Rapid genome editing by CRISPR-Cas9-POLD3 fusion

Engineering tripartite gene editing machinery for highly efficient non-viral targeted genome integration

Non-viral DNA donor templates are commonly used for targeted genomic integration via homologous recombination (HR), with efficiency improved by CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Circular single-stranded DNA (cssDNA) has been used as a genome engineering catalyst (GATALYST) for efficient and safe gene knock-in. Here, we introduce enGager, an enhanced GATALYST associated genome editor system that increases transgene integration efficiency by tethering cssDNA donors to nuclear-localized Cas9 fused with single-stranded DNA binding peptide motifs. This approach further improves targeted integration and expression of reporter genes at multiple genomic loci in various cell types, showing up to 6-fold higher efficiency compared to unfused Cas9, especially for large transgenes in primary cells. Notably, enGager enables efficient integration of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) transgene in 33% of primary human T cells, enhancing anti-tumor functionality. This 'tripartite editor with ssDNA optimized genome engineering (TESOGENASE) offers a safer, more efficient alternative to viral vectors for therapeutic gene modification.

POLD3 as Controller of Replicative DNA Repair

Multiple modes of DNA repair need DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase enzymes. The eukaryotic B-family DNA polymerase complexes delta (Polδ) and zeta (Polζ) help to repair DNA strand breaks when primed by homologous recombination or single-strand DNA annealing. DNA synthesis by Polδ and Polζ is mutagenic, but is needed for the survival of cells in the presence of DNA strand breaks. The POLD3 subunit of Polδ and Polζ is at the heart of DNA repair by recombination, by modulating polymerase functions and interacting with other DNA repair proteins. We provide the background to POLD3 discovery, investigate its structure, as well as function in cells. We highlight unexplored structural aspects of POLD3 and new biochemical data that will help to understand the pivotal role of POLD3 in DNA repair and mutagenesis in eukaryotes, and its impact on human health.

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout strategies for enhancing immunotherapy in breast cancer

Breast cancer, a prevalent disease with significant mortality rates, often presents treatment challenges due to its complex genetic makeup. This review explores the potential of combining Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) gene knockout strategies with immunotherapeutic approaches to enhance breast cancer treatment. The CRISPR/Cas9 system, renowned for its precision in inducing genetic alterations, can target and eliminate specific cancer cells, thereby minimizing off-target effects. Concurrently, immunotherapy, which leverages the immune system's power to combat cancer, has shown promise in treating breast cancer. By integrating these two strategies, we can potentially augment the effectiveness of immunotherapies by knocking out genes that enable cancer cells to evade the immune system. However, safety considerations, such as off-target effects and immune responses, necessitate careful evaluation. Current research endeavors aim to optimize these strategies and ascertain the most effective methods to stimulate the immune response. This review provides novel insights into the integration of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout strategies and immunotherapy, a promising avenue that could revolutionize breast cancer treatment as our understanding of the immune system's interplay with cancer deepens.

Fusion of histone variants to Cas9 suppresses non-homologous end joining

As a versatile genome editing tool, the CRISPR-Cas9 system induces DNA double-strand breaks at targeted sites to activate mainly two DNA repair pathways: HDR which allows precise editing via recombination with a homologous template DNA, and NHEJ which connects two ends of the broken DNA, which is often accompanied by random insertions and deletions. Therefore, how to enhance HDR while suppressing NHEJ is a key to successful applications that require precise genome editing. Histones are small proteins with a lot of basic amino acids that generate electrostatic affinity to DNA. Since H2A.X is involved in DNA repair processes, we fused H2A.X to Cas9 and found that this fusion protein could improve the HDR/NHEJ ratio by suppressing NHEJ. As various post-translational modifications of H2A.X play roles in the regulation of DNA repair, we also fused H2A.X mimicry variants to replicate these post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, methylation, and acetylation. However, none of them were effective to improve the HDR/NHEJ ratio. We further fused other histone variants to Cas9 and found that H2A.1 suppressed NHEJ better than H2A.X. Thus, the fusion of histone variants to Cas9 is a promising option to enhance precise genome editing.

