Is HE4 serum level a valid screening test in women candidates for kidney transplant? A case report and a review of literature

Comparison of Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm and cancer antigen 125 to discriminate between benign ovarian tumor and early-stage ovarian cancer according to imaging tumor subtypes

The present study aimed to compare the accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and cancer antigen (CA)125 to discriminate between benign ovarian tumors and early-stage ovarian cancer according to imaging tumor subtypes associated with post-operative histopathological findings. A total of 1,207 patients who were assessed using the ROMA test due to suspected early-stage ovarian cancer and underwent surgery at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) between September 2014 and March 2018 were identified. A total of 981 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective analysis. Among the 981 subjects, 816 had benign tumors, 90 had malignant tumors and 75 had borderline tumors. Of the patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer or borderline tumor, 47.3% were judged as high-risk by the ROMA test and 58.2% had CA125 levels of >35 U/ml. The specificity and accuracy of ROMA were higher compared with those of CA125 in pre-menopausal females. However, the superiority of the ROMA test in the identification of malignant ovarian tumors compared with CA125 was only observed in patients with endometriotic-type tumors but not in any of the other tumor subtypes. In the endometriotic type of ovarian tumor, the superiority of the ROMA test compared to CA125 was confirmed in triage of ovarian tumor. However, the sensitivity and specificity of ROMA and CA125 were similar for the other tumor types. Therefore, future development of better tumor-specific biomarkers for triage of ovarian tumor is required.

Analysis of falsely elevated risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with ovarian endometrioma

Objective

To estimate the incidence of falsely elevated risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in a group of women with pathologically confirmed endometrioma and to investigate the associated factors.

Methods

One hundred premenopausal women surgically diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma were selected. Preoperative clinical, laboratory, and surgical characteristics were compared between the elevated-risk group (ROMA-premenopausal value, ≥7.4%) and normal-risk group (ROMA-premenopausal value, <7.4%).

Results

Elevated ROMA was observed in 15 women (false positive rate, 15%). Excluding one woman with known chronic renal failure, we compared the characteristics of 99 women between the elevated-risk group (n=14) and the normalrisk group (n=85). None of the clinical and surgical variables distinguished the two groups. Serum level of CA 125 >82.3 U/mL and serum level of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) >46 pmol/L could predict an elevated ROMA test with a statistical significance. When serum level of HE4 ≤46 pmol/L, none of the women showed an elevated ROMA test, regardless of serum level of CA 125; however, 55.6% of the women showed an elevated ROMA test when serum level of HE4 >46 pmol/L and CA 125 ≤82.3 U/mL and all women showed an elevated ROMA test when serum level of HE4 >46 pmol/L and CA 125 >82.3 U/mL.

Conclusion

The incidence of falsely elevated ROMA was 15% in the group of women with pathologically confirmed endometrioma. Interpretation of the ROMA results should be cautious when serum level of HE4 >46 pmol/L and CA 125 >82.3 U/mL in women with suspicious ovarian endometrioma.

Human Epididymis Protein 4: A Novel Biomarker for Lupus Nephritis and Chronic Kidney Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is an available tumor biomarker for detecting ovarian cancer. However, it is unknown if serum HE4 could be a novel biomarker for diagnosis of lupus nephritis (LN) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

This study enrolled 209 SLE patients, 75 patients with renal dysfunction without SLE and 32 healthy subjects. HE4 concentrations were analyzed by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Fujirebio Diagnostics, Sweden). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess diagnostic accuracy of HE4 for LN or CKD in SLE.

RESULTS

Serum HE4 level was significantly higher in SLE patients than that in healthy controls (P < 0.001), especially for those with LN or CKD. It was also higher in patients with renal dysfunction without SLE than healthy controls (P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between these patients and those with SLE with CKD (P = 0.73). Multivariate analysis showed significant association between increased HE4 and LN or CKD after controlling for confounders. ROC curves showed the cutoff values were 150.1 pM (sensitivity, 76.8%; specificity, 91.1%) for the diagnosis of LN in SLE and 233.9 pM (sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 93.5%) for CKD in SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased serum HE4 level is closely associated with the development of LN or CKD in SLE patients. Furthermore, it can be used as a novel and useful biomarker for diagnosis of LN or CKD.