Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel-Aspirin Among CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Carriers With Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Relation to Renal Function: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CHANCE-2 Trial

Renal function and efficacy of dual antiplatelet vs. alteplase in minor stroke: a post hoc analysis of ARAMIS study

Background

This secondary analysis of the ARAMIS trial evaluated renal function's modifying effects on therapeutic responses to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute minor ischemic stroke.

Methods

Based on the as-treated set, we stratified patients by admission estimated glomerular filtration rate into three groups: normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), mildly decreased renal function (eGFR 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2), and moderate to severe impairment renal function group (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2). The primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days.

Results

Among 615 analyzed patients, 367 (59.7%) exhibited normal renal function, 209 (34.0%) exhibited mildly decreased renal function and 39 (6.3%) exhibited moderate to severe impairment renal function. A numerically higher rate of excellent functional outcome was found in normal renal function patients with DAPT vs. alteplase (94.4% vs. 90.4%; p = 0.147), while no intergroup difference emerged in mildly decreased renal function patients (93.9% vs. 93.7%; p = 0.958) and moderate to severe impairment renal function patients (93.8% vs. 95.7%; p = 0.792). There was no significant interaction between treatment and renal function on the primary outcome (adjusted interaction p = 0.337).

Conclusion

Among patients with normal renal function, DAPT was associated with a numerically higher, but not statistically significant, rate of excellent functional outcome in patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset compared with alteplase.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03661411.

CYP2C19 Genetic Testing for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

There is significant variability in the efficacy and safety of oral P2Y12 inhibitors, which are used to prevent ischemic outcomes in common diseases such as coronary and peripheral arterial disease and stroke. Clopidogrel, a prodrug, is the most used oral P2Y12 inhibitor and is activated primarily after being metabolized by a highly polymorphic hepatic cytochrome CYP2C219 enzyme. Loss-of-function genetic variants in CYP2C219 are common, can result in decreased active metabolite levels and increased on-treatment platelet aggregation, and are associated with increased ischemic events on clopidogrel therapy. Such patients can be identified by CYP2C19 genetic testing and can be treated with alternative therapy. Conversely, universal use of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor or prasugrel, which are not dependent on CYP2C19 for activation, has been recommended but can result in increased bleeding. Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that a precision medicine approach in which loss-of-function carriers are prescribed ticagrelor or prasugrel and noncarriers are prescribed clopidogrel results in reducing ischemic events without increasing bleeding risk. The evidence to date supports CYP2C19 genetic testing before oral P2Y12 inhibitors are prescribed in patients with acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical implementation of such genetic testing will depend on among multiple factors: rapid availability of results or adoption of the concept of performing preemptive genetic testing, provision of easy-to-understand results with therapeutic recommendations, and seamless integration in the electronic health record.

Association of CYP2C19 genotypes with postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery

This cohort study aims to assess the connection between cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19 (CYP2C19) genotyping, platelet aggregability following oral clopidogrel administration, and the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. From May 2017 to November 2022, a total of 258 patients undergoing elective first-time CABG surgery, receiving 100 mg/day oral aspirin and 75 mg/day oral clopidogrel postoperatively, was included for analysis. These patients were categorized based on CYP2C19 genotyping. Platelet aggregability was assessed serially using multiple-electrode aggregometry before CABG, 1 and 5 days after the procedure, and before discharge. The incidences of POAF were compared using the log-rank test for cumulative risk. CYP2C19 genotyping led to categorization into CYP2C19*1*1 (WT group, n = 123) and CYP2C19*2 or *3 (LOF group, n = 135). Baseline characteristics and operative data showed no significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of POAF after CABG was 42.2% in the LOF group, contrasting with 22.8% in the WT group (hazard risk [HR]: 2.061; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.347, 3.153; p = 0.0013). Adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation was notably higher in the LOF group compared to the WT group 5 days after CABG (30.4% ± 6.5% vs. 17.9% ± 4.1%, p < 0.001), remaining a similar higher level at hospital discharge (25.6% ± 6.1% vs. 12.2% ± 3.5%, p < 0.001). The presence of CYP2C19 LOF was linked to a higher incidence of POAF and relatively elevated platelet aggregation after CABG surgery under the same oral clopidogrel regimen.

The Influence of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on the Efficacy of Genotype-Guided Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Preventing Stroke Recurrence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), which represents the total cholesterol content of all pro-atherogenic lipoproteins, has recently been included as a new target for lipid-lowering therapy in high-risk atherosclerotic patients in multiple guidelines. Herein, we aimed to explore the relationship between non-HDL-C level and the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in preventing stroke recurrence.

METHODS

This study comprised a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 (Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II) trial, from which 5,901 patients with complete data on non-HDL-C were included and categorized by median non-HDL-C levels, using a cutoff of 3.5 mmol/L. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days.

RESULTS

Ticagrelor-aspirin significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with low non-HDL-C (71 [4.8%] vs. 119 [7.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.74), but not in those with high non-HDL-C (107 [7.3%] vs. 108 [7.6%]; adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.16), compared with clopidogrel-aspirin (P for interaction=0.010). When analyzed as a continuous variable, the benefit of ticagrelor-aspirin for recurrent stroke decreased as non-HDL-C levels increased. No significant differences in the treatment assignments across the non-HDL-C groups were observed in terms of the rate of severe or moderate bleeding (5 [0.3%] vs. 8 [0.5%] in the low non-HDL-C group; 4 [0.3%] vs. 2 [0.1%] in the high non-HDL-C group; P for interaction=0.425).

CONCLUSION

CHANCE-2 participants with low non-HDL-C levels received more clinical benefit from ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin compared to those with high non-HDL-C, following minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

A decision tree model to help treatment decision-making for severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment demonstrated a reduction in mortality among patients suffering from severe spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH). However, which SSICH patients could benefit from surgical treatment was unclear. This study aimed to establish and validate a decision tree (DT) model to help determine which SSICH patients could benefit from surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SSICH patients from a prospective, multicenter cohort study were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of neurological poor outcome (modified Rankin scale as 4-6) on the 180th day posthemorrhage. Then, surgically-treated SSICH patients were set as the derivation cohort (from a referring hospital) and validation cohort (from multiple hospitals). A DT model to evaluate the risk of 180-day poor outcome was developed within the derivation cohort and validated within the validation cohort. The performance of clinicians in identifying patients with poor outcome before and after the help of the DT model was compared using the area under curve (AUC).

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred sixty SSICH patients were included in this study (middle age as 56, and 984 male patients). Surgically-treated patients had a lower incidence of 180-day poor outcome compared to conservatively-treated patients (147/794 vs. 128/466, P <0.001). Based on 794 surgically-treated patients, multivariate logistic analysis revealed the ischemic cerebro-cardiovascular disease history, renal dysfunction, dual antiplatelet therapy, hematoma volume, and Glasgow coma score at admission as poor outcome factors. The DT model, incorporating these above factors, was highly predictive of 180-day poor outcome within the derivation cohort (AUC, 0.94) and validation cohort (AUC, 0.92). Within 794 surgically-treated patients, the DT improved junior clinicians' performance to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes (AUC from 0.81 to 0.89, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a DT model for predicting the poor outcome of SSICH patients postsurgically, which may serve as a useful tool assisting clinicians in treatment decision-making for SSICH.