Protocol for editing fibroblasts with in vitro transcribed Cas9 mRNA and profile off-target editing by optimized GUIDE-seq

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing is an efficient technique to modify specific sites/regions of DNA. Delivery of the Cas9 by mRNA is particularly promising in pre-clinical genome editing applications for its transient, nonintegrating feature. However, the off-target of Cas9-gRNA still remains a concern and needs a specific monitor. Here, we present a revised protocol to edit fibroblasts by in vitro transcribed Cas9 mRNA and profile its off-target effect by the optimized GUIDE-seq method. This protocol can also be applied to other cell lines. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Ganna Reint et al. (2021).1.

Engineering Tripartite Gene Editing Machinery for Highly Efficient Non-Viral Targeted Genome Integration

Non-viral DNA donor template has been widely used for targeted genomic integration by homologous recombination (HR). This process has become more efficient with RNA guided endonuclease editor system such as CRISPR/Cas9. Circular single stranded DNA (cssDNA) has been harnessed previously as a genome engineering catalyst (GATALYST) for efficient and safe targeted gene knock-in. Here we developed enGager, a system with enhanced GATALYST associated genome editor, comprising a set of novel genome editors in which the integration efficiency of a circular single-stranded (css) donor DNA is elevated by directly tethering of the cssDNA to a nuclear-localized Cas9 fused with ssDNA binding peptides. Improvements in site-directed genomic integration and expression of a knocked-in DNA encoding GFP were observed at multiple genomic loci in multiple cell lines. The enhancement of integration efficiency, compared to unfused Cas9 editors, ranges from 1.5- to more than 6-fold, with the enhancement most pronounced for transgenes of > 4Kb in length in primary cells. enGager-enhanced genome integration prefers ssDNA donors which, unlike traditional dsDNA donors, are not concatemerized or rearranged prior to and during integration Using an enGager fused to an optimized cssDNA binding peptide, exceptionally efficient, targeted integration of the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) transgene was achieved in 33% of primary human T cells. Enhanced anti-tumor function of these CAR-T primary cells demonstrated the functional competence of the transgenes. The 'tripartite editors with ssDNA optimized genome engineering' (TESOGENASE™) systems help address the efficacy needs for therapeutic gene modification while avoiding the safety and payload size limitations of viral vectors currently used for CAR-T engineering.

CRISPR-Cas9 Direct Fusions for Improved Genome Editing via Enhanced Homologous Recombination

DNA repair in mammalian cells involves the coordinated action of a range of complex cellular repair machinery. Our understanding of these DNA repair processes has advanced to the extent that they can be leveraged to improve the efficacy and precision of Cas9-assisted genome editing tools. Here, we review how the fusion of CRISPR-Cas9 to functional domains of proteins that directly or indirectly impact the DNA repair process can enhance genome editing. Such studies have allowed the development of diverse technologies that promote efficient gene knock-in for safer genome engineering practices.

TESOGENASE, An Engineered Nuclease Editor for Enhanced Targeted Genome Integration

Non-viral DNA donor template has been widely used for targeted genomic integration by homologous recombination (HR). This process has become more efficient with RNA guided endonuclease editor system such as CRISPR/Cas9. Circular single stranded DNA (cssDNA) has been harnessed previously as a g enome engineering c atalyst (GATALYST) for efficient and safe targeted gene knock-in. However, the engineering efficiency is bottlenecked by the nucleoplasm trafficking and genomic tethering of cssDNA donor, especially for extra-large transgene integration. Here we developed enGager, en hanced G ATALYST a ssociated g enome e ditor system by fusion of nucleus localization signal (NLS) peptide tagged Cas9 with various single stranded DNA binding protein modules through a GFP reporter Knock-in screening. The enGager system assembles an integrative genome integration machinery by forming tripartite complex for engineered nuclease editors, sgRNA and ssDNA donors, thereby facilitate the nucleus trafficking of DNA donors and increase their active local concentration at the targeted genomic site. When applied for genome integration with cssDNA donor templates to diverse genomic loci in various cell types, these enGagers outperform unfused editors. The enhancement of integration efficiency ranges from 1.5- to more than 6-fold, with the effect being more prominent for > 4Kb transgene knock-in in primary cells. We further demonstrated that enGager mediated enhancement for genome integration is ssDNA, but less dsDNA dependent. Using one of the mini-enGagers, we demonstrated large chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) transgene integration in primary T cells with exceptional efficiency and anti-tumor function. These tripartite e ditors with s sDNA o ptimized g enome en gineering system (TESOGENASE TM ) add a set of novel endonuclease editors into the gene-editing toolbox for potential cell and gene therapeutic development based on ssDNA mediated non-viral genome engineering.

