How cells kill a "killer" messenger

A Comparative Overview of the Role of Human Ribonucleases in Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay

Eukaryotic cells possess surveillance mechanisms that detect and degrade defective transcripts. Aberrant transcripts include mRNAs with a premature termination codon (PTC), targeted by the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway, and mRNAs lacking a termination codon, targeted by the nonstop decay (NSD) pathway. The eukaryotic exosome, a ribonucleolytic complex, plays a crucial role in mRNA processing and turnover through its catalytic subunits PM/Scl100 (Rrp6 in yeast), DIS3 (Rrp44 in yeast), and DIS3L1. Additionally, eukaryotic cells have other ribonucleases, such as SMG6 and XRN1, that participate in RNA surveillance. However, the specific pathways through which ribonucleases recognize and degrade mRNAs remain elusive. In this study, we characterized the involvement of human ribonucleases, both nuclear and cytoplasmic, in the mRNA surveillance mechanisms of NMD and NSD. We performed knockdowns of SMG6, PM/Scl100, XRN1, DIS3, and DIS3L1, analyzing the resulting changes in mRNA levels of selected natural NMD targets by RT-qPCR. Additionally, we examined the levels of different human β-globin variants under the same conditions: wild-type, NMD-resistant, NMD-sensitive, and NSD-sensitive. Our results demonstrate that all the studied ribonucleases are involved in the decay of certain endogenous NMD targets. Furthermore, we observed that the ribonucleases SMG6 and DIS3 contribute to the degradation of all β-globin variants, with an exception for βNS in the former case. This is also the case for PM/Scl100, which affects all β-globin variants except the NMD-sensitive variants. In contrast, DIS3L1 and XRN1 show specificity for β-globin WT and NMD-resistant variants. These findings suggest that eukaryotic ribonucleases are target-specific rather than pathway-specific. In addition, our data suggest that ribonucleases play broader roles in mRNA surveillance and degradation mechanisms beyond just NMD and NSD.

Elongating RNA polymerase II and RNA:DNA hybrids hinder fork progression and gene expression at sites of head-on replication-transcription collisions

Uncoordinated clashes between replication forks and transcription cause replication stress and genome instability, which are hallmarks of cancer and neurodegeneration. Here, we investigate the outcomes of head-on replication-transcription collisions, using as a model system budding yeast mutants for the helicase Sen1, the ortholog of human Senataxin. We found that RNA Polymerase II accumulates together with RNA:DNA hybrids at sites of head-on collisions. The replication fork and RNA Polymerase II are both arrested during the clash, leading to DNA damage and, in the long run, the inhibition of gene expression. The inactivation of RNA Polymerase II elongation factors, such as the HMG-like protein Spt2 and the DISF and PAF complexes, but not alterations in chromatin structure, allows replication fork progression through transcribed regions. Attenuation of RNA Polymerase II elongation rescues RNA:DNA hybrid accumulation and DNA damage sensitivity caused by the absence of Sen1, but not of RNase H proteins, suggesting that such enzymes counteract toxic RNA:DNA hybrids at different stages of the cell cycle with Sen1 mainly acting in replication. We suggest that the main obstacle to replication fork progression is the elongating RNA Polymerase II engaged in an R-loop, rather than RNA:DNA hybrids per se or hybrid-associated chromatin modifications.

UPFront and center in RNA decay: UPF1 in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and beyond

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), which is arguably the best-characterized translation-dependent regulatory pathway in mammals, selectively degrades mRNAs as a means of post-transcriptional gene control. Control can be for the purpose of ensuring the quality of gene expression. Alternatively, control can facilitate the adaptation of cells to changes in their environment. The key to NMD, no matter what its purpose, is the ATP-dependent RNA helicase upstream frameshift 1 (UPF1), without which NMD fails to occur. However, UPF1 does much more than regulate NMD. As examples, UPF1 is engaged in functionally diverse mRNA decay pathways mediated by a variety of RNA-binding proteins that include staufen, stem-loop-binding protein, glucocorticoid receptor, and regnase 1. Moreover, UPF1 promotes tudor-staphylococcal/micrococcal-like nuclease-mediated microRNA decay. In this review, we first focus on how the NMD machinery recognizes an NMD target and triggers mRNA degradation. Next, we compare and contrast the mechanisms by which UPF1 functions in the decay of other mRNAs and also in microRNA decay. UPF1, as a protein polymath, engenders cells with the ability to shape their transcriptome in response to diverse biological and physiological needs.