Impairment of hepatic drug oxidation by propoxyphene

Opioid Drug-Drug Interactions: A Review

Opioid analgesics are among the most commonly prescribed medications. Frequently, they are combined with other therapeutic agents and pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interactions may ensue. This review summarizes published case reports and studies of potential opioid drug interactions. A MED-LINE computer literature search (1966-1998) was undertaken to retrieve all pertinent case reports and studies of opioid drug interactions published in the English language. The results of the search indicate that numerous compounds from various therapeutic classes may participate in clinically significant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions usually involved additive central nervous system depression. Additionally, propoxyphene and tramadol can potentiate a hyperserotonergic state when coadministered with the SSRIs and MAOIs. Pharmacokinetic interactions typically involved inhibition or induction by specific hepatic cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes. Agents with enzyme inhibiting ability such as erythromycin, cimetidine, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been shown to potentiate the effects of certain opioid analgesics while codeine, which requires metabolic conversion via CYP 2D6 for pharmacological effectiveness, has reduced analgesic efficacy in the presence of inhibitors. The enzyme inducers rifampin and several anticonvulsants have been involved in the emergence of methadone withdrawal when added to existing methadone treatment. Additionally, enzyme inducers can increase the formation of the toxic metabolite of meperidine. Genetic polymorphism also potentially impacts the effectiveness of agents such as codeine since reduced active metabolite formation and analgesic efficacy has been demonstrated in individuals who lack CYP 2D6 activity.

Drug-drug interactions in pediatric psychopharmacology

Serious consequences caused by drug-drug interactions continue to plague contemporary pharmacotherapy. The possibility of a drug-drug interaction should be suspected anytime a new or unexpected effect occurs that complicates the clinical management of a patient in the setting where the patient is receiving more than one drug. In this article, the authors address the mechanisms of pharmacokinetic-based drug-drug interactions focusing on important interactions that may occur with the common medications a pediatrician may prescribe to the child receiving psychoactive medication(s) prescribed by a child psychiatrist.

Catastrophic neurologic signs due to drug interaction: Tegretol and Darvon

Eight cases of carbamazepine toxicity from interaction with propoxyphene are reported. Serum concentrations of carbamazepine increased up to sixfold. All patients were symptomatic and two were hospitalized. Practitioners prescribing propoxyphene acutely for pain should be aware of this significant interaction.

The basis for variability of response to anti-rheumatic drugs

The reasons for variability of response to anti-rheumatic drugs are myriad. All the factors that contribute to kinetic variability, for example, contribute to differences in response between individuals. Thus, differences in drug formulation, protein binding, drug metabolism and excretion, all contribute to variable responses. Further, factors which contribute to differential clinical response/toxicity must be considered. Here, age, gender, genetic background, weight, concomitant diseases and numerous environmental factors come into play. Among the environmental factors are such diverse elements as smoking, activity and diet. Finally our ability to measure change, be it in response or toxicity, is limited, introducing apparent variability (as much as real variability) into the equation. While we cannot, at present, delineate the contribution of each factor to individual variability, it is hoped that systematic, persistent effort will help us understand and then control these elements, leading to improved ability to individualize therapy and decrease the variability of response to anti-rheumatic drugs.

Dextropropoxyphene overdose. Epidemiology, clinical presentation and management

This paper comprehensively reviews the worldwide situation regarding acute overdosage of dextropropoxyphene (propoxyphene). The changing epidemiology of this type of poisoning over the last 20 years is described with discussion of concurrent trends and, in particular, the effects of different preventive measures adopted in various countries. The clinical pharmacology of dextropropoxyphene relevant to the clinical toxic effects resulting from acute overdosage is described, and the management is detailed. In particular, the importance of early diagnosis and treatment is stressed in view of the potentially lethal complications that may suddenly occur with this poisoning. Recommendations for the correct use of the specific narcotic antagonist, naloxone, are made, together with other intensive supportive measures. As dextropropoxyphene is frequently taken together with other toxic agents, the concomitant effects of alcohol and sedative drugs are described and the treatment of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in combination with dextropropoxyphene is emphasised. The most effective preventive measures for the future are suggested, but caution is advised regarding the prescription for 'at risk' patients of alternative analgesics, which may be no safer in overdosage.

