Effect of a forefoot off-loading postoperative shoe on muscle activity, posture, and static balance

Diabetic foot ulcers: Classification, risk factors and management

Diabetic foot ulceration is a devastating complication of diabetes that is associated with infection, amputation, and death, and is affecting increasing numbers of patients with diabetes mellitus. The pathogenesis of foot ulcers is complex, and different factors play major roles in different stages. The refractory nature of foot ulcer is reflected in that even after healing there is still a high recurrence rate and amputation rate, which means that management and nursing plans need to be considered carefully. The importance of establishment of measures for prevention and management of DFU has been emphasized. Therefore, a validated and appropriate DFU classification matching the progression is necessary for clinical diagnosis and management. In the first part of this review, we list several commonly used classification systems and describe their application conditions, scope, strengths, and limitations; in the second part, we briefly introduce the common risk factors for DFU, such as neuropathy, peripheral artery disease, foot deformities, diabetes complications, and obesity. Focusing on the relationship between the risk factors and DFU progression may facilitate prevention and timely management; in the last part, we emphasize the importance of preventive education, characterize several of the most frequently used management approaches, including glycemic control, exercise, offloading, and infection control, and call for taking into account and weighing the quality of life during the formulation of treatment plans. Multidisciplinary intervention and management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) based on the effective and systematic combination of these three components will contribute to the prevention and treatment of DFUs, and improve their prognosis.

Orthotic approach to prevention and management of diabetic foot: A narrative review

Diabetic foot is a common complication affecting more than one-fifth of patients with diabetes. If not treated in time, it may lead to diabetic foot ulcers or Charcot arthropathy. For the management of diabetic foot, shoe modifications and orthoses can be used to reduce pressure on the affected foot or provide the foot with increased stability. In addition, the shoe modifications and orthotic devices can relieve patient discomfort during walking. Appropriate shoe modifications include changing the insole material, modifying the heel height, adding a steel shank or rocker sole, and using in-depth shoes. Alternatively, a walking brace or ankle-foot orthosis can be used to reduce the pressure on the affected foot. The purpose of this narrative review was to provide a reference guide to support clinicians in prescribing shoe modifications and foot orthoses to treat diabetic foot ulcers and Charcot arthropathy.

Effect of gait protocols and postoperative shoes on off-loading of forefoot in preoperative patients for forefoot disorders

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of gait protocols and postoperative shoes on forefoot load in preoperative patients for forefoot disorders and compare footwear comfort between different types of postoperative shoes.

METHODS

Fourteen subjects scheduled to undergo forefoot surgeries were recruited. The maximum force under the forefoot region was measured during 10 m straight walking in two gait patterns with six different shoe types. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for footwear comfort, subjective lower thigh pain, and electrical activities of lower thigh muscles were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The body weight-normalized maximum force under the forefoot region significantly decreased in step-to gait compared to normal gait regardless of the shoe types used. Under the same gait condition, no significant difference was observed in the forefoot off-loading effect between the different shoe types used. Significantly worse VAS scores, significantly higher tibialis anterior muscle activities, and complaints of lower thigh pain were demonstrated in the gait with the reverse camber shoe.

CONCLUSIONS

Gait protocol of step-to gait had more forefoot off-loading effect than postoperative shoes. The forefoot off-loading effect did not differ among the postoperative shoes, suggesting that postoperative shoes can be selected with an emphasis on footwear comfort.

The apex angle of the rocker sole affects the posture and gait stability of healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

Rocker sole (RS) shoes have been linked to impaired postural control. However, which features of RS design affect balance is unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Which RS design features affect standing balance and gait stability?