Highlight

A reporter Knock-in screening establishes enGager system to identify TESOGENASE editor to improving ssDNA mediated genome integrationMini-TESOGENASEs developed by fusing Cas9 nuclease with novel ssDNA binding motifsmRNA mini-TESOGENASEs enhance targeted genome integration via various non-viral delivery approachesEfficient functional CAR-T cell engineering by mini-TESOGENASE.

Strategies for precise gene edits in mammalian cells

CRISPR-Cas technologies have the potential to revolutionize genetic medicine. However, work is still needed to make this technology clinically efficient for gene correction. A barrier to making precise genetic edits in the human genome is controlling how CRISPR-Cas-induced DNA breaks are repaired by the cell. Since error-prone non-homologous end-joining is often the preferred cellular repair pathway, CRISPR-Cas-induced breaks often result in gene disruption. Homology-directed repair (HDR) makes precise genetic changes and is the clinically desired pathway, but this repair pathway requires a homology donor template and cycling cells. Newer editing strategies, such as base and prime editing, can affect precise repair for relatively small edits without requiring HDR and circumvent cell cycle dependence. However, these technologies have limitations in the extent of genetic editing and require the delivery of bulky cargo. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of precise gene correction using CRISPR-Cas-induced HDR, as well as base and prime editing for repairing small mutations. Finally, we consider emerging new technologies, such as recombination and transposases, which can circumvent both cell cycle and cellular DNA repair dependence for editing the genome.

Hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells gene editing: Beyond blood disorders

Lessons learned from decades-long practice in the transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to treat severe inherited disorders or cancer, have set the stage for the current ex vivo gene therapies using autologous gene-modified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that have treated so far, hundreds of patients with monogenic disorders. With increased knowledge of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell biology, improved modalities for patient conditioning and with the emergence of new gene editing technologies, a new era of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell-based gene therapies is poised to emerge. Gene editing has the potential to restore physiological expression of a mutated gene, or to insert a functional gene in a precise locus with reduced off-target activity and toxicity. Advances in patient conditioning has reduced treatment toxicities and may improve the engraftment of gene-modified cells and specific progeny. Thanks to these improvements, new potential treatments of various blood- or immune disorders as well as other inherited diseases will continue to emerge. In the present review, the most recent advances in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell gene editing will be reported, with a focus on how this approach could be a promising solution to treat non-blood-related inherited disorders and the mechanisms behind the therapeutic actions discussed.

Examination of the Cell Cycle Dependence of Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors

Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in C•G to A•T “byproduct” introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise C•G to A•T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.

CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair

Genome editing technologies operate by inducing site-specific DNA perturbations that are resolved by cellular DNA repair pathways. Products of genome editors include DNA breaks generated by CRISPR-associated nucleases, base modifications induced by base editors, DNA flaps created by prime editors, and integration intermediates formed by site-specific recombinases and transposases associated with CRISPR systems. Here, we discuss the cellular processes that repair CRISPR-generated DNA lesions and describe strategies to obtain desirable genomic changes through modulation of DNA repair pathways. Advances in our understanding of the DNA repair circuitry, in conjunction with the rapid development of innovative genome editing technologies, promise to greatly enhance our ability to improve food production, combat environmental pollution, develop cell-based therapies, and cure genetic and infectious diseases.