Prophylactic Dual Catheter Technique to Prevent Side Branch Snowplowing Complications during Angioplasty and Stenting

Outcomes of Hypogastric Coverage and Occlusion during Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

The risk of hypogastric occlusion (HO) following bare-metal stent (BMS) coverage of the hypogastric origin during endovascular treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is unclear. This study sought to determine the rate and clinical significance of HO following BMS coverage during iliac stenting for complex AIOD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing elective iliac stenting for AIOD from 2010-2018 at Cleveland Clinic were reviewed. Patients with BMS coverage of a patent hypogastric origin were included. Rate of HO were determined by review of intraoperative angiography and follow up imaging. Predictors of HO were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes were compared between those who did and did not develop HO.

RESULTS

There were 251 patients (338 limbs) with BMS coverage of the hypogastric origin during treatment of AIOD. Lesion severity was classified as TASC C/D in 249/338 (73.7%) of cases. Bilateral hypogastric coverage occurred in 93/251 (37.1%) patients. Hypogastric patency was 78.1% at 24-months following coverage. Recanalization of an ipsilateral external iliac artery (EIA) occlusion was predictive of HO (HR 3.12, 95% CI: 1.33, 7.34; P= 0.009). Increased luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin protected against HO (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.88; P= 0.006). Perioperative outcomes were no different between patients with and without HO. There were no cases of gluteal necrosis, spinal cord ischemia, or pelvic organ ischemia. Four-year mortality and limb salvage were not affected by HO. HO was associated with decreased primary patency of ipsilateral iliac stents and increased risk of ipsilateral reintervention (HR 5.49; 95% CI: 1.82, 16.58; P= 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

HO is relatively infrequent following BMS coverage during treatment of AIOD. Luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin and ipsilateral EIA occlusion are associated with occlusion. HO is well tolerated in AIOD, though it is potentially associated with increased risk iliac stent occlusion and reintervention.

Microcatheter-Assisted Protection of the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery During Parent Artery Sacrifice of a Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm

Branch vessel occlusion is a major cause of stroke in parent artery sacrifice (PAS) for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADA). There is now an increasing trend towards preservation of branch vessels during PAS. Stents are commonly employed to achieve this but bring with it the attendant risks of future thrombosis and lifelong antiplatelet use. Although a microcatheter protection technique has been utilised in branch artery protection of wide-necked saccular aneurysms, it has rarely been described in PAS for VADAs. We describe the use of a dual microcatheter technique in the protection and remodelling of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) during PAS of the vertebral artery, which also served as a temporary scaffold to support placement of the coils during the embolisation process.

Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND

Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.

RESULTS

Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.

CONCLUSION

There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.