METHODS

This study utilized an intervention and cross-over design. Twenty healthy young adults (10 males and 10 females) participated in this study. Standing balance and gait stability were measured using a single force platform and three-dimensional motion analysis system, respectively. The experimental conditions included the control shoe and five RS shoes in the combination of apex position (%) and apex angle (degree) for RS50-95, RS60-95, RS70-95, RS60-70, and RS60-110. The main outcome measures were the area surrounding the maximal rectangular amplitude, mean path length, average displacement of the center of pressure along the lateral and anterior/posterior directions, and maximal center of pressure excursion as the standing balance and lateral margin of stability as the gait stability. Statistical analyses were conducted using a two-way split-plot analysis of variance with repeated measures (with RS design as the within-subject factor and sex as the between-subject factor) and the Bonferroni post hoc test (α = .05).

RESULTS

Regarding the mean path length, RS60-70 was significantly longer than the control shoe, and it showed a significantly increased lateral margin of stability. Thus, RS60-70 was shown to affect standing balance, limit of stability, and gait stability of the frontal plane during gait.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that the apex angle of the RS design feature affects standing balance and gait stability, and RS60-70 is detrimental to stability. Therefore, when RS with a small apex angle is prescribed, it is necessary to consider the patient's balance ability.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Forefoot Offloading Versus Rigid Flat Shoes in Patients Undergoing Surgery of the First Ray

BACKGROUND

It is common clinical practice to use either flat or reverse camber shoes to protect the foot for up to 6 weeks after surgery for hallux valgus or hallux rigidus. To date there is a paucity of evidence as to whether there is any difference between these 2 postoperative shoes, in either patient satisfaction or clinical outcomes.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients undergoing scarf/Akin osteotomies or first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis were recruited. Patients were randomized 50:50 to either flat or reverse camber postoperative shoes. Patients undergoing ancillary lesser toe procedures were not excluded. Patient satisfaction was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and Likert satisfaction survey. Radiographic outcomes were reviewed at 1 year observing differences in fusion rates or deformity recurrence. There were 47 patients in the reverse cam and 43 in the flat shoe group. No difference in primary forefoot operation, additional operation, age at surgery, or preop VAS pain score was seen.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, there was no significant difference in postop VAS pain score. The flat shoe group was significantly more likely to be satisfied with their general mobility (86.0% vs 61.7%; P = .01) and with their stability in the shoe (90.7% vs 69.6%; P = .03). No significant difference was seen between groups for nonunion or hallux valgus recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

Both forms of postoperative footwear were effective in enabling patients to mobilize and in preventing adverse outcomes. Patients were more likely to be satisfied with a flat postoperative shoe due to improved stability and ease of mobilizing. The results of this study aid surgeon decision making for postoperative footwear in forefoot surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of two different designs of forefoot off-loader shoes and their influence on gait and spinal posture

BACKGROUND

The purpose of forefoot off-loader shoes (FOS) is to unload the operated region of the foot in order to allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. However, little is known about the actual biomechanical effects of different designs of FOS on gait, pelvis and spine.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Aim of this study was to analyse and compare the effects of two different designs of forefoot unloader shoes.

METHODS

Ortho-Wedge (FOS A) and Relief-Dual® (FOS B) were evaluated in this study during standing and while walking. Changes of the pelvic position and spinal posture were measured with a surface topography system and an instrumented treadmill. Gait phases were detected automatically by a built-in pressure plate.

RESULTS

Both FOS resulted in a significant increase of pelvic obliquity, pelvic torsion, lateral deviation and surface rotation (p < 0.001) while standing. Between both shoe models, pelvic obliquity and lateral deviation (p < 0.05) were significantly different. During walking, both FOS had a significant effect on spine and pelvis (p < 0.05), however only minor differences were found between the designs. All gait parameters were affected more, wearing FOS A than B. Step length were significantly longer by wearing FOS (p < 0.005). However stance phase raised and swing phase is reduced on the leg wearing FOS A (p < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

The study showed that FOS lead to significant changes in pelvic position and spinal posture during standing and while walking. A compensating shoe on the contralateral side is therefore recommend. Gait parameters however were affected more by the traditional FOS A half-shoe. The sole- design and shape of FOS B leads to a more physiological roll-over of the foot.

