Heterogeneous non-canonical nucleosomes predominate in yeast cells in situ

Always on the Move: Overview on Chromatin Dynamics within Nuclear Processes

Our genome is organized into chromatin, a dynamic and modular structure made of nucleosomes. Chromatin organization controls access to the DNA sequence, playing a fundamental role in cell identity and function. How nucleosomes enable these processes is an active area of study. In this review, we provide an overview of chromatin dynamics, its properties, mechanisms, and functions. We highlight the diverse ways by which chromatin dynamics is controlled during transcription, DNA replication, and repair. Recent technological developments have promoted discoveries in this area, to which we provide an outlook on future research directions.

Macromolecular and cytological changes in fission yeast G0 nuclei

When starved of nitrogen, cells of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe enter a quiescent 'G0' state with smaller nuclei and transcriptional repression. The genomics of S. pombe G0 cells has been well studied, but much of its nuclear cell biology remains unknown. Here, we use confocal microscopy, immunoblots and electron cryotomography to investigate the cytological, biochemical and ultrastructural differences between S. pombe proliferating, G1-arrested and G0 cell nuclei, with an emphasis on the histone acetylation, RNA polymerase II fates and macromolecular complex packing. Compared to proliferating cells, G0 cells have lower levels of histone acetylation, nuclear RNA polymerase II and active transcription. The G0 nucleus has similar macromolecular crowding yet fewer chromatin-associated multi-megadalton globular complexes. Induced histone hyperacetylation during nitrogen starvation results in cells that have larger nuclei and therefore chromatin that is less compact. However, these histone-hyperacetylated cells remain transcriptionally repressed with similar nuclear crowding. Canonical nucleosomes - those that resemble the crystal structure - are rare in proliferating, G1-arrested and G0 cells. Our study therefore shows that extreme changes in nucleus physiology are possible without extreme reorganization at the macromolecular level.

HMGB1 restores a dynamic chromatin environment in the presence of linker histone by deforming nucleosomal DNA

The essential architectural protein HMGB1 increases accessibility of nucleosomal DNA and counteracts the effects of linker histone H1. However, HMGB1 is less abundant than H1 and binds nucleosomes more weakly raising the question of how HMGB1 effectively competes with H1. Here, we show that HMGB1 rescues H1's inhibition of nucleosomal DNA accessibility without displacing H1. HMGB1 also increases the dynamics of condensed, H1-bound chromatin. Cryo-EM shows that HMGB1 binds at internal locations on a nucleosome and locally distorts the DNA. These sites, which are away from the binding site of H1, explain how HMGB1 and H1 co-occupy a nucleosome. Our findings lead to a model where HMGB1 counteracts the activity of H1 by distorting nucleosomal DNA and by contacting the H1 C-terminal tail. Compared to direct competition, nucleosome co-occupancy by HMGB1 and H1 allows a greater diversity of dynamic chromatin states and may be generalizable to other chromatin regulators.

Histone Tetrasome Dynamics Affects Chromatin Transcription

During various DNA-centered processes in the cell nucleus, the minimal structural units of chromatin organization, nucleosomes, are often transiently converted to hexasomes and tetrasomes missing one or both H2A/H2B histone dimers, respectively. However, the structural and functional properties of the subnucleosomes and their impact on biological processes in the nuclei are poorly understood. Here, using biochemical approaches, molecular dynamics simulations, single-particle Förster resonance energy transfer (spFRET) microscopy and NMR spectroscopy, we have shown that, surprisingly, removal of both dimers from a nucleosome results in much higher mobility of both histones and DNA in the tetrasome. Accordingly, DNase I footprinting shows that DNA-histone interactions in tetrasomes are greatly compromised, resulting in formation of a much lower barrier to transcribing RNA polymerase II than nucleosomes. The data suggest that tetrasomes are remarkably dynamic structures and their formation can strongly affect various biological processes.

From feulgen to modern methods: marking a century of DNA imaging advances

The mystery of how human DNA is compactly packaged into a nucleus-a space a hundred thousand times smaller-while still allowing for the regulation of gene function, has long been one of the greatest enigmas in cell biology. This puzzle is gradually being solved, thanks in part to the advent of new technologies. Among these, innovative genome-labeling techniques combined with high-resolution imaging methods have been pivotal. These methods facilitate the visualization of DNA within intact nuclei and have significantly contributed to our current understanding of genome organization. This review will explore various labeling and imaging approaches that are revolutionizing our understanding of the three-dimensional organization of the genome, shedding light on the relationship between its structure and function.

Pioneer factors: nature or nurture?

Chromatin is densely packed with nucleosomes, which limits the accessibility of many chromatin-associated proteins. Pioneer factors (PFs) are usually viewed as a special group of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) that can recognize nucleosome-embedded motifs, invade compact chromatin, and generate open chromatin regions. Through this process, PFs initiate a cascade of events that play key roles in gene regulation and cell differentiation. A current debate in the field is if PFs belong to a unique subset of TFs with intrinsic "pioneering activity", or if all TFs have the potential to function as PFs within certain cellular contexts. There are also different views regarding the key feature(s) that define pioneering activity. In this review, we present evidence from the literature related to these alternative views and discuss how to potentially reconcile them. It is possible that both intrinsic properties, like tight nucleosome binding and structural compatibility, and cellular conditions, like concentration and co-factor availability, are important for PF function.