Benzodiazepines: selective administration

Benzodiazepines are unique chemicals with anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, muscle relaxant and hypnotic properties. Twelve preparations of this group are available in the U.S.A.: two of them belong to the triazolo and one to the 3-nitro groups, the remaining ones are 3-OH or 2-keto benzodiazepines. A number of commonly employed drugs interact with benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists which block only one of its actions have been isolated. These promise to lead to preparations with only anxiolytic action without sedation or anticonvulsant action in the future. Guidelines for the selection of the proper drug and for the prevention of dependence are described.

Altered distribution of debrisoquine oxidation phenotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Oxidative metabolism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was studied using the antihypertensive drug, debrisoquine. The metabolism of this drug to its principal metabolite, 4-hydroxydebrisoquine, is catalyzed by a discrete isozyme of cytochrome P-450. The extent of this reaction exhibits genetic polymorphism, with 2 phenotypes, "poor metabolizers" and "extensive metabolizers," discernible in the normal population. We observed the poor metabolizer debrisoquine phenotype in 9 of 42 patients with idiopathic SLE (21%), in contrast with 12 of 147 healthy volunteers (8%), which is a significant difference in frequency (P less than 0.04). These data provide further evidence for altered oxidative metabolism in SLE and support the concept that genetic differences in oxidative metabolism of endogenous compounds, such as sex steroid hormones, or of xenobiotics might influence susceptibility to SLE.

Interaction of propoxyphene with diazepam, alprazolam and lorazepam

Healthy volunteers received single doses of three benzodiazepines (diazepam, 10 mg i.v.; alprazolam, 1.0 mg orally; lorazepam, 2 mg i.v.) on two occasions in random sequence. One trial was a control; for the other, subjects ingested propoxyphene, 65 mg every 6 h, for the duration of the benzodiazepine study. The kinetics of each benzodiazepine were determined from multiple plasma concentrations measured following each dose. For diazepam, propoxyphene produced a small and statistically insignificant prolongation of elimination half-life (43 vs 38 h) and reduction of total clearance (0.41 vs 0.47 ml min-1 kg-1). Propoxyphene significantly prolonged alprazolam half-life (18 vs 12 h, P less than 0.005) and reduced total clearance (0.8 vs 1.3 ml min-1 kg-1, P less than 0.005). Propoxyphene had no apparent influence on lorazepam half-life (13.4 vs 13.5 h) or clearance (1.5 vs 1.4 ml min-1 kg-1). Thus propoxyphene significantly impairs the clearance of alprazolam, biotransformed mainly by the oxidative reaction of aliphatic hydroxylation. Propoxyphene has far less effect on the oxidation of diazepam by N-demethylation, and has no apparent influence on lorazepam conjugation.

Ibuprofen does not impair antipyrine clearance

The influence of therapeutic doses of ibuprofen on the distribution and clearance of antipyrine in humans was evaluated in a series of healthy volunteers. Subjects received a single intravenous dose of antipyrine on two occasions, once in the drug-free control state and again during coadministration of ibuprofen, 1.6 to 2.4 Gm per day in divided doses. Compliance was verified by measurement of plasma ibuprofen levels, which averaged 22 micrograms/ml. Kinetic variables for antipyrine were determined from multiple plasma antipyrine concentrations measured during 24 hours after each dose. Between drug-free control and ibuprofen coadministration trials, there was no significant difference in antipyrine volume of distribution (0.69 vs. 0.69 liter/kg), elimination half-life (12.2 vs. 12.5 hours), or total metabolic clearance (0.69 vs. 0.70 ml/min/kg). Thus, ibuprofen does not impair the clearance of the marker compound antipyrine, often used as an index of drug oxidizing capacity in humans.