Lower-extremity dynamics of walking in neuropathic diabetic patients who wear a forefoot-offloading shoe

BACKGROUND

A forefoot-offloading shoes has a negative-heel rocker outsole and is used to treat diabetic plantar forefoot ulcers, but its mechanisms of action and their association with offloading and gait stability are not sufficiently clear.

METHODS

Ten neuropathic diabetic patients were tested in a forefoot-offloading shoe and subsequently in a control shoe with no specific offloading construction, both worn on the right foot (control shoe on left), while walking at 1.2m/s. 3D-instrumented gait analysis and simultaneous in-shoe plantar pressure measurements were used to explain the shoe's offloading efficacy and to define centre-of-pressure profiles and left-to-right symmetry in ankle joint dynamics (0-1, 1:maximum symmetry), as indicators for gait stability.

FINDINGS

Compared to the control shoe, peak forefoot pressures, vertical ground reaction force, plantar flexion angle, and ankle joint moment, all in terminal stance, and the proximal-to-distal centre-of-pressure trajectory were significantly reduced in the forefoot-offloading shoe (P<0.01). Peak ankle joint power was 51% lower in the forefoot-offloading shoe compared to the control shoe: 1.61 (0.35) versus 3.30 (0.84) W/kg (mean (SD), P<0.001), and was significantly associated with forefoot peak pressure (R²=0.72, P<0.001). Left-to-right symmetry in the forefoot-offloading shoe was 0.39 for peak ankle joint power.

INTERPRETATION

By virtue to their negative-heel rocker-outsole design, forefoot-offloading shoes significantly alter a neuropathic diabetic patient's gait towards a reduced push-off power that explains the shoe's offloading efficacy. However, gait symmetry and stability are compromised, and may be factors in the low perceived walking discomfort and limited use of these shoes in clinical practice. Shoe modifications (e.g. less negative heel, a more cushioning insole) may resolve this trade-off between efficacy and usability.

Pedobarographic and kinematic analysis in the functional evaluation of two post-operative forefoot offloading shoes

BACKGROUND

Forefoot offloading shoes are special orthopaedic footwear designed to protect and unload the injured part of the foot after surgery and for conservative treatments. The offloading action is often achieved by transferring plantar load to the rearfoot via rocker shoes with reduced contact area between shoe and ground. While these shoes are intended to be worn only for short periods, a compromise must be found between functionality and the risk of alterations in gait patterns at the lower limb joints. In this study, the pedobarographic, kinematic and kinetic effects of a traditional half-shoe and a double-rocker full-outsole shoe were compared to those of a comfortable shoe (control).

METHODS

Ten healthy female participants (28.2 ± 10.0 years) were asked to walk in three different footwear conditions for the left/right foot: control/half-shoe, control/full-outsole, and control/control. Full gait analysis was obtained in three walking trials for each participant in each condition. Simultaneously a sensor insole system recorded plantar pressure in different foot regions. Normalized root-mean-square error, coefficient of determination, and frame-by-frame statistical analysis were used to assess differences in time-histories of kinematic and kinetic parameters between shoes.

RESULTS

The half -shoe group showed the slowest walking speed and the shortest stride length. Forefoot plantar load was significantly reduced in the half-shoe (maximum force as % of Body Weight: half-shoe = 62.1; full-outsole = 86.9; control = 93.5; p < 0.001). At the rearfoot, mean pressure was the highest in the full-outsole shoe. At the ankle, sagittal-plane kinematics in the full-outsole shoe had a pattern more similar to control.

CONCLUSIONS

The half-shoe appears significantly more effective in reducing plantar load at the forefoot than a double-rocker full-outsole shoe, which is designed to reduce forefoot loading by using an insole with a thicker profile anteriorly as to maintain the foot in slight dorsiflexion. However, the half-shoe is also associated with altered gait spatio-temporal parameters, more kinematic modifications at the proximal lower limb joints and reduced propulsion in late stance.