A Case Report of an Osteoid Osteoma on the Bearing Surface of the Talus Treated with Arthroscopic Resection Associated with Autologous Iliac Crest Graft

Arthroscopic Management of Osteoid Osteoma of the Ankle Joint: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Osteoid osteomas (OOs) are rare benign bone tumors that may occur in various joints including the ankle. These tumors are generally removed via open surgical excision or radiofrequency ablation. However, when they occur intra-articularly, these treatments are more difficult to perform because of more difficult access and the increased risk of damaging articular cartilage. Therefore, some have advocated for the use of arthroscopy to treat these cases. This systematic review aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for intra-articular OO of the ankle. Using Medline and Embase, we systematically reviewed the literature as of May 31, 2017. All articles published on and before that date were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Seventeen articles containing a total of 27 cases were included in the review. Most reported cases were in the talar neck, followed by the distal tibia. Of all the cases, only 2 recurrences were reported (in the same patient), and no complications were reported. Therefore, these cases demonstrate arthroscopic excision of intra-articular OO of the ankle as a safe and effective alternative to open surgical excision and radiofrequency ablation, with a success rate of 96%. However, all articles found were case studies or small case series owing to the rarity of this disease. In the future, analyses of case series with larger case collections should be performed.

Diagnosis and treatment of hindfoot osteoid osteoma: A therapeutic method for each case

OBJECTIVES

1) to set a reminder of the diagnostic approach to osteoid osteomas (OOs) of the foot; 2) to define the indications of treatment for hindfoot OOs.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

5 OOs were checked (3 cases located in the talus and two cases in calcaneus). The diagnosis was established by clinical and imaging data. In all cases, a calcified nidus was identified on CT, perilesional bone oedema on MRI and focal scintigraphic uptake. Two cases were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 3 cases with surgical resections: two open surgeries and one arthroscopic surgery. Clinical and oncological outcomes were evaluated at the end of the follow-up.

RESULTS

No complications were reported. The clinical outcome was excellent in all cases. One patient was initially treated with open surgery and then subsequently with RFA due to failure of the procedure. There were no recurrences after an average follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months (range, 1-12 years).

DISCUSSION

Hindfoot OOs are uncommon and their diagnosis is based on clinical data in conjunction with characteristic imaging findings. Their treatment choices depend on the location of the nidus and relationships with nearby anatomical structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of an OO of the hindfoot can be ensured when the epidemiological, clinical and imaging data are compatible with this pathological entity. RFA is indicated for intracortical or cancellous cases in which the nidus is more than 1cm off the skin and significant neurovascular structures. For all other cases an open surgical resection or arthroscopic resection would be the first choice.