationship (loxtidine greater than ranitidine greater than cimetidine) on H2-mediated effects. We conclude that H2-receptors are involved in the induction of rat paw oedema, especially those induced by histamine and carrageenan, but that their relative effectiveness appears atypical.

Haematological adverse effects of histamine H2-receptor antagonists

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases related to gastric acid hypersecretion. Cimetidine was introduced into medical practice in 1976 and ranitidine, famotidine and nizatidine in 1981, 1985 and 1987, respectively. Haematological adverse effects are relatively uncommon and most have been reported in cases of cimetidine administration. These adverse effects are reviewed under 4 main headings: (a) blood cytopenias and leucocytosis; (b) coagulation disorders related to drug interactions with oral anticoagulants; (c) reduction of dietary iron absorption; and (d) reduction of dietary cobalamin absorption. 85 reported cases of blood cytopenias attributed to these drugs are reviewed, of which 75 (88%) were associated with cimetidine therapy. In postmarketing surveillance studies, the incidence of cimetidine-associated blood cytopenia has been evaluated at about 2.3 per 100,000 patients. Neutropenia and agranulocytosis are by far the most frequently encountered. Whatever the drug or the type of cytopenia, this adverse effect is almost always rapidly reversible when treatment is stopped. Moreover, in several cases other factors such as underlying diseases or additional drugs could have been responsible, at least partly, for the cytopenia. The pathophysiological basis of these adverse effects remains poorly explained. Various mechanisms have been proposed, which in some cases are probably associated: (a) direct toxicity for haemopoietic stem cells; (b) drug-induced immune reactions leading to blood or bone marrow cell damage, and (c) drug interactions, with increased and prolonged action of potentially haematotoxic drugs. Mechanisms (a) and (c) appear to be of particular clinical importance in cases of impaired renal elimination of H2-receptor antagonists. Cimetidine and probably to a lesser extent ranitidine potentiate the action of oral anticoagulants of both coumarin and indanedione structure. This may result in haemorrhagic complications. Such action is a consequence of the reduced hepatic metabolism of oral anticoagulants through a dose-dependent, reversible inhibition of cytochrome P450. Malabsorption of dietary iron and cobalamin appears to result from inhibition of gastric secretion by the H2-receptor antagonists. This is of no clinical importance in short term treatment, but long term use of H2-receptor antagonists may theoretically contribute to the occurrence of iron or cobalamin deficiency anaemia.

Lack of interaction of ranitidine with amitriptyline

The possibility of an interaction of ranitidine with amitriptyline was assessed by means of amitriptyline and nortriptyline plasma concentration measurements, blood pressure and pulse rate, digit symbol substitution, and visual analogue scales. Ranitidine had no effect on amitriptyline or nortriptyline concentrations. Responses recorded by the digit symbol substitution and visual analogue scale tests correlated with changes in concentrations of amitriptyline and nortriptyline in plasma. No effects on blood pressure or pulse rate were observed. We concluded that there was no effect of ranitidine on amitriptyline kinetics or response in the conditions of our study.

Femoxetine and cimetidine: interaction in healthy volunteers

The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between femoxetine and cimetidine has been evaluated in 8 healthy volunteers. Two volunteers received single doses of femoxetine, and 6 were given multiple doses of femoxetine for 7 days with and without concurrent cimetidine. No influence of cimetidine was observed on the kinetics of single doses of femoxetine, but after multiple doses the plasma concentration of femoxetine was significantly increased. Similarly, the AUC at steady state tended to be increased, but not to a significant extent. Concurrent cimetidine did not cause a reduction in the AUC of the active desmethyl metabolite. It is recommended that femoxetine is given in reduced doses (e.g. 400 mg) when administered with cimetidine.

Cimetidine versus famotidine: the effect on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in rats

The effects of cimetidine and a new, potent H2-antagonist, famotidine, on the single dose pharmacokinetics of theophylline were examined in rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (6 rats/group) received an i.v. dose of theophylline (6 mg/kg) alone and in conjunction with an i.v. dose of famotidine (10 mg/kg) or cimetidine (10 mg/kg). Venous blood samples were collected serially for seven hours after theophylline infusion and analyzed for theophylline concentration by HPLC. Concomitant famotidine administration did not alter any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline (AUC0- infinity; 38.1 +/- 8.7 vs. 38.8 +/- 6.3 micrograms.hr.ml-1), while cimetidine demonstrated a significant reduction in theophylline systemic clearance (0.11 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.02 L/hr/kg; p less than 0.001), a 40% prolongation of half-life (2.8 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.5 hr), with no change in the volume of distribution (0.39 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.13 L/kg). These results suggest that in contrast to cimetidine, famotidine, a non-imidazole H2-receptor antagonist, does not interfere with theophylline disposition in the rat.

Cimetidine interaction with amitriptyline

The interaction of cimetidine with amitriptyline was assessed by means of amitriptyline and nortriptyline plasma concentration measurements, standing blood pressure and pulse rate, digit symbol substitution, and visual analogue scales. Cimetidine increased plasma amitriptyline concentrations and decreased plasma nortriptyline concentrations, apparently by inhibiting presystemic metabolism. The changes in blood pressure, pulse rate and digit symbol substitution correlated with changes in concentrations of amitriptyline in plasma and expected changes based on a dose ranging preliminary experiment. Changes in subjective ratings of effects correlated with changes in nortriptyline concentrations in plasma.

