1
|
Malagón G, Marigold DS. The effects of auditory consequences on visuomotor adaptation and motor memory. Exp Brain Res 2024:10.1007/s00221-024-06850-7. [PMID: 38806711 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06850-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
Sensorimotor adaptation is a form of motor learning that is essential for maintaining motor performance across the lifespan and is integral to recovery of function after neurological injury. Recent research indicates that experiencing a balance-threatening physical consequence when making a movement error during adaptation can enhance subsequent motor memory. This is perhaps not surprising, as learning to avoid injury is critical for our survival and well-being. Reward and punishment can also differentially modify aspects of motor learning. However, it remains unclear whether other forms of non-physical consequences can impact motor learning. Here we tested the hypothesis that a loud acoustic stimulus linked to a movement error during adaptation could lead to greater generalization and consolidation. Two groups of participants (n = 12 each) adapted to a new, prism-induced visuomotor mapping while performing a precision walking task. One group experienced an unexpected loud acoustic stimulus (85 dB tone) when making foot-placement errors during adaptation. This auditory consequence group adapted faster and showed greater generalization with an interlimb transfer task, but not greater generalization to an obstacle avoidance task. Both groups showed faster relearning (i.e., savings) during the second testing session one week later despite the presence of an interference block of trials following initial adaptation, indicating successful consolidation. However, we did not find significant differences between groups with relearning during session 2. Overall, our results suggest that auditory consequences may serve as a useful method to improve motor learning, though further research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Malagón
- Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
- Institute for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Daniel S Marigold
- Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
- Institute for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang T, Ivry RB. A cerebellar population coding model for sensorimotor learning. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.07.04.547720. [PMID: 37461557 PMCID: PMC10349940 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.04.547720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
The cerebellum is crucial for sensorimotor adaptation, using error information to keep the sensorimotor system well-calibrated. Here we introduce a population-coding model to explain how cerebellar-dependent learning is modulated by contextual variation. The model consists of a two-layer network, designed to capture activity in both the cerebellar cortex and deep cerebellar nuclei. A core feature of the model is that within each layer, the processing units are tuned to both movement direction and the direction of movement error. The model captures a large range of contextual effects including interference from prior learning and the influence of error uncertainty and volatility. While these effects have traditionally been taken to indicate meta learning or context-dependent memory within the adaptation system, our results show that they are emergent properties that arise from the population dynamics within the cerebellum. Our results provide a novel framework to understand how the nervous system responds to variable environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianhe Wang
- Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California
| | - Richard B. Ivry
- Department of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang T, Avraham G, Tsay JS, Thummala T, Ivry RB. Advanced feedback enhances sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 2024; 34:1076-1085.e5. [PMID: 38402615 PMCID: PMC10990049 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.01.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
It is widely recognized that sensorimotor adaptation is facilitated when feedback is provided throughout the movement compared with when it is provided at the end of the movement. However, the source of this advantage is unclear: continuous feedback is more ecological, dynamic, and available earlier than endpoint feedback. Here, we assess the relative merits of these factors using a method that allows us to manipulate feedback timing independent of actual hand position. By manipulating the onset time of "endpoint" feedback, we found that adaptation was modulated in a non-monotonic manner, with the peak of the function occurring in advance of the hand reaching the target. Moreover, at this optimal time, learning was of similar magnitude as that observed with continuous feedback. By varying movement duration, we demonstrate that this optimal time occurs at a relatively fixed time after movement onset, an interval we hypothesize corresponds to when the comparison of the sensory prediction and feedback generates the strongest error signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianhe Wang
- Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
| | - Guy Avraham
- Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Jonathan S Tsay
- Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Tanvi Thummala
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Weill Hall, #3200, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Richard B Ivry
- Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, 2121 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Li Ka Shing Center, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seegelke C, Heed T. It is time to integrate models across disciplines: a commentary on Krüger et al. (2022). PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s00426-024-01930-3. [PMID: 38430251 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01930-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Seegelke
- Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunner Straße 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
- Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Tobias Heed
- Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunner Straße 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Orschiedt J, Franklin DW. Learning context shapes bimanual control strategy and generalization of novel dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011189. [PMID: 38064495 PMCID: PMC10732368 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Bimanual movements are fundamental components of everyday actions, yet the underlying mechanisms coordinating adaptation of the two hands remain unclear. Although previous studies highlighted the contextual effect of kinematics of both arms on internal model formation, we do not know how the sensorimotor control system associates the learned memory with the experienced states in bimanual movements. More specifically, can, and if so, how, does the sensorimotor control system combine multiple states from different effectors to create and adapt a motor memory? Here, we tested motor memory formation in two groups with a novel paradigm requiring the encoding of the kinematics of the right hand to produce the appropriate predictive force on the left hand. While one group was provided with training movements in which this association was evident, the other group was trained on conditions in which this association was ambiguous. After adaptation, we tested the encoding of the learned motor memory by measuring the generalization to new movement combinations. While both groups adapted to the novel dynamics, the evident group showed a weighted encoding of the learned motor memory based on movements of the other (right) hand, whereas the ambiguous group exhibited mainly same (left) hand encoding in bimanual trials. Despite these differences, both groups demonstrated partial generalization to unimanual movements of the left hand. Our results show that motor memories can be encoded depending on the motion of other limbs, but that the training conditions strongly shape the encoding of the motor memory formation and determine the generalization to novel contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Orschiedt
- Neuromuscular Diagnostics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - David W. Franklin
- Neuromuscular Diagnostics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Data Science Institute (MDSI), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Mastrigt NM, Tsay JS, Wang T, Avraham G, Abram SJ, van der Kooij K, Smeets JBJ, Ivry RB. Implicit reward-based motor learning. Exp Brain Res 2023; 241:2287-2298. [PMID: 37580611 PMCID: PMC10471724 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06683-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induces implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2-3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina M van Mastrigt
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | - Katinka van der Kooij
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B J Smeets
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Mastrigt NM, Tsay JS, Wang T, Avraham G, Abram SJ, van der Kooij K, Smeets JBJ, Ivry RB. Implicit reward-based motor learning. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.06.27.546738. [PMID: 37425740 PMCID: PMC10327077 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.27.546738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2-3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina M van Mastrigt
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan S Tsay
- UC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States
| | - Tianhe Wang
- UC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States
| | - Guy Avraham
- UC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States
| | - Sabrina J Abram
- UC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States
| | - Katinka van der Kooij
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen B J Smeets
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard B Ivry
- UC Berkeley, CognAc lab, Berkeley, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Calame DJ, Becker MI, Person AL. Cerebellar associative learning underlies skilled reach adaptation. Nat Neurosci 2023:10.1038/s41593-023-01347-y. [PMID: 37248339 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-023-01347-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The cerebellum is hypothesized to refine movement through online adjustments. We examined how such predictive control may be generated using a mouse reach paradigm, testing whether the cerebellum uses within-reach information as a predictor to adjust reach kinematics. We first identified a population-level response in Purkinje cells that scales inversely with reach velocity, pointing to the cerebellar cortex as a potential site linking kinematic predictors and anticipatory control. Next, we showed that mice can learn to compensate for a predictable reach perturbation caused by repeated, closed-loop optogenetic stimulation of pontocerebellar mossy fiber inputs. Both neural and behavioral readouts showed adaptation to position-locked mossy fiber perturbations and exhibited aftereffects when stimulation was removed. Surprisingly, position-randomized stimulation schedules drove partial adaptation but no opposing aftereffects. A model that recapitulated these findings suggests that the cerebellum may decipher cause-and-effect relationships through time-dependent generalization mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan J Calame
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew I Becker
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Abigail L Person
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|