Cimetidine-drug interactions

The use of cimetidine, the histamine H2 receptor antagonist, is associated with a relatively low incidence of adverse reactions. However, its liberal use has led to the identification of several clinically significant cimetidine-drug interactions that can lead to drug accumulation, toxicity, and life-threatening sequelae. A review of the literature and the clinical significance and physiologic basis of these interactions are presented. Recommended management of cimetidine-drug interactions is discussed.

Trauma and oral anticoagulants

Patients on oral anticoagulants who present to the emergency department following trauma pose a special problem. Careful attention must be given to exclude any sites of overt or occult bleeding, particularly in the CNS, where there may be no external evidence of injury. A PT or thrombotest should be obtained as minimum laboratory workup in all cases. In specific situations, emergency reversal of anticoagulation must be undertaken.

[Effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists on the hepatic elimination of drugs]

H2-blocking agents, such as cimetidine or ranitidine are used in numerous patients. This treatment is often associated with the co-administration of a variety of other drugs. From clinical observations and pharmacokinetic studies it is obvious that even short-term treatment with therapeutic doses of cimetidine inhibits the hepatic elimination of antipyrine, warfarin, diazepam, desmethyldiazepam, chlordiazepoxide, propranolol, labetalol, metoprolol, phenytoin, carbamazepine, chlormethiazole, theophylline and caffeine. All these drugs are metabolized by cytochrome-dependent so-called phase I reactions. Cimetidine can interact with drug binding to the cytochrome P450 system leading to impaired drug metabolism. On the other hand drugs which are eliminated by glucuronidation (cytochrome independent phase II reaction), such as oxazepam and lorazepam are not affected by cimetidine. Other H2-blocking agents (ranitidine, oxmetidine) did not impair the elimination of antipyrine, warfarin, diazepam or propranolol. Furthermore, cimetidine and ranitidine might slightly reduce hepatic blood flow which could reduce the elimination of drugs with high hepatic clearance.

Effect of cimetidine on phenytoin serum levels

Cimetidine, 300 mg p.o. four times a day, was administered for 5 days to nine epileptics who were stabilized while receiving phenytoin. Five patients had statistically significant increases in phenytoin serum levels, including two who became clinically toxic. One patient had a statistically significant decrease in phenytoin serum concentration. A relationship was not found between cimetidine levels and change in phenytoin serum levels. Cimetidine can cause significant changes in phenytoin serum levels which may be manifested clinically.

Review of cimetidine drug interactions

The literature on cimetidine drug interactions has been thoroughly reviewed. Several different mechanisms have been proposed for cimetidine-related drug interactions. These mechanisms include: (1) impaired hepatic drug metabolism due to inhibition of hepatic microsomal enzymes, (2) reduced hepatic blood flow, resulting in decreased clearance of drugs that are highly extracted by the liver, (3) increased potential for myelosuppression when administered concurrently with other drugs capable of causing myelosuppression, and (4) altered bioavailability of acid-labile drugs. Cimetidine binds reversibly to the hepatic cytochrome P-450 and P-448 systems, resulting in decreased metabolism of drugs that undergo Phase I reactions (e.g., dealkylation and hydroxylation). In contrast, glucuronidation pathways are unaffected. The rapid onset and reversal of cimetidine's inhibition of hepatic metabolism indicates an effect on hepatic enzyme systems. Cimetidine also has been reported to decrease hepatic blood flow. Drugs that are highly extracted by the liver, such as propranolol, lidocaine, and morphine, may be postulated to have a decreased hepatic clearance. Cimetidine, through its effect on gastric pH, may increase the absorption of acid-labile drugs or may decrease the absorption of drugs. There have been reports of increased potential for myelosuppression when cimetidine is administered concurrently with drugs capable of causing bone marrow suppression. An understanding of the mechanisms involved in cimetidine drug interactions allows the clinician to prevent and predict these interactions.

Cimetidine as an inhibitor of drug metabolism: therapeutic implications and review of the literature

Cimetidine has been reported to decrease the biotransformation of drugs metabolized by the MFOE system. Additionally, cimetidine decreases liver blood flow and increases the bioavailability of drugs with high hepatic extraction ratios. Patients receiving cimetidine in conjunction with drugs known to interact with cimetidine in conjunction with drugs known to interact with cimetidine are at risk of experiencing toxicity. When appropriate, reducing the dosage of these agents or switching to an alternative drug will minimize the incidence of side effects. Clinicians should be suspicious if patients experience exaggerated drug effects when cimetidine therapy is begun.

Cimetidine: clinical uses and possible side effects

Cimetidine has now been on the market for over three years and appears to be safe and effective. Its beneficial effect in the short-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in the duodenum is well documented, and it appears to be helpful in preventing ulcer relapse. It may also be therapeutic in other diseases associated with gastric acid abnormalities. Cimetidine may cause mental confusion and should be used with caution and in reduced dosage in the presence of hepatic or renal disease, or both, and in elderly patients. Other potential problems include neutropenia, reduced sperm count, and potentiation of warfarin.